Why Science Accepts Anthropogenic Global Warming and Tells Us We Need to Act

Crick

Platinum Member
Joined
May 10, 2014
Messages
30,700
Reaction score
6,056
Points
1,140
Location
N/A
If the Earth had no atmosphere, the planet's average temperature would be 58F (32C) cooler. Adding back just the oxygen and nitrogen would have almost NO effect on the temperature. That 58F of warming is due almost ENTIRELY to the greenhouse effect acting on two components of our atmosphere. About two-thirds is due to water vapor and one-third to carbon dioxide (CO2). The other components having greenhouse effects are methane, nitrous oxide, chloro- and hydrofluorocarbons.

The Earth began warming with the advent of the Industrial Revolution when the use of steam engines and then internal combustion engines grew rapidly, all fueled with hydrocarbon fossil fuels. The Earth is now warming at a historically extreme rate; twenty five times as rapidly as the Earth moved from glacial to interglacial states over the last 3 million years. That warming has been studied extensively for decades by scientists all over the planet. Their near-universal conclusion is that the primary cause of that warming is the greenhouse effect acting on CO2 emitted by humans burning fossil fuels (coal, petroleum, natural gas) for energy and transportation.

Up until the invention of the steam engine, CO2 in our atmosphere stayed in the range of 280 - 300 ppm for almost 3 million years. It is now just breaching 420 ppm, a 50% increase in the gas responsible for one-third of all greenhouse warming. That warming is reinforced by positive feedback from increased humidity in the Earth's atmosphere; water vapor is the most effective greenhouse gas but as a precipitable component of the atmosphere, changes only in response to temperature changes brought about by other agents. Atmospheric CO2 levels are also increased by deforestation and the thawing of frozen tundra.

The warming has numerous effects, many of which are harmful. Aside from its impact on all life forms via more frequent and more intense heat waves, we are experiencing sea level rise and increased ice melt. The energy that drives weather comes from the sun via the atmosphere and the hydrosphere. As global warming increases the energy available for weather, the average intensity of weather will increase. Increased temperatures are causing glaciers and snowpack to disappear. That decreases the Earth's albedo, decreasing the amount of solar radiation reflected back to space and providing more positive feedback. Increased meltwater from the poles is reducing the density of water there and thus the drive for the overturning currents responsible for the basis of almost the entire marine food chain as well as the temperate climate of Europe

Currently, thirty percent of human CO2 emissions are absorbed by the world's oceans. CO2 in aqueous solution produces carbonic acid which reduces the oceans pH (makes it more acidic). That change affects numerous biochemical reactions utilized by marine life, in particular the ability to fix carbonates into shells, exoskeletons and corals. The loss of corals will expose thousands of miles of coastlines to higher wave energies causing increased erosion and coastal flooding.

So, while some argue that added CO2 will increase agricultural production in some locales and that warming will be welcome by some residents in high latitude settings, the balance of warming effects are and will continue to be overwhelmingly negative.

TOPICS TO EXPLORE

How Do We Know that Humans Are the Source of the Increased CO2?

How Do We Know that CO2 is the Cause of the Warming?

How Do We Know that Warming Will be Harmful?

What Are Tipping Points and Have We Crossed Any?

References





 
Last edited:

Why Science Accepts Anthropogenic Global Warming and Tells Us We Need to Act​


"Science" isn't a thing with cognitive functions of choice and the ability to accept or reject anything, let alone does it tell "us" to act in any respect.

Therefore, your entire premise is a line of total shit.
 

Why Science Accepts Anthropogenic Global Warming and Tells Us We Need to Act​


"Science" isn't a thing with cognitive functions of choice and the ability to accept or reject anything, let alone does it tell "us" to act in any respect.
Science, in this context, is the overwhelming consensus of scientists, particularly scientists involved in climate research, who accept the theory of anthropogenic global warming.

The majority of mainstream scientists believe that global warming is a threat and needs to be dealt with.

Therefore, your entire premise is a line of total shit.
A position allowing you to ignore the entire contents of the OP without doing a lick of work. How fucking convenient.
 
Science, in this context, is the overwhelming consensus of scientists, particularly scientists involved in climate research, who accept the theory of anthropogenic global warming.

The majority of mainstream scientists believe that global warming is a threat and needs to be dealt with.


A position allowing you to ignore the entire contents of the OP without doing a lick of work. How fucking convenient.
As has been explained to you too many times to be counted; "consensus" isn't scientific, it's political.

The language you use gives you away as the utter charlatan that you are....The rest is just duplicity via verbosity.
 
As has been explained to you too many times to be counted; "consensus" isn't scientific, it's political.

The language you use gives you away as the utter charlatan that you are....The rest is just duplicity via verbosity.
Do you have anything in the way of actual science to add to the conversation? Do you accept or reject any of the specific points I made?
 
The "actual science" is revealed to be shit, by the duplicitous language describing it.
What duplicitous language do you believe I have used here?
You really aren't half as bright as you obviously believe yourself to be.
That doesn't really matter, does it. Do you believe the Earth to be warming? Do you believe the primary cause to be the greenhouse effect operating on the CO2 that humans have added to the atmosphere? Do you believe that warming presents a risk to humankind?
 
Do you have anything in the way of actual science to add to the conversation? Do you accept or reject any of the specific points I made?
Give it up....We saw too much of this guy jetting around the world and spending billions to take any of your tripe seriously.

R.6daf5016c00f796ddde402ff54ef8f81
 
What duplicitous language do you believe I have used here?

That doesn't really matter, does it. Do you believe the Earth to be warming? Do you believe the primary cause to be the greenhouse effect operating on the CO2 that humans have added to the atmosphere? Do you believe that warming presents a risk to humankind?
You have been told repeatedly of the vague and duplicitous language used by the warmer cult....Your shitty memory is your problem.

And it does matter.
 
Give it up....We saw too much of this guy jetting around the world and spending billions to take any of your tripe seriously.

R.6daf5016c00f796ddde402ff54ef8f81
So... because people still shoot up heroin, do you believe it to be harmless?

Because people keep loaded, unlocked guns in houses with small children, do you believe that to be a safe practice?

Because people play with firecrackers on the 4th, do you believe them to be harmless?

Because people drink and drive, do you believe that to be okay?

Because people are careless with campfires, do you believe there is no risk of fire?

Because people overeat, do you believe they will not gain weight, suffer from heart disease or develop Type 2 diabetes?

Surely you understand how stupid it is to conclude global warming isn't an issue based on the behavior of one man and rejecting an enormous amount of hard science.
 
So... because people still shoot up heroin, do you believe it to be harmless?

Because people keep loaded, unlocked guns in houses with small children, do you believe that to be a safe practice?

Because people play with firecrackers on the 4th, do you believe them to be harmless?

Because people drink and drive, do you believe that to be okay?

Because people are careless with campfires, do you believe there is no risk of fire?

Because people overeat, do you believe they will not gain weight, suffer from heart disease or develop Type 2 diabetes?

Surely you understand how stupid it is to conclude global warming isn't an issue based on the behavior of one man and rejecting an enormous amount of hard science.
I don't believe that the hoax of MMCC is something to even bother about so long as you people are not trying to pick my pocket over it.
 
I don't believe that the hoax of MMCC is something to even bother about so long as you people are not trying to pick my pocket over it.
Please explain to us how you come to the conclusion that anthropogenic global warming is a hoax
 
If the Earth had no atmosphere, the planet's average temperature would be 58F (32C) cooler. Adding back just the oxygen and nitrogen would have almost NO effect on the temperature. That 58F of warming is due almost ENTIRELY to the greenhouse effect acting on two components of our atmosphere. About two-thirds is due to water vapor and one-third to carbon dioxide (CO2). The other components having greenhouse effects are methane, nitrous oxide, chloro- and hydrofluorocarbons.

The Earth began warming with the advent of the Industrial Revolution when the use of steam engines and then internal combustion engines grew rapidly, all fueled with hydrocarbon fossil fuels. The Earth is now warming at a historically extreme rate; twenty five times as rapidly as the Earth moved from glacial to interglacial states over the last 3 million years. That warming has been studied extensively for decades by scientists all over the planet. Their near-universal conclusion is that the primary cause of that warming is the greenhouse effect acting on CO2 emitted by humans burning fossil fuels (coal, petroleum, natural gas) for energy and transportation.

Up until the invention of the steam engine, CO2 in our atmosphere stayed in the range of 280 - 300 ppm for almost 3 million years. It is now just breaching 420 ppm, a 50% increase in the gas responsible for one-third of all greenhouse warming. That warming is reinforced by positive feedback from increased humidity in the Earth's atmosphere; water vapor is the most effective greenhouse gas but as a precipitable component of the atmosphere, changes only in response to temperature changes brought about by other agents. Atmospheric CO2 levels are also increased by deforestation and the thawing of frozen tundra.

The warming has numerous effects, many of which are harmful. Aside from its impact on all life forms via more frequent and more intense heat waves, we are experiencing sea level rise and increased ice melt. The energy that drives weather comes from the sun via the atmosphere and the hydrosphere. As global warming increases the energy available for weather, the average intensity of weather will increase. Increased temperatures are causing glaciers and snowpack to disappear. That decreases the Earth's albedo, decreasing the amount of solar radiation reflected back to space and providing more positive feedback. Increased meltwater from the poles is reducing the density of water there and thus the drive for the overturning currents responsible for the basis of almost the entire marine food chain as well as the temperate climate of Europe

Currently, thirty percent of human CO2 emissions are absorbed by the world's oceans. CO2 in aqueous solution produces carbonic acid which reduces the oceans pH (makes it more acidic). That change affects numerous biochemical reactions utilized by marine life, in particular the ability to fix carbonates into shells, exoskeletons and corals. The loss of corals will expose thousands of miles of coastlines to higher wave energies causing increased erosion and coastal flooding.

So, while some argue that added CO2 will increase agricultural production in some locales and that warming will be welcome by some residents in high latitude settings, the balance of warming effects are and will continue to be overwhelmingly negative.

TOPICS TO EXPLORE

How Do We Know that Humans Are the Source of the Increased CO2?

How Do We Know that CO2 is the Cause of the Warming?

How Do We Know that Warming Will be Harmful?

What Are Tipping Points and Have We Crossed Any?

References





https://www.reuters.com/sustainabil...e-financing-far-more-than-current-2024-07-27/

$3 Trillion reasons! Annually too!
 
Back
Top Bottom