$3 trillion per year to 2050 to reduce CO2 from the historic 7,000 PPM according to U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen
- Thread starter healthmyths
- Start date
Frankeneinstein
Gold Member
TRANSLATION: "This is what we need to keep socialist economies around the world afloat"...
...the obscene price tag is what "climate change" is really all about.
CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 153,880
- 79,318
- 2,645
So we have to pay for China why you should be chaining yourself to their Embassy in protest?
Not only don’t they have to make an effort to reduce their CO2 as the US has already done, but we have to pay their share?
That’s ridiculous!
healthmyths
Diamond Member
- Sep 19, 2011
- 30,062
- 11,509
- 1,400
- Thread starter
- #84
Don't disagree with that.
BUT who was burning the fossil fuels when CO2 had a 7,000 ppm, 500 million years ago?
otto105
Diamond Member
- Sep 11, 2017
- 47,214
- 15,794
- 2,165
- Banned
- #85
What the fuck are you posting about?
U.S. and China on Climate: How the World’s Two Largest Polluters Stack Up (Published 2023)
healthmyths
Diamond Member
- Sep 19, 2011
- 30,062
- 11,509
- 1,400
- Thread starter
- #87
A typical passenger vehicle emits about 4.6 metric tons of carbon dioxide per year.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions from a Typical Passenger Vehicle | US EPA
This page answers questions about GHG emissions from passenger vehicles and how these emissions are measured and calculated.
www.epa.gov
CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 153,880
- 79,318
- 2,645
China produces almost DOUBLE our CO2 output
CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 153,880
- 79,318
- 2,645
So only American CO2 is raising temperatures?? Is it a different isotope?
CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 153,880
- 79,318
- 2,645
I thought CO2 was going to kill all mankind no matter which nation produced it?
healthmyths
Diamond Member
- Sep 19, 2011
- 30,062
- 11,509
- 1,400
- Thread starter
- #94
No one has yet to answer my question as to what kind of fossil fuels were used 500 million years ago when CO2 had a 7,000 PPM.
And unlike people like you I provide the links in this case Yale University!
How the World Passed a Carbon Threshold and Why It Matters
Last year marked the first time in several million years that atmospheric concentrations of CO2 passed 400 parts per million. By looking at what Earth’s climate was like in previous eras of high CO2 levels, scientists are getting a sobering picture of where we are headed.
e360.yale.edu
otto105
Diamond Member
- Sep 11, 2017
- 47,214
- 15,794
- 2,165
- Banned
- #95
It's not a question.No one has yet to answer my question as to what kind of fossil fuels were used 500 million years ago when CO2 had a 7,000 PPM.
And unlike people like you I provide the links in this case Yale University!
How the World Passed a Carbon Threshold and Why It Matters
Last year marked the first time in several million years that atmospheric concentrations of CO2 passed 400 parts per million. By looking at what Earth’s climate was like in previous eras of high CO2 levels, scientists are getting a sobering picture of where we are headed.
Yellen's estimate of costs is way WAY under the cost calculated in this study:U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said on Saturday that the global transition to a low-carbon economy requires $3 trillion in new capital each year through 2050, far above current annual financing, but that filling the gap is the biggest economic opportunity of the 21st century
NEW PEER REVIEWED STUDY: CO2 HAS ZERO IMPACT ON CLIMATE CHANGE
Once again... those of you that continue to believe that the BIASED MSM is your source...
New Peer Reviewed Study: CO2 has Zero Impact on Climate Change - The HighWire
New study shows CO2 has minimal effect on temperatures, questions climate crisis claims, and warns against hasty energy transitions.thehighwire.com
read the above link and if you have an 8.5 seconds attention span here is a summary!
Squirrel! Why attention spans seem to be shrinking and what we can do about it
A powerful peer-reviewed scientific study delivers substantial evidence that carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in the atmosphere have zero impact on the Earth’s global temperatures.
The study concludes that even though most publications attempt to depict a catastrophic future for our planet due to an increase in CO2, there is serious doubt that this is, in fact, the case.
Instead, the study authors deduced that their research unequivocally means that the officially presented narrative that human activity is causing a detrimental CO2 increase on Earth’s climate is merely a hypothesis rather than a substantiated reality.
The study also confirms what climatologist Dr. Judith Curry has stated, which is that the “manufactured consensus of scientists at the request of policymakers” regarding climate change is all a ruse to push an agenda that has nothing to do with climate change. She insists that “Earth has survived far bigger insults that what human beings are doing.”
According to Curry, the most significant danger is if “we do really stupid stuff like destroy our energy infrastructure before we have something better to replace it with.” She believes the biggest climate risk right now is a so-called transition risk, the risk of rapidly getting rid of fossil fuels
New Peer Reviewed Study: CO2 has Zero Impact on Climate Change - The HighWire
New study shows CO2 has minimal effect on temperatures, questions climate crisis claims, and warns against hasty energy transitions.thehighwire.com
Finally those of you that believe that a 1.5° C increase will destroy our world and it is caused by increasing CO2 parts per million PPM of 422.04 ppm daily average reading for atmospheric CO2 on the planet.
So what caused this?
"Some 500 million years ago, when the number of living things in the oceans exploded and creatures first stepped on land, the ancient atmosphere happened to be rich with about 7,000 ppm of carbon dioxide. "
How the World Passed a Carbon Threshold and Why It Matters
Last year marked the first time in several million years that atmospheric concentrations of CO2 passed 400 parts per million. By looking at what Earth’s climate was like in previous eras of high CO2 levels, scientists are getting a sobering picture of where we are headed.
". . .A new peer-reviewed study of all the scientific estimates of climate-change effects shows the most likely cost of global warming averaged across the century will be about 1% of global gross domestic product, reaching 2% by the end of the century. This is a very long way from global extinction.
Draconian net-zero climate policies, on the other hand, will be prohibitively costly. The latest peer-reviewed climate-economic research shows the total cost will average $27 trillion each year across the century, reaching $60 trillion a year in 2100. Net zero is more than seven times as costly as the climate problem it tries to address . . ."
For those who can't get past WSJ paywall a more in depth discussion is here:
A Balanced View of Climate Change
Paraphrased from my source for this thread: more than a million people are killed and multi millions injured in traffic accidents every year that goes by. We could reduce that carnage to near zero if we just reduced traffic speeds to 3 miles an hour. Anybody willing to agree to that to save...
www.usmessageboard.com
CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 153,880
- 79,318
- 2,645
Just can’t understand the “science”
Country A produces X CO2 and releases less than it did
Country B produces 2X CO2 and continues to INCREASE its CO2
If increasing CO2 will end all human life on Earth, what is your recommended course of action?
otto105
Diamond Member
- Sep 11, 2017
- 47,214
- 15,794
- 2,165
- Banned
- #98
I suggest you read up a little more on the subject.
U.S. and China on Climate: How the World’s Two Largest Polluters Stack Up (Published 2023)
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
-
ancestryDNA eye color surveys of eastern european roma
- Started by Mortimer
- Replies: 0
-
-
