Why Science Accepts Anthropogenic Global Warming and Tells Us We Need to Act

Did you make up this information ? Tell us where it came from. You’re a bullshitter. Because everything you look up is from a source that also supported AGW.
All your maps support AGW
God supports AGW.
All your little maps with narratives support AGW and you can’t even read it.


Disprove it...
 
You can’t even read what’s in your own post ? Now you claim you’re what, a non reader ? I’ve copied and posted it already…fraud.


LOL!!!

What an unreal moron!!!
 
The Earth is now warming at a historically extreme rate; twenty five times as rapidly as the Earth moved from glacial to interglacial states over the last 3 million years.
Right…..this is what AGW is about……the increase in RATE at which the earth is warming, FASTER than we can adapt.
 
Right…..this is what AGW is about……the increase in RATE at which the earth is warming, FASTER than we can adapt.


Outside of the surface of growing urban areas, Earth is not warming at all.

Climate data continues to read

NO WARMING in the ATMOSPHERE
NO WARMING in the OCEANS
NO BREAKOUT in CANE ACTIVITY
NO OCEAN RISE
NO ONGOING NET ICE MELT


and we are once again having a WEAK Cane season, with no storms in the Gulf or the Atlantic Coast even getting to Cat 3 so far...

OCEAN TEMPS ARE COLD... DUH... in 1938 a Cat 5 hit Martha's Vineyard.... this year not even a TS that far north.
 
Outside of the surface of growing urban areas, Earth is not warming at all.

Climate data continues to read

NO WARMING in the ATMOSPHERE
NO WARMING in the OCEANS
NO BREAKOUT in CANE ACTIVITY
NO OCEAN RISE
NO ONGOING NET ICE MELT


and we are once again having a WEAK Cane season, with no storms in the Gulf or the Atlantic Coast even getting to Cat 3 so far...

OCEAN TEMPS ARE COLD... DUH... in 1938 a Cat 5 hit Martha's Vineyard.... this year not even a TS that far north.
You are stupid.
 
If the Earth had no atmosphere, the planet's average temperature would be 58F (32C) cooler. Adding back just the oxygen and nitrogen would have almost NO effect on the temperature. That 58F of warming is due almost ENTIRELY to the greenhouse effect acting on two components of our atmosphere. About two-thirds is due to water vapor and one-third to carbon dioxide (CO2). The other components having greenhouse effects are methane, nitrous oxide, chloro- and hydrofluorocarbons.

The Earth began warming with the advent of the Industrial Revolution when the use of steam engines and then internal combustion engines grew rapidly, all fueled with hydrocarbon fossil fuels. The Earth is now warming at a historically extreme rate; twenty five times as rapidly as the Earth moved from glacial to interglacial states over the last 3 million years. That warming has been studied extensively for decades by scientists all over the planet. Their near-universal conclusion is that the primary cause of that warming is the greenhouse effect acting on CO2 emitted by humans burning fossil fuels (coal, petroleum, natural gas) for energy and transportation.

Up until the invention of the steam engine, CO2 in our atmosphere stayed in the range of 280 - 300 ppm for almost 3 million years. It is now just breaching 420 ppm, a 50% increase in the gas responsible for one-third of all greenhouse warming. That warming is reinforced by positive feedback from increased humidity in the Earth's atmosphere; water vapor is the most effective greenhouse gas but as a precipitable component of the atmosphere, changes only in response to temperature changes brought about by other agents. Atmospheric CO2 levels are also increased by deforestation and the thawing of frozen tundra.

The warming has numerous effects, many of which are harmful. Aside from its impact on all life forms via more frequent and more intense heat waves, we are experiencing sea level rise and increased ice melt. The energy that drives weather comes from the sun via the atmosphere and the hydrosphere. As global warming increases the energy available for weather, the average intensity of weather will increase. Increased temperatures are causing glaciers and snowpack to disappear. That decreases the Earth's albedo, decreasing the amount of solar radiation reflected back to space and providing more positive feedback. Increased meltwater from the poles is reducing the density of water there and thus the drive for the overturning currents responsible for the basis of almost the entire marine food chain as well as the temperate climate of Europe

Currently, thirty percent of human CO2 emissions are absorbed by the world's oceans. CO2 in aqueous solution produces carbonic acid which reduces the oceans pH (makes it more acidic). That change affects numerous biochemical reactions utilized by marine life, in particular the ability to fix carbonates into shells, exoskeletons and corals. The loss of corals will expose thousands of miles of coastlines to higher wave energies causing increased erosion and coastal flooding.

So, while some argue that added CO2 will increase agricultural production in some locales and that warming will be welcome by some residents in high latitude settings, the balance of warming effects are and will continue to be overwhelmingly negative.

TOPICS TO EXPLORE

How Do We Know that Humans Are the Source of the Increased CO2?

How Do We Know that CO2 is the Cause of the Warming?

How Do We Know that Warming Will be Harmful?

What Are Tipping Points and Have We Crossed Any?

References





Exactly. Man’s evolution is directly tied to his environment. From covid to mass immigration to food supplies. The rate of change before the introduction of fossil fuels was well within man’s ability to adapt. Other wise, like other species, we face extinction…

Trump and other dictators are a manifestation of the fears that man has over the changes that come about do to the pressures of a climate that changes faster than man can adapt. Hitler, Japan, Italy etc were all facing crises related energy and fossil fuels. It takes a fool not to see the increase in conflicts around the use of fossil fuels.

Literally FREE Renewable energy sources do more just cut carbon emissions, they make energy more accessible to more peoples who are caught in political and economic strife. You want proof of this change ? Try working in the south after slavery in the summer time without technology. We are still dependent upon immigrant labor……
 
Last edited:
Outside of the surface of growing urban areas, Earth is not warming at all.

Climate data continues to read

NO WARMING in the ATMOSPHERE
NO WARMING in the OCEANS
NO BREAKOUT in CANE ACTIVITY
NO OCEAN RISE
NO ONGOING NET ICE MELT


and we are once again having a WEAK Cane season, with no storms in the Gulf or the Atlantic Coast even getting to Cat 3 so far...

OCEAN TEMPS ARE COLD... DUH... in 1938 a Cat 5 hit Martha's Vineyard.... this year not even a TS that far north.
A non reader like yourself has nothing to contribute to any discussion related science.
 
A non reader like yourself has nothing to contribute to any discussion related science.


Translation = we cannot refute anything EMH says, so we have Ding endlessly posting isotope charts as "temperatures" and other idiots trolling...
 
Translation = we cannot refute anything EMH says, so we have Ding endlessly posting isotope charts as "temperatures" and other idiots trolling...
You support AGW with the idiocy you spew.
 
Translation = we cannot refute anything EMH says, so we have Ding endlessly posting isotope charts as "temperatures" and other idiots trolling...
Refuting drivel and outright lies is a waste of time. You have no such thing. You’ve never produce any evidence what so ever. You can’t even read your own feeble attempts.
 
You don’t refute shit. You just babble.


You and the Co2 FRAUD cannot refute one word of any of this...








and you cannot even answer basic climate questions, and instead you count on your side, the Co2 FRAUD side, to censor them...

 
Laughable, since EMH has completely refuted AGW, and you and the Co2 FRAUD cannot refute anything EMH posts.
I have refuted everything you post. Try studying the oxygen isotope curve which was developed before AGW was even a thing. Your continual denial that the planet is warming like it always does when the northern hemisphere deglaciates is idiotic.
 
I have refuted everything you post. Try studying the oxygen isotope curve which was developed before AGW was even a thing. Your continual denial that the planet is warming like it always does when the northern hemisphere deglaciates is idiotic.


A complete liar like most homos....
 
A complete liar like most homos....
The oxygen isotope curve existed before CO2 fraud. And that data shows that when the northern hemisphere is deglaciating the oceans and the atmosphere warm like they are today. There's no need to deny today's warming because today's warming is quite natural.
 

Why Science Accepts Anthropogenic Global Warming and Tells Us We Need to Act​


Because they're right about the science, but wrong about everything else.
 
The Earth began warming with the advent of the Industrial Revolution when the use of steam engines and then internal combustion engines grew rapidly, all fueled with hydrocarbon fossil fuels. The Earth is now warming at a historically extreme rate; twenty five times as rapidly as the Earth moved from glacial to interglacial states over the last 3 million years.

You can't show actual evidence for the rate claim.
 

Forum List

Back
Top