Big Blow To Hillary: U.S. Judge Allows Battleground State Ohio To Remove Inactive Voters From Rolls

Indeed it is bad for Hillary. Now the inactive, the dead, and Ohios prisoners won't be able to vote for her.


Judge allows Ohio to remove inactive voters from rolls

Every precinct across this country has to purge inactive voters. People move and register in their new precinct, and they don't notify their old precinct that they moved. They die and they can't vote so they're purged after long time inactivity.

How this adds up to the Chimpanzee winning a battleground state is a real stretch--LOL

handelsman_trump_tribune_0.jpg
 
Purging dead people from the voting roles? Well shit, there goes half of Hillary's base.
 
this is racist! Dead People are people too!!! and to think democrats are going to poop their pants over this?,,,,next week they will have to remove all registered pets too!
 
Dead people should be removed when they die, when the State issues a death certificate for them dying, they should be removed from voter rolls...not years of inactivity.
 
too tired to read the damn thing----what is defined as "INACTIVE"????


Excerpt from link:

The ACLU contends that the measure disenfranchises minority and poor voters — blocs that lean Democratic. But the judge disagreed, pointing out that voters can only be removed after failing to vote and respond to a change of address confirmation.

According to the present Ohio Secretary of State (R) this is nothing new He says it is a policy that has been used by both parties since 1990. Now it has been legally sanctioned by the court. Of course he is happy about the decision since the power to determine who can be removed is in his hands. But just what does fail to vote mean? Is that applicable to a person who failed to vote in one local election or missed one chance to vote in ten years? The ambiguity of the policy reeks of corruption but if both parties have used it in the past, there must be a lot of republicans that fall into those categories too. Hopefully, there is a check and balance system to ensure that republicans who are "inactive" get taken off the rolls too. Leaving the option solely in the hands of one man without safeguards to ensure fairness for the voting public as well as the opposing party would be a recipe for unbridled corruption. But who is worried? If this strategy is old hat and no one has complained before, there must be safeguards in place to prevent cheating. If so, republicans are just as much at risk of being removed from the rolls as democrats are.
 
Dead people should be removed when they die, when the State issues a death certificate for them dying, they should be removed from voter rolls...not years of inactivity.
Now you're going against your party.
not really... taking dead people off the voter roll WHEN THEY DIE is different than removing ALL CITIZENS who are still alive but haven't voted in a while...
 
Dead people should be removed when they die, when the State issues a death certificate for them dying, they should be removed from voter rolls...not years of inactivity.
Now you're going against your party.
not really... taking dead people off the voter roll WHEN THEY DIE is different than removing ALL CITIZENS who are still alive but haven't voted in a while...
Then Kennedy would have never won in 1960.
 
Indeed it is bad for Hillary. Now the inactive, the dead, and Ohios prisoners won't be able to vote for her.


Judge allows Ohio to remove inactive voters from rolls
I'm gonna kill your thread. Ready?
The rule is not new. It's been in place since the 90s. And Obama won Ohio twice anyway.
From the article.
'Secretary of State John Husted, a Republican, applauded the decision, saying that the policy has been used by both Democrats and Republicans who have occupied his office since the 1990s.'
 
Thanks, I did not know that and live in Ohio. I have not voted since 2012 and wonder if that makes me an inactive voter.
 
Indeed it is bad for Hillary. Now the inactive, the dead, and Ohios prisoners won't be able to vote for her.


Judge allows Ohio to remove inactive voters from rolls
I'm gonna kill your thread. Ready?
The rule is not new. It's been in place since the 90s. And Obama won Ohio twice anyway.
From the article.
'Secretary of State John Husted, a Republican, applauded the decision, saying that the policy has been used by both Democrats and Republicans who have occupied his office since the 1990s.'
So why waste time with a lawsuit?
 
Dead people should be removed when they die, when the State issues a death certificate for them dying, they should be removed from voter rolls...not years of inactivity.
Now you're going against your party.

no, lying loon. she isn't. do yo think for five minutes you could possibly try not to prove that you don't have two functioning brain cells to rub together.
 

Forum List

Back
Top