Blowing Up Darwin

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The one where you imagine how life started.

Which is? Be specific. None of this low IQ equivocation and vagueness to waste everyone's time and to hedge your trolling.

Specific claim, or shut up already.

 

[Woodznutz]

Natural processes would be biological evolution, complex chemical reactions occurring In incalculable numbers. Simple, explainable and demonstrated.

If those changes had ever been demonstrated everyone would believe in evolution.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

If those changes had ever been demonstrated everyone would believe in evolution.

They have been. Over and over and over.

This is low grade trolling. Worthless.

 

[Woodznutz]

A metaphor that is convenient to explain a rather nonsensical biblical claim.

The problem we have is that “it’s just a metaphor” is used arbitrarily and capriciously to define out of absurdity the really absurd claims in the Bibles.

'I know a metaphor when I see one.'' So, was Noah’s yachting adventure “cruise to nowhere” just a metaphor?

Noah's story is written as an actual event. An event can be literal and a metaphor at the same time.

 

[Robert W]

Which is? Be specific. None of this low IQ equivocation and vagueness to waste everyone's time and to hedge your trolling.

Specific claim, or shut up already.

Again as a loyal Democrat, all you did is prove you are a strict authoritarian and not a scholar in any sense of the word. And you forget that it is you that must talk with no equivocation and vagueness and all you have done so far is waste my time. And others who happen to read your false claims.

 

[Robert W]

They have been. Over and over and over.

This is low grade trolling. Worthless.

I have studied this a hell of a lot. All you present is trolling.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Noah's story is written as an actual event.

Demonstrably false. You're attention begging, now.

 

[Woodznutz]

They have been. Over and over and over.

This is low grade trolling. Worthless.

Then why doesn't everyone believe it? And why does it fall out favor as one gets older? Are older folks just fools?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I have studied this a hell of a lot.

Hilarious lie. You wouldn't pass a 7th grade science quiz.

 

[Hollie]

Actually go back to Abiogenesis. Scientists have tried to do it in the lab and so far can't do it. This proves scientists have no clue what creates life.

So far, religious extremists have tried and failed to present evidence of their gods. This proves you have no clue what creates life.

The obvious difference is that scientific discovery tends to happen with regularity while gods are r3legated to duties like paper shuffling while being displaced by knowledge and learning.

Do you know that thunder and lightning are understood to be natural phenomenon not managed by gods?

 

[Woodznutz]

Demonstrably false. You're attention begging, now.

Literarily a true story, if you've taken the time to read it. That said the story is so misunderstood, even by serious Christians, that it's no wonder people think it's just a myth or allegory. You can thank the translators, and Medieval artists. for this.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Then why doesn't everyone believe it?

Why doesn't everyone believe the earth is round?

Red herring No more attention will be given to this worthelss point.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Demonstrably true, if you've taken the time to read it.

Oh boy, the religioners are in shameless lying mode, now.

 

[Woodznutz]

Oh boy, the religioners are in shameless lying mode, now.

Have you read it?

 

[Hollie]

Noah's story is written as an actual event. An event can be literal and a metaphor at the same time.

You do understand that there was no global flood, right?

“It’s a metaphor” it’s a common tactic used when religionists are held to a consistent, identifiable standard. Christians will claim that the genesis fable is a standard by which we can identify the beginning of a 6,000 year old earth. Is that accurate or not? If not, what standard (other than none or personal preference), is used to reach that conclusion? Similarly, if the Noah fable is not literally true, what does that suggest about the veracity of other biblical tales? In other words, is the message of the bibles a cold, unalterable law: Ye must believeth this, or be damned, or rather an exercise in pick and choose theism?

Are we to accept that the bibles range from fact to fiction, from literalism to metaphor helter-skelter, and humans are then asked to pick and choose which aspects are literal and which are not?

Is the biblical flood literal Ior not? Is Joshua's sun-standing still (i.e., Earth stopping its rotation) a true rendering of an historical event, or not? Is Adam and Eve and original sin true (this one is primary, for without it, all the rest is unnecessary).

Kinda. Sorta. Yes and no, some yes, some no. Super. Make it up as you go. That's what you embrace. Meanwhile, the underlying message remains:

Believe this, or be eternally, forever, always and from now until never – roasted in Hell.

Sorry, but humanity can do better.

 

[Robert W]

Do you know that thunder and lightning are understood to be natural phenomenon not managed by gods?

You mentioned two things we discussed in Physics. Physics did not mention GOD though every post by you contains god.

 

[Robert W]

Hilarious lie. You wouldn't pass a 7th grade science quiz.

See how eager you are to prove you really are stupid? All you do is lie.

 

[Hollie]

You mentioned two things we discussed in Physics. Physics did not mention GOD though every post by you contains god.

Your every post is anti-science and drenched in appeals to gods.

 

[Robert W]

Information for the Man creates life group.

AI Overview
Learn more

No, science has not yet created life from scratch, but scientists have achieved a significant milestone by creating a synthetic organism with a completely man-made genome, essentially designing and building a living cell with new genetic code, which some consider a form of "synthetic life"; however, this was achieved by modifying existing bacteria, not generating life entirely from non-living matter.

Key points to remember:

• Synthetic biology advancements:
  Scientists have successfully constructed a bacteria with a fully synthetic genome, demonstrating the ability to manipulate and redesign life at a fundamental level.
  
  
• Not creating life from scratch:
  While this is a major breakthrough, it does not mean scientists have created life from non-living matter; they essentially reprogrammed existing bacterial cells with a new DNA sequence.
  
  
• Challenges remain:
  The process of truly creating life from scratch remains a significant scientific challenge, as understanding the complex mechanisms behind the emergence of life is still evolving.

 

[Robert W]

Your every post is anti-science and drenched in appeals to gods.

I will be certain to bring up GOD if you should stop bringing up gods.

I have not got around yet to saying GOD did it. But you claim nobody did it. That somehow this magic you call nature figured out life was needed and despite the best tries by scientists they can't do it. So you keep saying god.

AI Overview
Learn more

No, science has not yet created life from scratch, but scientists have achieved a significant milestone by creating a synthetic organism with a completely man-made genome, essentially designing and building a living cell with new genetic code, which some consider a form of "synthetic life"; however, this was achieved by modifying existing bacteria, not generating life entirely from non-living matter.

Key points to remember:

• Synthetic biology advancements:
  Scientists have successfully constructed a bacteria with a fully synthetic genome, demonstrating the ability to manipulate and redesign life at a fundamental level.
  
  
• Not creating life from scratch:
  While this is a major breakthrough, it does not mean scientists have created life from non-living matter; they essentially reprogrammed existing bacterial cells with a new DNA sequence.
  
  
• Challenges remain:
  The process of truly creating life from scratch remains a significant scientific challenge, as understanding the complex mechanisms behind the emergence of life is still evolving.