Blowing Up Darwin

When did I ever mention "various Gods"? You asked for supernatural; I gave you supernatural.
You gave nothing more than, “…. because I say so” in your insistence for supernaturalism.
 
See? Another shamanistic declaration. This is what religion does to people. You think you know things you could not know.
You are funny for accusing others for things you do yourself.
 
You gave nothing more than, “…. because I say so” in your insistence for supernaturalism.
On the scale of supernatural vs natural I would say that life on earth favors the supernatural, against the backdrop of the lifeless universe.
 
The arrogant proclamation of the religious extremist. beliebers of competing gods dismiss your gods as mere pretenders.
Lucifer was a 'competing' god. Look what happened to him (her actually). :omg:
 
Who are these competing "gods"?
All the gods who are claimed to have existed before the invention of your gods.

In the history of gods invented by humans, your gods are just reinvented incarnations of those earlier gods.
 
Your aim appears to be to pretend to be a victim at all times. And you do this to justify your own, poor behavior as some sort of elicited response. Pretty basic, low IQ stuff.
You put in tons of effort to remain wrong. I put you on ignore for a long time due to your poor behavior. Your nonsense was too much.
 
Lucifer was a 'competing' god. Look what happened to him (her actually). :omg:
Just another bit of fear and superstition tossed aside as knowledge and the sciences matured. You don’t need to hide under your bed in fear of boogeymen.
 
Isn't it interesting that the government school grads eschew religion, but have a religous belief in Darwin's unproven theory?

Notice how they practically call any criticism of the theory blasphemy?



For the Democrats, Liberals, Communists, Nazis, Fascists.....Militant Secularism. Lacking self-awareness, the Democrats, Liberals, Progressives ridicule religion as superstition......but kneel to their false religion, Militant Secularism.
From the Amazon review of Godless, by Coulter…


Though liberalism rejects the idea of God and reviles people of faith, it bears all the attributes of a religion. In Godless, Coulter throws open the doors of the Church of Liberalism, showing us its sacraments (abortion), its holy writ (Roe v. Wade), its martyrs (from Soviet spy Alger Hiss to cop-killer Mumia Abu-Jamal), its clergy (public school teachers), its churches (government schools, where prayer is prohibited but condoms are free), its doctrine of infallibility (as manifest in the "absolute moral authority" of spokesmen from Cindy Sheehan to Max Cleland), and its cosmology (in which mankind is an inconsequential accident).

Then, of course, there's the liberal creation myth: Charles Darwin's theory of evolution.



Here we can watch their religious service:

1733093073299.png
You are so far over their heads a telescope can't find you. Curiosity and not certainty is the mark of the super high intelligent person. They claim to be certain. Because it is similar to not believing the oceans have bottoms because they never saw any of them.

In fact there are many stars, alleged to be billions of them, yet they have no clue what created them all.
 
Are you claiming that has happened? Was it done by the gods?
That is your idea. Imagine if you will, before life. If you can think that far back, come up with your idea of what is the basis of life. Bear in mind, it will sound like your idea is earth caused life to start. What is your explanation?
 
That is your idea. Imagine if you will, before life. If you can think that far back, come up with your idea of what is the basis of life. Bear in mind, it will sound like your idea is earth caused life to start. What is your explanation?
Life appeared early on (in geologic timescales) after the formation of the planet. That makes sense when we understand that all the building blocks for life exist in the universe. All of the simpler, lighter elements readily combine to form more complicated structures. . Biochemistry produces various, complex chemical products and all of those products then interact in complex ways. Secondly, the religioner ignores the very basic reality that there would be incalculable numbers of biochemical interactions occurring simultaneously In a young earth.
 
Life appeared early on (in geologic timescales) after the formation of the planet. That makes sense when we understand that all the building blocks for life exist in the universe. All of the simpler, lighter elements readily combine to form more complicated structures. . Biochemistry produces various, complex chemical products and all of those products then interact in complex ways. Secondly, the religioner ignores the very basic reality that there would be incalculable numbers of biochemical interactions occurring simultaneously In a young earth.
I predicted that would be the answer. Here is my prediction.
"Bear in mind, it will sound like your idea is earth caused life to start."
 
I predicted that would be the answer. Here is my prediction.
"Bear in mind, it will sound like your idea is earth caused life to start."
I predicted your sidestep with. “the gawds did it” why not give us some indication of an actual 6,000 year old planet or something to support supernaturalism about life emerging on the planet?
 
I predicted your sidestep with. “the gawds did it” why not give us some indication of an actual 6,000 year old planet or something to support supernaturalism about life emerging on the planet?
You must be disappointed that was not my reply.
I don't classify the beginnings of the universe and planets to be explainable by me. If you think GOD created it all, it does sound sensible.
 
Bear in mind, it will sound like your idea is earth caused life to start.
That isn't anyone's idea. That's a strawman you invented for yourself to argue against, for lack of intelligent responses to the points people actually make.

Selection by physical forces caused life to form, just as this principle causes every observable object to form as it does.
 
That isn't anyone's idea. That's a strawman you invented for yourself to argue against, for lack of intelligent responses to the points people actually make.
She confirmed to me, and you should have read her reply, that is precisely her idea.
Actually she also mentioned GOD though I did not.
 
She confirmed to me, and you should have read her reply, that is precisely her idea.
False.

Selection by physical forces caused life to form, just as this principle causes every observable object to form as it does.

And Hollie will agree, as will every educated, rational person.
 
You must be disappointed that was not my reply.
I don't classify the beginnings of the universe and planets to be explainable by me. If you think GOD created it all, it does sound sensible.
You don’t identify which gods you believe magically created life on the planet. That the beginning of the universe and planets is not understood by you is no reason for anyone to accept, “the gods did it”.

There is nothing unexplainable about how purely natural means are the answer to the beginning of the universe and formation of the planets.


If you know of some unnatural forces that are extant, you should present them.

We can, however, make a rational and reasoned case for abiogenesis as a natural phenomenon without intervention of supernatural agents. The processes of biological evolution follow readily from there.
 
False.

Selection by physical forces caused life to form, just as this principle causes every observable object to form as it does.

And Hollie will agree, as will every educated, rational person.
This is why so many posters reject your posts. I know very well what she told me. Even your explanation is a very poor explanation.
 
This is why so many posters reject your posts. I know very well what she told me. Even your explanation is a very poor explanation.
No, you're diddling a strawman. Please spare us the low IQ trolling.

Selection by physical forces caused life to form.

And life did indeed form, as you have already admitted yourself.
 
Back
Top Bottom