"We are stardust"... Abiogenesis + evolution = God's plan?

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Need to read more

Apparently, Quantum entanglement information travelled 100MM light years in an instant

No, you need to read more. Start here:

Even with quantum entanglement, there's no faster-than-light communication

Even with quantum teleportation and the existence of entangled quantum states, faster-than-light communication still remains impossible.

bigthink.com

 

[Clyde 154]

the spirit is inviolable - the spirit is in the everlasting, neither the everlasting nor the heavens are in the spirit.



really -

monotheistic would all be the same, cookie cutter mentality. polytheism w/ random authorities provides the diversity and other potentials a single source would be incapable to create.

One word.......comprehend. Super (superior) Natural (to nature). Nature did not create itself......When physics and the laws of physics cannot prove the source of its origins, that leaves only one logical and reasonable explanation. That which is superior to the effect known as nature CAUSED (the law of causality) i.e, created the inferior.

The creator explains in lay terms His omnipresence, omnipotence and omniscience.......all that is natural exists within the eternally Supernatural Realm called heaven. Of course not all self professed smart people will accept logic and reason. What these SMART ass people do is project the illogical concept that the inferior can somehow quantify/measure and define the superior, as if they have a super-natural-o=meter stuck up their keyster.

A supernatural event can no more be explained by man........than it can be dismissed by measuring it against the inferior laws of physics. Thus the term Super (superior) Natural (to nature). This prima facie evidence is truth until it can be dismissed by EVIDENCE that it is false.........beyond a reason to doubt otherwise. Why? Eyewitnesses to the supernatural acts.....number 3 or more. In the case of the Holy Bible.....there are some 35 authors who profess to being eyewitnesses to the supernatural events of record. And you can't prove otherwise.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Nature did not create itself

Yes it did.

 

[Clyde 154]

Yes it did.

Prove it. No theories (theories cannot produce the facts required to be a Law of SCIENCE) What you will engage in is a subjective diatribe suggesting that your prima facie truths are beyond a reason of doubt. Simply explain how something can be the product of NOTHING by presenting the facts. If you start with nothing -0-.......-0- is all that you will ever have.

You must begin by rejecting SCIENCE and the LAWS OF PHYSICS, such as the law of causality........which states that every effect requires a superior or greater CAUSE.

Don't attempt the gravity angle.........gravity is SOMETHING that is quantifiable..........measurable by it potential. Science declares that gravity cannot exist void of mass and energy. Next you will attempt to declare that the Universe is 85% made up of DARK MATTER........which has no scientific method of quantification. Dark Matter is not even a theory.........its a subjective hypothesis.

Hypothesis: a proposal. Question? Where did DARK MATTER COME from? Did it also create itself from nothing............how far along this circular reasoning circus ride do intent to ride? Its like the circular reason used in the attempt to verify radio carbon dating. Pseudo Science claims the age of any fossil can be verified based on the age of the rock strata.......which is determined by the age of the fossils found therein. Fact: Nothing can be considered a FACT void of observation. Who observed the universe creating itself from nothing? Radio carbon dating can be calibrated to absolute ..............by recorded history (observation). After recorded history.......radio carbon dating is based upon a theoretical assumption, that the past as been static with no changes for billions of years, a demonstrable lie.......as simple water leeching can change the rate of radioactive decay.

I hope that if someone finds my fossilized bones one day in the future they do not claim that I was as old as the dirt they found me in.

Next question? If evolution is a valid theory.........and man descended from primates, why are there still primates around (living fossils) today? What? are today's primates just to stupid to evolve? Reality: all life forms on earth share DNA to an extent ..........because all life forms on earth are carbon based. Next question? Were dinosaurs warm blooded or cold blooded?

 

[ding]

the spirit is inviolable

One can dishonor their spirit. You seem to do it on a daily basis.

 

[ding]

the spirit is in the everlasting

Sure, but that doesn't mean you will be united with God eternally.

 

[ding]

neither the everlasting nor the heavens are in the spirit.

That seems very unlikely.

 

[ding]

really -

monotheistic would all be the same, cookie cutter mentality. polytheism w/ random authorities provides the diversity and other potentials a single source would be incapable to create.

Yes, really.

Polytheism is unnecessarily complicated, so not likely.

 

[BreezeWood]

..When physics and the laws of physics cannot prove the source of its origins

the sciences do formulate the evolution for creating physiology and its evolution once established - science does not formulate or understand the spiritual content that is required for physiology to function.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Prove it.

You first.

So you see the prattfall of your authoritative, magical declarations.

Any trained monkey can just say nuh uh,
and you're done.

 

[ding]

sciences do formulate the evolution for creating physiology and its evolution once established

The evolution for creating physiology and its evolution once established?

What's the evolution for creating physiology?

 

[ding]

science does not formulate or understand the spiritual content that is required for physiology to function.

Science is the study of nature to discover the order within nature so as to be able to make predictions of nature. I don't think anyone is saying it's more than that.

 

[ding]

science does not formulate or understand the spiritual content that is required for physiology to function.

What spiritual content is required for physiology to function?

 

[BreezeWood]

the spirit is inviolable -

One can dishonor their spirit. You seem to do it on a daily basis.

that's what inviolable means - only the being themselves have precedent over their spirit - the heavens can only destroy a spirit if necessary they can not change its content.

 

[BreezeWood]

What's the evolution for creating physiology?

physiology is a metaphysical substance that will dissipate into the atmosphere when its spiritual content is removed both are guided by the forces of the universe - physiology is derived from the periodic table of elements same as the universe.

 

[ding]

that's what inviolable means - only the being themselves have precedent over their spirit - the heavens can only destroy a spirit if necessary they can not change its content.

I'm arguing it can be broken. You are breaking it almost daily, You are broken and don't know it.

 

[ding]

physiology is a metaphysical substance that will dissipate into the atmosphere when its spiritual content is removed both are guided by the forces of the universe - physiology is derived from the periodic table of elements same as the universe.

No. Physiology is the physical normal functions of living organisms and their parts. The way in which a living organism or bodily part functions in the physical sense. There's nothing metaphysical about it.

 

[BreezeWood]

There's nothing metaphysical about it.

physiology is a metaphysical substance that will dissipate into the atmosphere when its spiritual content is removed both are guided by the forces of the universe -

yes, physiology is a metaphysical substance not native to planet earth and will occur where conditions are conducive for its development - what is not understood is the spiritual content required for its existence.

 

[ding]

yes, physiology is a metaphysical substance not native to planet earth and will occur where conditions are conducive for its development - what is not understood is the spiritual content required for its existence.

No. It's not. Maybe try googling it?

 

[Clyde 154]

You first.

So you see the prattfall of your authoritative, magical declarations.

Any trained monkey can just say nuh uh,
and you're done.

Sock Puppet: An alter ego............someone that constantly "masturbates/strokes" their own ego. What? Do you fear others will know that you live with your moms and pops and falsely present yourself as a keyboard warrior?
Narcissist: Someone in love with themselves. "Professing to be wise.........they became FOOLS" -- Romans 1:22-23

Strange that you cannot use Science and the Scientific method to validate your claims.....you are the one suggesting that Science is own your side, applied science uses facts. On the other hand........I present eye witnessed prima facie based truths, truths that you have no method to dismiss via the scientific method.

You are the one suggesting that Nothing can Produce Something..........I present the fact, Science begins and ends with the Law of Causality. You are yet to prove where the Energy came from that supposedly created the known universe. All you present is subjective pseudo science and pretend its APPLIED SCIENCE......many reasons TO DOUBT.