Bailout Deal Reached Before McCain Steps Foot in Washington

DavidS

Anti-Tea Party Member
Sep 7, 2008
9,811
770
48
New York, NY
My goodness does McCain look like an idiot now.

Lawmakers: Financial bailout agreement reached - Yahoo! News

WASHINGTON - Warned that time was running short to bolster the distressed economy, congressional Republicans and Democrats reported agreement in principle Thursday on a $700 billion bailout of the financial industry, and said they would present it to the Bush administration in hopes of a vote within days.

Emerging from a two-hour negotiating session, Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., said, "We are very confident that we can act expeditiously."

"I now expect that we will indeed have a plan that can pass the House, pass the Senate (and) be signed by the president," said Sen. Bob Bennett, R-Utah.

The bipartisan consensus on the general direction of the legislation was reported just hours before President Bush was to host presidential contenders Barack Obama and John McCain and congressional leaders at the White House for discussions on how to clear obstacles to the unpopular rescue plan.

Key lawmakers said at midday that few difficulties actually remained.

"There really isn't much of a deadlock to break," said Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee.

The White House remained cautious.

"It's a good sign that progress is being made," said deputy press secretary Tony Fratto said. "We'll want to hear from Secretary Paulson, and take a look at the details. We look forward to a good discussion at the meeting this afternoon."

Bush told the nation in a televised address Wednesday night that passage of the package his administration has proposed is urgently needed to calm the markets and restore confidence in the reeling financial system. His top spokeswoman, Dana Perino, had told reporters earlier Thursday that "significant progress" was being made.

Financial markets were mixed in early trading; the Dow Jones industrial average rose more than 200 points on optimism about the deal but a credit market squeeze remained as doubts about the proposed plan's effectiveness drove demand for short-term, safe-haven assets.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said Bush's agreement with Democrats on limiting pay for executives of bailed out financial institutions and giving taxpayers an equity stake in the companies cleared a significant hurdle.

The core of the plan envisions the government buying up sour assets of shaky financial firms in a bid to keep them from going under and to stave off a potentially severe recession.

Even as political figures haggled over the shape and price of the bailout, new economic indicators showed that orders for big-ticket manufactured goods plunged in August by the largest amount in seven months and that new applications for unemployment benefits were at their highest level in seven years.

And new home sales tumbled in August to the slowest pace in 17 years, while the average sales price fell by the largest amount on record. It served to further dramatize the problem that Washington is trying to solve.

Bush acknowledged Wednesday night that the bailout would be a "tough vote" for lawmakers. But he said failing to approve it would risk dire consequences for the economy and most Americans.

"Without immediate action by Congress, America could slip into a financial panic, and a distressing scenario would unfold," Bush said as he worked to resurrect the unpopular bailout package. "Our entire economy is in danger."

Bush's warning came soon after he invited Obama and McCain, one of whom will inherit the economic mess in four months, as well as key congressional leaders to a White House meeting Thursday to work on a compromise.

With the administration's original proposal considered dead in Congress, House leaders said they were making progress toward revised legislation that could be approved.

Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke have been crisscrossing Capitol Hill in recent days, shuttling between public hearings on the proposal and private meetings with lawmakers, to sell the proposal.

Obama and McCain are calling for a bipartisan effort to deal with the crisis, little more than five weeks before national elections in which the economy has emerged as the dominant theme.

"The plan that has been submitted to Congress by the Bush administration is flawed, but the effort to protect the American economy must not fail," they said in a joint statement Wednesday night. "This is a time to rise above politics for the good of the country. We cannot risk an economic catastrophe."

Presidential politics intruded, nonetheless, when McCain said earlier Wednesday he intended to return to Washington and was asking Obama to agree to delay their first debate, scheduled for Friday, to deal with the meltdown.

Obama said the debate should go ahead.

Lawmakers in both parties have objected strenuously to the rescue plan over the past two days, Republicans complaining about federal intervention in private business and Democrats pressing to tack on more conditions and help for beleaguered homeowners.

But many in both parties said they were open to legislation, although on different terms than the White House has proposed.
 
see all he had to do was threaten to be there lol...mccain and palin such a sad combo.....then you look to your left...to obama and biden...we are so screwed as taxpayers
 
I just can't shake the sneaking suspicion that this is all a scam to ensure a dependent, obediant populace for generations to come. But shit, at least I still got my house.
 
Knowing that The Maverick was on his way to whup their partisan asses was enough to make them act quickly. John McCain is the reason the deal was reached.

All Americans owe The Maverick a huge debt of gratitude.

:doubt:
 
I just can't shake the sneaking suspicion that this is all a scam to ensure a dependent, obediant populace for generations to come. But shit, at least I still got my house.

Isn't that just about what the motive is for almost everything government does?

Of course this ensures dependence. Instead of manning up to our mistakes and livig with the recession that would ensue without a bailout, we look to government to save us. Having no idea the long term ramifications, either.

When the next bubble inflates and bursts in about 10 years because of malinvestment once again, do we look to government to save us from it like always?

Of course we do. It's the American way these days.
 
Dodd, interviewed on CBS's "The Early Show," said many members of Congress believe a legislative relief package also should done in a measured, careful manner and should be tailored to protect taxpayers in the best way possible.

He said they should be "first in line" to get money back once conditions in the industry stabilize and recover.

Dodd, a Connecticut Democrat, said, "We want oversight."

He added that "the last thing any of us want is to be back here in a month coming up with some new plan because this didn't work. It's important that we act quickly, but it's more important that we act responsibly."

The Associated Press: Democrats wants pay limits, loan aid in bailout

Dodd Three Days Ago

Emerging from a two-hour negotiating session, Sen. Chris Dodd said, "We are very confident that we can act expeditiously."

Sen. Bob Bennett, a Utah Republican, told reporters: "I now expect that we will indeed hvae a plan that can pass the House, pass the Senate (and) be signed by the president." Dodd is a Connecticut Democrat who heads the Senate Banking Committee.

Dodd Today


"This thing is not workable and we need to go back and get it done"

Dodd Yesterday


So you think he got the call from Howard Dean?

*Sorry folks, I put this in another thread right before this one got made,same topic.
 
Knowing that The Maverick was on his way to whup their partisan asses was enough to make them act quickly. John McCain is the reason the deal was reached.

All Americans owe The Maverick a huge debt of gratitude.

you are a delusional fucknut :cuckoo:
 
Knowing that The Maverick was on his way to whup their partisan asses was enough to make them act quickly. John McCain is the reason the deal was reached.

All Americans owe The Maverick a huge debt of gratitude.

:cool: Good one! I bet your phone is ringing right now and it is Jay Leno calling so you can do your comedy routine on his show tonight? :doubt:
 
I doubt it ... but I am sure he will come up with another bright idea why he can't be there! :eusa_eh: Ya, think? :confused:

Now does this mean that he and Sarah are back on the campaign bus? :eusa_shifty:

He probably feels telling Obama where to stand on foreign policy is getting pretty tiresome...

he'll just send Obama the memo...
 
Sen. Bob Menendez, D-N.J., said, “I don’t want to be stampeded into wrong decisions, wrong for the country, wrong for the markets and, above all, wrong for the taxpayers. Some people got stampeded into voting for the war in Iraq; I’m not ready to do that in this case.”

“It’s not reasonable to think it will be done by the end of the week,” said Rep. Bill Clay, D-Mo., a member of the Financial Services Committee, which will debate the bill, probably on Thursday.

“As much as I admire Secretary Paulson and Ben Bernanke, this administration has no credibility at all,” said veteran liberal Democrat Rep. Jim McGovern of Massachusetts. “I wouldn’t trust them to tell me the correct time.”

Alright, so now what is it? you have many democrats yesterday saying things like this, and now, you have AFTER John McCains announcement all these democrats scrambling to tell you. WE REACHED A DEAL!! two hours before the meeting with Bush, hmmm, well this makes sense doesn't it?


Max Bacus, " We Have NO DEAL!! we have agreements on macro-principles, I have no idea what they are talking about "

John Bayner " There is no Deal on this , it's segments"


MOMENTS AGO
 
Sen. Bob Menendez, D-N.J., said, “I don’t want to be stampeded into wrong decisions, wrong for the country, wrong for the markets and, above all, wrong for the taxpayers. Some people got stampeded into voting for the war in Iraq; I’m not ready to do that in this case.”

“It’s not reasonable to think it will be done by the end of the week,” said Rep. Bill Clay, D-Mo., a member of the Financial Services Committee, which will debate the bill, probably on Thursday.

“As much as I admire Secretary Paulson and Ben Bernanke, this administration has no credibility at all,” said veteran liberal Democrat Rep. Jim McGovern of Massachusetts. “I wouldn’t trust them to tell me the correct time.”

Alright, so now what is it? you have many democrats yesterday saying things like this, and now, you have AFTER John McCains announcement all these democrats scrambling to tell you. WE REACHED A DEAL!! two hours before the meeting with Bush, hmmm, well this makes sense doesn't it?


Max Bacus, " We Have NO DEAL!! we have agreements on macro-principles, I have no idea what they are talking about "

John Bayner " There is no Deal on this , it's segments"


MOMENTS AGO

people in the committees sayyyyy they've reached a deal, all the rest say they want more time???

what a bunch of double talk....and the ones in the committees are the ones getting their pockets lined with gold on both the democratic and republican sides of the aisle!

this whole thing is disgusting, ya know? :(:(:(
 
Bohener, just sent word not to believe a single solitary lie the Dems are trying to piss out. Republicans haven't agreed to anything yet..



oh my
 
people in the committees sayyyyy they've reached a deal, all the rest say they want more time???

what a bunch of double talk....and the ones in the committees are the ones getting their pockets lined with gold on both the democratic and republican sides of the aisle!

this whole thing is disgusting, ya know? :(:(:(


I completely agree with that Care!!! You would think, that spending this much money would not be treated like the clock is ticking down in a football game to get to some debate. Is TV going off the Air after Friday? or did I miss that one? Is it possible, to say, we have moved it to Wed. or whatever date? You would think this would be a little more important than rehashing your stands on Iraq that everyone knows by now for both McCain and Obama or has anyone missed the fact this is a foreign policy debate?
 
oh my! did ya get it that time??? can ya hear me now??

sorry, i thought you actually were trying to relay some information or news but got overly excited and couldnt put it together cohesively. guess not
 

Forum List

Back
Top