Any debate on global warming now OVER!?

Yup, the "debate is over."
Skookerasbil LOST.
He Started the Wrongest thread EVER made here with his NINE Year running "Skeptics are Winning" thread in 2013-2022.

Nailed it!
Astonishing Call in 2013!

1727038504618.png



`
 
Not in the ACTUAL DATA, the highly correlated satellite and balloon data, which your side had to FUDGE to show "warming" that DOES NOT EXIST...






LOL!!!

Then why is the record decade for canes still the 1940s, second place the 1890s?

Why is the last time a Cat Five got as far north as Martha's Vineyard 1938?



If oceans were warming, which they clearly are not, there would be MORE and BIGGER canes and YOUR SIDE CLAIMED THIS before...


To have a BREAKOUT in CANES we would need to see Cat 4s and 5s hitting north of New Jersey.... and for the past few years nothing north of Georgia has been able to hold even Cat 1, because THE WATER IS TOO COLD TO SUSTAIN....



Your side also claims "ocean rise" with FUDGE but when pressed to show us ONE SINGLE PHOTO of this your side cannot do that... while our side has EVER SINGLE PHOTO set old and new....

and this is because your side has been LYING ALL ALONG about Antarctic ice, which grows EVERY YEAR....
My side is opposing AGW. Your side is to make opposition of AGW look silly by making ridiculous arguments built upon flawed logic. I hope you get run over by your old folks home bus.
 
Yup, the "debate is over."
Skookerasbil LOST.
He Started the Wrongest thread EVER made here with his NINE Year running "Skeptics are Winning" thread in 2013-2022.

Nailed it!
Astonishing Call in 2013!

1727038504618.png



`
Nope. Not as long as the geologic record exists it isn't.
 
My side is opposing AGW.


Complete bull, proven by your sticking with easily discredited Co2 FRAUD bullshit "glacials" and other laughable excuses of "climate science."

you are a complete FRAUD, a taxpayer funded Co2 FRAUD "faux skeptic" here to shout down the truth of Land Near the Poles and keep morons accepting clearly FUDGED data as "real."




Your side is to make opposition of AGW look silly by making ridiculous arguments built upon flawed logic


Translation - you cannot refute one word of what EMH has posted, not one. Indeed, you cannot even answer basic climate questions.... and don't have the intellectual courage to try... but you are here to shout down, troll, lie, and spazz....


The real truth of Earth climate change that NOBODY here can refute one word of...







 
Complete bull, proven by your sticking with easily discredited Co2 FRAUD bullshit "glacials" and other laughable excuses of "climate science."

you are a complete FRAUD, a taxpayer funded Co2 FRAUD "faux skeptic" here to shout down the truth of Land Near the Poles and keep morons accepting clearly FUDGED data as "real."







Translation - you cannot refute one word of what EMH has posted, not one. Indeed, you cannot even answer basic climate questions.... and don't have the intellectual courage to try... but you are here to shout down, troll, lie, and spazz....


The real truth of Earth climate change that NOBODY here can refute one word of...







You support AGW with your idiocy.
 
You support AGW with your idiocy.


This is why you are a fraud, you lie, you cannot refute one word, you won't answer questions, and you keep parroting easily discredited bullshit...
 
This is why you are a fraud, you lie, you cannot refute one word, you won't answer questions, and you keep parroting easily discredited bullshit...
You support AGW with your idiocy.
 
If anyone here could refute what EMH has posted, they would.

They can't.

That's how science works. You put the theory and data out there, and let people try to refute. When they can't...


Earth climate change is 99% about where land is and where it is moving. Co2 does nothing. Ice ages are continent specific events, Greenland and Antarctica being two.
 
LOL!!

and it never occurred to you that the ice might melt and release that air.... even as an ICEBERG....

Gosh, you are really stupid. No wonder you parrot the Co2 FRAUD's bullshit religiously...

Care to disclose a source for the "10%" claim....
Glacier ice results from the compaction of snow. Air pockets between snowflakes are trapped in pores between ice crystals as the ice makes its way from the upper layer of a glacier to deep inside it. There are about 200 bubbles per cubic centimeter, meaning glacier ice is about 10% air.
 
If anyone here could refute what EMH has posted, they would.

They can't.

That's how science works. You put the theory and data out there, and let people try to refute. When they can't...


Earth climate change is 99% about where land is and where it is moving. Co2 does nothing. Ice ages are continent specific events, Greenland and Antarctica being two.
You support AGW with your idiocy. Which is why you won't say the surface of the earth is not heated evenly by the sun.
 


meaning glacier ice is about 10% air.

“These are the same bubbles that preserve ancient air studied in ice cores,” said co-author Erin Pettit, glaciologist and professor in the OSU College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences. “The tiny bubbles can have very high pressures – sometimes up to 20 atmospheres, or 20 times normal atmospheric pressure at sea level.”




Go down a mile in Antarctic ice and it is 50 times...


So, let's use 20 times. If the ice is 10% air, and the air is 20 fold Surface Air Pressure, then the actual surface air pressure volume is TWICE WHAT THE ICE IS....
 
meaning glacier ice is about 10% air.

“These are the same bubbles that preserve ancient air studied in ice cores,” said co-author Erin Pettit, glaciologist and professor in the OSU College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences. “The tiny bubbles can have very high pressures – sometimes up to 20 atmospheres, or 20 times normal atmospheric pressure at sea level.”




Go down a mile in Antarctic ice and it is 50 times...


So, let's use 20 times. If the ice is 10% air, and the air is 20 fold Surface Air Pressure, then the actual surface air pressure volume is TWICE WHAT THE ICE IS....
If you accept that evidence then you should be accepting oxygen isotope data. Please stop supporting AGW with your idiocy.
 
So, let's use 20 times. If the ice is 10% air, and the air is 20 fold Surface Air Pressure, then the actual surface air pressure volume is TWICE WHAT THE ICE IS....
and so...
 
And so get ready to go down crazy because he is cray cray.
That is exactly where I want to go. I just need to get past his anti-Semitism.

In case you haven't realized it, I've long since given up trying to convert anyone to anything. If I can make someone think, I'd take that as a win, but I'm really here to see how the other half thinks. It's been both entertaining and scary but as long as no one comes knocking on my door, I'm good.
 
If you accept that evidence then you should be accepting oxygen isotope data. Please stop supporting AGW with your idiocy.


That has nothing to do with isotopes, and isotopes have ZERO EVIDENCE supporting that they are a reliable source of ancient temperature.

You are an employee of the Co2 FRAUD and your job is to troll, shout down, lie, obstruct, and push easily discredited fudge fraud in order to PRESERVE YOUR JOB by preventing the actual truth from coming out....


This truth....










and you and the Co2 FRAUD cannot refute one word of any of that...
 
and so...


and so if there was an ongoing net ice melt on Earth now, which there is NOT, Surface Air Pressure would rise, but instead is actually dropping over the past 70 years...



BTW, if Earth was warming, would there be more wildfires or less??
 
If anyone here could refute what EMH has posted, they would.

They can't.

That's how science works. You put the theory and data out there, and let people try to refute. When they can't...


Earth climate change is 99% about where land is and where it is moving. Co2 does nothing. Ice ages are continent specific events, Greenland and Antarctica being two.
You refute theory with theory, fact with fact. You don't come up with a theory and force others to retort with factual, sourced data.
 
Back
Top Bottom