Climate Change is all bunk?

That isn't what the documentary is about, and if you had watched it, you would not make such an ignorant comment.

If you had read Brave New World ... you wouldn't have made such an ignorant comparison ...

You also seem to be unaware of the feudalism ongoing in the Banana Republics ... what makes the United States economy so prosperous is exploiting the labor and natural wealth of other countries ... how many times have we sent in the Marines when a Latin American country didn't vote the way we told them to ...

Just like the Soviet Union ... which is who 1984 and Brave New World were describing ...

But again ... like you say ... I'm on the winner's side here ... why would I want change? ...
 
If you had read Brave New World ... you wouldn't have made such an ignorant comparison ...

You also seem to be unaware of the feudalism ongoing in the Banana Republics ... what makes the United States economy so prosperous is exploiting the labor and natural wealth of other countries ... how many times have we sent in the Marines when a Latin American country didn't vote the way we told them to ...

Just like the Soviet Union ... which is who 1984 and Brave New World were describing ...

But again ... like you say ... I'm on the winner's side here ... why would I want change? ...
Again, not the point of the documentary.

Neither you, nor I, are on the winning side of this narrative. That you think you are? That totally explains your nonsensical and ignorant posting.

OF course I read Brave New World, and I, unlike you, understand why and how the comparison to what the documentary is explaining is apt. Why? Because I have watched the documentary, and was familiar with the material in it even before I watched it.

If you were familiar with both sources of media, you would not come off as so ignorant in your posts about the situation.
 
I see that Old Rocks has never addressed posts #53 and #54 could it be because it is all from official data that he can't address.

Snicker.......
 
Waiting for the exspurts' to come out and attack the validity of AI.

You do know it's Musk's Grok3 AI.

3-2-1
You mean like schmidlap ?

That guy isn't going to attack anything.

All you'll get from him is "Because you guys won't accept the arguments of people looking for money, that I (meaning schmidlap) can't understand, much less defend, then you are dogma lovers"

:laughing0301: :laughing0301: :laughing0301: :laughing0301:
 
Of course it is. I was on a forum a couple of years ago with a bunch of climate alarmists. I looked up a lot of research from NOAA, UN-FAO, peer review, etc. I found that temperatures probably have recently increased, but they were actually and probably higher in Roman times. I basically found these five things:

-There is more global food than ever
-There are more global trees than 40 years ago
-Climate deaths have significantly dropped in the past 100 years
-Extreme weather has remained the same or declined
-Polar bears are increasing
Any links would be appreciated. Especially on the CO aruond the time of ROME.
 
Climate Change is a science.

The theory regarding Climate Change called "Global Warming" aka CO2 FRAUD is "all bunk" and always was. The climate changes...

here's why...





When MORONS on our side say "climate change is bunk" and "there is warming but I don't think CO2 is the cause" they are

ABSOLUTE ******* LIABILITIES TO GETTING THE TRUTH OUT...

GLOBAL WARMING IS BUNK, CLIMATE CHANGE IS QUITE REAL

EARTH IS NOT WARMING - the ACTUAL DATA -= satellites, balloons, surface air pressure, hurricanes
 
Back
Top Bottom