Any debate on global warming now OVER!?

[EMH]

Greenland loses around 270 billion tons of ice each year, which is adding to sea level rise

FACT - you cannot show us ONE SINGLE PHOTO of anything "sinking" due to this completely bullshit claim of "ice melt."

FACT - if there was an ongoing net ice melt, SURFACE AIR PRESSURE would increase because of all the air trapped in the ice, but THAT IS NOT HAPPENING EITHER....

Co2 Fraud hasn't fudged all data, surface air pressure for one....

The Co2 FRAUD is run by very lame "climate scientists" who flat out aren't very good at science at all. They are good at lying, fudging data, and censoring truth. But there is data, and it isn't friendly to the Co2 FRAUD, which is why the Co2 FRAUD fudges everything they think they need to...

www.usmessageboard.com

Lady Liberty, any ocean rise???

Lady Liberty = NOPE, not here...

 

[alang1216]

Not if the guy whose carbon footprint is slightly more than yours doesn't believe it's a problem. He's not a hypocrite at all and he sees your actions not meeting your words as evidence that even you don't believe what you say.

If that other guy votes for a government that will ignore climate change because he himself doesn't believe it, he is not a hypocrite but he damages the planet for future generations. I wonder which is worse, hypocrisy or physical damage?

 

[EMH]

That is your deflection to my question:


To answer your question: the Earth continues to warm, threatening sea level rise.

Since you are such a parroting "expert" of all lies Co2 FRAUD, how about answering some simple climate questions for us...


1. Why does one Earth polar circle have 9+ times the ice of the other?
2. Why is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska?
3. If the oceans are "warming" why is the record decade for canes still the 1940s?
4. If the oceans are "rising" why can't we see one single photo of land sinking?
5. How did Co2 thaw North America and freeze Greenland at the same time?

 

[alang1216]

FACT - you cannot show us ONE SINGLE PHOTO of anything "sinking" due to this completely bullshit claim of "ice melt."

FACT - if there was an ongoing net ice melt, SURFACE AIR PRESSURE would increase because of all the air trapped in the ice, but THAT IS NOT HAPPENING EITHER....

A theory I've never heard before, probably for a very good reason, it is bad science. Air pressure changes daily.

Co2 Fraud hasn't fudged all data, surface air pressure for one....

The Co2 FRAUD is run by very lame "climate scientists" who flat out aren't very good at science at all. They are good at lying, fudging data, and censoring truth. But there is data, and it isn't friendly to the Co2 FRAUD, which is why the Co2 FRAUD fudges everything they think they need to...

www.usmessageboard.com

Wrong

 

[EMH]

A theory I've never heard before, probably for a very good reason, it is bad science. Air pressure changes daily.


Wrong

You were asked for a PHOTO and you responded with another FUDGE CHART.

Can you show us a PHOTO? NO


Thanks for the confession...



As for the answer to air pressure, yeah, it does change daily, but the 70 year chart shows it DROPPING because EARTH IS ACTUALLY ADDING ICE which explains why YOU CANNOT SHOW US ONE SINGLE PHOTO OF OCEAN RISE...

Court Identifies Eleven Inaccuracies in Al Gore’s ‘An Inconvenient Truth’

Here's something American media are virtually guaranteed to not report: a British court has determined that Al Gore's schlockumentary "An Inconvenient Truth" contains at least eleven material falsehoods. It seems a safe bet Matt Lauer and Diane Sawyer won't be discussing this Tuesday morning...

www.newsbusters.org

• The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting, the evidence was that it is in fact increasing.

Study: Mass gains of Antarctic ice sheet greater than losses - NASA Science

A new NASA study says that an increase in Antarctic snow accumulation that began 10,000 years ago is currently adding enough ice to the continent to outweigh the increased losses from its thinning glaciers.

science.nasa.gov

the Antarctic ice sheet showed a net gain of 112 billion tons of ice a year from 1992 to 2001. That net gain slowed to 82 billion tons of ice per year between 2003 and 2008.

 

[EMH]

If that other guy votes for a government that will ignore climate change because he himself doesn't believe it, he is not a hypocrite but he damages the planet for future generations. I wonder which is worse, hypocrisy or physical damage?

Wasting $20 trillion on a lie that has never had any real data to support it... just FUDGE...

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling.



Translation from NBC - the two and only two measures of atmospheric temps, satellites and balloons, showed NO WARMING in the ATMOSPHERE for decades of rising Co2 in highly correlated fashion, before being FUDGED in 2005.


There is NO ACTUAL DATA to support the theory that increasing atmospheric Co2 causes warming, JUST FUDGE.

 

[EMH]

A theory I've never heard before, probably for a very good reason

So, is there any air trapped in Antarctic ice or not???

PARROTING MORON of LIES you are...

 

[ding]

If that other guy votes for a government that will ignore climate change because he himself doesn't believe it, he is not a hypocrite but he damages the planet for future generations. I wonder which is worse, hypocrisy or physical damage?

Hypocrisy because that is real.

 

[skookerasbil]

Again... nobody in here can answer the simple question..

Where is the "science" mattering in the real world?
Where is it impacting western energy policy?

You can debate the climate in here until the cows come home ( happening in this forum for 16 years).

Nobody is caring

 

[abu afak]

Again... nobody in here can answer the simple question..
Where is the "science" mattering in the real world?
Where is it impacting western energy policy?
You can debate the climate in here until the cows come home ( happening in this forum for 16 years).
Nobody is caring

[ATTACACH]

We're having our Second Hurricane in 10 days you ldiot.
Everyone notices what Warming is doing Now MORE THAN EVER YOU BLIND DEMENTED CLOWN.
Another Spectacularly ILL-timed thread/comment.
`

 

[skookerasbil]

We're having our Second Hurricane in 10 days you ldiot.
Everyone notices what Warming is doing Now MORE THAN EVER YOU BLIND DEMENTED CLOWN.
Another Spectacularly ILL-timed thread/comment.
`

sOn...but you're obsessed with climate alarmism. Most people don't give a fuck...have waaaaay too much other shit to worry about, thus, don't get hysterical like you do.

I make your head explode because you'd like a net zero world which isn't happening for shit. Most social forums would laugh you out of the room.

You might just as well join a group navel gazing society where you might get a smidge of attention.

God I relish stopping into this forum every so often

 

[skookerasbil]

For the blind demented clown it's....

 

[abu afak]

Again... nobody in here can answer the simple question..
Where is the "science" mattering in the real world?
Where is it impacting western energy policy?
You can debate the climate in here until the cows come home ( happening in this forum for 16 years).
Nobody is caring

[ATTACACH]

We're having our Second Hurricane in 10 days you ldiot.
Everyone notices what Warming is doing Now MORE THAN EVER YOU BLIND DEMENTED CLOWN.
Another Spectacularly ILL-timed thread/comment.
`
`

 

[healthmyths]

candycorn here, let me help.

View attachment 1021963

You do know who Englander, Hansen and Sato are, right? You aren't saying THOSE guys are wrong, right?

But where is your chart showing 4,000 PPM?
the idiot has guaranteed to rid fossil fuels.
Question: If current 422.52 ppm CO2 level tell me why according to the experts...
"Concentrations of CO 2 in the atmosphere were as high as 4,000 ppm during the Cambrian period about 500 million years ago,"

Carbon dioxide in Earth's atmosphere - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Were fossil fuel emissions 500 million years ago the cause of over 9 times CO2 ppm i.e. 4,000???

 

[healthmyths]

We're having our Second Hurricane in 10 days you ldiot.
Everyone notices what Warming is doing Now MORE THAN EVER YOU BLIND DEMENTED CLOWN.
Another Spectacularly ILL-timed thread/comment.
`
`

FACTS... 20 years ago!
The 2004 hurricane season was unprecedented for the time. There were a total of five storms that would impact Florida in just six weeks.
In fact, two of the four, Frances and Jeanne, made landfall just 2 miles apart with only three weeks between them.

20 Year Anniversary of the 2004 Hurricane Season

FACTS...

 

[ding]

But where is your chart showing 4,000 PPM?
the idiot has guaranteed to rid fossil fuels.
Question: If current 422.52 ppm CO2 level tell me why according to the experts...
"Concentrations of CO 2 in the atmosphere were as high as 4,000 ppm during the Cambrian period about 500 million years ago,"

Carbon dioxide in Earth's atmosphere - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Were fossil fuel emissions 500 million years ago the cause of over 9 times CO2 ppm i.e. 4,000???

Here it is. And it was 50 million years ago. Know what happened THE PLANET COOLED.

 

[abu afak]

FACTS... 20 years ago!
The 2004 hurricane season was unprecedented for the time. There were a total of five storms that would impact Florida in just six weeks.
In fact, two of the four, Frances and Jeanne, made landfall just 2 miles apart with only three weeks between them.

20 Year Anniversary of the 2004 Hurricane Season

FACTS...

And how many crushed people in SIX States?

I was pointing out, contrary his post/Lie of the DAY/Decade, ("Nobody cares")... people were Never more aware than they are now... with another en route.
People in states never or barely hit... Now understand.
I was not counting how many hit Florida... you board-wide Conspiracy POS.
`

 

[ding]

And how many crushed people in SIX States?

I was pointing out, contrary his post/Lie of the DAY/Decade, ("Nobody cares")... people were Never more aware than they are now... with another en route.
People in states never or barely hit... Now understand.
I was not counting how many hit Florida... you board-wide Conspiracy POS.
`

I'm sure in your tiny pea sized brain this made sense but could you please try to be a little more coherent. I can't understand what you are trying to say.

 

[ding]

I just love it when apu "fake news" factual empirical climate evidence of the geologic record. It shows how big of an imbecile she is.

 

[healthmyths]

And how many crushed people in SIX States?

I was pointing out, contrary his post/Lie of the DAY/Decade, ("Nobody cares")... people were Never more aware than they are now... with another en route.
People in states never or barely hit... Now understand.
I was not counting how many hit Florida... you board-wide Conspiracy POS.
`

And so were you around in the turn of the 20th century...i.e. in case you don't know what that is.. 20th century is from 1900 to 1999..." especially in the first 50 years. The United States Weather Bureau started naming hurricanes in 1950, using the phonetic alphabet: Able, Baker, Charlie, and so forth. In 1953, the practice of using women's names began, starting with Tropical Storm Alice.

History of naming storms: How do hurricanes get their names?

Today, the World Meteorological Organization maintains a rotating set of six lists. But the history of naming storms goes back hundreds of years!

www.13newsnow.com

How many hurricanes occurred in the 1800s?
Answer: 1835 – Major hurricane passed near Key West on September 14th and 15th. First “documented” hurricane to strike Key West.

Tropical Cyclones of the 1800s

U.S. Hurricane Strikes by Decade

FACTS!!! Hey dummy how many more hurricanes