Abortion should be banned in the United States

"Alcohol is a psychoactive substance with dependence-producing"

*Beyond health consequences, alcohol kills brain cells making the recipient retarded*

" Waaa Sex Waaa "

" Primal Jealousy For A Genetic Afterlife *


There are without cause abortion and with cause abortion and without cause abortion are not sought when with cause abortion are valid .

Can I suggest you quit the Babycham
 
" On The Pathetic Intuition Proffered By Ignorance Of A Neophyte "

* Removing All Doubt *

"Alcohol is a psychoactive substance with dependence-producing"
*Beyond health consequences, alcohol kills brain cells making the recipient retarded*

Can I suggest you quit the Babycham
This moniker seldom indulges in alcohol and only does so in moderation when it does occur , so apparently your intuition about public policy on abortion is proven to be as ignorant and pathetic as your intuition about the disposition of this moniker .

 
" On The Pathetic Intuition Proffered By Ignorance Of A Neophyte "

* Removing All Doubt *


This moniker seldom indulges in alcohol and only does so in moderation when it does occur , so apparently your intuition about public policy on abortion is proven to be as ignorant and pathetic as your intuition about the disposition of this moniker .

It sounds like it's bakes like you that support abortion because you've no brains in how to avoid not getting pregnant, or not getting a woman pregnant.

Keep off the drugs then, or are you one of those trannies?
 
" Nature Mocking The Mentally Challenged Egocentric Beliefs Of Damned Dirty Apes "

* Ad Hominem Red Herring Demonstrations Because Of Shit For Brains Ineptitude *

It sounds like it's bakes like you that support abortion because you've no brains in how to avoid not getting pregnant, or not getting a woman pregnant.
Keep off the drugs then, or are you one of those trannies?
Learn the difference between without cause abortion , that results from unintended pregnancy that is handled during the first trimester , and with cause abortion that occurs due to developmental anomalies detected between 13 and 20 weeks of gestation through ultrasound .

Women do not seek without cause abortion when with cause abortion is valid , and abortion of the healthy fetus without cause are sensationalized false claims by sanctimonious reprobates , who want all abortion outlawed and who are blubbering that individuals are choosing to abort 90% of down syndrome fetus .

Historically , between 0% and 200% of the poverty line have had 75% of elective , without cause abortions , and more than 50% of women having abortions already have children .

About 3% of all conceptions are associated with major congenital malformations, many of them are lethal developmental defect and genetic in origin or teratogenic (adverse effects of the envi- ronment during gametogenesis or early embryogenesis).

In 2020, 93% of abortions occurred during the first trimester – that is, at or before 13 weeks of gestation, according to the CDC. An additional 6% occurred between 14 and 20 weeks of pregnancy, and 1% were performed at 21 weeks or more of gestation. These CDC figures include data from 40 states and New York City (but not the rest of New York).


* Us Republicanism Explained To Its Traitors And Dummies *

The dumbfounded dobbs decision is sedition against us 14th , 9th and 1st amendments , that is supported by traitors to us republic .

While any other requirements for naturalization are relative , birth is required to become a citizen , and by equitable doctrine , birth is required for equal protection with a citizen , that would have included a wright to life .

Thus , states a prohibited from protecting a wright to life of any which has not met a live birth requirement to receive it , and consequently , states are prohibited from proscribing abortion .
 
It sounds like it's bakes like you that support abortion because you've no brains in how to avoid not getting pregnant, or not getting a woman pregnant.

Keep off the drugs then, or are you one of those trannies?

I suppose they brought in the abortion act to try to prevent those do-it-yourself botched up jobs so rampant in the 19th century.

There’s a case now in England regarding a woman who’s gone to prison for somehow obtaining abortion pills from somwhere.

 
I suppose they brought in the abortion act to try to prevent those do-it-yourself botched up jobs so rampant in the 19th century.

There’s a case now in England regarding a woman who’s gone to prison for somehow obtaining abortion pills from somwhere.

Completely unacceptable sentencing - she should die in prison.
 
" Too Cut And Dry Missing Information "

* Potential For A Wright To Life *

I suppose they brought in the abortion act to try to prevent those do-it-yourself botched up jobs so rampant in the 19th century.
An abortion at 28 weeks is beyond the threshold of 24 weeks , decided in #roevwade as an onset of valid state interests in a wright to life , where natural viability was substituted in lie of a live birth requirement for equal protection with a citizen , based on an ability of a fetus to survive an imminent live birth , that #roevwade court referred to as a potential life .

The #roevwade court did not stipulate exceptions for developmental abnormalities in the third trimester , though it did decide that first trimester was between doctors and patient , and in the second trimester states could regulate the procedures to ensure safety , which is implicit with equal protection of negative liberties among individuals .


* Medical Practitioner Regulations To Mitigate Nefarious Propensities *
There’s a case now in England regarding a woman who’s gone to prison for somehow obtaining abortion pills from somwhere.
A dispensation of mifepristone through mail without witness of the drug whereabouts would seem to qualify as a valid safety or security concern to assure equal protection of negative liberties among individuals .


* Peculiar Maternal Instinct Versus Publicly Mandated Congenital Abnormalities *

Was reasoning of the woman , for seeking an abortion at 28 weeks , disclosed ?

If it is expected of maternal instinct , not to wantonly seek a without cause abortion when with cause abortions would be valid , then would a with cause abortion have been a valid precept except for a lack of its exception in the law ?

That women seek without cause abortion is not an expected behavior , when with cause abortion is valid , though sanctimonious abortion anti-choice pundits use its hypothetical in hyperbole for great consternation to outlaw all abortion without regard to with cause considerations ,

That she lied about it does not make any difference , except as perjury , thoug that she did not tell her doctor because she was embarrassed might have been an expected behavior .
 

Attachments

  • ALITO-IMBECILE.png
    ALITO-IMBECILE.png
    171 KB · Views: 10
Last edited:
" Nature Mocking The Mentally Challenged Egocentric Beliefs Of Damned Dirty Apes "

* Ad Hominem Red Herring Demonstrations Because Of Shit For Brains Ineptitude *


Learn the difference between without cause abortion , that results from unintended pregnancy that is handled during the first trimester , and with cause abortion that occurs due to developmental anomalies detected between 13 and 20 weeks of gestation through ultrasound .

Women do not seek without cause abortion when with cause abortion is valid , and abortion of the healthy fetus without cause are sensationalized false claims by sanctimonious reprobates , who want all abortion outlawed and who are blubbering that individuals are choosing to abort 90% of down syndrome fetus .

Historically , between 0% and 200% of the poverty line have had 75% of elective , without cause abortions , and more than 50% of women having abortions already have children .

About 3% of all conceptions are associated with major congenital malformations, many of them are lethal developmental defect and genetic in origin or teratogenic (adverse effects of the envi- ronment during gametogenesis or early embryogenesis).

In 2020, 93% of abortions occurred during the first trimester – that is, at or before 13 weeks of gestation, according to the CDC. An additional 6% occurred between 14 and 20 weeks of pregnancy, and 1% were performed at 21 weeks or more of gestation. These CDC figures include data from 40 states and New York City (but not the rest of New York).


* Us Republicanism Explained To Its Traitors And Dummies *

The dumbfounded dobbs decision is sedition against us 14th , 9th and 1st amendments , that is supported by traitors to us republic .

While any other requirements for naturalization are relative , birth is required to become a citizen , and by equitable doctrine , birth is required for equal protection with a citizen , that would have included a wright to life .

Thus , states a prohibited from protecting a wright to life of any which has not met a live birth requirement to receive it , and consequently , states are prohibited from proscribing abortion .
You're a piss artist.
 
I suppose they brought in the abortion act to try to prevent those do-it-yourself botched up jobs so rampant in the 19th century.

There’s a case now in England regarding a woman who’s gone to prison for somehow obtaining abortion pills from somewhere.

No, she acquired and used abortion pills beyond the prescribed timescale when you're allowed to take them. So she aborted when the fetus/human in her body was too old.
 
" Droll Trolls Full Of Themselves Huff And Puff With Fire And Brimstone Challenged To Consider Natural Alternatives "

* Dumbfounded Hypothetical Conjectures That With Cause Abortions Are Not Valid Or Real *
No, she acquired and used abortion pills beyond the prescribed timescale when you're allowed to take them. So she aborted when the fetus/human in her body was too old.
The principles of legal positivism preclude there not to be a necessary correlation between a legal statute and ethical or moral validity of the legal statute .

She’s been prosecuted under the Offences Against the Person Act 1861, sparking calls for abortion reform in the UK.

Every woman, being with child, who, with intent to procure her own miscarriage, shall unlawfully administer to herself any poison or other noxious thing, or shall unlawfully use any instrument or other means whatsoever with the like intent, and whosoever, with intent to procure the miscarriage of any woman, whether she be or be not with child, shall unlawfully administer to her or cause to be taken by her any poison or other noxious thing, or shall unlawfully use any instrument or other means whatsoever with the like intent, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable F2 ... to be kept in penal servitude for life



* When Dumbfounded Dictates By States Violate Equal Protection Of Negative Liberties *

Suppose the woman discovered from ultrasound that the fetus is expected to die shortly after delivery , or perhaps the fetus is afflicted with a severe congenital abnormality that will significantly disparaged its quality of life ?

Why would it be better for a state to dictate decisions contrary to wishes of the individual directly involved if the affliction severely disparages the quality of life , liberty and pursuit of happiness in the offspring ?

The public policies for abortion in european countries make without cause abortions before 12 to 15 weeks readily available , while with cause abortions are allowed for developmental anomalies through authorization by a physician given a list of exceptions .

The fantastical haughtiness of being judge , jury and executioner , to issue retribution for some magnanimous crime , based on a dumbfounded statute devised through ignorance , though actions contrary to the statute of law are ethically and morally valid , is an obvious example of ethical and moral turpitude derided in legal systems by legal positivism .
 
Last edited:
President Clinton was on the right track when he suggested that abortions should be legal, safe, and rare. The only question is how to define "rare."

It shouldn't be rare. It should be NON-existent

It is murder

De-humanizing the person in the womb by calling it "defective" or by saying that it was a total WRONG how that person came to be conceived... in no way lessens the fact it is MURDER

and therefore should not be legalized EVER

If a woman doesnt want a child, there ARE ways to avoid it... many ways. Rape is 1) hard to prove and 2) doesn't make abortion any less murder
 
I am pro-life, my view is that unless human rights mean something divergent to "human rights," the unborn should have them. As a consequence, I believe nearly all abortion should be banned (the typical 99% or more or cases). There are potential exceptions which I remain agnostic on but these do not make up the paradigm of incidents. Otherwise, I have never heard a good argument for legal abortion and I will openly argue that it ought to be banned.
As abortion isn't in the Constitution, and the Supreme Court overturned Roe vs Wade, and left it up to the states, that is how it should be. If your state is a red state, then limit it to rape and incest, no sense in punishing the woman to have a daily reminder of the trauma for nine months (that, in my opinion, comes under the heading of cruel and unusual punishment). If you live in a blue state, suck it out, scrape it out, yank it out, whatever you decide. If you are a leftist in a red state, move to a blue state and if you are a right-wing individual, move to a blue state.
 
When a traditional male and female have intercourse (not the new females with a beard and cock), a baby can result if no numerous contraceptives were used. So unless it's ectopic or down syndrome, there's no need to terminate a healthy pregnancy, unless you want to murder a human being.

Is a baby with down sydrome not human?
 
Most pro-lifers say no, since almost everyone aborts such pregnancies when detected, pro-lifers included.

When it affects themselves, pro-lifers will show their true colors.

Prolifers not only need to not abort babies like this, but they need to take care of the ones that are born from other ppl as well.
 
Is a baby with down sydrome not human?
No, they're human. I assume you're American. Most Americans on this board can only default between two states, all or none, as in all guns or no guns, all abortions or no abortions. It's called Binary Thinking.

So when you stray from one extreme to the other, you compromise, you meet in the middle. And with abortions, a healthy fetus is not an illness unless it's an ectopic pregnancy, so I:m all for banning abortions. Where's the quality of life with a diagnosed fetus that has Downs, MS, deformity etc.. to both the baby and parents? So I would be all for banning abortions unless ectopic and some abnormality, illness etc... You know, middle ground.
 
Most pro-lifers say no, since almost everyone aborts such pregnancies when detected, pro-lifers included.

When it affects themselves, pro-lifers will show their true colors.
Fuck you, eugenicist trash.

Find a fire and jump in.
 
Fuck you, eugenicist trash.
So you're calling pro-lifers eugenecist trash. After all, they are aborting almost all Downs pregnancies.

Do you plan to reform yourself, or are you happy with it being a eugenecist movement? And it is. After all, you base the worth of an organism entyirely its genetic code. Eugenics on steroids, the pro-life movement.

So, should we worry about what happens when you declare our genetic code isn't up to snuff, which justifies you murdering us?

Find a fire and jump in.
We'll take that as a yes. You _are_ out to exterminate your opposition.
 
So you're calling pro-lifers eugenecist trash. After all, they are aborting almost all Downs pregnancies.
No, they aren’t. You’re just a liar.

And you are entirely a repository of manure.

It’s not a matter of your genes, you choose to be a rotten piece of shit who deserves to die.
 

Forum List

Back
Top