CarsomyrPlusSix
Diamond Member
- Jul 29, 2022
- 3,537
- 2,604
- 1,938
Don’t worry - it was just a clump of bricks, not a real building.You like the one woman in Wyoming that set fire to an abortion clinic because she was against abortion.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Don’t worry - it was just a clump of bricks, not a real building.You like the one woman in Wyoming that set fire to an abortion clinic because she was against abortion.
So unless it's ectopic or down syndrome, there's no need to terminate a healthy pregnancy, unless you want to murder a human being.
A patriot who protected the sanctity of my vote for Joe Biden who has created 13 million jobs and is defending Europe from Russian aggression. Shooting a stupid Q/anon imbecile like Ashley Babbit also saved Ukraine from being taken by Putin if he had his wish come true that Biden never ever was inaugurated.Who shot the veteran climbing through the widow?
I'm agnostic with no clemmies.Are you a Christian with a hand full of stones....
{nfbw #905 to ncvmn #902 } In a secular world human life is ascribed value the moment one of our species is born or takes a first birth, but you say a woman who terminates her own pregnancy before birth is murdering a human being.I'm agnostic with no clemmies.
You have no sense in reality. There being a healthy pregnancy with rape, domestic violence, poverty, fired by the job, incest, divorce or minor girls.When a traditional male and female have intercourse (not the new females with a beard and cock), a baby can result if no numerous contraceptives were used. So unless it's ectopic or down syndrome, there's no need to terminate a healthy pregnancy, unless you want to murder a human being.
Murder is defined as the unlawful killing of a human being. The five members of the Supreme Court (SC) has made it clear; R v. W was repealed, and abortion is a murder in the 1st degree.{nfbw #905 to ncvmn #902 } In a secular world human life is ascribed value the moment one of our species is born or takes a first birth, but you say a woman who terminates her own pregnancy before birth is murdering a human being.
{ captaincvmn #902 } “When a traditional male and female have intercourse (not the new females with a beard and cock), a baby can result if no numerous contraceptives were used. So unless it's ectopic or down syndrome, there's no need to terminate a healthy pregnancy, unless you want to murder a human being.”
Are you citing any precedent in common or established law where an abortion is murder in the USA?
If not why are you stoning women that have done nothing to you when they get an abortion?
And you have no sense of reality, nature rewards those with a baby too. Nature is not bothered what label you place on the intercourse.You have no sense in reality. There being a healthy pregnancy with rape, domestic violence, poverty, fired by the job, incest, divorce or minor girls.
Are you a woman? Are you a virgin? Are you a misogynist? How old are you?And you have no sense of reality, nature rewards those with a baby too. Nature is not bothered what label you place on the intercourse.
The fuck you doAre you a woman? Are you a virgin? Are you a misogynist? How old are you?
I have a clear sense of reality.
So people with Downs syndrome aren't people and you think you can just kill them.When a traditional male and female have intercourse (not the new females with a beard and cock), a baby can result if no numerous contraceptives were used. So unless it's ectopic or down syndrome, there's no need to terminate a healthy pregnancy, unless you want to murder a human being.
How is that a “reward”?And you have no sense of reality, nature rewards those with a baby too. Nature is not bothered what label you place on the intercourse.
Something you receive for your deed. What nature can present you with, reward you with for having unprotected intercourse.How is that a “reward”?
I’m trying figure out why an 11 yr old girl or a rape victim should be be “rewarded”.Something you receive for your deed. What nature can present you with, reward you with for having unprotected intercourse.
If you don't want it, don't do it.
TLDR all the responses up to this point.I am pro-life, my view is that unless human rights mean something divergent to "human rights," the unborn should have them. As a consequence, I believe nearly all abortion should be banned (the typical 99% or more or cases). There are potential exceptions which I remain agnostic on but these do not make up the paradigm of incidents. Otherwise, I have never heard a good argument for legal abortion and I will openly argue that it ought to be banned.
That girl falls into a statistic bracket of less than 1%, yet pro-abortionists use that tiny statistic 100% of the time in abortion debates.I’m trying figure out why an 11 yr old girl or a rape victim should be be “rewarded”.
There are without cause abortion and with cause abortion and without cause abortion are not sought when with cause abortion are valid .When a traditional male and female have intercourse (not the new females with a beard and cock), a baby can result if no numerous contraceptives were used. So unless it's ectopic or down syndrome, there's no need to terminate a healthy pregnancy, unless you want to murder a human being.
According to nature or theism , was it a miracle that the plane went down , or that 3 children survived ?That girl falls into a statistic bracket of less than 1%, yet pro-abortionists use that tiny statistic 100% of the time in abortion debates.
It's pretty obvious that nature does not take age or circumstance into account when a sperm meets an egg. Can't believe I had to point that out.
The dumbfounded dobbs decision is sedition against us 14th , 9th and 1st amendments , that is supported by traitors to us republic .What you are suggesting is an impingement upon state's rights. The individual States/Church have the right to outlaw or restrict abortion as they see fit. It's described and outlined in the constitution in this manner as the SCOTUS has established.