The Balls to Impeach

Democratic Leadership Can't Find its Backbone on Impeachment

For those unwilling to read the essay, what Goldberg is saying is that Impeachment is NOT a CRIMINAL Process! It is a political process. "High crimes and misdemeanors" can be anything from corruption to failing to respect the oath of office; it means whatever the House of Representative wants it to mean! And it does not require that a crime be committed under the United States Code, or that there be "proof beyond a reasonable doubt," but only sufficient proof to satisfy the members of the House of Representatives that some infamous malfeasance has occurred.

So there is NO QUESTION that "impeachable" offenses have been committed by this President, even assuming that none of them rises to the level of indictable crimes with overwhelming proof of guilt.

But the Democrats controlling the House know that the American People will not tolerate removal of their duly-elected President for simply being an out-of-control jerk. They ELECTED a jerk, with a cornucopia of known faults.

And the Democrat leadership has abdicated its obligations by PRETENDING that it is a LEGAL matter, and hiding behind lawyers who quote the law and bewail the burden of proof, neither of which are particularly relevant to the matter of impeachment.

In fact, they would rather THREATEN to impeach, and hold that threat over the President's head for the next two years, than to actually go through with a process that would make them look ridiculous, and would ultimately fail.

And there you have it. No balls at all.


Your OP infers those that elected Trump are OK with a sitting POTUS making numerous attempts to obstruct a DOJ investigation.

The fact that those that elected Trump are OK with a sitting POTUS obstructing the process of justice is no surprise to me but it is disappointing to know that tens of millions of AmeriKKKans are willing to 'look the other way' when it comes to having a person so void of any moral compass residing in The White House.

That says just as much about those tens of millions of Trump voters as it does about Trump. It says that those tens of millions of Trump voters are just as void of any moral compass as Trump is.
 
Last edited:
Democratic Leadership Can't Find its Backbone on Impeachment

For those unwilling to read the essay, what Goldberg is saying is that Impeachment is NOT a CRIMINAL Process! It is a political process. "High crimes and misdemeanors" can be anything from corruption to failing to respect the oath of office; it means whatever the House of Representative wants it to mean! And it does not require that a crime be committed under the United States Code, or that there be "proof beyond a reasonable doubt," but only sufficient proof to satisfy the members of the House of Representatives that some infamous malfeasance has occurred.

So there is NO QUESTION that "impeachable" offenses have been committed by this President, even assuming that none of them rises to the level of indictable crimes with overwhelming proof of guilt.

But the Democrats controlling the House know that the American People will not tolerate removal of their duly-elected President for simply being an out-of-control jerk. They ELECTED a jerk, with a cornucopia of known faults.

And the Democrat leadership has abdicated its obligations by PRETENDING that it is a LEGAL matter, and hiding behind lawyers who quote the law and bewail the burden of proof, neither of which are particularly relevant to the matter of impeachment.

In fact, they would rather THREATEN to impeach, and hold that threat over the President's head for the next two years, than to actually go through with a process that would make them look ridiculous, and would ultimately fail.

And there you have it. No balls at all.


Your OP infers those that elected Trump are OK with a sitting POTUS making numerous attempts to obstruct a DOJ investigation.

The fact that those that elected Trump are OK with a sitting POTUS obstructing the process of justice is no surprise to me but it is disappointing to know that tens of millions of AmeriKKKans are willing to 'look the other way' when it comes to having a person so void of any moral compass residing in The White House.
He did not obstruct the Mueller investigation. It was carried out with unlimited resources, cost us 30 million dollars and he was absolved of collusion with Russia! Justice my ass! You aren’t looking for justice you are looking for revenge because he won the Presidencey. You have a massive case of butthurt!
 
Democratic Leadership Can't Find its Backbone on Impeachment

For those unwilling to read the essay, what Goldberg is saying is that Impeachment is NOT a CRIMINAL Process! It is a political process. "High crimes and misdemeanors" can be anything from corruption to failing to respect the oath of office; it means whatever the House of Representative wants it to mean! And it does not require that a crime be committed under the United States Code, or that there be "proof beyond a reasonable doubt," but only sufficient proof to satisfy the members of the House of Representatives that some infamous malfeasance has occurred.

So there is NO QUESTION that "impeachable" offenses have been committed by this President, even assuming that none of them rises to the level of indictable crimes with overwhelming proof of guilt.

But the Democrats controlling the House know that the American People will not tolerate removal of their duly-elected President for simply being an out-of-control jerk. They ELECTED a jerk, with a cornucopia of known faults.

And the Democrat leadership has abdicated its obligations by PRETENDING that it is a LEGAL matter, and hiding behind lawyers who quote the law and bewail the burden of proof, neither of which are particularly relevant to the matter of impeachment.

In fact, they would rather THREATEN to impeach, and hold that threat over the President's head for the next two years, than to actually go through with a process that would make them look ridiculous, and would ultimately fail.

And there you have it. No balls at all.


Your OP infers those that elected Trump are OK with a sitting POTUS making numerous attempts to obstruct a DOJ investigation.

The fact that those that elected Trump are OK with a sitting POTUS obstructing the process of justice is no surprise to me but it is disappointing to know that tens of millions of AmeriKKKans are willing to 'look the other way' when it comes to having a person so void of any moral compass residing in The White House.
He did not obstruct the Mueller investigation. It was carried out with unlimited resources, cost us 30 million dollars and he was absolved of collusion with Russia! Justice my ass! You aren’t looking for justice you are looking for revenge because he won the Presidencey. You have a massive case of butthurt!

You are obviously ill informed, or just plain stupid: Trump made numerous attempts to obstruct the SC investigation.
Trump's attempts to derail the SC investigation are laid out in the report.
 
Your OP infers those that elected Trump are OK with a sitting POTUS making numerous attempts to obstruct a DOJ investigation.
Expressing your disfavor with a politicized
witch hunt is NOT obstruction! Grow up, snowflake. Wipe the tears from your chubby, rosy cheeks.
The Mueller investigation went about their unobstructed way and produced a finding of no collusion.

The fact that those that elected Trump are OK with a sitting POTUS obstructing the process of justice is no surprise to me but it is disappointing to know that tens of millions of AmeriKKKans are willing to 'look the other way' when it comes to having a person so void of any moral compass residing in The White House.
There was no "process of justice" but there was an attempted coup to remove a sitting president through a false contrived claim of collusion between Putin and Trump. Herr Mueller found none at all!

Try and step outside of your Bizarro bubble to see how absurd your claims all are, if you can.
 
Democrats/leftists are truly brain dead stupid because Special Counsel Robert Mueller NEVER produced Prosecution charges against Trump. Since he sent the completed report to AG Barr without a single prosecution charge posted against Trump, the case is closed.

Here is the LAW that Mueller was supposed to follow:

28 CFR § 600.8 - Notification and reports by the Special Counsel.

"(c)Closing documentation. At the conclusion of the Special Counsel's work, he or she shall provide the Attorney General with a confidential report explaining the prosecution or declination decisions reached by the Special Counsel. "

bolding mine

As you can see it is either PROSECUTION or DECLINATION, that is it. Since NO Prosecution decisions were made against Trump, there is nothing left.

Get over it!
 
upload_2019-4-25_10-16-44.jpeg
 
Your OP infers those that elected Trump are OK with a sitting POTUS making numerous attempts to obstruct a DOJ investigation.
Expressing your disfavor with a politicized
witch hunt is NOT obstruction!
Grow up, snowflake. Wipe the tears from your chubby, rosy cheeks.
The Mueller investigation went about their unobstructed way and produced a finding of no collusion.

The fact that those that elected Trump are OK with a sitting POTUS obstructing the process of justice is no surprise to me but it is disappointing to know that tens of millions of AmeriKKKans are willing to 'look the other way' when it comes to having a person so void of any moral compass residing in The White House.
There was no "process of justice" but there was an attempted coup to remove a sitting president through a false contrived claim of collusion between Putin and Trump. Herr Mueller found none at all!

Try and step outside of your Bizarro bubble to see how absurd your claims all are, if you can.


Well, Trump did certainly express his displeasure & disfavor with Mueller's investigation as Trump whined about the SC investigation daily for nearly two years. Too bad Trump didn't act like an adult during those nearly two years, allow the investigation to proceed, without constantly attacking Mueller, Sessions, Rosenstien, and basically anyone associated with the investigation.

According to Mueller's report, Trump on at least ten occasions made attempts to obstruct the investigation. You seem to have an issue with those facts. Not my problem.
 
Now isn't the time to impeach.
When do you think would be the best time to impeach 45?

He is going to have to be beaten at the ballot box, any candidate has more than enough ammo to do it.
Ha ha! The bad ass whore from California who promises to take your guns? Spartacus? Crarzy Beries with his free everything? Ya!

Well the pussy grabber has got to go.
 
Now isn't the time to impeach.
When do you think would be the best time to impeach 45?

He is going to have to be beaten at the ballot box, any candidate has more than enough ammo to do it.
Ha ha! The bad ass whore from California who promises to take your guns? Spartacus? Crarzy Beries with his free everything? Ya!

Well the pussy grabber has got to go.
Go for it!
 
Now isn't the time to impeach.
When do you think would be the best time to impeach 45?

He is going to have to be beaten at the ballot box, any candidate has more than enough ammo to do it.

Ammo?? All their ammo is blanks and Trump will win in 2020.

Enjoy I sure as hell will.

I am pretty sure you will, amazing how the deficit doesn't matter anymore since Trump is running it up.
 
Your OP infers those that elected Trump are OK with a sitting POTUS making numerous attempts to obstruct a DOJ investigation.
Expressing your disfavor with a politicized
witch hunt is NOT obstruction!
Grow up, snowflake. Wipe the tears from your chubby, rosy cheeks.
The Mueller investigation went about their unobstructed way and produced a finding of no collusion.

The fact that those that elected Trump are OK with a sitting POTUS obstructing the process of justice is no surprise to me but it is disappointing to know that tens of millions of AmeriKKKans are willing to 'look the other way' when it comes to having a person so void of any moral compass residing in The White House.
There was no "process of justice" but there was an attempted coup to remove a sitting president through a false contrived claim of collusion between Putin and Trump. Herr Mueller found none at all!

Try and step outside of your Bizarro bubble to see how absurd your claims all are, if you can.


Well, Trump did certainly express his displeasure & disfavor with Mueller's investigation as Trump whined about the SC investigation daily for nearly two years. Too bad Trump didn't act like an adult during those nearly two years, allow the investigation to proceed, without constantly attacking Mueller, Sessions, Rosenstien, and basically anyone associated with the investigation.

According to Mueller's report, Trump on at least ten occasions made attempts to obstruct the investigation. You seem to have an issue with those facts. Not my problem.
Then why didn’t Mueller have the balls to charge him with obstruction?
 
Your OP infers those that elected Trump are OK with a sitting POTUS making numerous attempts to obstruct a DOJ investigation.
Expressing your disfavor with a politicized
witch hunt is NOT obstruction!
Grow up, snowflake. Wipe the tears from your chubby, rosy cheeks.
The Mueller investigation went about their unobstructed way and produced a finding of no collusion.

The fact that those that elected Trump are OK with a sitting POTUS obstructing the process of justice is no surprise to me but it is disappointing to know that tens of millions of AmeriKKKans are willing to 'look the other way' when it comes to having a person so void of any moral compass residing in The White House.
There was no "process of justice" but there was an attempted coup to remove a sitting president through a false contrived claim of collusion between Putin and Trump. Herr Mueller found none at all!

Try and step outside of your Bizarro bubble to see how absurd your claims all are, if you can.


Well, Trump did certainly express his displeasure & disfavor with Mueller's investigation as Trump whined about the SC investigation daily for nearly two years. Too bad Trump didn't act like an adult during those nearly two years, allow the investigation to proceed, without constantly attacking Mueller, Sessions, Rosenstien, and basically anyone associated with the investigation.

According to Mueller's report, Trump on at least ten occasions made attempts to obstruct the investigation. You seem to have an issue with those facts. Not my problem.
Then why didn’t Mueller have the balls to charge him with obstruction?

If you would have read the report you would have seen where Mueller was in agreement with the current DOJ guidelines that indicting a sitting POTUS is not current DOJ SOP.

Also, if you would have read the report you would have noticed that Mueller handed the 'obstruction' concerns to The US Congress, which is their function to act as a check on abuse of powers.
 
Last edited:
Well, Trump did certainly express his displeasure & disfavor with Mueller's investigation as Trump whined about the SC investigation daily for nearly two years. Too bad Trump didn't act like an adult during those nearly two years, allow the investigation to proceed, without constantly attacking Mueller, Sessions, Rosenstien, and basically anyone associated with the investigation.

According to Mueller's report, Trump on at least ten occasions made attempts to obstruct the investigation. You seem to have an issue with those facts. Not my problem.
And how did these "attempts to obstruct the investigation" manifest themselves? That would be helpful to outline
because as it is you are just alleging something that cannot be supported by facts.
 
Well, Trump did certainly express his displeasure & disfavor with Mueller's investigation as Trump whined about the SC investigation daily for nearly two years. Too bad Trump didn't act like an adult during those nearly two years, allow the investigation to proceed, without constantly attacking Mueller, Sessions, Rosenstien, and basically anyone associated with the investigation.

According to Mueller's report, Trump on at least ten occasions made attempts to obstruct the investigation. You seem to have an issue with those facts. Not my problem.
And how did these "attempts to obstruct the investigation" manifest themselves? That would be helpful to outline
because as it is you are just alleging something that cannot be supported by facts.


The numerous documented attempts by Trump to obstruct Mueller's investigation are laid out in the SC report.

You could try reading the report.

I'm not doing your home work for you.
 
Impeach over what? Anger and frustration over an election that happened over two years ago aren't good enough reasons.
 
Democratic Leadership Can't Find its Backbone on Impeachment

For those unwilling to read the essay, what Goldberg is saying is that Impeachment is NOT a CRIMINAL Process! It is a political process. "High crimes and misdemeanors" can be anything from corruption to failing to respect the oath of office; it means whatever the House of Representative wants it to mean! And it does not require that a crime be committed under the United States Code, or that there be "proof beyond a reasonable doubt," but only sufficient proof to satisfy the members of the House of Representatives that some infamous malfeasance has occurred.

So there is NO QUESTION that "impeachable" offenses have been committed by this President, even assuming that none of them rises to the level of indictable crimes with overwhelming proof of guilt.

But the Democrats controlling the House know that the American People will not tolerate removal of their duly-elected President for simply being an out-of-control jerk. They ELECTED a jerk, with a cornucopia of known faults.

And the Democrat leadership has abdicated its obligations by PRETENDING that it is a LEGAL matter, and hiding behind lawyers who quote the law and bewail the burden of proof, neither of which are particularly relevant to the matter of impeachment.

In fact, they would rather THREATEN to impeach, and hold that threat over the President's head for the next two years, than to actually go through with a process that would make them look ridiculous, and would ultimately fail.

And there you have it. No balls at all.


Your OP infers those that elected Trump are OK with a sitting POTUS making numerous attempts to obstruct a DOJ investigation.

The fact that those that elected Trump are OK with a sitting POTUS obstructing the process of justice is no surprise to me but it is disappointing to know that tens of millions of AmeriKKKans are willing to 'look the other way' when it comes to having a person so void of any moral compass residing in The White House.

LMAO We already had that. Clinton was his name.

You know. One of yours.

Oh and just how did Trump obstruct justice for a crime that wasn't committed?? Oh that's according the Mueller report.

You know the report you were just oh so sure would hang Trump but instead found no collusion between he and Russia??
 
Now isn't the time to impeach.
When do you think would be the best time to impeach 45?

He is going to have to be beaten at the ballot box, any candidate has more than enough ammo to do it.
Ha ha! The bad ass whore from California who promises to take your guns? Spartacus? Crarzy Beries with his free everything? Ya!

Well the pussy grabber has got to go.

Funny you had no problem with BJ Clinton yet you sure have a problem with Trump.

And you have proof he grabbed someone pussy??

Didn't think so.

Another bat shit crazy lefty.
 
The jerk-off DEMs seem to have forgot the FACT that the REP controlled Senate would decide what happens.
The fucking stupid DEMs are playing with a set of rubber mechanic's tools 'pretending' they can actually accomplish anything. Truly fucking hilarious and pathetic to watch!
 
Democratic Leadership Can't Find its Backbone on Impeachment

For those unwilling to read the essay, what Goldberg is saying is that Impeachment is NOT a CRIMINAL Process! It is a political process. "High crimes and misdemeanors" can be anything from corruption to failing to respect the oath of office; it means whatever the House of Representative wants it to mean! And it does not require that a crime be committed under the United States Code, or that there be "proof beyond a reasonable doubt," but only sufficient proof to satisfy the members of the House of Representatives that some infamous malfeasance has occurred.

So there is NO QUESTION that "impeachable" offenses have been committed by this President, even assuming that none of them rises to the level of indictable crimes with overwhelming proof of guilt.

But the Democrats controlling the House know that the American People will not tolerate removal of their duly-elected President for simply being an out-of-control jerk. They ELECTED a jerk, with a cornucopia of known faults.

And the Democrat leadership has abdicated its obligations by PRETENDING that it is a LEGAL matter, and hiding behind lawyers who quote the law and bewail the burden of proof, neither of which are particularly relevant to the matter of impeachment.

In fact, they would rather THREATEN to impeach, and hold that threat over the President's head for the next two years, than to actually go through with a process that would make them look ridiculous, and would ultimately fail.

And there you have it. No balls at all.


Your OP infers those that elected Trump are OK with a sitting POTUS making numerous attempts to obstruct a DOJ investigation.

The fact that those that elected Trump are OK with a sitting POTUS obstructing the process of justice is no surprise to me but it is disappointing to know that tens of millions of AmeriKKKans are willing to 'look the other way' when it comes to having a person so void of any moral compass residing in The White House.

LMAO We already had that. Clinton was his name.

You know. One of yours.

Oh and just how did Trump obstruct justice for a crime that wasn't committed?? Oh that's according the Mueller report.

You know the report you were just oh so sure would hang Trump but instead found no collusion between he and Russia??


You seem to be confused: The obstruction concept is based on attempts to obstruct the investigation itself.

The investigation was to determine what lengths the Russian government went to in meddling in the 2016 election, and also to determine if there was any conspiracy between Russian entities & anyone connected with the Trump campaign.

You should already have a grasp on these extremely basic concepts. If you don't know what you are talking about then maybe you might not want to make yourself look so stupid.
 

Forum List

Back
Top