The Balls to Impeach

[RealDave]

At this rate, they're going to get the shit kicked out of them in 2020.

So says the White Supremacist.

 

[Claudette]

Now isn't the time to impeach.

When do you think would be the best time to impeach 45?

He is going to have to be beaten at the ballot box, any candidate has more than enough ammo to do it.

Ammo?? All their ammo is blanks and Trump will win in 2020.

Enjoy I sure as hell will.

I am pretty sure you will, amazing how the deficit doesn't matter anymore since Trump is running it up.

Every President has run up the deficit. Nothing will ever change that.

The last President who balanced the US budget was Andrew Jackson back in the 1840's.

No President will ever balance the US budget and if you think they will your not to bright.

 

[Claudette]

Democratic Leadership Can't Find its Backbone on Impeachment

For those unwilling to read the essay, what Goldberg is saying is that Impeachment is NOT a CRIMINAL Process! It is a political process. "High crimes and misdemeanors" can be anything from corruption to failing to respect the oath of office; it means whatever the House of Representative wants it to mean! And it does not require that a crime be committed under the United States Code, or that there be "proof beyond a reasonable doubt," but only sufficient proof to satisfy the members of the House of Representatives that some infamous malfeasance has occurred.

So there is NO QUESTION that "impeachable" offenses have been committed by this President, even assuming that none of them rises to the level of indictable crimes with overwhelming proof of guilt.

But the Democrats controlling the House know that the American People will not tolerate removal of their duly-elected President for simply being an out-of-control jerk. They ELECTED a jerk, with a cornucopia of known faults.

And the Democrat leadership has abdicated its obligations by PRETENDING that it is a LEGAL matter, and hiding behind lawyers who quote the law and bewail the burden of proof, neither of which are particularly relevant to the matter of impeachment.

In fact, they would rather THREATEN to impeach, and hold that threat over the President's head for the next two years, than to actually go through with a process that would make them look ridiculous, and would ultimately fail.

And there you have it. No balls at all.

Your OP infers those that elected Trump are OK with a sitting POTUS making numerous attempts to obstruct a DOJ investigation.

The fact that those that elected Trump are OK with a sitting POTUS obstructing the process of justice is no surprise to me but it is disappointing to know that tens of millions of AmeriKKKans are willing to 'look the other way' when it comes to having a person so void of any moral compass residing in The White House.

LMAO We already had that. Clinton was his name.

You know. One of yours.

Oh and just how did Trump obstruct justice for a crime that wasn't committed?? Oh that's according the Mueller report.

You know the report you were just oh so sure would hang Trump but instead found no collusion between he and Russia??

You seem to be confused: The obstruction concept is based on attempts to obstruct the investigation itself.

The investigation was to determine what lengths the Russian government went to in meddling in the 2016 election, and also to determine if there was any conspiracy between Russian entities & anyone connected with the Trump campaign.

You should already have a grasp on these extremely basic concepts. If you don't know what you are talking about then maybe you might not want to make yourself look so stupid.

LMAO How do you obstruct something that didn't happen??

You sure are stupid.

 

[RealDave]

The jerk-off DEMs seem to have forgot the FACT that the REP controlled Senate would decide what happens.
The fucking stupid DEMs are playing with a set of rubber mechanic's tools 'pretending' they can actually accomplish anything. Truly fucking hilarious and pathetic to watch!

They can impeach the POS & then force the Republicans to protect him.

 

[Claudette]

The jerk-off DEMs seem to have forgot the FACT that the REP controlled Senate would decide what happens.
The fucking stupid DEMs are playing with a set of rubber mechanic's tools 'pretending' they can actually accomplish anything. Truly fucking hilarious and pathetic to watch!

They can impeach the POS & then force the Republicans to protect him.

Nah. It would never make it through the Senate.

Oh and no one needs to protect him. He's pretty good at protecting himself you POS.

 

[caddo kid]

Democratic Leadership Can't Find its Backbone on Impeachment

For those unwilling to read the essay, what Goldberg is saying is that Impeachment is NOT a CRIMINAL Process! It is a political process. "High crimes and misdemeanors" can be anything from corruption to failing to respect the oath of office; it means whatever the House of Representative wants it to mean! And it does not require that a crime be committed under the United States Code, or that there be "proof beyond a reasonable doubt," but only sufficient proof to satisfy the members of the House of Representatives that some infamous malfeasance has occurred.

So there is NO QUESTION that "impeachable" offenses have been committed by this President, even assuming that none of them rises to the level of indictable crimes with overwhelming proof of guilt.

But the Democrats controlling the House know that the American People will not tolerate removal of their duly-elected President for simply being an out-of-control jerk. They ELECTED a jerk, with a cornucopia of known faults.

And the Democrat leadership has abdicated its obligations by PRETENDING that it is a LEGAL matter, and hiding behind lawyers who quote the law and bewail the burden of proof, neither of which are particularly relevant to the matter of impeachment.

In fact, they would rather THREATEN to impeach, and hold that threat over the President's head for the next two years, than to actually go through with a process that would make them look ridiculous, and would ultimately fail.

And there you have it. No balls at all.

Your OP infers those that elected Trump are OK with a sitting POTUS making numerous attempts to obstruct a DOJ investigation.

The fact that those that elected Trump are OK with a sitting POTUS obstructing the process of justice is no surprise to me but it is disappointing to know that tens of millions of AmeriKKKans are willing to 'look the other way' when it comes to having a person so void of any moral compass residing in The White House.

LMAO We already had that. Clinton was his name.

You know. One of yours.

Oh and just how did Trump obstruct justice for a crime that wasn't committed?? Oh that's according the Mueller report.

You know the report you were just oh so sure would hang Trump but instead found no collusion between he and Russia??

You seem to be confused: The obstruction concept is based on attempts to obstruct the investigation itself.

The investigation was to determine what lengths the Russian government went to in meddling in the 2016 election, and also to determine if there was any conspiracy between Russian entities & anyone connected with the Trump campaign.

You should already have a grasp on these extremely basic concepts. If you don't know what you are talking about then maybe you might not want to make yourself look so stupid.

LMAO How do you obstruct something that didn't happen??

You sure are stupid.

I already laid it out for you as simple as it gets but here.

You seem to be confused:
The obstruction concept is based on attempts to obstruct the investigation itself.

The investigation was to determine what lengths the Russian government went to in meddling in the 2016 election, and also to determine if there was any conspiracy between Russian entities & anyone connected with the Trump campaign.

You should already have a grasp on these extremely basic concepts. If you don't know what you are talking about then maybe you might not want to make yourself look so stupid.

 

[RealDave]

Now isn't the time to impeach.

When do you think would be the best time to impeach 45?

He is going to have to be beaten at the ballot box, any candidate has more than enough ammo to do it.

Ammo?? All their ammo is blanks and Trump will win in 2020.

Enjoy I sure as hell will.

I am pretty sure you will, amazing how the deficit doesn't matter anymore since Trump is running it up.

Every President has run up the deficit. Nothing will ever change that.

The last President who balanced the US budget was Andrew Jackson back in the 1840's.

No President will ever balance the US budget and if you think they will your not to bright.

Clinton balanced the budget.

Obama lowered the deficit.

Trump has ballooned the deficit.

You make excuses.

 

[RealDave]

The jerk-off DEMs seem to have forgot the FACT that the REP controlled Senate would decide what happens.
The fucking stupid DEMs are playing with a set of rubber mechanic's tools 'pretending' they can actually accomplish anything. Truly fucking hilarious and pathetic to watch!

They can impeach the POS & then force the Republicans to protect him.

Nah. It would never make it through the Senate.

Oh and no one needs to protect him. He's pretty good at protecting himself you POS.

I love it how you defend a man that has trashed the Constitution, Trashed our veterans, Stole children from their parents, groped women, cheated your country out of millions in tax dollars, demeaned women, is a bigot & racist.

How fucking stupid are you?

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

The numerous documented attempts by Trump to obstruct Mueller's investigation are laid out in the SC report.

You could try reading the report.

I'm not doing your home work for you.

No. Of course not.
You just want to make bullshit claims with no one challenging the lies. I don't doubt Mueller alleged obstruction.
I'm equally sure his allegations amount to nothing more substantial than the cheese dust left at the bottom of a bag of used Doritos.

 

[RealDave]

Democratic Leadership Can't Find its Backbone on Impeachment

For those unwilling to read the essay, what Goldberg is saying is that Impeachment is NOT a CRIMINAL Process! It is a political process. "High crimes and misdemeanors" can be anything from corruption to failing to respect the oath of office; it means whatever the House of Representative wants it to mean! And it does not require that a crime be committed under the United States Code, or that there be "proof beyond a reasonable doubt," but only sufficient proof to satisfy the members of the House of Representatives that some infamous malfeasance has occurred.

So there is NO QUESTION that "impeachable" offenses have been committed by this President, even assuming that none of them rises to the level of indictable crimes with overwhelming proof of guilt.

But the Democrats controlling the House know that the American People will not tolerate removal of their duly-elected President for simply being an out-of-control jerk. They ELECTED a jerk, with a cornucopia of known faults.

And the Democrat leadership has abdicated its obligations by PRETENDING that it is a LEGAL matter, and hiding behind lawyers who quote the law and bewail the burden of proof, neither of which are particularly relevant to the matter of impeachment.

In fact, they would rather THREATEN to impeach, and hold that threat over the President's head for the next two years, than to actually go through with a process that would make them look ridiculous, and would ultimately fail.

And there you have it. No balls at all.

Your OP infers those that elected Trump are OK with a sitting POTUS making numerous attempts to obstruct a DOJ investigation.

The fact that those that elected Trump are OK with a sitting POTUS obstructing the process of justice is no surprise to me but it is disappointing to know that tens of millions of AmeriKKKans are willing to 'look the other way' when it comes to having a person so void of any moral compass residing in The White House.

LMAO We already had that. Clinton was his name.

You know. One of yours.

Oh and just how did Trump obstruct justice for a crime that wasn't committed?? Oh that's according the Mueller report.

You know the report you were just oh so sure would hang Trump but instead found no collusion between he and Russia??

You seem to be confused: The obstruction concept is based on attempts to obstruct the investigation itself.

The investigation was to determine what lengths the Russian government went to in meddling in the 2016 election, and also to determine if there was any conspiracy between Russian entities & anyone connected with the Trump campaign.

You should already have a grasp on these extremely basic concepts. If you don't know what you are talking about then maybe you might not want to make yourself look so stupid.

LMAO How do you obstruct something that didn't happen??

You sure are stupid.

We had an investigation & your fat assed POS buddy obstructed it.,

How fucking stupid are you?

 

[RealDave]

The numerous documented attempts by Trump to obstruct Mueller's investigation are laid out in the SC report.

You could try reading the report.

I'm not doing your home work for you.

No. Of course not.
You just want to make bullshit claims with no one challenging the lies. I don't doubt Mueller alleged obstruction.
I'm equally sure his allegations amount to nothing more substantial than the cheese dust left at the bottom of a bag of used Doritos.

The obstruction is real. You are a moron for just blowing it off.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

You seem to be confused: The obstruction concept is based on attempts to obstruct the investigation itself.

Such as, smart guy. Such as.

 

[caddo kid]

You seem to be confused: The obstruction concept is based on attempts to obstruct the investigation itself.

Such as, smart guy. Such as.

here's a bone: Don McGahn

Obviously you
(1) have not read the Mueller report
(2) have not paid any attention whatsoever to ANY news reporting concerning the Mueller report
(3) are very lazy & speak about events you have no knowledge of

 

[Claudette]

You seem to be confused: The obstruction concept is based on attempts to obstruct the investigation itself.

Such as, smart guy. Such as.

That's just it. They scream obstruction, obstruction but can't tell you just what was obstructed.

Mueller's report cleared Trump and you can't obstruct something that never happened.

You and I get it but the dense lefty loons are still howling at the moon.

They sure are a whiny bunch of shits.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

The obstruction is real. You are a moron for just blowing it off.

Who obstructed Robert Mueller and his investigation? Who stopped it? Who failed to fund it? Who made him wrap things up prematurely and against his will? Who prevented him from making his report?
So ironic "ass fuck" Dave is calling someone else a moron.

 

[Claudette]

The obstruction is real. You are a moron for just blowing it off.

Who obstructed Robert Mueller and his investigation? Who stopped it? Who failed to fund it? Who made him wrap things up prematurely and against his will? Who prevented him from making his report?
So ironic "ass fuck" Dave is calling someone else a moron.

Moron is as moron does. LOL

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

here's a bone: Don McGahn

Obviously you
(1) have not read the Mueller report
(2) have not paid any attention whatsoever to ANY news reporting concerning the Mueller report
(3) are very lazy & speak about events you have no knowledge of

LOL...you clowns have a new talking point but your case for obstruction is still missing the one essential element you need most ...the obstruction itself.
Good luck with your idiocy.

 

[caddo kid]

You seem to be confused: The obstruction concept is based on attempts to obstruct the investigation itself.

Such as, smart guy. Such as.

That's just it. They scream obstruction, obstruction but can't tell you just what was obstructed.

Mueller's report cleared Trump and you can't obstruct something that never happened.

You and I get it but the dense lefty loons are still howling at the moon.

They sure are a whiny bunch of shits.

Then why is Trump fighting the Congressional subpoena for Don McGahn?

Please, do tell.

 

[Claudette]

You seem to be confused: The obstruction concept is based on attempts to obstruct the investigation itself.

Such as, smart guy. Such as.

That's just it. They scream obstruction, obstruction but can't tell you just what was obstructed.

Mueller's report cleared Trump and you can't obstruct something that never happened.

You and I get it but the dense lefty loons are still howling at the moon.

They sure are a whiny bunch of shits.

Then why is Trump fighting the Congressional subpoena for Don McGahn?

Please, do tell.

Go ask him. I'm sure he'll give you the scoop.

Please do tell.

 

[Darkwind]

Your OP infers those that elected Trump are OK with a sitting POTUS making numerous attempts to obstruct a DOJ investigation.

Expressing your disfavor with a politicized
witch hunt is NOT obstruction! Grow up, snowflake. Wipe the tears from your chubby, rosy cheeks.
The Mueller investigation went about their unobstructed way and produced a finding of no collusion.

The fact that those that elected Trump are OK with a sitting POTUS obstructing the process of justice is no surprise to me but it is disappointing to know that tens of millions of AmeriKKKans are willing to 'look the other way' when it comes to having a person so void of any moral compass residing in The White House.

There was no "process of justice" but there was an attempted coup to remove a sitting president through a false contrived claim of collusion between Putin and Trump. Herr Mueller found none at all!

Try and step outside of your Bizarro bubble to see how absurd your claims all are, if you can.

Well, Trump did certainly express his displeasure & disfavor with Mueller's investigation as Trump whined about the SC investigation daily for nearly two years. Too bad Trump didn't act like an adult during those nearly two years, allow the investigation to proceed, without constantly attacking Mueller, Sessions, Rosenstien, and basically anyone associated with the investigation.

According to Mueller's report, Trump on at least ten occasions made attempts to obstruct the investigation. You seem to have an issue with those facts. Not my problem.

He said no such thing.