The Notorious “catch and kill" campaign: Turning the National Enquirer into an arm of Trump's 2016 presidential campaign

Procrustes Stretched

And you say, "Oh my God, am I here all alone?"
Dec 1, 2008
60,405
7,543
1,840
Positively 4th Street
What I Saw Working at The National Enquirer During Donald Trump’s Rise - By Lachlan Cartwright

Inside the notorious “catch and kill” campaign that now stands at the heart of the former president’s legal trial.

I pulled up the indictment and the statement of facts on my iPhone. At the center of the case is the accusation that Trump took part in a scheme to turn The National Enquirer and its sister publications into an arm of his 2016 presidential campaign. The documents detailed three “hush money” payments made to a series of individuals to guarantee their silence about potentially damaging stories in the months before the election. Because this was done with the goal of helping his election chances, the case implied, these payments amounted to a form of illegal, undisclosed campaign spending. And, Bragg argued, because Trump created paperwork to make the payments seem like regular legal expenses, that amounted to a criminal effort at a coverup. Trump has denied the charges against him.


The documents rattled off a number of seedy stories that would have been right at home in a venerable supermarket tabloid, had they actually been published. The subjects were anonymized but recognizable to anyone who had followed the story of Trump’s entanglement with The Enquirer. His affair with the porn star Stormy Daniels, of course, was the heart of it. There was also Karen McDougal, the Playboy Playmate of the Year in 1998, whose affair with Trump was similarly made to disappear, the payments for the rights to her story made to look like fees for writing a fitness column and appearing on magazine covers. (Trump has denied involvement with both women.) There were others that were lesser known, too, like Dino Sajudin, a former Trump World Tower doorman who claimed that Trump had a love child with one of the building’s employees; the story was never published, and Sajudin was paid $30,000 to keep quiet about it
.


To me this is unbelievable. Before Mr. Trump's official entry into presidential politics - he becoming a politician - this kind of story that surfaced years ago, would've killed the career of an aspiring politician. But with Mr. Trump's troll-like campaign (proof/not opinion is his personal/family insults and attacks on a debate stage, breaking of norms, rules...unheard of before 2015), the bizarre became acceptable to small but then growing a segment of the population.

TRE45ON Trump Tiny Fingers Hands.jpg


This is a story that needs telling.
 
What I Saw Working at The National Enquirer During Donald Trump’s Rise - By Lachlan Cartwright

Inside the notorious “catch and kill” campaign that now stands at the heart of the former president’s legal trial.

I pulled up the indictment and the statement of facts on my iPhone. At the center of the case is the accusation that Trump took part in a scheme to turn The National Enquirer and its sister publications into an arm of his 2016 presidential campaign. The documents detailed three “hush money” payments made to a series of individuals to guarantee their silence about potentially damaging stories in the months before the election. Because this was done with the goal of helping his election chances, the case implied, these payments amounted to a form of illegal, undisclosed campaign spending. And, Bragg argued, because Trump created paperwork to make the payments seem like regular legal expenses, that amounted to a criminal effort at a coverup. Trump has denied the charges against him.


The documents rattled off a number of seedy stories that would have been right at home in a venerable supermarket tabloid, had they actually been published. The subjects were anonymized but recognizable to anyone who had followed the story of Trump’s entanglement with The Enquirer. His affair with the porn star Stormy Daniels, of course, was the heart of it. There was also Karen McDougal, the Playboy Playmate of the Year in 1998, whose affair with Trump was similarly made to disappear, the payments for the rights to her story made to look like fees for writing a fitness column and appearing on magazine covers. (Trump has denied involvement with both women.) There were others that were lesser known, too, like Dino Sajudin, a former Trump World Tower doorman who claimed that Trump had a love child with one of the building’s employees; the story was never published, and Sajudin was paid $30,000 to keep quiet about it.


To me this is unbelievable. Before Mr. Trump's official entry into presidential politics - he becoming a politician - this kind of story that surfaced years ago, would've killed the career of an aspiring politician. But with Mr. Trump's troll-like campaign (proof/not opinion is his personal/family insults and attacks on a debate stage, breaking of norms, rules...unheard of before 2015), the bizarre became acceptable to small but then growing a segment of the population.

View attachment 928170

This is a story that needs telling.
OhPleaseJustQuit calls this Fake News?

The Troll cannot refute the facts. This stuff is laid out in an indictment. The facts cannot be refuted.

Meister can laugh. It usually does when it lacks a credible argument.
 
Nothing more than a hit piece to try and keep the leading candidate from
running against a dementia ridden president. :cuckoo:

National Enquire? oh brother...,....:rolleyes-41:

Wait a minute. The facts of what transpired in 2015/2016 are a hit piece? Cohen, Trump's longtime personal attorney already testified under oath to the facts.

In August 2015, shortly after announcing his candidacy for president, Donald Trump convened a meeting at his namesake Manhattan skyscraper to hatch a plan to "suppress negative stories" that might threaten to derail his White House bid, prosecutors claimed in charging documents on Tuesday.

Two of the candidate's most trusted allies joined him at the Trump Tower confab, according to prosecutors: his longtime attorney Michael Cohen, and a tabloid executive named David Pecker.

The trio agreed to an arrangement in which Pecker would act as the campaign's "eyes and ears" to identify negative stories, according to prosecutors, after which he would procure their exclusive rights and never publish. Prosecutors claim Trump and Cohen agreed to then "reimburse" Pecker's company, National Enquirer publisher American Media Inc., known as AMI.



 
The Russian dossier? You mean the Steele dossier?

And there was smoke there, unlike the shit on Bidens.

And the Trump campaign did collude with Russian agents.

These conclusions are not in dispute. Analysis | The truth about Russia, Trump and the 2016 election


The FBI had reason to investigate a tip suggesting Trump campaign involvement

The FBI on July 31, 2016, opened a counterintelligence investigation, dubbed “Crossfire Hurricane,” into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government. The team was set up because of a tip from an Australian diplomat: that a Trump campaign adviser, George Papadopoulos, had disclosed in a May conversation that Russia had obtained damaging information on Clinton, the Democratic presidential nominee, and appeared willing to help the Trump campaign with it.



And there was smoke there, unlike the shit on Bidens.

Crack smoke?

The team was set up because of a tip from an Australian diplomat: that a Trump campaign adviser, George Papadopoulos, had disclosed in a May conversation that Russia had obtained damaging information on Clinton, the Democratic presidential nominee, and appeared willing to help the Trump campaign with it.

Who told George Papadopoulos that Russia had damaging information on Clinton?
 
What I Saw Working at The National Enquirer During Donald Trump’s Rise - By Lachlan Cartwright

Inside the notorious “catch and kill” campaign that now stands at the heart of the former president’s legal trial.

I pulled up the indictment and the statement of facts on my iPhone. At the center of the case is the accusation that Trump took part in a scheme to turn The National Enquirer and its sister publications into an arm of his 2016 presidential campaign. The documents detailed three “hush money” payments made to a series of individuals to guarantee their silence about potentially damaging stories in the months before the election. Because this was done with the goal of helping his election chances, the case implied, these payments amounted to a form of illegal, undisclosed campaign spending. And, Bragg argued, because Trump created paperwork to make the payments seem like regular legal expenses, that amounted to a criminal effort at a coverup. Trump has denied the charges against him.


The documents rattled off a number of seedy stories that would have been right at home in a venerable supermarket tabloid, had they actually been published. The subjects were anonymized but recognizable to anyone who had followed the story of Trump’s entanglement with The Enquirer. His affair with the porn star Stormy Daniels, of course, was the heart of it. There was also Karen McDougal, the Playboy Playmate of the Year in 1998, whose affair with Trump was similarly made to disappear, the payments for the rights to her story made to look like fees for writing a fitness column and appearing on magazine covers. (Trump has denied involvement with both women.) There were others that were lesser known, too, like Dino Sajudin, a former Trump World Tower doorman who claimed that Trump had a love child with one of the building’s employees; the story was never published, and Sajudin was paid $30,000 to keep quiet about it.


To me this is unbelievable. Before Mr. Trump's official entry into presidential politics - he becoming a politician - this kind of story that surfaced years ago, would've killed the career of an aspiring politician. But with Mr. Trump's troll-like campaign (proof/not opinion is his personal/family insults and attacks on a debate stage, breaking of norms, rules...unheard of before 2015), the bizarre became acceptable to small but then growing a segment of the population.

View attachment 928170

This is a story that needs telling.
Trump doesn’t want us to find out how he stole the 2016 election.
 

Actually, poster Procrustes has got a valid subject with legs. A good and interesting one....even if a bit salacious.​

------------------------------------------​


I say that as the phenomena of "Catch & Kill" ain't new ground. It has been covered before*, most widely by the journalist Colin Farrow in his book:

Catch and Kill: Lies, Spies, and a Conspiracy to Protect Predators


So, in my opinion, it is a real deal. The Enquirer acted like a defensive front-line for bad actors who raped women, accosted women, blackmailed women.

Whenever those women had a bad expereince with a bad character with money and a story to tell about that bad actor. The bad actor, like a Don Trump or a Harvey Weinstein.....would contact the sleazeball running the Enquirer and a team of so-called "journalist" would get an interview from the woman.

And then use that interview NOT....to tell her story.....but to provide ammunition for the bad actor and his bad faith lawyers. And trash the woman's reputation with colleagues, friends, career.....even her family.

I listened to a lecture by Farrow shortly after the book came out. I believed the book and I believed his background details.
---------------------------------
The same phenomena was excellently covered by the authors Kantor & Twohey, in their book "She Said"
(

"She Said: Breaking the Sexual Harassment Story That Helped Ignite a Movement"​


Here are links to reviews of this important book:

 
The documents detailed three “hush money” payments made to a series of individuals to guarantee their silence about potentially damaging stories in the months before the election. Because this was done with the goal of helping his election chances, the case implied, these payments amounted to a form of illegal, undisclosed campaign spending.

Not illegal. Not campaign contributions.
 

Actually, poster Procrustes has got a valid subject with legs. A good and interesting one....even if a bit salacious.​

------------------------------------------​


I say that as the phenomena of "Catch & Kill" ain't new ground. It has been covered before*, most widely by the journalist Colin Farrow in his book:

Catch and Kill: Lies, Spies, and a Conspiracy to Protect Predators


So, in my opinion, it is a real deal. The Enquirer acted like a defensive front-line for bad actors who raped women, accosted women, blackmailed women.

Whenever those women had a bad expereince with a bad character with money and a story to tell about that bad actor. The bad actor, like a Don Trump or a Harvey Weinstein.....would contact the sleazeball running the Enquirer and a team of so-called "journalist" would get an interview from the woman.

And then use that interview NOT....to tell her story.....but to provide ammunition for the bad actor and his bad faith lawyers. And trash the woman's reputation with colleagues, friends, career.....even her family.

I listened to a lecture by Farrow shortly after the book came out. I believed the book and I believed his background details.
---------------------------------
The same phenomena was excellently covered by the authors Kantor & Twohey, in their book "She Said"
(

"She Said: Breaking the Sexual Harassment Story That Helped Ignite a Movement"​


Here are links to reviews of this important book:

The OP's words:

To me this is unbelievable. Before Mr. Trump's official entry into presidential politics - he becoming a politician - this kind of story that surfaced years ago, would've killed the career of an aspiring politician. But with Mr. Trump's troll-like campaign (proof/not opinion is his personal/family insults and attacks on a debate stage, breaking of norms, rules...unheard of before 2015), the bizarre became acceptable to small but then growing a segment of the population.
 
Nothing more than a hit piece to try and keep the leading candidate from
running against a dementia ridden president. :cuckoo:

National Enquire? oh brother...,....:rolleyes-41:
Psycho Trump tried to supress the E. Jean Carroll story with his threats & it ended up costing him $83 million big ones.

The bastard finally got some Karma.
 

Forum List

Back
Top