- Aug 4, 2009
- 281,171
- 140,790
- 2,615
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You were never a slave eitherI never got every gift I wanted for Christmas either.40 acres and a mule never materializedMLK was a Reparations pusher, whodathunk? I guess he forgot about the 40 acres and a mule thing that enabled former slaves to own and work their own land. 30 years after the Civil War ended Southern Blacks owned millions of acres. So what check is MLK talking about?
Long after the only words the white racists think King ever spoke, he said these words:
"We're Coming To Get Our Check"
We blacks know what King was about. And we will not whitewash it to serve your need to lie to yourselves.
He was a registered republican.. you have RDS
Dear IM2 Maybe that's the difference.
If Republicans like Gladys House in Freedmen's Town work for reparations,
it's to invest in democratic self-government for liberation.
If Democrats seek reparations it's for more dependence on govt instead of liberation.
And that gets abused to troll for Race-Baiting instead of seeking unifying solutions.
If both MLK and Gladys House represent the same side of self-govt and independent development,
that's where I believe restitution for past abuses should be invested as well. I'm all for it.
I'm trying to take the best of both approaches, in order to correct the worse flaws on both sides.
The INCLUSION of cultural diversity and minority voices that the Democrats preach.
And the Enforcement of Constitutional rule of law that conservative Republicans proclaim.
Neither party does the best job, but we should still hold them to their own principles anyway.
Emily,
When you learn that white conservatives are not for self government but for government only for themselves you will have come a long way to understanding why many of us oppose republicans.
Obviously.You were never a slave eitherI never got every gift I wanted for Christmas either.40 acres and a mule never materializedMLK was a Reparations pusher, whodathunk? I guess he forgot about the 40 acres and a mule thing that enabled former slaves to own and work their own land. 30 years after the Civil War ended Southern Blacks owned millions of acres. So what check is MLK talking about?
Long after the only words the white racists think King ever spoke, he said these words:
"We're Coming To Get Our Check"
We blacks know what King was about. And we will not whitewash it to serve your need to lie to yourselves.
He was a registered republican.. you have RDS
No he wasn't...his father was tho....when the Republicans actually stood for something decent.
Well the modern day FD is Ben CarsonWait...don't you think the contributions of Frederick Douglass will become more and more?He started another thread attacking today’s Fredrick Douglas .. crazy
LOL! Yes. Why just yesterday Douglass spoke about the current state of race relations.
What's with all the scatology on the Right?Your video proves nothing like all the rest of the "proof" you poop out.We blacks know what King was about.
You clearly have zero clue
I most certainly do.
Apparently you didn't watch the 1 minute video.
Long after the only words the white racists think King ever spoke, he said these words:
"We're Coming To Get Our Check"
We blacks know what King was about. And we will not whitewash it to serve your need to lie to yourselves.
So what exactly are you trying to say?
Please stop trying tell black people about MLK
What is this about knowing what he was about? What about do you think he was, and how is it different than the about others allegedly think he was?
King was not colorblind. And King held whites accountable for their continuing racism until he was murdered. But to some whites here at USMB, if we hold whites accountable for continuing racism we are not adhering to Kings belief based on one sentence in a speech they use to try shutting us up because we call out their racism.
King was not a conservative republican and he certainly would not be a republican today. If King had adhered to the things the racists who are white in this forum claim, his children would support the republican party. We as blacks know this. There are whites here who if you have them tell it, he'd be a Trump supporting member of the Freedom Caucus.
I see what you're saying. You think that MLK was a racist. But you are wrong. King didn't hold whites responsible for racism, nor did he claim that whites as a whole were racist.
What's with all the scatology on the Right?Your video proves nothing like all the rest of the "proof" you poop out.We blacks know what King was about.
You clearly have zero clue
I most certainly do.
Apparently you didn't watch the 1 minute video.
So what exactly are you trying to say?
Please stop trying tell black people about MLK
What is this about knowing what he was about? What about do you think he was, and how is it different than the about others allegedly think he was?
King was not colorblind. And King held whites accountable for their continuing racism until he was murdered. But to some whites here at USMB, if we hold whites accountable for continuing racism we are not adhering to Kings belief based on one sentence in a speech they use to try shutting us up because we call out their racism.
King was not a conservative republican and he certainly would not be a republican today. If King had adhered to the things the racists who are white in this forum claim, his children would support the republican party. We as blacks know this. There are whites here who if you have them tell it, he'd be a Trump supporting member of the Freedom Caucus.
I see what you're saying. You think that MLK was a racist. But you are wrong. King didn't hold whites responsible for racism, nor did he claim that whites as a whole were racist.
You have just made one of the most ignorant comments of all time.
“Whenever any black person utters words that make white people adjust their collars, white people unfailingly respond with a variation of the phrase “but not all white people.” If they are bold enough, they might even challenge you with the Super Saiyan Caucasian preamble of all preambles: “What would Martin Luther King say about ...”
I am 100 percent correct. King did hold whites responsible for racism. All whites. He held the whites who claimed non racism but did nothing just as accountable as the racists.
“First, I must confess that over the past few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action"; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a "more convenient season." Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection."
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.And this is why I say:
Please stop trying tell black people about MLK
Oh Goodie! Yet another Racist Race Baiting thread by a Racist Race Baiting Race Baiter!!!!!!!
It's all the pos ever does.Oh Goodie! Yet another Racist Race Baiting thread by a Racist Race Baiting Race Baiter!!!!!!!
Please stop trying tell black people about MLK
What is this about knowing what he was about? What about do you think he was, and how is it different than the about others allegedly think he was?
King was not colorblind. And King held whites accountable for their continuing racism until he was murdered. But to some whites here at USMB, if we hold whites accountable for continuing racism we are not adhering to Kings belief based on one sentence in a speech they use to try shutting us up because we call out their racism.
King was not a conservative republican and he certainly would not be a republican today. If King had adhered to the things the racists who are white in this forum claim, his children would support the republican party. We as blacks know this. There are whites here who if you have them tell it, he'd be a Trump supporting member of the Freedom Caucus.
I see what you're saying. You think that MLK was a racist. But you are wrong. King didn't hold whites responsible for racism, nor did he claim that whites as a whole were racist.
You have just made one of the most ignorant comments of all time.
“Whenever any black person utters words that make white people adjust their collars, white people unfailingly respond with a variation of the phrase “but not all white people.” If they are bold enough, they might even challenge you with the Super Saiyan Caucasian preamble of all preambles: “What would Martin Luther King say about ...”
I am 100 percent correct. King did hold whites responsible for racism. All whites. He held the whites who claimed non racism but did nothing just as accountable as the racists.
“First, I must confess that over the past few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action"; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a "more convenient season." Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection."
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.And this is why I say:
Please stop trying tell black people about MLK
You should really stop trying to tell white people about white people.
What is this about knowing what he was about? What about do you think he was, and how is it different than the about others allegedly think he was?
King was not colorblind. And King held whites accountable for their continuing racism until he was murdered. But to some whites here at USMB, if we hold whites accountable for continuing racism we are not adhering to Kings belief based on one sentence in a speech they use to try shutting us up because we call out their racism.
King was not a conservative republican and he certainly would not be a republican today. If King had adhered to the things the racists who are white in this forum claim, his children would support the republican party. We as blacks know this. There are whites here who if you have them tell it, he'd be a Trump supporting member of the Freedom Caucus.
I see what you're saying. You think that MLK was a racist. But you are wrong. King didn't hold whites responsible for racism, nor did he claim that whites as a whole were racist.
You have just made one of the most ignorant comments of all time.
“Whenever any black person utters words that make white people adjust their collars, white people unfailingly respond with a variation of the phrase “but not all white people.” If they are bold enough, they might even challenge you with the Super Saiyan Caucasian preamble of all preambles: “What would Martin Luther King say about ...”
I am 100 percent correct. King did hold whites responsible for racism. All whites. He held the whites who claimed non racism but did nothing just as accountable as the racists.
“First, I must confess that over the past few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action"; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a "more convenient season." Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection."
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.And this is why I say:
Please stop trying tell black people about MLK
You should really stop trying to tell white people about white people.
I'm not. But I am telling whites who are racists to stop being racist.
Long after the only words the white racists think King ever spoke, he said these words:
"We're Coming To Get Our Check"
We blacks know what King was about. And we will not whitewash it to serve your need to lie to yourselves.