Roadrunner
Roadrunner
What a sweeping generalization.I could care less as long as they are a good person. Asian women actually are hot!!!How many white people are happy with their child marrying a black, hispanic or oriental?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
What a sweeping generalization.I could care less as long as they are a good person. Asian women actually are hot!!!How many white people are happy with their child marrying a black, hispanic or oriental?
Well you know I do like all women.What a sweeping generalization.I could care less as long as they are a good person. Asian women actually are hot!!!How many white people are happy with their child marrying a black, hispanic or oriental?
A Native American Indian tribe wants to preserve its heritage but a group of Black politicians wants to put a stop to it. Wait a minute!!! We're all forced to endure the annual, February "Black History Month" but blacks don't want Indians to celebrate their history and heritage? Isn't that a tad bit disingenuous of them?
Past ban on marrying blacks may mar tribe's futureWASHINGTON (AP) — Several members of the Congressional Black Caucus are urging the Obama administration to withhold federal recognition of a Virginia Indian tribe because of its history of banning intermarriage with blacks.
In January, the Interior Department proposed recognizing the Pamunkey tribe in southeast Virginia, which would make members eligible for special benefits in education, housing and medical care — and allow the tribe to pursue a casino. A decision on recognition, which would be the first for a Virginia tribe, is due by March 30.Past ban on marrying blacks may mar tribe s future CNS NewsThe Bureau of Indian Affairs said that the significant number of Pamunkey-Pamunkey marriages and efforts to encourage them helped satisfy a criterion for federal recognition: that a predominant portion of the group comprises a distinct community and has existed as one from historical times to the present.
We can allow an all black ...:
a) ... Miss Black American pageant.
b) ... colleges and Universities.
c) ... entertainment television (BET)
d) ... magazines (Ebony)
... but Indians aren't allowed to have an all Indian tribe? What gives?
A Native American Indian tribe wants to preserve its heritage but a group of Black politicians wants to put a stop to it. Wait a minute!!! We're all forced to endure the annual, February "Black History Month" but blacks don't want Indians to celebrate their history and heritage? Isn't that a tad bit disingenuous of them?
Past ban on marrying blacks may mar tribe's futureWASHINGTON (AP) — Several members of the Congressional Black Caucus are urging the Obama administration to withhold federal recognition of a Virginia Indian tribe because of its history of banning intermarriage with blacks.
In January, the Interior Department proposed recognizing the Pamunkey tribe in southeast Virginia, which would make members eligible for special benefits in education, housing and medical care — and allow the tribe to pursue a casino. A decision on recognition, which would be the first for a Virginia tribe, is due by March 30.Past ban on marrying blacks may mar tribe s future CNS NewsThe Bureau of Indian Affairs said that the significant number of Pamunkey-Pamunkey marriages and efforts to encourage them helped satisfy a criterion for federal recognition: that a predominant portion of the group comprises a distinct community and has existed as one from historical times to the present.
We can allow an all black ...:
a) ... Miss Black American pageant.
b) ... colleges and Universities.
c) ... entertainment television (BET)
d) ... magazines (Ebony)
... but Indians aren't allowed to have an all Indian tribe? What gives?
Not like indians are the only ones with that sort of ban. Was common for Catholics and Jews too.
It doesn't matter what whites would do or how they feel about interracial marriage. The subject is that an indian tribe bans interracial marriage. It's their right to do that. They are an independent people.
A Native American Indian tribe wants to preserve its heritage but a group of Black politicians wants to put a stop to it. Wait a minute!!! We're all forced to endure the annual, February "Black History Month" but blacks don't want Indians to celebrate their history and heritage? Isn't that a tad bit disingenuous of them?
Past ban on marrying blacks may mar tribe's futureWASHINGTON (AP) — Several members of the Congressional Black Caucus are urging the Obama administration to withhold federal recognition of a Virginia Indian tribe because of its history of banning intermarriage with blacks.
In January, the Interior Department proposed recognizing the Pamunkey tribe in southeast Virginia, which would make members eligible for special benefits in education, housing and medical care — and allow the tribe to pursue a casino. A decision on recognition, which would be the first for a Virginia tribe, is due by March 30.Past ban on marrying blacks may mar tribe s future CNS NewsThe Bureau of Indian Affairs said that the significant number of Pamunkey-Pamunkey marriages and efforts to encourage them helped satisfy a criterion for federal recognition: that a predominant portion of the group comprises a distinct community and has existed as one from historical times to the present.
We can allow an all black ...:
a) ... Miss Black American pageant.
b) ... colleges and Universities.
c) ... entertainment television (BET)
d) ... magazines (Ebony)
... but Indians aren't allowed to have an all Indian tribe? What gives?
Not like indians are the only ones with that sort of ban. Was common for Catholics and Jews too.
Agreed! See my post above.
A Native American Indian tribe wants to preserve its heritage but a group of Black politicians wants to put a stop to it. Wait a minute!!! We're all forced to endure the annual, February "Black History Month" but blacks don't want Indians to celebrate their history and heritage? Isn't that a tad bit disingenuous of them?
Past ban on marrying blacks may mar tribe's futureWASHINGTON (AP) — Several members of the Congressional Black Caucus are urging the Obama administration to withhold federal recognition of a Virginia Indian tribe because of its history of banning intermarriage with blacks.
In January, the Interior Department proposed recognizing the Pamunkey tribe in southeast Virginia, which would make members eligible for special benefits in education, housing and medical care — and allow the tribe to pursue a casino. A decision on recognition, which would be the first for a Virginia tribe, is due by March 30.Past ban on marrying blacks may mar tribe s future CNS NewsThe Bureau of Indian Affairs said that the significant number of Pamunkey-Pamunkey marriages and efforts to encourage them helped satisfy a criterion for federal recognition: that a predominant portion of the group comprises a distinct community and has existed as one from historical times to the present.
We can allow an all black ...:
a) ... Miss Black American pageant.
b) ... colleges and Universities.
c) ... entertainment television (BET)
d) ... magazines (Ebony)
... but Indians aren't allowed to have an all Indian tribe? What gives?
Not like indians are the only ones with that sort of ban. Was common for Catholics and Jews too.
Agreed! See my post above.
All ethnicities share this concern. For various reasons some believe a 'pure ethnicty' is desireable, and so try to control who intermarries with whom. Jews worry interfaith marriages will result in children not being raised Jewish, indians apparently worry interethnic marriage will result in children being half indian the first generation, quarter the next, and on n on.
Simple fact though is this is inevitible. Human race will eventually be so interbred the ethnicites as they exist now will be long gone. Sooner we're all some tannish shade the better. Though I'm sure we'll still find something to hate one another about. Stars on our bellies, or no stars on our bellies...
A Native American Indian tribe wants to preserve its heritage but a group of Black politicians wants to put a stop to it. Wait a minute!!! We're all forced to endure the annual, February "Black History Month" but blacks don't want Indians to celebrate their history and heritage? Isn't that a tad bit disingenuous of them?
Past ban on marrying blacks may mar tribe's futureWASHINGTON (AP) — Several members of the Congressional Black Caucus are urging the Obama administration to withhold federal recognition of a Virginia Indian tribe because of its history of banning intermarriage with blacks.
In January, the Interior Department proposed recognizing the Pamunkey tribe in southeast Virginia, which would make members eligible for special benefits in education, housing and medical care — and allow the tribe to pursue a casino. A decision on recognition, which would be the first for a Virginia tribe, is due by March 30.Past ban on marrying blacks may mar tribe s future CNS NewsThe Bureau of Indian Affairs said that the significant number of Pamunkey-Pamunkey marriages and efforts to encourage them helped satisfy a criterion for federal recognition: that a predominant portion of the group comprises a distinct community and has existed as one from historical times to the present.
We can allow an all black ...:
a) ... Miss Black American pageant.
b) ... colleges and Universities.
c) ... entertainment television (BET)
d) ... magazines (Ebony)
... but Indians aren't allowed to have an all Indian tribe? What gives?
Not like indians are the only ones with that sort of ban. Was common for Catholics and Jews too.
Agreed! See my post above.
All ethnicities share this concern. For various reasons some believe a 'pure ethnicty' is desireable, and so try to control who intermarries with whom. Jews worry interfaith marriages will result in children not being raised Jewish, indians apparently worry interethnic marriage will result in children being half indian the first generation, quarter the next, and on n on.
Simple fact though is this is inevitible. Human race will eventually be so interbred the ethnicites as they exist now will be long gone. Sooner we're all some tannish shade the better. Though I'm sure we'll still find something to hate one another about. Stars on our bellies, or no stars on our bellies...
I tend to disagree. True ... the Liberal/Socialist push to intermarry for the sake of intermarriage is alive and well and many there be who will fall for their mantra hook, line, and sinker. However, there will always be pockets where various ethnic groups remain true to their roots and heritage. I consider the Feline Family. Lions and Tigers have been around for centuries. They're still Lions and Tigers. Can they interbreed? Yes. Do they interbreed without man's interference? No.
A Native American Indian tribe wants to preserve its heritage but a group of Black politicians wants to put a stop to it. Wait a minute!!! We're all forced to endure the annual, February "Black History Month" but blacks don't want Indians to celebrate their history and heritage? Isn't that a tad bit disingenuous of them?
Past ban on marrying blacks may mar tribe s future CNS News
We can allow an all black ...:
a) ... Miss Black American pageant.
b) ... colleges and Universities.
c) ... entertainment television (BET)
d) ... magazines (Ebony)
... but Indians aren't allowed to have an all Indian tribe? What gives?
Not like indians are the only ones with that sort of ban. Was common for Catholics and Jews too.
Agreed! See my post above.
All ethnicities share this concern. For various reasons some believe a 'pure ethnicty' is desireable, and so try to control who intermarries with whom. Jews worry interfaith marriages will result in children not being raised Jewish, indians apparently worry interethnic marriage will result in children being half indian the first generation, quarter the next, and on n on.
Simple fact though is this is inevitible. Human race will eventually be so interbred the ethnicites as they exist now will be long gone. Sooner we're all some tannish shade the better. Though I'm sure we'll still find something to hate one another about. Stars on our bellies, or no stars on our bellies...
I tend to disagree. True ... the Liberal/Socialist push to intermarry for the sake of intermarriage is alive and well and many there be who will fall for their mantra hook, line, and sinker. However, there will always be pockets where various ethnic groups remain true to their roots and heritage. I consider the Feline Family. Lions and Tigers have been around for centuries. They're still Lions and Tigers. Can they interbreed? Yes. Do they interbreed without man's interference? No.
There's no evolutionary advantages in remaining ethnicly "pure." Quite a lot of disadvantages in fact as seen in Jews and blacks with inherited genetic conditions becoming more and more common as with Taysach's in Jews, and sickle cell in blacks. Interethnic breeding helps to suppress heriditary contions like these.
Not like indians are the only ones with that sort of ban. Was common for Catholics and Jews too.
Agreed! See my post above.
All ethnicities share this concern. For various reasons some believe a 'pure ethnicty' is desireable, and so try to control who intermarries with whom. Jews worry interfaith marriages will result in children not being raised Jewish, indians apparently worry interethnic marriage will result in children being half indian the first generation, quarter the next, and on n on.
Simple fact though is this is inevitible. Human race will eventually be so interbred the ethnicites as they exist now will be long gone. Sooner we're all some tannish shade the better. Though I'm sure we'll still find something to hate one another about. Stars on our bellies, or no stars on our bellies...
I tend to disagree. True ... the Liberal/Socialist push to intermarry for the sake of intermarriage is alive and well and many there be who will fall for their mantra hook, line, and sinker. However, there will always be pockets where various ethnic groups remain true to their roots and heritage. I consider the Feline Family. Lions and Tigers have been around for centuries. They're still Lions and Tigers. Can they interbreed? Yes. Do they interbreed without man's interference? No.
There's no evolutionary advantages in remaining ethnicly "pure." Quite a lot of disadvantages in fact as seen in Jews and blacks with inherited genetic conditions becoming more and more common as with Taysach's in Jews, and sickle cell in blacks. Interethnic breeding helps to suppress heriditary contions like these.
I disagree again. There are various advantages to remaining ethnically pure. Firstly, if God is the Planner and Designer then I should think that His current design IS as it should be. He, not we, get to exercise His will in such a manner. Secondly, history shows that Europeans are far more advanced where architecture; engineering; technology; medicine; travel; communication; etc. are concerned as compared to African peoples. Would it benefit the European peoples to reduce their standards by mixing their blood with a people who's standards are far lower?
Not like indians are the only ones with that sort of ban. Was common for Catholics and Jews too.
Agreed! See my post above.
All ethnicities share this concern. For various reasons some believe a 'pure ethnicty' is desireable, and so try to control who intermarries with whom. Jews worry interfaith marriages will result in children not being raised Jewish, indians apparently worry interethnic marriage will result in children being half indian the first generation, quarter the next, and on n on.
Simple fact though is this is inevitible. Human race will eventually be so interbred the ethnicites as they exist now will be long gone. Sooner we're all some tannish shade the better. Though I'm sure we'll still find something to hate one another about. Stars on our bellies, or no stars on our bellies...
I tend to disagree. True ... the Liberal/Socialist push to intermarry for the sake of intermarriage is alive and well and many there be who will fall for their mantra hook, line, and sinker. However, there will always be pockets where various ethnic groups remain true to their roots and heritage. I consider the Feline Family. Lions and Tigers have been around for centuries. They're still Lions and Tigers. Can they interbreed? Yes. Do they interbreed without man's interference? No.
There's no evolutionary advantages in remaining ethnicly "pure." Quite a lot of disadvantages in fact as seen in Jews and blacks with inherited genetic conditions becoming more and more common as with Taysach's in Jews, and sickle cell in blacks. Interethnic breeding helps to suppress heriditary contions like these.
I disagree again. There are various advantages to remaining ethnically pure. Firstly, if God is the Planner and Designer then I should think that His current design IS as it should be. He, not we, get to exercise His will in such a manner. Secondly, history shows that Europeans are far more advanced where architecture; engineering; technology; medicine; travel; communication; etc. are concerned as compared to African peoples. Would it benefit the European peoples to reduce their standards by mixing their blood with a people who's standards are far lower?
Individuals are free to partner with those of other races. So it's not that we MUST mix races; however, it's that race mixing is not prohibited.Why MUST we mix races?
What is the point, other than it being part of the progtard's vision of their melting pot utopia where everyone is the SAME?
Ugly comes in all races.Well you know I do like all women.What a sweeping generalization.I could care less as long as they are a good person. Asian women actually are hot!!!How many white people are happy with their child marrying a black, hispanic or oriental?
Agreed! See my post above.
All ethnicities share this concern. For various reasons some believe a 'pure ethnicty' is desireable, and so try to control who intermarries with whom. Jews worry interfaith marriages will result in children not being raised Jewish, indians apparently worry interethnic marriage will result in children being half indian the first generation, quarter the next, and on n on.
Simple fact though is this is inevitible. Human race will eventually be so interbred the ethnicites as they exist now will be long gone. Sooner we're all some tannish shade the better. Though I'm sure we'll still find something to hate one another about. Stars on our bellies, or no stars on our bellies...
I tend to disagree. True ... the Liberal/Socialist push to intermarry for the sake of intermarriage is alive and well and many there be who will fall for their mantra hook, line, and sinker. However, there will always be pockets where various ethnic groups remain true to their roots and heritage. I consider the Feline Family. Lions and Tigers have been around for centuries. They're still Lions and Tigers. Can they interbreed? Yes. Do they interbreed without man's interference? No.
There's no evolutionary advantages in remaining ethnicly "pure." Quite a lot of disadvantages in fact as seen in Jews and blacks with inherited genetic conditions becoming more and more common as with Taysach's in Jews, and sickle cell in blacks. Interethnic breeding helps to suppress heriditary contions like these.
I disagree again. There are various advantages to remaining ethnically pure. Firstly, if God is the Planner and Designer then I should think that His current design IS as it should be. He, not we, get to exercise His will in such a manner. Secondly, history shows that Europeans are far more advanced where architecture; engineering; technology; medicine; travel; communication; etc. are concerned as compared to African peoples. Would it benefit the European peoples to reduce their standards by mixing their blood with a people who's standards are far lower?
Maybe God created us ethnicly pure to teach us that staying thus is bad, but intermarrying is good?
Who are you to tell any race they HAVE to allow another race to marry them? What right do you have to do that?Individuals are free to partner with those of other races. So it's not that we MUST mix races; however, it's that race mixing is not prohibited.Why MUST we mix races?
What is the point, other than it being part of the progtard's vision of their melting pot utopia where everyone is the SAME?
As such, America will become more and more a blended population as time goes on.
For one, there is no such thing is "evolution."A Native American Indian tribe wants to preserve its heritage but a group of Black politicians wants to put a stop to it. Wait a minute!!! We're all forced to endure the annual, February "Black History Month" but blacks don't want Indians to celebrate their history and heritage? Isn't that a tad bit disingenuous of them?
Past ban on marrying blacks may mar tribe s future CNS News
We can allow an all black ...:
a) ... Miss Black American pageant.
b) ... colleges and Universities.
c) ... entertainment television (BET)
d) ... magazines (Ebony)
... but Indians aren't allowed to have an all Indian tribe? What gives?
Not like indians are the only ones with that sort of ban. Was common for Catholics and Jews too.
Agreed! See my post above.
All ethnicities share this concern. For various reasons some believe a 'pure ethnicty' is desireable, and so try to control who intermarries with whom. Jews worry interfaith marriages will result in children not being raised Jewish, indians apparently worry interethnic marriage will result in children being half indian the first generation, quarter the next, and on n on.
Simple fact though is this is inevitible. Human race will eventually be so interbred the ethnicites as they exist now will be long gone. Sooner we're all some tannish shade the better. Though I'm sure we'll still find something to hate one another about. Stars on our bellies, or no stars on our bellies...
I tend to disagree. True ... the Liberal/Socialist push to intermarry for the sake of intermarriage is alive and well and many there be who will fall for their mantra hook, line, and sinker. However, there will always be pockets where various ethnic groups remain true to their roots and heritage. I consider the Feline Family. Lions and Tigers have been around for centuries. They're still Lions and Tigers. Can they interbreed? Yes. Do they interbreed without man's interference? No.
There's no evolutionary advantages in remaining ethnicly "pure." Quite a lot of disadvantages in fact as seen in Jews and blacks with inherited genetic conditions becoming more and more common as with Taysach's in Jews, and sickle cell in blacks. Interethnic breeding helps to suppress heriditary contions like these.
And who are you to tell any individual that he/she cannot marry someone who is not of the same race? I am not ruled by my race? Are you ruled by your race?Who are you to tell any race they HAVE to allow another race to marry them? What right do you have to do that?Individuals are free to partner with those of other races. So it's not that we MUST mix races; however, it's that race mixing is not prohibited.Why MUST we mix races?
What is the point, other than it being part of the progtard's vision of their melting pot utopia where everyone is the SAME?
As such, America will become more and more a blended population as time goes on.
And I see no advantage at all to a "blended population." Again, why does everyone have to be the SAME? That's just politically correct leftist hyperbole.