Indian Tribe Wants to Preserve Heritage - Blacks Angry!

[Roadrunner]

How many white people are happy with their child marrying a black, hispanic or oriental?

I could care less as long as they are a good person. Asian women actually are hot!!!

What a sweeping generalization.

 

[jknowgood]

How many white people are happy with their child marrying a black, hispanic or oriental?

I could care less as long as they are a good person. Asian women actually are hot!!!

What a sweeping generalization.

Well you know I do like all women.

 

[007]

Why MUST we mix races?

What is the point, other than it being part of the progtard's vision of their melting pot utopia where everyone is the SAME?

 

[Delta4Embassy]

A Native American Indian tribe wants to preserve its heritage but a group of Black politicians wants to put a stop to it. Wait a minute!!! We're all forced to endure the annual, February "Black History Month" but blacks don't want Indians to celebrate their history and heritage? Isn't that a tad bit disingenuous of them?

Past ban on marrying blacks may mar tribe's future

WASHINGTON (AP) — Several members of the Congressional Black Caucus are urging the Obama administration to withhold federal recognition of a Virginia Indian tribe because of its history of banning intermarriage with blacks.

In January, the Interior Department proposed recognizing the Pamunkey tribe in southeast Virginia, which would make members eligible for special benefits in education, housing and medical care — and allow the tribe to pursue a casino. A decision on recognition, which would be the first for a Virginia tribe, is due by March 30.

The Bureau of Indian Affairs said that the significant number of Pamunkey-Pamunkey marriages and efforts to encourage them helped satisfy a criterion for federal recognition: that a predominant portion of the group comprises a distinct community and has existed as one from historical times to the present.

Past ban on marrying blacks may mar tribe s future CNS News

We can allow an all black ...:
a) ... Miss Black American pageant.
b) ... colleges and Universities.
c) ... entertainment television (BET)
d) ... magazines (Ebony)

... but Indians aren't allowed to have an all Indian tribe? What gives?

Not like indians are the only ones with that sort of ban. Was common for Catholics and Jews too.

 

[DriftingSand]

I personally have no problem with a race or nationality embracing their roots/heritage and having a collective desire to preserve it. I actually don't have a problem with "Black History Month." My problem lies in the fact that it's not seen as "racist" when blacks embrace their heritage but it totally "racist" if whites or Indians attempt to exercise the same right/privilege.

I enjoy the fact that there are different cultures and unique historical avenues by which various peoples have traveled. There's nothing wrong with that uniqueness. So, I don't have a problem with an Indian tribe that issues an edict encouraging folks to marry within their own race/culture. Traditional Jews in Israel adhere to a very similar mentality but we don't hear the media or the Libs squawking about THAT!

 

[Katzndogz]

It doesn't matter what whites would do or how they feel about interracial marriage. The subject is that an indian tribe bans interracial marriage. It's their right to do that. They are an independent people.

 

[DriftingSand]

A Native American Indian tribe wants to preserve its heritage but a group of Black politicians wants to put a stop to it. Wait a minute!!! We're all forced to endure the annual, February "Black History Month" but blacks don't want Indians to celebrate their history and heritage? Isn't that a tad bit disingenuous of them?

Past ban on marrying blacks may mar tribe's future

WASHINGTON (AP) — Several members of the Congressional Black Caucus are urging the Obama administration to withhold federal recognition of a Virginia Indian tribe because of its history of banning intermarriage with blacks.

In January, the Interior Department proposed recognizing the Pamunkey tribe in southeast Virginia, which would make members eligible for special benefits in education, housing and medical care — and allow the tribe to pursue a casino. A decision on recognition, which would be the first for a Virginia tribe, is due by March 30.

The Bureau of Indian Affairs said that the significant number of Pamunkey-Pamunkey marriages and efforts to encourage them helped satisfy a criterion for federal recognition: that a predominant portion of the group comprises a distinct community and has existed as one from historical times to the present.

Past ban on marrying blacks may mar tribe s future CNS News

We can allow an all black ...:
a) ... Miss Black American pageant.
b) ... colleges and Universities.
c) ... entertainment television (BET)
d) ... magazines (Ebony)

... but Indians aren't allowed to have an all Indian tribe? What gives?

Not like indians are the only ones with that sort of ban. Was common for Catholics and Jews too.

Agreed! See my post above.

 

[DriftingSand]

It doesn't matter what whites would do or how they feel about interracial marriage. The subject is that an indian tribe bans interracial marriage. It's their right to do that. They are an independent people.

There's only ONE instance where suggesting that marrying your own kind is 100% politically incorrect and that's when white folks say it. That's totally "racist." All others are encouraged to embrace and remember their heritage with complete impunity.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

A Native American Indian tribe wants to preserve its heritage but a group of Black politicians wants to put a stop to it. Wait a minute!!! We're all forced to endure the annual, February "Black History Month" but blacks don't want Indians to celebrate their history and heritage? Isn't that a tad bit disingenuous of them?

Past ban on marrying blacks may mar tribe's future

WASHINGTON (AP) — Several members of the Congressional Black Caucus are urging the Obama administration to withhold federal recognition of a Virginia Indian tribe because of its history of banning intermarriage with blacks.

In January, the Interior Department proposed recognizing the Pamunkey tribe in southeast Virginia, which would make members eligible for special benefits in education, housing and medical care — and allow the tribe to pursue a casino. A decision on recognition, which would be the first for a Virginia tribe, is due by March 30.

The Bureau of Indian Affairs said that the significant number of Pamunkey-Pamunkey marriages and efforts to encourage them helped satisfy a criterion for federal recognition: that a predominant portion of the group comprises a distinct community and has existed as one from historical times to the present.

Past ban on marrying blacks may mar tribe s future CNS News

We can allow an all black ...:
a) ... Miss Black American pageant.
b) ... colleges and Universities.
c) ... entertainment television (BET)
d) ... magazines (Ebony)

... but Indians aren't allowed to have an all Indian tribe? What gives?

Not like indians are the only ones with that sort of ban. Was common for Catholics and Jews too.

Agreed! See my post above.

All ethnicities share this concern. For various reasons some believe a 'pure ethnicty' is desireable, and so try to control who intermarries with whom. Jews worry interfaith marriages will result in children not being raised Jewish, indians apparently worry interethnic marriage will result in children being half indian the first generation, quarter the next, and on n on.

Simple fact though is this is inevitible. Human race will eventually be so interbred the ethnicites as they exist now will be long gone. Sooner we're all some tannish shade the better. Though I'm sure we'll still find something to hate one another about. Stars on our bellies, or no stars on our bellies...

 

[DriftingSand]

A Native American Indian tribe wants to preserve its heritage but a group of Black politicians wants to put a stop to it. Wait a minute!!! We're all forced to endure the annual, February "Black History Month" but blacks don't want Indians to celebrate their history and heritage? Isn't that a tad bit disingenuous of them?

Past ban on marrying blacks may mar tribe's future

WASHINGTON (AP) — Several members of the Congressional Black Caucus are urging the Obama administration to withhold federal recognition of a Virginia Indian tribe because of its history of banning intermarriage with blacks.

In January, the Interior Department proposed recognizing the Pamunkey tribe in southeast Virginia, which would make members eligible for special benefits in education, housing and medical care — and allow the tribe to pursue a casino. A decision on recognition, which would be the first for a Virginia tribe, is due by March 30.

The Bureau of Indian Affairs said that the significant number of Pamunkey-Pamunkey marriages and efforts to encourage them helped satisfy a criterion for federal recognition: that a predominant portion of the group comprises a distinct community and has existed as one from historical times to the present.

Past ban on marrying blacks may mar tribe s future CNS News

We can allow an all black ...:
a) ... Miss Black American pageant.
b) ... colleges and Universities.
c) ... entertainment television (BET)
d) ... magazines (Ebony)

... but Indians aren't allowed to have an all Indian tribe? What gives?

Not like indians are the only ones with that sort of ban. Was common for Catholics and Jews too.

Agreed! See my post above.

All ethnicities share this concern. For various reasons some believe a 'pure ethnicty' is desireable, and so try to control who intermarries with whom. Jews worry interfaith marriages will result in children not being raised Jewish, indians apparently worry interethnic marriage will result in children being half indian the first generation, quarter the next, and on n on.

Simple fact though is this is inevitible. Human race will eventually be so interbred the ethnicites as they exist now will be long gone. Sooner we're all some tannish shade the better. Though I'm sure we'll still find something to hate one another about. Stars on our bellies, or no stars on our bellies...

I tend to disagree. True ... the Liberal/Socialist push to intermarry for the sake of intermarriage is alive and well and many there be who will fall for their mantra hook, line, and sinker. However, there will always be pockets where various ethnic groups remain true to their roots and heritage. I consider the Feline Family. Lions and Tigers have been around for centuries. They're still Lions and Tigers. Can they interbreed? Yes. Do they interbreed without man's interference? No.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

A Native American Indian tribe wants to preserve its heritage but a group of Black politicians wants to put a stop to it. Wait a minute!!! We're all forced to endure the annual, February "Black History Month" but blacks don't want Indians to celebrate their history and heritage? Isn't that a tad bit disingenuous of them?

Past ban on marrying blacks may mar tribe's future

WASHINGTON (AP) — Several members of the Congressional Black Caucus are urging the Obama administration to withhold federal recognition of a Virginia Indian tribe because of its history of banning intermarriage with blacks.

In January, the Interior Department proposed recognizing the Pamunkey tribe in southeast Virginia, which would make members eligible for special benefits in education, housing and medical care — and allow the tribe to pursue a casino. A decision on recognition, which would be the first for a Virginia tribe, is due by March 30.

The Bureau of Indian Affairs said that the significant number of Pamunkey-Pamunkey marriages and efforts to encourage them helped satisfy a criterion for federal recognition: that a predominant portion of the group comprises a distinct community and has existed as one from historical times to the present.

Past ban on marrying blacks may mar tribe s future CNS News

We can allow an all black ...:
a) ... Miss Black American pageant.
b) ... colleges and Universities.
c) ... entertainment television (BET)
d) ... magazines (Ebony)

... but Indians aren't allowed to have an all Indian tribe? What gives?

Not like indians are the only ones with that sort of ban. Was common for Catholics and Jews too.

Agreed! See my post above.

All ethnicities share this concern. For various reasons some believe a 'pure ethnicty' is desireable, and so try to control who intermarries with whom. Jews worry interfaith marriages will result in children not being raised Jewish, indians apparently worry interethnic marriage will result in children being half indian the first generation, quarter the next, and on n on.

Simple fact though is this is inevitible. Human race will eventually be so interbred the ethnicites as they exist now will be long gone. Sooner we're all some tannish shade the better. Though I'm sure we'll still find something to hate one another about. Stars on our bellies, or no stars on our bellies...

I tend to disagree. True ... the Liberal/Socialist push to intermarry for the sake of intermarriage is alive and well and many there be who will fall for their mantra hook, line, and sinker. However, there will always be pockets where various ethnic groups remain true to their roots and heritage. I consider the Feline Family. Lions and Tigers have been around for centuries. They're still Lions and Tigers. Can they interbreed? Yes. Do they interbreed without man's interference? No.

There's no evolutionary advantages in remaining ethnicly "pure." Quite a lot of disadvantages in fact as seen in Jews and blacks with inherited genetic conditions becoming more and more common as with Taysach's in Jews, and sickle cell in blacks. Interethnic breeding helps to suppress heriditary contions like these.

 

[DriftingSand]

A Native American Indian tribe wants to preserve its heritage but a group of Black politicians wants to put a stop to it. Wait a minute!!! We're all forced to endure the annual, February "Black History Month" but blacks don't want Indians to celebrate their history and heritage? Isn't that a tad bit disingenuous of them?
Past ban on marrying blacks may mar tribe s future CNS News

We can allow an all black ...:
a) ... Miss Black American pageant.
b) ... colleges and Universities.
c) ... entertainment television (BET)
d) ... magazines (Ebony)

... but Indians aren't allowed to have an all Indian tribe? What gives?

Not like indians are the only ones with that sort of ban. Was common for Catholics and Jews too.

Agreed! See my post above.

All ethnicities share this concern. For various reasons some believe a 'pure ethnicty' is desireable, and so try to control who intermarries with whom. Jews worry interfaith marriages will result in children not being raised Jewish, indians apparently worry interethnic marriage will result in children being half indian the first generation, quarter the next, and on n on.

Simple fact though is this is inevitible. Human race will eventually be so interbred the ethnicites as they exist now will be long gone. Sooner we're all some tannish shade the better. Though I'm sure we'll still find something to hate one another about. Stars on our bellies, or no stars on our bellies...

I tend to disagree. True ... the Liberal/Socialist push to intermarry for the sake of intermarriage is alive and well and many there be who will fall for their mantra hook, line, and sinker. However, there will always be pockets where various ethnic groups remain true to their roots and heritage. I consider the Feline Family. Lions and Tigers have been around for centuries. They're still Lions and Tigers. Can they interbreed? Yes. Do they interbreed without man's interference? No.

There's no evolutionary advantages in remaining ethnicly "pure." Quite a lot of disadvantages in fact as seen in Jews and blacks with inherited genetic conditions becoming more and more common as with Taysach's in Jews, and sickle cell in blacks. Interethnic breeding helps to suppress heriditary contions like these.

I disagree again. There are various advantages to remaining ethnically pure. Firstly, if God is the Planner and Designer then I should think that His current design IS as it should be. He, not we, get to exercise His will in such a manner. Secondly, history shows that Europeans are far more advanced where architecture; engineering; technology; medicine; travel; communication; etc. are concerned as compared to African peoples. Would it benefit the European peoples to reduce their standards by mixing their blood with a people who's standards are far lower?

 

[DriftingSand]

Not like indians are the only ones with that sort of ban. Was common for Catholics and Jews too.

Agreed! See my post above.

All ethnicities share this concern. For various reasons some believe a 'pure ethnicty' is desireable, and so try to control who intermarries with whom. Jews worry interfaith marriages will result in children not being raised Jewish, indians apparently worry interethnic marriage will result in children being half indian the first generation, quarter the next, and on n on.

Simple fact though is this is inevitible. Human race will eventually be so interbred the ethnicites as they exist now will be long gone. Sooner we're all some tannish shade the better. Though I'm sure we'll still find something to hate one another about. Stars on our bellies, or no stars on our bellies...

I tend to disagree. True ... the Liberal/Socialist push to intermarry for the sake of intermarriage is alive and well and many there be who will fall for their mantra hook, line, and sinker. However, there will always be pockets where various ethnic groups remain true to their roots and heritage. I consider the Feline Family. Lions and Tigers have been around for centuries. They're still Lions and Tigers. Can they interbreed? Yes. Do they interbreed without man's interference? No.

There's no evolutionary advantages in remaining ethnicly "pure." Quite a lot of disadvantages in fact as seen in Jews and blacks with inherited genetic conditions becoming more and more common as with Taysach's in Jews, and sickle cell in blacks. Interethnic breeding helps to suppress heriditary contions like these.

I disagree again. There are various advantages to remaining ethnically pure. Firstly, if God is the Planner and Designer then I should think that His current design IS as it should be. He, not we, get to exercise His will in such a manner. Secondly, history shows that Europeans are far more advanced where architecture; engineering; technology; medicine; travel; communication; etc. are concerned as compared to African peoples. Would it benefit the European peoples to reduce their standards by mixing their blood with a people who's standards are far lower?

 

[Delta4Embassy]

Not like indians are the only ones with that sort of ban. Was common for Catholics and Jews too.

Agreed! See my post above.

All ethnicities share this concern. For various reasons some believe a 'pure ethnicty' is desireable, and so try to control who intermarries with whom. Jews worry interfaith marriages will result in children not being raised Jewish, indians apparently worry interethnic marriage will result in children being half indian the first generation, quarter the next, and on n on.

Simple fact though is this is inevitible. Human race will eventually be so interbred the ethnicites as they exist now will be long gone. Sooner we're all some tannish shade the better. Though I'm sure we'll still find something to hate one another about. Stars on our bellies, or no stars on our bellies...

I tend to disagree. True ... the Liberal/Socialist push to intermarry for the sake of intermarriage is alive and well and many there be who will fall for their mantra hook, line, and sinker. However, there will always be pockets where various ethnic groups remain true to their roots and heritage. I consider the Feline Family. Lions and Tigers have been around for centuries. They're still Lions and Tigers. Can they interbreed? Yes. Do they interbreed without man's interference? No.

There's no evolutionary advantages in remaining ethnicly "pure." Quite a lot of disadvantages in fact as seen in Jews and blacks with inherited genetic conditions becoming more and more common as with Taysach's in Jews, and sickle cell in blacks. Interethnic breeding helps to suppress heriditary contions like these.

I disagree again. There are various advantages to remaining ethnically pure. Firstly, if God is the Planner and Designer then I should think that His current design IS as it should be. He, not we, get to exercise His will in such a manner. Secondly, history shows that Europeans are far more advanced where architecture; engineering; technology; medicine; travel; communication; etc. are concerned as compared to African peoples. Would it benefit the European peoples to reduce their standards by mixing their blood with a people who's standards are far lower?

Maybe God created us ethnicly pure to teach us that staying thus is bad, but intermarrying is good?

 

[JoeMoma]

Why MUST we mix races?

What is the point, other than it being part of the progtard's vision of their melting pot utopia where everyone is the SAME?

Individuals are free to partner with those of other races. So it's not that we MUST mix races; however, it's that race mixing is not prohibited.

As such, America will become more and more a blended population as time goes on.

 

[Roadrunner]

How many white people are happy with their child marrying a black, hispanic or oriental?

I could care less as long as they are a good person. Asian women actually are hot!!!

What a sweeping generalization.

Well you know I do like all women.

Ugly comes in all races.

You can have ugly, my woman is smokin' hot.
the who you talk about your woman i wish you could see mine - Bing Videos

 

[DriftingSand]

Agreed! See my post above.

All ethnicities share this concern. For various reasons some believe a 'pure ethnicty' is desireable, and so try to control who intermarries with whom. Jews worry interfaith marriages will result in children not being raised Jewish, indians apparently worry interethnic marriage will result in children being half indian the first generation, quarter the next, and on n on.

Simple fact though is this is inevitible. Human race will eventually be so interbred the ethnicites as they exist now will be long gone. Sooner we're all some tannish shade the better. Though I'm sure we'll still find something to hate one another about. Stars on our bellies, or no stars on our bellies...

I tend to disagree. True ... the Liberal/Socialist push to intermarry for the sake of intermarriage is alive and well and many there be who will fall for their mantra hook, line, and sinker. However, there will always be pockets where various ethnic groups remain true to their roots and heritage. I consider the Feline Family. Lions and Tigers have been around for centuries. They're still Lions and Tigers. Can they interbreed? Yes. Do they interbreed without man's interference? No.

There's no evolutionary advantages in remaining ethnicly "pure." Quite a lot of disadvantages in fact as seen in Jews and blacks with inherited genetic conditions becoming more and more common as with Taysach's in Jews, and sickle cell in blacks. Interethnic breeding helps to suppress heriditary contions like these.

I disagree again. There are various advantages to remaining ethnically pure. Firstly, if God is the Planner and Designer then I should think that His current design IS as it should be. He, not we, get to exercise His will in such a manner. Secondly, history shows that Europeans are far more advanced where architecture; engineering; technology; medicine; travel; communication; etc. are concerned as compared to African peoples. Would it benefit the European peoples to reduce their standards by mixing their blood with a people who's standards are far lower?

Maybe God created us ethnicly pure to teach us that staying thus is bad, but intermarrying is good?

Not if you read what He has to say about it:

Genesis 1:25, "And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good."

1 Kings 11:2, "Of the nations concerning which the LORD said unto the children of Israel, Ye shall not go in to them, neither shall they come in unto you: for surely they will turn away your heart after their gods: Solomon clave unto these in love."

 

[007]

Why MUST we mix races?

What is the point, other than it being part of the progtard's vision of their melting pot utopia where everyone is the SAME?

Individuals are free to partner with those of other races. So it's not that we MUST mix races; however, it's that race mixing is not prohibited.

As such, America will become more and more a blended population as time goes on.

Who are you to tell any race they HAVE to allow another race to marry them? What right do you have to do that?

And I see no advantage at all to a "blended population." Again, why does everyone have to be the SAME? That's just politically correct leftist hyperbole.

 

[007]

A Native American Indian tribe wants to preserve its heritage but a group of Black politicians wants to put a stop to it. Wait a minute!!! We're all forced to endure the annual, February "Black History Month" but blacks don't want Indians to celebrate their history and heritage? Isn't that a tad bit disingenuous of them?
Past ban on marrying blacks may mar tribe s future CNS News

We can allow an all black ...:
a) ... Miss Black American pageant.
b) ... colleges and Universities.
c) ... entertainment television (BET)
d) ... magazines (Ebony)

... but Indians aren't allowed to have an all Indian tribe? What gives?

Not like indians are the only ones with that sort of ban. Was common for Catholics and Jews too.

Agreed! See my post above.

All ethnicities share this concern. For various reasons some believe a 'pure ethnicty' is desireable, and so try to control who intermarries with whom. Jews worry interfaith marriages will result in children not being raised Jewish, indians apparently worry interethnic marriage will result in children being half indian the first generation, quarter the next, and on n on.

Simple fact though is this is inevitible. Human race will eventually be so interbred the ethnicites as they exist now will be long gone. Sooner we're all some tannish shade the better. Though I'm sure we'll still find something to hate one another about. Stars on our bellies, or no stars on our bellies...

I tend to disagree. True ... the Liberal/Socialist push to intermarry for the sake of intermarriage is alive and well and many there be who will fall for their mantra hook, line, and sinker. However, there will always be pockets where various ethnic groups remain true to their roots and heritage. I consider the Feline Family. Lions and Tigers have been around for centuries. They're still Lions and Tigers. Can they interbreed? Yes. Do they interbreed without man's interference? No.

There's no evolutionary advantages in remaining ethnicly "pure." Quite a lot of disadvantages in fact as seen in Jews and blacks with inherited genetic conditions becoming more and more common as with Taysach's in Jews, and sickle cell in blacks. Interethnic breeding helps to suppress heriditary contions like these.

For one, there is no such thing is "evolution."

Two, show me any sort of proof that interracial breeding has any advantages, as opposed to disadvantages.

Three, what right does anyone have to tell a race of people they have no right to wish to remain pure to their kind?

 

[JoeMoma]

Why MUST we mix races?

What is the point, other than it being part of the progtard's vision of their melting pot utopia where everyone is the SAME?

Individuals are free to partner with those of other races. So it's not that we MUST mix races; however, it's that race mixing is not prohibited.

As such, America will become more and more a blended population as time goes on.

Who are you to tell any race they HAVE to allow another race to marry them? What right do you have to do that?

And I see no advantage at all to a "blended population." Again, why does everyone have to be the SAME? That's just politically correct leftist hyperbole.

And who are you to tell any individual that he/she cannot marry someone who is not of the same race? I am not ruled by my race? Are you ruled by your race?