Incredibly Gutsy

How is that, by killing innocent people by remote control?

Innocent? Way to spin it Osama brit Laden.

What terrorist training camp were you trained at?

Obama has killed hundreds of people with drone attacks, and a good percentage of them never committed any terrorism.

Don't Democrats believe terrorists are entitled to a fair trial, just like Americans?

Whatever happened to that Democrat so-called "principle?"

Listen to this poor little turd brain whine and whimper because our President did exactly what he said he would do. After all, he was 'concerned' about Bin Laden.
 
Dumb ass. Our President didn't attack Pakistan. He went in and took out the man that masterminded the murder of 3000 Americans on American soil.

Wont get any argument on me on that comment, but it does not change the fact that if Obama was not a Democrat you Libs would be attacking him for taking a unilateral Action, and risking the destabilization of a Nuclear Powered Muslim Nation.

The level of Hippocracy this issue has exposed on the Lefts part is unbelievable.

I also have to take issue with who ever said Obama has made the right call at every turn.

he made the right call this time, on nearly every other matter of Foreign Policy, National Defense, and Terrorism, he has appeared indecisive, and made Poor Decisions.

IMO anyways.

He had to make the decision to take unilateral action against terrorists inside Pakistan for 2 reasons:

1. If he didn't, word would get out that he failed to act and he would be skewered.
2. His poll numbers were in the dumps.
 
Rush is right. Obama is INCREDIBLY gutsy.

Just days after a predawn raid by Navy SEALS killed OBL, the US launches another drone attack inside Pakistan which reportedly killed 15 militants. And this is taking place despite Pakistan's protests.

As I recall, Bush just tiptoed on the issue of going after militants inside Pakistan even as he sent billions of US dollars to Musharraff.


US Drone Strike Kills 15 Militants, Says Pakistan | South Asia | English

Funny I also seem to remember Democrats attacking Bush for even thinking of attacking inside Pakistan. They said it was insanity to attack into a nuclear powered Country, they said it could destabilize the Government of Pakistan and cause it to fall to Islamic Militants. They said Bush was a lunatic Warmonger for even considering it.

Does your Memory not include those little tid bits?

WE Must Give credit to Obama though...(YES, I'm serious here)...

August 1, 2007...

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uw2XTC1V4fk"]YouTube - Obama saying he would attack terrorists in Pakistan[/ame]

REUTERS ARTICLE

I agree, and I have and do give him much Credit. However I will not sit by and watch Liberals try and make it out like he is the only Reason we got Osama.
 
The only time there is any doubt about it is when a Democrat is in office.

A Democrat saved your ass in WWII. Guess you forgot about that.

ROFL! Sorry, but we were in no danger of being invaded by Nazi Germany or Japan. By becoming allies with the Soviet Union and sending it $billions in arms, FDR turned it into a much bigger threat than Nazi Germany ever could have been.

Egad, hard to believe anyone is this dumb about history. Ever hear of Pearl Harbor? And Germany declared war on the US, not the other way around.

But then this little turd wants to kiss Bin Laden's ass for murdering 3000 Americans on American soil. For proof, just look at his recent posts.
 
Funny I also seem to remember Democrats attacking Bush for even thinking of attacking inside Pakistan. They said it was insanity to attack into a nuclear powered Country, they said it could destabilize the Government of Pakistan and cause it to fall to Islamic Militants. They said Bush was a lunatic Warmonger for even considering it.

Does your Memory not include those little tid bits?

WE Must Give credit to Obama though...(YES, I'm serious here)...

August 1, 2007...

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uw2XTC1V4fk"]YouTube - Obama saying he would attack terrorists in Pakistan[/ame]

REUTERS ARTICLE

I agree, and I have and do give him much Credit. However I will not sit by and watch Liberals try and make it out like he is the only Reason we got Osama.

Agreed. Obama HAD TO adhere to the 'Bush Doctrine' and that includes GTMO ...
 
Dumb ass. Our President didn't attack Pakistan. He went in and took out the man that masterminded the murder of 3000 Americans on American soil.

Wont get any argument on me on that comment, but it does not change the fact that if Obama was not a Democrat you Libs would be attacking him for taking a unilateral Action, and risking the destabilization of a Nuclear Powered Muslim Nation.

The level of Hippocracy this issue has exposed on the Lefts part is unbelievable.

I also have to take issue with who ever said Obama has made the right call at every turn.

he made the right call this time, on nearly every other matter of Foreign Policy, National Defense, and Terrorism, he has appeared indecisive, and made Poor Decisions.

IMO anyways.

He had to make the decision to take unilateral action against terrorists inside Pakistan for 2 reasons:

1. If he didn't, word would get out that he failed to act and he would be skewered.
2. His poll numbers were in the dumps.

Pretty sad when those are the Reasons a president makes what was the right decision for America.

I mean let's face it here guys, it was not rocket science. When someone says hey we found the fucker, how much brains does it take to say go get his ass. Obama gets big kudos from me for choosing to send in commandos, and for not taking him alive.

He gets negative kudos from me for disposing of the body less than 5 hours after killing him, and refusing to show proof, and For nearly every other Major Foreign Policy decision he has made to date.

This latest attack into Pakistan today gets him some serious kudos as well. I am happy to see so far he is resisting the Urge some Liberals have already shown, to try and claim the War on Terror is over now. In the Short Term, I am guessing things just got a little more Dangerous not less. They are sure to attempt some form of Retribution attacks.
 
Last edited:
Dumb ass. Our President didn't attack Pakistan. He went in and took out the man that masterminded the murder of 3000 Americans on American soil.

Wont get any argument on me on that comment, but it does not change the fact that if Obama was not a Democrat you Libs would be attacking him for taking a unilateral Action, and risking the destabilization of a Nuclear Powered Muslim Nation.

The level of Hippocracy this issue has exposed on the Lefts part is unbelievable.

I also have to take issue with who ever said Obama has made the right call at every turn.

he made the right call this time, on nearly every other matter of Foreign Policy, National Defense, and Terrorism, he has appeared indecisive, and made Poor Decisions.

IMO anyways.

He had to make the decision to take unilateral action against terrorists inside Pakistan for 2 reasons:

1. If he didn't, word would get out that he failed to act and he would be skewered.
2. His poll numbers were in the dumps.

And seeing he had been adhering to the BUSH doctrine much to the dismay of his followers? Bootlickers? He had NO other choice...and he knew it.
 
Rush is right. Obama is INCREDIBLY gutsy.

Just days after a predawn raid by Navy SEALS killed OBL, the US launches another drone attack inside Pakistan which reportedly killed 15 militants. And this is taking place despite Pakistan's protests.

As I recall, Bush just tiptoed on the issue of going after militants inside Pakistan even as he sent billions of US dollars to Musharraff.


US Drone Strike Kills 15 Militants, Says Pakistan | South Asia | English

Strange.

When Bush attacked countries and used cowboy diplomacy it was a bad thing, what makes it good when Obama does it?

Bush used cowboy diplomacy ans obama is incredibly gutsy. Aren't you paying attention?
 
Wont get any argument on me on that comment, but it does not change the fact that if Obama was not a Democrat you Libs would be attacking him for taking a unilateral Action, and risking the destabilization of a Nuclear Powered Muslim Nation.

The level of Hippocracy this issue has exposed on the Lefts part is unbelievable.

I also have to take issue with who ever said Obama has made the right call at every turn.

he made the right call this time, on nearly every other matter of Foreign Policy, National Defense, and Terrorism, he has appeared indecisive, and made Poor Decisions.

IMO anyways.

He had to make the decision to take unilateral action against terrorists inside Pakistan for 2 reasons:

1. If he didn't, word would get out that he failed to act and he would be skewered.
2. His poll numbers were in the dumps.

Pretty sad when those are the Reasons a president makes what was the right decision for America.

I mean let's face it here guys, it was not rocket science. When someone says hey we found the fucker, how much brains does it take to say go get his ass. Obama gets big kudos from me for choosing to send in commandos, and for not taking him alive.

He gets negative kudos from me for disposing of the body less than 5 hours after killing him, and refusing to show proof, and For nearly every other Major Foreign Policy decision he has made to date.

This latest attack into Pakistan today gets him some serious kudos as well. I am happy to see so far he is resisting the Urge some Liberals have already shown, to try and claim the War on Terror is over now. In the Short Term, I am guessing things just got a little more Dangerous not less. They are sure to attempt some form of Retribution attacks.

And he gets Negatives from me for the multiple stories out there about HOW this went down and NOT putting his foot down and telling the friggin' TRUTH.
 
Rush is right. Obama is INCREDIBLY gutsy.

Just days after a predawn raid by Navy SEALS killed OBL, the US launches another drone attack inside Pakistan which reportedly killed 15 militants. And this is taking place despite Pakistan's protests.

As I recall, Bush just tiptoed on the issue of going after militants inside Pakistan even as he sent billions of US dollars to Musharraff.


US Drone Strike Kills 15 Militants, Says Pakistan | South Asia | English

Strange.

When Bush attacked countries and used cowboy diplomacy it was a bad thing, what makes it good when Obama does it?

Dumb ass. Our President didn't attack Pakistan. He went in and took out the man that masterminded the murder of 3000 Americans on American soil.

And that was justified whether that man was in Pakistan, or had been in the center of Paris, London, Moscow, or Bejing.

As far as using drones on Al Quida, that is far better than carpet bombing an area to get them.

Get over, you pathetic losers, our President made the right call, and has been making the right calls on the terrorists since he took office. From Africa to Pakistan, he has made clear that he intends to destroy the Al Queda.

Dumb ass.

Sending armed forces into another country without their permission is an act of war under all applicable international laws. That means, if you believe that Pakistan did not approve the raid in advance, we just attacked Pakistan.

If you point out any place I said that Obama did not make the right call I will be happy to admit that I said that. Until then, the only real reason you have to jump me is for calling out people who jumped on Bush for this while supporting Obama for doing the exact same thing. Did I strike a nerve?
 
Strange.

When Bush attacked countries and used cowboy diplomacy it was a bad thing, what makes it good when Obama does it?

Dumb ass. Our President didn't attack Pakistan. He went in and took out the man that masterminded the murder of 3000 Americans on American soil.

And that was justified whether that man was in Pakistan, or had been in the center of Paris, London, Moscow, or Bejing.

As far as using drones on Al Quida, that is far better than carpet bombing an area to get them.

Get over, you pathetic losers, our President made the right call, and has been making the right calls on the terrorists since he took office. From Africa to Pakistan, he has made clear that he intends to destroy the Al Queda.

Dumb ass.

Sending armed forces into another country without their permission is an act of war under all applicable international laws. That means, if you believe that Pakistan did not approve the raid in advance, we just attacked Pakistan.

If you point out any place I said that Obama did not make the right call I will be happy to admit that I said that. Until then, the only real reason you have to jump me is for calling out people who jumped on Bush for this while supporting Obama for doing the exact same thing. Did I strike a nerve?

Again it boggles the mind...some folks here (NOT YOU QW), have alot to learn about Sovereignty of a piece of land...
 
THIS..is the way you prosecute a war on terror.

How is that, by killing innocent people by remote control?
I don't recall cons being concerned about the deaths of thousands of civilians in Iraq or Afghanistan.
Hell, I heard calls for nuking Iran.
And we SHOULD Nuke those bastards....but ot so hastily...they have internal problems with the call for AhmainaJhihad being asked to step down from their religious leader...
 
You guys are seriously, REALLY griping about the carrying on of an already well established Bush program?

Really?

I think that far more credit should be given to the various men who helped develop the helicopter.
Nobody's really griping about the stealth copter, at least not in this thread. Unfortunate we didn't completely destroy it though.

BUT, military secrets are always the most fleeting.... China probably has all the specs on it anyway, probably has videos of it being built, tested, everything else.
China probably built all of the parts ,in 200 different factories, and had no idea what they were.
The parts were under contract for a Russian guy named Fred who builds windmills.
"Wong. Fred here. Remember those experimental rotors I had you build ? . You heard about the tornadoes right ? Yeah. I need 100 more".
"We'll have to go fishing some day"
"Скажите Hellow к жене."
 
THIS..is the way you prosecute a war on terror.

How is that, by killing innocent people by remote control?
I don't recall cons being concerned about the deaths of thousands of civilians in Iraq or Afghanistan.
Hell, I heard calls for nuking Iran.

I still don't see any of them concerned about it. What bothers me is the fact that, now that a bona fide progressive is in office, neither are the liberals.
 
How is that, by killing innocent people by remote control?
I don't recall cons being concerned about the deaths of thousands of civilians in Iraq or Afghanistan.
Hell, I heard calls for nuking Iran.

I still don't see any of them concerned about it. What bothers me is the fact that, now that a bona fide progressive is in office, neither are the liberals.

But those same Liberals are quick to lay blame/success depending upon politics.
 
He only did as it would embellish himself as the ONLY POTUS to have FOUR TERMS breaking from tradition of George Washington.

*NEXT*

I'm sorry, did you really just say that the only reason Roosevelt entered World War II was to get a fourth term?

Seriously?

Wow. Just, wow.
 
The only time there is any doubt about it is when a Democrat is in office.

A Democrat saved your ass in WWII. Guess you forgot about that.

ROFL! Sorry, but we were in no danger of being invaded by Nazi Germany or Japan. By becoming allies with the Soviet Union and sending it $billions in arms, FDR turned it into a much bigger threat than Nazi Germany ever could have been.

ROFL. Wow, revisionist history is RAMPANT among right-wingers these days.

SO, you're saying, and let me make sure I have this right, that America fucked things up for the UK by coming to help in WWII.

Right?
 

Forum List

Back
Top