If you try to impeach Trump, the American people will not stand for it

[Papageorgio]

So if the investigation turns up nothing, I bet we see the left to continue with the accusations and treat it as if Trump is guilty and then we will see them dig up the next issue. It won't end for four to eight years. Just like what the Republicans did to Obama.

All BS, both sides participate and both claim "only the other side" does it.

It is a big joke!

So when did the GOP get hacked and when did Dems fire the FBI head, and when did Dems project an imaginary world where say, the rich pay too much in taxes, "Dem laws" from years ago caused a "mild recession", corrupt Hillary and Foundation, gay Muslim Barry had 2 years of control and caused inequality lol, Total GOP BS: ACORN, Kenyan Muslim Marxist,Tides, Mosque, Death Panel, lose your doctor, huge costs, DEBT CRISIS, Obama Recession, stimulus failed, Barney Frank, Nazi Soros, Nazi socialists, Volt suqs, Iran making bomb etc etc.

You are another partisan hack, anything you post is BS, thanks for proving you are just a mindless tool of the Democrats.

Answer: Never, and that is all BS GOP propaganda, dupe. You believe all the GOP character assassination that never makes it to the real world. Oh- a consensual BJ...idiot.

Didn't ask a question, again your reading comprehension is terrible. Never mentioned the blow job shithead, another lie from the Democrats bitch. What do I believe, you fucking don't know, nor do you care because you are the pussy of the Democratic Party.

I caught you lying so fuck off! You said no Democrats were talking impeachment and I proved you wrong, now go ahead and lie some more.

Fox found a few, ditto CNN, it's no more a serious trend than anarchists causing damage, let alone Dems, dupe. Fear mongering propaganda (Fox Rush) and ratings hounds (real media also suqs)...

So you lied, just admit it and move on and quit justifying your BS.

 

[Papageorgio]

Here you go myth busters:

Byron York: Harvard study: CNN, NBC Trump coverage 93 percent negative

93%! Wow! That's not Journalism, that's propaganda....Worthy of Pravda.

Outside of Fox and Am radio, the liberals have everything else. They dominate the schools, they dominate the colleges, they dominate Hollywood, they dominate MSM, they dominate newspapers. Heck, I got so sick of Goggle News I went to Bing instead because Google News has so much bias.

They have so much domination of the general public but cry foul when you point out the obvious.

Intelligent people you mean. Rednecks, bigots, haters dominate the GOP vote, lying scumbags the GOP.

You are a bigot, a hater and a liar, so you are worse than the GOP! LOL!

I hate lies, and don't tell any. You believe exceptions to the rules mean something. Dems dominate the coasts, the GOP dominates farmers and rednecks and ignorant whites. And of course their greedy rich a-hole white lying core.

You hate lies yet you constantly spew them. Pretty funny, look if you have to lie to make your point, go ahead but I call you out on it.

 

[Flopper]

You miss the point

Was there collusion?
if there was....it is treason

Do you agree?
If Trump traded concessions in return for help winning an election?

You don't investigate something based on what people make up in their heads. You investigate when there is some kind of evidence that something was done illegally. There is nothing.....not even a smidgen of evidence that Trump had anything to do with the Russians.

That would be similar if you lived down the street from me, and I went to the police and said I think you're a murderer. No body, no evidence, no names, just I decided that you were. Do you think the police department would send their detectives out to investigate you based on something I made up in my head?

True, but that evidence may not be known to the public. It is not uncommon for the FBI to conduct investigations without any public knowledge of any evidence of a crime. In the files on the fourth floor of the J. Edgar Hoover Building, there are records of thousands of investigation carried out in secret by the FBI. Usually if there is insufficient evidence to prosecute after the investigation completes, the bureau will close the investigation with no report to the public. Only in high profile cases, such as the Clinton email investigation does the FBI make a report public.

In high profile investigations such the Russian interference in the election and the Clinton email investigation, there are always leaks creating a media frenzy. Congressional investigations put pressure on the FBI to release information before the investigation is complete which feeds the media frenzy and produces more leaks with both real and false information.

The closest thing we will get to an accurate picture of Russian inference in the election and any Trump campaign involvement will come from the final report of FBI investigation which has now morphed into the investigation by the Special Council. One thing we can count on is that report will not please either side just as the report of the Clinton email investigation brought condemnation from both the right and left.

I think this investigation will show what we already suspect, and that is Trump is not guilty of anything.

Trump was not a politician until he joined this race. And it's not like it's a job he just had to have. For Trump, it was great if he could become President, and if not, he had better things to do anyway.

And again, this Seth Rich story. Why is his computer under lock and key by the authorities? Why did they close the murder investigation? One would think that if the FBI were serious about finding out who hacked the servers, that would be the first place they'd look.

If Trump is found guilty of anything, it will be because he wasn't a politician. The name of game in politics is "cover your ass and assume someone is always listening and watching.

Trump has owned his own business for over 30 years, operated it in near complete privacy, has never had the media to contend with in his decisions, and has bent the rules if not violating them as every successful developer does. It's pretty clear that Trump never took Politics 101. He may be a success seasoned businessman, but in politics, he is a babe in the woods.

Oh he's had the media to deal with in his past. Remember he was also an entertainer.

Trump is learning and has much more learning to go. No, he's not a professional politician which is why I stated he didn't have anything to do with Russia. That's not how he operates and to be totally honest, I don't think he wanted the job of President all that badly.

The left can't sleep at night because they are so consumed with a Trump impeachment. As far as they are concerned, he's already guilty. But like they've done to themselves repeatedly in the past, they are only setting themselves up for yet another huge disappointment.

My point is that Trump leaves himself completely open to attacks by the opposition because of his behavior.

Throughout his career he has been a tell it the way it is kind of guy, or at least the way he believed it is. It didn't matter who got hurt. He loved to shock people with vial language as he has done on the Howard Stern Show a number of times. He would brag about the women he was sleeping with while he was married to Ivana and later to Marla, referring to his daughter as a piece of ass. Tearing down successful people became an obsession with him. When asked about the sport stadium he promised to build in New York or the public art walk that was to be part of the Hyatt deal, he just ignores the question or totally denies what is public record. That is the Trump that entered the campaign for president.

As a candidate, he did pretty much what he did in New York as a business man. Thanks to a democrat that never should have run, an overconfident democrat base, and a message that resonated with rural America, he found himself president. As president, he is following the same pattern that has made him successful and a darling of the media but it's not working because the opposition knows how to turn every statement he says against him. Most presidents, know how to hold their tongue but not Trump, to resist boasting, and to coordinates statements with his staff and follow the advice of those with real political experience. If he doesn't start paying attention to people that really know Washington politics, he's going to find himself out of a job.

 

[Flopper]

That's probably true in my case. I imagine I won't stand for it --- I'll sit back with a beer and some munchies, cheering on my team like a spor
You STILL haven't seen the numbers?

What do you do, go 24/7?

He got the majority in every state he won the electoral votes. Popular vote doesn't count in this country.

Oh, the national popular vote counts, just not toward the election of the president.

Oh really? What does it count for then?

When there is a large disparity between the electoral vote and popular vote, the presidents job becomes more difficult because there will be more people speaking out against him, more protests, and more attacks from media. Considering Trump's outrageous behavior, the opposition is all the greater. In states where Trump won by narrow margins, such as Florida, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and New Hampshire, Republican congressmen in these states have to be very careful of support for Trump, least it comes back to haunt them in the next execution.

I don't know where you've been living, but in the US, the media is always against a Republican President. Last measured, the media is reporting negative stories on Trump in the 90% range. Troublemakers will protest whether they are in the majority or in the 20% bracket of people against who they are protesting. They don't care, as long as they can start trouble.

So the popular vote means very little. As for representatives, they have to be careful both ways. Like the last election, Trump supporters are not as overt as liberals. They only get riled up on voting day. The RNC learned this the hard way. They've been yanking our chain for years now telling us if we give them the ability, they will carry out our wishes. When we do give them that ability, they give us excuses instead of action. So all 15 other candidates were rejected and we nominated Donald Trump because we got sick of the status quo.

Most of the people I know that voted for Trump were just voting against Hillary. Well, Hillary's out of the picture now and it's just Trump. A lot of Trump voters are seeing Trump for what he is, a rather meanspirited, incompetent president who is totally self absorbed.

As I said having a large popular vote means a lot. It means lots of opposition. It means 5 states that Trump won by a sliver can easily swing away from in the midterms.

 

[francoHFW]

So when did the GOP get hacked and when did Dems fire the FBI head, and when did Dems project an imaginary world where say, the rich pay too much in taxes, "Dem laws" from years ago caused a "mild recession", corrupt Hillary and Foundation, gay Muslim Barry had 2 years of control and caused inequality lol, Total GOP BS: ACORN, Kenyan Muslim Marxist,Tides, Mosque, Death Panel, lose your doctor, huge costs, DEBT CRISIS, Obama Recession, stimulus failed, Barney Frank, Nazi Soros, Nazi socialists, Volt suqs, Iran making bomb etc etc.

You are another partisan hack, anything you post is BS, thanks for proving you are just a mindless tool of the Democrats.

Answer: Never, and that is all BS GOP propaganda, dupe. You believe all the GOP character assassination that never makes it to the real world. Oh- a consensual BJ...idiot.

Didn't ask a question, again your reading comprehension is terrible. Never mentioned the blow job shithead, another lie from the Democrats bitch. What do I believe, you fucking don't know, nor do you care because you are the pussy of the Democratic Party.

I caught you lying so fuck off! You said no Democrats were talking impeachment and I proved you wrong, now go ahead and lie some more.

Fox found a few, ditto CNN, it's no more a serious trend than anarchists causing damage, let alone Dems, dupe. Fear mongering propaganda (Fox Rush) and ratings hounds (real media also suqs)...

So you lied, just admit it and move on and quit justifying your BS.

What lie, jackass?

 

[Flopper]

No it's not. You're just too retarded to comprehend there are multiple reasons for people to not be in the workforce -- one of which, includes people 16 and over who never held a job or looked for one. You know, what you idiotically refer to as "dropping out" of something they were never in.

Which is irrelevant to the discussion. We were talking about the unemployment rate under DumBama. The unemployment rate is effected by the amount of people (of working age) not (or no longer) in the workforce. Instead of looking at the obvious, you create some kind of leftist wack job theory that 16 year olds simultaneously decided not to work. As the chart shows, there haven't been this many people out of the workforce since the Carter administration.

But nooooo, it can't be DumBama's fault. It must be 16 year olds decided not to work once he became President.

Are you complaining about the 95 million who are not in the workforce under today's Republicans?

Why aren't they doing anything about it?

Trump is trying to do something about it. In 2014, it was estimated that all new jobs created during DumBama's time equaled the amount of illegals that entered this country. Stopping that will be a big help.

Lower taxes means more business will stay here, and quite possibly bring some back. So jobs are part of the answer, the other part is getting all these people off of social programs so they have to go work.

What legislation has Trump passed?
Illegals are not counted as out of the workforce. There were one million fewer illegals at the end of Obama's presidency

95 million are without a job, why hasn't Trump done anything?

Lower taxes mean business just keeps the extra money. If there is a market for additional product......business would already be filling it

I guess 120 or so days and the entire agenda is supposed to be filled and done....Wow....That would be amazing...Too bad it's not realistic.

There has never been anything realistic about Trump.

 

[Papageorgio]

You are another partisan hack, anything you post is BS, thanks for proving you are just a mindless tool of the Democrats.

Answer: Never, and that is all BS GOP propaganda, dupe. You believe all the GOP character assassination that never makes it to the real world. Oh- a consensual BJ...idiot.

Didn't ask a question, again your reading comprehension is terrible. Never mentioned the blow job shithead, another lie from the Democrats bitch. What do I believe, you fucking don't know, nor do you care because you are the pussy of the Democratic Party.

I caught you lying so fuck off! You said no Democrats were talking impeachment and I proved you wrong, now go ahead and lie some more.

Fox found a few, ditto CNN, it's no more a serious trend than anarchists causing damage, let alone Dems, dupe. Fear mongering propaganda (Fox Rush) and ratings hounds (real media also suqs)...

So you lied, just admit it and move on and quit justifying your BS.

What lie, jackass?

Again idiot, you said the only ones talking impeachment was Fox News and the Republicans, you claimed the Democrats weren't talking about it at all. There were at least three Democrats on CNN talking impeachment and I would venture that there are more besides the three on CNN. So you lied, live with it!

Now go spin your BS propaganda that you didn't lie. Lol! We all can read what you posted, you low life lying sack of crap.

 

[Papageorgio]

You are another partisan hack, anything you post is BS, thanks for proving you are just a mindless tool of the Democrats.

Answer: Never, and that is all BS GOP propaganda, dupe. You believe all the GOP character assassination that never makes it to the real world. Oh- a consensual BJ...idiot.

Didn't ask a question, again your reading comprehension is terrible. Never mentioned the blow job shithead, another lie from the Democrats bitch. What do I believe, you fucking don't know, nor do you care because you are the pussy of the Democratic Party.

I caught you lying so fuck off! You said no Democrats were talking impeachment and I proved you wrong, now go ahead and lie some more.

Fox found a few, ditto CNN, it's no more a serious trend than anarchists causing damage, let alone Dems, dupe. Fear mongering propaganda (Fox Rush) and ratings hounds (real media also suqs)...

So you lied, just admit it and move on and quit justifying your BS.

What lie, jackass?

Been there done that, you can't read what you wrote? Lol! I thought you were a teacher and you can't even follow a thread! Man have the Democrats landed one stupid lying partisan hack.

 

[Indeependent]

True, but that evidence may not be known to the public. It is not uncommon for the FBI to conduct investigations without any public knowledge of any evidence of a crime. In the files on the fourth floor of the J. Edgar Hoover Building, there are records of thousands of investigation carried out in secret by the FBI. Usually if there is insufficient evidence to prosecute after the investigation completes, the bureau will close the investigation with no report to the public. Only in high profile cases, such as the Clinton email investigation does the FBI make a report public.

In high profile investigations such the Russian interference in the election and the Clinton email investigation, there are always leaks creating a media frenzy. Congressional investigations put pressure on the FBI to release information before the investigation is complete which feeds the media frenzy and produces more leaks with both real and false information.

The closest thing we will get to an accurate picture of Russian inference in the election and any Trump campaign involvement will come from the final report of FBI investigation which has now morphed into the investigation by the Special Council. One thing we can count on is that report will not please either side just as the report of the Clinton email investigation brought condemnation from both the right and left.

So if the investigation turns up nothing, I bet we see the left to continue with the accusations and treat it as if Trump is guilty and then we will see them dig up the next issue. It won't end for four to eight years. Just like what the Republicans did to Obama.

All BS, both sides participate and both claim "only the other side" does it.

It is a big joke!

So when did the GOP get hacked and when did Dems fire the FBI head, and when did Dems project an imaginary world where say, the rich pay too much in taxes, "Dem laws" from years ago caused a "mild recession", corrupt Hillary and Foundation, gay Muslim Barry had 2 years of control and caused inequality lol, Total GOP BS: ACORN, Kenyan Muslim Marxist,Tides, Mosque, Death Panel, lose your doctor, huge costs, DEBT CRISIS, Obama Recession, stimulus failed, Barney Frank, Nazi Soros, Nazi socialists, Volt suqs, Iran making bomb etc etc.

You are another partisan hack, anything you post is BS, thanks for proving you are just a mindless tool of the Democrats.

Answer: Never, and that is all BS GOP propaganda, dupe. You believe all the GOP character assassination that never makes it to the real world. Oh- a consensual BJ...idiot.

Didn't ask a question, again your reading comprehension is terrible. Never mentioned the blow job shithead, another lie from the Democrats bitch. What do I believe, you fucking don't know, nor do you care because you are the pussy of the Democratic Party.

I caught you lying so fuck off! You said no Democrats were talking impeachment and I proved you wrong, now go ahead and lie some more.

Maxine Waters, the Official Retard of the Democratic Party, for one.
Or considering her non-existent IQ, for none.

 

[Indeependent]

Answer: Never, and that is all BS GOP propaganda, dupe. You believe all the GOP character assassination that never makes it to the real world. Oh- a consensual BJ...idiot.

Didn't ask a question, again your reading comprehension is terrible. Never mentioned the blow job shithead, another lie from the Democrats bitch. What do I believe, you fucking don't know, nor do you care because you are the pussy of the Democratic Party.

I caught you lying so fuck off! You said no Democrats were talking impeachment and I proved you wrong, now go ahead and lie some more.

Fox found a few, ditto CNN, it's no more a serious trend than anarchists causing damage, let alone Dems, dupe. Fear mongering propaganda (Fox Rush) and ratings hounds (real media also suqs)...

So you lied, just admit it and move on and quit justifying your BS.

What lie, jackass?

Again idiot, you said the only ones talking impeachment was Fox News and the Republicans, you claimed the Democrats weren't talking about it at all. There were at least three Democrats on CNN talking impeachment and I would venture that there are more besides the three on CNN. So you lied, live with it!

Now go spin your BS propaganda that you didn't lie. Lol! We all can read what you posted, you low life lying sack of crap.

You can't make this bullshit up; the "Impeachment" talk was on every fucking web site for days.

 

[Flopper]

No, you flaming moron. The "not in labor force" is not just folks who "dropped out." It's the number of people, age 16 and over, who are not in the work force. There are roughly 4 million teenagers who turn 16 every year. Every one who either doesn't have a job, or is not actively looking for one, would be considered "not in the labor force" though they were never in the labor force to begin with. And you idiotically categorize people who were never in the labor force as those who "dropped out."

The only possible way for that number to be so low is if people gave up looking for work, or did drop out. If you tell the survey people you are out of work and looking for a job, that counts in the unemployment rate. If you tell them you are not working nor looking for a job, you dropped out of the labor participation force and are not considered unemployed. That's one of the reasons the unemployment rate dropped like it did, yet no economic activity to reflect that rate.

No it's not. You're just too retarded to comprehend there are multiple reasons for people to not be in the workforce -- one of which, includes people 16 and over who never held a job or looked for one. You know, what you idiotically refer to as "dropping out" of something they were never in.

Which is irrelevant to the discussion. We were talking about the unemployment rate under DumBama. The unemployment rate is effected by the amount of people (of working age) not (or no longer) in the workforce. Instead of looking at the obvious, you create some kind of leftist wack job theory that 16 year olds simultaneously decided not to work. As the chart shows, there haven't been this many people out of the workforce since the Carter administration.

But nooooo, it can't be DumBama's fault. It must be 16 year olds decided not to work once he became President.

Holyfuckingshit!

YOU were the one to start talking about folks dropping out of the labor force. Now that you've been shown up as the raging imbecile you are with your ludicrous claims about it, you want to run away from it.

And I never said 16 year olds were the problem. I said 16 year olds included just one group of people who didn't "drop out" of the labor force. They were never in the labor force to begin with. That reveals what a moron you are for claiming 100% of the people not in the labor force are not in it because they "dropped out."

You are the moron that can't look at a chart and see something wrong. The LPR did not drop all of a sudden when DumBama became President because of 16 year olds.

Here are some other charts to give you a clue:

View attachment 128048


View attachment 128052


Starting to see the picture now????

And Trump still has not done anything about this

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

He got the majority in every state he won the electoral votes. Popular vote doesn't count in this country.

Oh, the national popular vote counts, just not toward the election of the president.

Oh really? What does it count for then?

When there is a large disparity between the electoral vote and popular vote, the presidents job becomes more difficult because there will be more people speaking out against him, more protests, and more attacks from media. Considering Trump's outrageous behavior, the opposition is all the greater. In states where Trump won by narrow margins, such as Florida, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and New Hampshire, Republican congressmen in these states have to be very careful of support for Trump, least it comes back to haunt them in the next execution.

I don't know where you've been living, but in the US, the media is always against a Republican President. Last measured, the media is reporting negative stories on Trump in the 90% range. Troublemakers will protest whether they are in the majority or in the 20% bracket of people against who they are protesting. They don't care, as long as they can start trouble.

So the popular vote means very little. As for representatives, they have to be careful both ways. Like the last election, Trump supporters are not as overt as liberals. They only get riled up on voting day. The RNC learned this the hard way. They've been yanking our chain for years now telling us if we give them the ability, they will carry out our wishes. When we do give them that ability, they give us excuses instead of action. So all 15 other candidates were rejected and we nominated Donald Trump because we got sick of the status quo.

Most of the people I know that voted for Trump were just voting against Hillary. Well, Hillary's out of the picture now and it's just Trump. A lot of Trump voters are seeing Trump for what he is, a rather meanspirited, incompetent president who is totally self absorbed.

As I said having a large popular means a lot. It means lots of opposition. It means 5 states that Trump won by a sliver can easily swing away from in the midterms.

That may be true, but not so accurate about us choosing Trump as our nominee.

The Hillary voters voted for Hillary. The Republicans voted for Trump, and Trump is now our President. The next election, the Hillary voters will vote for whoever the Democrat candidate is, and we will still vote for Trump whether it's for him, or to keep the Democrat candidate out.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

The only possible way for that number to be so low is if people gave up looking for work, or did drop out. If you tell the survey people you are out of work and looking for a job, that counts in the unemployment rate. If you tell them you are not working nor looking for a job, you dropped out of the labor participation force and are not considered unemployed. That's one of the reasons the unemployment rate dropped like it did, yet no economic activity to reflect that rate.

No it's not. You're just too retarded to comprehend there are multiple reasons for people to not be in the workforce -- one of which, includes people 16 and over who never held a job or looked for one. You know, what you idiotically refer to as "dropping out" of something they were never in.

Which is irrelevant to the discussion. We were talking about the unemployment rate under DumBama. The unemployment rate is effected by the amount of people (of working age) not (or no longer) in the workforce. Instead of looking at the obvious, you create some kind of leftist wack job theory that 16 year olds simultaneously decided not to work. As the chart shows, there haven't been this many people out of the workforce since the Carter administration.

But nooooo, it can't be DumBama's fault. It must be 16 year olds decided not to work once he became President.

Holyfuckingshit!

YOU were the one to start talking about folks dropping out of the labor force. Now that you've been shown up as the raging imbecile you are with your ludicrous claims about it, you want to run away from it.

And I never said 16 year olds were the problem. I said 16 year olds included just one group of people who didn't "drop out" of the labor force. They were never in the labor force to begin with. That reveals what a moron you are for claiming 100% of the people not in the labor force are not in it because they "dropped out."

You are the moron that can't look at a chart and see something wrong. The LPR did not drop all of a sudden when DumBama became President because of 16 year olds.

Here are some other charts to give you a clue:

View attachment 128048


View attachment 128052


Starting to see the picture now????

And Trump still has not done anything about this

Correct, he has not.....yet. He is currently a four month President with much opposition from the left. It's only reasonable to give a new President a year or so to prove what he can do. With all this Russia nonsense taking much of his time, not to mention leftist activist judges interfering in his duties, he's not doing too bad for a rookie.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Here you go myth busters:

Byron York: Harvard study: CNN, NBC Trump coverage 93 percent negative

93%! Wow! That's not Journalism, that's propaganda....Worthy of Pravda.

Outside of Fox and Am radio, the liberals have everything else. They dominate the schools, they dominate the colleges, they dominate Hollywood, they dominate MSM, they dominate newspapers. Heck, I got so sick of Goggle News I went to Bing instead because Google News has so much bias.

They have so much domination of the general public but cry foul when you point out the obvious.

Yup, all you ignorant brainwashed hater dupes have is the New BS GOP propaganda machine. And it's still enough to get liars and thieves elected AGAIN and obstruct fair policies and tax rates AGAIN. Great job, racist bigot morons....

No dum-dum. There are people with strong minds and people with weak minds. All the other outlets (outside of Fox and AM radio) are where the weak minds go. They are told what to think but not why to think it.

You are a perfect example of what I'm talking about because you post the same shit over and over day after day. You don't even know why you are posting it, but you are told to and that's all you need to know. I don't know who's worse, you or DannyPalos or whatever his name is. You are so boring I seldom even look at your posts because I know what they are going to say before reading them.

The truth is repetitive, so is your brainwashed propaganda. What you call a strong mind the rest of the world calls close minded bigotry. I listen to both sides and know history and know the facts. You believe a pile of pander to the greedy idiot rich propaganda and believe people just got stupid and lazy, not that GOP tax policy and reduced services cause all this suffering. You are a dupe.

Thanks for proving my point once again.

 

[francoHFW]

93%! Wow! That's not Journalism, that's propaganda....Worthy of Pravda.

Outside of Fox and Am radio, the liberals have everything else. They dominate the schools, they dominate the colleges, they dominate Hollywood, they dominate MSM, they dominate newspapers. Heck, I got so sick of Goggle News I went to Bing instead because Google News has so much bias.

They have so much domination of the general public but cry foul when you point out the obvious.

Intelligent people you mean. Rednecks, bigots, haters dominate the GOP vote, lying scumbags the GOP.

You are a bigot, a hater and a liar, so you are worse than the GOP! LOL!

I hate lies, and don't tell any. You believe exceptions to the rules mean something. Dems dominate the coasts, the GOP dominates farmers and rednecks and ignorant whites. And of course their greedy rich a-hole white lying core.

You hate lies yet you constantly spew them. Pretty funny, look if you have to lie to make your point, go ahead but I call you out on it.

WTF are you referring to jackass? Try quoting any such thing> I might be mistaken, just like you dupes just might be totally FOS as usual, not lying...

Answer: Never, and that is all BS GOP propaganda, dupe. You believe all the GOP character assassination that never makes it to the real world. Oh- a consensual BJ...idiot.

Didn't ask a question, again your reading comprehension is terrible. Never mentioned the blow job shithead, another lie from the Democrats bitch. What do I believe, you fucking don't know, nor do you care because you are the pussy of the Democratic Party.

I caught you lying so fuck off! You said no Democrats were talking impeachment and I proved you wrong, now go ahead and lie some more.

Fox found a few, ditto CNN, it's no more a serious trend than anarchists causing damage, let alone Dems, dupe. Fear mongering propaganda (Fox Rush) and ratings hounds (real media also suqs)...

So you lied, just admit it and move on and quit justifying your BS.

What lie, jackass?

Again idiot, you said the only ones talking impeachment was Fox News and the Republicans, you claimed the Democrats weren't talking about it at all. There were at least three Democrats on CNN talking impeachment and I would venture that there are more besides the three on CNN. So you lied, live with it!

Now go spin your BS propaganda that you didn't lie. Lol! We all can read what you posted, you low life lying sack of crap.

Basically no Dems, right. THEY WERE ASKED ABOUT IT, dupe.

 

[Flopper]

Oh, the national popular vote counts, just not toward the election of the president.

Oh really? What does it count for then?

When there is a large disparity between the electoral vote and popular vote, the presidents job becomes more difficult because there will be more people speaking out against him, more protests, and more attacks from media. Considering Trump's outrageous behavior, the opposition is all the greater. In states where Trump won by narrow margins, such as Florida, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and New Hampshire, Republican congressmen in these states have to be very careful of support for Trump, least it comes back to haunt them in the next execution.

I don't know where you've been living, but in the US, the media is always against a Republican President. Last measured, the media is reporting negative stories on Trump in the 90% range. Troublemakers will protest whether they are in the majority or in the 20% bracket of people against who they are protesting. They don't care, as long as they can start trouble.

So the popular vote means very little. As for representatives, they have to be careful both ways. Like the last election, Trump supporters are not as overt as liberals. They only get riled up on voting day. The RNC learned this the hard way. They've been yanking our chain for years now telling us if we give them the ability, they will carry out our wishes. When we do give them that ability, they give us excuses instead of action. So all 15 other candidates were rejected and we nominated Donald Trump because we got sick of the status quo.

Most of the people I know that voted for Trump were just voting against Hillary. Well, Hillary's out of the picture now and it's just Trump. A lot of Trump voters are seeing Trump for what he is, a rather meanspirited, incompetent president who is totally self absorbed.

As I said having a large popular means a lot. It means lots of opposition. It means 5 states that Trump won by a sliver can easily swing away from in the midterms.

That may be true, but not so accurate about us choosing Trump as our nominee.

The Hillary voters voted for Hillary. The Republicans voted for Trump, and Trump is now our President. The next election, the Hillary voters will vote for whoever the Democrat candidate is, and we will still vote for Trump whether it's for him, or to keep the Democrat candidate out.

You are assuming that Trump will be around as a viable candidate.
Trump won the election with 46.1% of the vote. On Jan 20th his approval rating stood at 45%. It has been falling rather steadily to 38%. It's far too soon to say what might happen in the next presidential election but unless Trump does a lot better than he has done in the first 4 months, voters are going to be pretty sick of Agent Orange's pontificating and whining about the unfair media.

 

[francoHFW]

93%! Wow! That's not Journalism, that's propaganda....Worthy of Pravda.

Outside of Fox and Am radio, the liberals have everything else. They dominate the schools, they dominate the colleges, they dominate Hollywood, they dominate MSM, they dominate newspapers. Heck, I got so sick of Goggle News I went to Bing instead because Google News has so much bias.

They have so much domination of the general public but cry foul when you point out the obvious.

Yup, all you ignorant brainwashed hater dupes have is the New BS GOP propaganda machine. And it's still enough to get liars and thieves elected AGAIN and obstruct fair policies and tax rates AGAIN. Great job, racist bigot morons....

No dum-dum. There are people with strong minds and people with weak minds. All the other outlets (outside of Fox and AM radio) are where the weak minds go. They are told what to think but not why to think it.

You are a perfect example of what I'm talking about because you post the same shit over and over day after day. You don't even know why you are posting it, but you are told to and that's all you need to know. I don't know who's worse, you or DannyPalos or whatever his name is. You are so boring I seldom even look at your posts because I know what they are going to say before reading them.

The truth is repetitive, so is your brainwashed propaganda. What you call a strong mind the rest of the world calls close minded bigotry. I listen to both sides and know history and know the facts. You believe a pile of pander to the greedy idiot rich propaganda and believe people just got stupid and lazy, not that GOP tax policy and reduced services cause all this suffering. You are a dupe.

Thanks for proving my point once again.

Facts really bother you...

 

[francoHFW]

No it's not. You're just too retarded to comprehend there are multiple reasons for people to not be in the workforce -- one of which, includes people 16 and over who never held a job or looked for one. You know, what you idiotically refer to as "dropping out" of something they were never in.

Which is irrelevant to the discussion. We were talking about the unemployment rate under DumBama. The unemployment rate is effected by the amount of people (of working age) not (or no longer) in the workforce. Instead of looking at the obvious, you create some kind of leftist wack job theory that 16 year olds simultaneously decided not to work. As the chart shows, there haven't been this many people out of the workforce since the Carter administration.

But nooooo, it can't be DumBama's fault. It must be 16 year olds decided not to work once he became President.

Holyfuckingshit!

YOU were the one to start talking about folks dropping out of the labor force. Now that you've been shown up as the raging imbecile you are with your ludicrous claims about it, you want to run away from it.

And I never said 16 year olds were the problem. I said 16 year olds included just one group of people who didn't "drop out" of the labor force. They were never in the labor force to begin with. That reveals what a moron you are for claiming 100% of the people not in the labor force are not in it because they "dropped out."

You are the moron that can't look at a chart and see something wrong. The LPR did not drop all of a sudden when DumBama became President because of 16 year olds.

Here are some other charts to give you a clue:

View attachment 128048


View attachment 128052


Starting to see the picture now????

And Trump still has not done anything about this

Correct, he has not.....yet. He is currently a four month President with much opposition from the left. It's only reasonable to give a new President a year or so to prove what he can do. With all this Russia nonsense taking much of his time, not to mention leftist activist judges interfering in his duties, he's not doing too bad for a rookie.

Much opposition from intelligent GOPers too. And he's dumped the dupes on all kinds of stuff. Lock her up, the wall basically, ISI, China, etc etc the first day. He's bullshitter, and so are the dupes like you...

 

[Faun]

No, you flaming moron. The "not in labor force" is not just folks who "dropped out." It's the number of people, age 16 and over, who are not in the work force. There are roughly 4 million teenagers who turn 16 every year. Every one who either doesn't have a job, or is not actively looking for one, would be considered "not in the labor force" though they were never in the labor force to begin with. And you idiotically categorize people who were never in the labor force as those who "dropped out."

The only possible way for that number to be so low is if people gave up looking for work, or did drop out. If you tell the survey people you are out of work and looking for a job, that counts in the unemployment rate. If you tell them you are not working nor looking for a job, you dropped out of the labor participation force and are not considered unemployed. That's one of the reasons the unemployment rate dropped like it did, yet no economic activity to reflect that rate.

No it's not. You're just too retarded to comprehend there are multiple reasons for people to not be in the workforce -- one of which, includes people 16 and over who never held a job or looked for one. You know, what you idiotically refer to as "dropping out" of something they were never in.

Which is irrelevant to the discussion. We were talking about the unemployment rate under DumBama. The unemployment rate is effected by the amount of people (of working age) not (or no longer) in the workforce. Instead of looking at the obvious, you create some kind of leftist wack job theory that 16 year olds simultaneously decided not to work. As the chart shows, there haven't been this many people out of the workforce since the Carter administration.

But nooooo, it can't be DumBama's fault. It must be 16 year olds decided not to work once he became President.

Holyfuckingshit!

YOU were the one to start talking about folks dropping out of the labor force. Now that you've been shown up as the raging imbecile you are with your ludicrous claims about it, you want to run away from it.

And I never said 16 year olds were the problem. I said 16 year olds included just one group of people who didn't "drop out" of the labor force. They were never in the labor force to begin with. That reveals what a moron you are for claiming 100% of the people not in the labor force are not in it because they "dropped out."

You are the moron that can't look at a chart and see something wrong. The LPR did not drop all of a sudden when DumBama became President because of 16 year olds.

Here are some other charts to give you a clue:

View attachment 128048


View attachment 128052


Starting to see the picture now????

What the fuck is wrong with you? You suffer some real brain disorder. Though I never said the not in labor force dropped under Obama nor did I say 16 year olds were the reason the number rose, you're so mentally challenged, you actually think I did.

Moron.... again .... you idiotically posited that 100% of the folks who are not in the labor force "dropped out" of it. I pointed to 16 year olds who never had a job and never looked for one are but one example of folks who are not in the labor force and did not drop "out of it." There are also millions of others of all ages who, for various reasons, such has being a stay-at-home parent, who did not "drop out" of the work force.

 

[Contumacious]

You don't investigate something based on what people make up in their heads. You investigate when there is some kind of evidence that something was done illegally. There is nothing.....not even a smidgen of evidence that Trump had anything to do with the Russians.

That would be similar if you lived down the street from me, and I went to the police and said I think you're a murderer. No body, no evidence, no names, just I decided that you were. Do you think the police department would send their detectives out to investigate you based on something I made up in my head?

True, but that evidence may not be known to the public. It is not uncommon for the FBI to conduct investigations without any public knowledge of any evidence of a crime. In the files on the fourth floor of the J. Edgar Hoover Building, there are records of thousands of investigation carried out in secret by the FBI. Usually if there is insufficient evidence to prosecute after the investigation completes, the bureau will close the investigation with no report to the public. Only in high profile cases, such as the Clinton email investigation does the FBI make a report public.

In high profile investigations such the Russian interference in the election and the Clinton email investigation, there are always leaks creating a media frenzy. Congressional investigations put pressure on the FBI to release information before the investigation is complete which feeds the media frenzy and produces more leaks with both real and false information.

The closest thing we will get to an accurate picture of Russian inference in the election and any Trump campaign involvement will come from the final report of FBI investigation which has now morphed into the investigation by the Special Council. One thing we can count on is that report will not please either side just as the report of the Clinton email investigation brought condemnation from both the right and left.

I think this investigation will show what we already suspect, and that is Trump is not guilty of anything.

Trump was not a politician until he joined this race. And it's not like it's a job he just had to have. For Trump, it was great if he could become President, and if not, he had better things to do anyway.

And again, this Seth Rich story. Why is his computer under lock and key by the authorities? Why did they close the murder investigation? One would think that if the FBI were serious about finding out who hacked the servers, that would be the first place they'd look.

If Trump is found guilty of anything, it will be because he wasn't a politician. The name of game in politics is "cover your ass and assume someone is always listening and watching.

Trump has owned his own business for over 30 years, operated it in near complete privacy, has never had the media to contend with in his decisions, and has bent the rules if not violating them as every successful developer does. It's pretty clear that Trump never took Politics 101. He may be a success seasoned businessman, but in politics, he is a babe in the woods.

Oh he's had the media to deal with in his past. Remember he was also an entertainer.

Trump is learning and has much more learning to go. No, he's not a professional politician which is why I stated he didn't have anything to do with Russia. That's not how he operates and to be totally honest, I don't think he wanted the job of President all that badly.

The left can't sleep at night because they are so consumed with a Trump impeachment. As far as they are concerned, he's already guilty. But like they've done to themselves repeatedly in the past, they are only setting themselves up for yet another huge disappointment.

My point is that Trump leaves himself completely open to attacks by the opposition because of his behavior.

Throughout his career he has been a tell it the way it is kind of guy, or at least the way he believed it is. It didn't matter who got hurt. He loved to shock people with vial language as he has done on the Howard Stern Show a number of times. He would brag about the women he was sleeping with while he was married to Ivana and later to Marla, referring to his daughter as a piece of ass. Tearing down successful people became an obsession with him. When asked about the sport stadium he promised to build in New York or the public art walk that was to be part of the Hyatt deal, he just ignores the question or totally denies what is public record. That is the Trump that entered the campaign for president.

As a candidate, he did pretty much what he did in New York as a business man. Thanks to a democrat that never should have run, an overconfident democrat base, and a message that resonated with rural America, he found himself president. As president, he is following the same pattern that has made him successful and a darling of the media but it's not working because the opposition knows how to turn every statement he says against him. Most presidents, know how to hold their tongue but not Trump, to resist boasting, and to coordinates statements with his staff and follow the advice of those with real political experience. If he doesn't start paying attention to people that really know Washington politics, he's going to find himself out of a job.

How did any of that constitute a FACTUAL BASIS FOR THE ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT?


.