Zone1 Would it Have Been Acceptable For Mary to Abort Jesus?

What if Mary were impregnated by Satan?

Would abortion be acceptable?
 
I don't misinterpret anything. Jesus is Lord God and Savior of all who accept Him. And, while there are those within all religions that are tempted to do evil, most are good people just living their lives. Or, at least, trying to.
No. They are not. Most are evil murdering savages who will **** you over if they can.

Jesus Good
Dogs Good
Men horrify even Satan.
 
Faith is evidence of things not seen but are true. Because you lack this ability doesn't mean there isn't evidence. There is plenty of it.

What evidence? Can you provide me with a "God-Detector"?

Oh, no, wait, you can't. in fact, unlike a tone of instruments that can be used to measure unseen things, there's no scientific instrument to detect God.

Whoops, I have a zero reading for Yahweh, but I'm getting some residual Krishna here!
 
Yes, billions of people throughout history, including scholars, doctors, scientists, teachers, leaders, and many many others are all wrong.

It's the uneducated retard on the internet who's figured it out. Lol

Millions of people used to believe the Earth was the Center of the Universe, and it was flat.

Again, where's your evidence of "God".
 
If God the Father knows the end from the beginning, he certainly chose Mary knowing full well that she would not murder her own child but love him and raise him in love. Jesus had the most important mission to fulfill in this life and I don't believe that God the Father would have allowed his plan to be frustrated. So I don't believe it would have been anywhere near acceptable for the mother of God to thwart the plan of God the Father.
 
No. They are not. Most are evil murdering savages who will **** you over if they can.

Jesus Good
Dogs Good
Men horrify even Satan.
Sorry you are a warped old boring cry baby. Most people are good people. You have a sickness. Probably TDS too
 
What evidence? Can you provide me with a "God-Detector"?

Oh, no, wait, you can't. in fact, unlike a tone of instruments that can be used to measure unseen things, there's no scientific instrument to detect God.

Whoops, I have a zero reading for Yahweh, but I'm getting some residual Krishna here!
I have the Holy Ghost who has detected God for me. I’m speaking of faith. Something that you have no control over me. 🤣
 
A lot of Christians are fine with whatever suits their fancy, regardless of what they claim they believe.

I suspect the same is true of people of other faiths.

And even of people who are not people of faith but rather people of humanistic morals and ethics.
 
I have the Holy Ghost who has detected God for me. I’m speaking of faith. Something that you have no control over me. 🤣

Those are the voices in your head, not evidence.

Look, I wish I could cure the religion delusion. We'd all be better off.

But as long as people are scared of dying, the religious hucksters will have a place in this world.
 
Those are the voices in your head, not evidence.

Look, I wish I could cure the religion delusion. We'd all be better off.

But as long as people are scared of dying, the religious hucksters will have a place in this world.
Nope, not in my head. Funny. You can't control these things over me. I have something you don't and it makes you mad. I have complete control over my conscience and decisions. The funny thing is, I'm not scared of dying. Because I know what comes next and you don't. And, that makes you hate even more what I have that you don't.
 
Nope, not in my head. Funny. You can't control these things over me. I have something you don't and it makes you mad. I have complete control over my conscience and decisions. The funny thing is, I'm not scared of dying. Because I know what comes next and you don't. And, that makes you hate even more what I have that you don't.

Guy, what you have, I neither want or need.

My problem with the Religious is that you aren't happy keeping your delusions in your churches, you want to inflict them on the rest of us.
 
When it came/comes to learning: Do you believe you can learn, or do you have faith you can learn?
None of the above.

I trust, based on evidence, that i can learn.


I know one of the favorite parlor tricks of religious rhetoric is to conflate the ideas of faith and trust. Because religious people want to see their magical beliefs placed on shelves with evidence-based determinations, where they do not belong.
 
None of the above.

I trust, based on evidence, that i can learn.


I know one of the favorite parlor tricks of religious rhetoric is to conflate the ideas of faith and trust. Because religious people want to see their magical beliefs placed on shelves with evidence-based determinations, where they do not belong.
It's etymology, not "parlor tricks". Because of etymology, the first synonym usually shown for 'faith' is 'trust'. 'Faith' came from 'fides' and originally it was used in a contractual way, having faith, trust, confidence that the contract would be fulfilled. I expected your volley to be 'confidence--I have confidence I can learn' but they (including 'confidence' all come from the same roots. 'Belief' is connected to these roots, as well, but from a slightly different angle meaning to value or hold dear (i.e., I believe in you).

I value God and hold him dear. I have faith, trust, confidence, etc. that he will fulfill his contracts/promises to us.

Your position is that you do not value God nor hold him dear. You have no faith, trust, confidence that God honors his contracts and fulfills his promises.

If you trust you can learn, then you also have faith you can learn from your teachers. You have confidence in that teacher-student contract.
 
15th post
Guy, what you have, I neither want or need.

My problem with the Religious is that you aren't happy keeping your delusions in your churches, you want to inflict them on the rest of us.
Says who? Who has forced you to join any church? Christians invite people to join them. They state their case and you get to freely accept or reject. Jews don’t actively proselytize. Neither do Buddhists and Hindus. Islam has sectors that do and are not freely accepted by most Muslims. You are such a woose.
 
Says who? Who has forced you to join any church? Christians invite people to join them. They state their case and you get to freely accept or reject. Jews don’t actively proselytize. Neither do Buddhists and Hindus. Islam has sectors that do and are not freely accepted by most Muslims. You are such a woose.

And if you kept your delusions in your churches, you'd be harmless. But it's when you try to keeping making them into laws I'm going to have an issue with you.

We really dodged a bullet when Romney was defeated.
 
And if you kept your delusions in your churches, you'd be harmless. But it's when you try to keeping making them into laws I'm going to have an issue with you.

We really dodged a bullet when Romney was defeated.
You are really a communist. You hate our Constitution. The Constitution protects religious freedoms. It does not protect atheist beliefs. There is no separation of Church and state. We are a Constitutional Republic who votes our conscience which includes religious beliefs.
 
You are really a communist. You hate our Constitution. The Constitution protects religious freedoms. It does not protect atheist beliefs. There is no separation of Church and state. We are a Constitutional Republic who votes our conscience which includes religious beliefs.

Um, no, guy, there is separation of Church and State, for which you should be happy, given that the Evangelicals think you Mormons are all heretical cultists.

Without secularism and separation of Church and State, America becomes Protestants and Catholics arguing over whether or not Jesus is made out of Stale Wafers.
 
Back
Top Bottom