Because I am either spouting mainstream science or absurdity. Elektra had been implying that wind turbines required petroleum-based lubricants, which he repeatedly described as "fossil fuels", and that this made wind turbines a global warming contributor. I responded that I didn't care if he used coal tar, the lubricants were not a source of GHG emissions. Would YOU have taken that as a suggestion that we should actually use coal tar? I doubt it. The problem here is Elektra.Your whole take on climate change is a joke. How can anyone differentiate between when you are serious and when you are joking--do you know?