Using Fossil fuels has caused you to live much longer. Why would you not enjoy that?

Wise use of fossils fuels is well within the ability of the earth to provide and to survive. It's the wastefulness that's the problem. Once again, overpopulation is the 800-pound gorilla in the room.
 
If the deniers here want to forgo electricity and indoor plumbing, and live in a cave with a hairy woman, they should feel free to do so.

The rest of us like technology.

And that's why we fight to keep the lights on after the fossil fuels run out. Deniers would leave humanity shivering in the dark, forever.
 
If the deniers here want to forgo electricity and indoor plumbing, and live in a cave with a hairy woman, they should feel free to do so.

The rest of us like technology.

And that's why we fight to keep the lights on after the fossil fuels run out. Deniers would leave humanity shivering in the dark, forever.

The hyperbolic lying is obvious here as NO one wants anyone to shiver in the dark, you just made it up.
 
If the deniers here want to forgo electricity and indoor plumbing, and live in a cave with a hairy woman, they should feel free to do so.

The rest of us like technology.

And that's why we fight to keep the lights on after the fossil fuels run out. Deniers would leave humanity shivering in the dark, forever.
What are you denying? Write it all down. You deny the following constantly.

Climate is caused not by humans, but by the environment. Examples are oceans, lakes, mountains, spin of earth, location on earth. And other factors. But humans lack the intelligence to manage climate. They try to manage rain and do poorly. They can't create clouds. They can't change climate.
 
If the deniers here want to forgo electricity and indoor plumbing, and live in a cave with a hairy woman, they should feel free to do so.

The rest of us like technology.

And that's why we fight to keep the lights on after the fossil fuels run out. Deniers would leave humanity shivering in the dark, forever.

The rest of us like technology.

How many new nuclear reactors should we build?
 
Industrial pollution and forever chemicals, combined with herbicides and pesticides in the food supply are a bigger threat and will cost hundreds of billions to mitigate their carcinogenic and toxic effects.
 
Naturally no one wants that - not even the craziest greenies

But libs are risking that result thanks to their deep belief in the global warming doomsday hoax

I prefer calling it a SCAM since it has been warming since the late 1970's
 

Forum List

Back
Top