A terrorist is anyone who attempts to use terror to attain a political or social objective. “Freedom fighters” would be attacking military personnel and targets NOT civilians like the Islamic terrorists do in almost every case.
It's time for the ignore button.
I could list hundreds of times Muslim terrorists deliberately attacked civilians while avoiding military personnel.
A few things here. Interestingly, the Palestinian people reject Iran because they think they’re all talk no walk..Notice how Iran only launched strike against Israel when Israel attacked Iran, but not when Israel was attacking Gaza.
Do We Go to War to Prevent Iran from Having Nuclear Weapons?
I hate war. As a historian, I have read countless books about war, especially those over the past cetownhall.com
With due respect to Mr. Lewis, I think he misses the point.
Has there ever been a time (in recent history) when a sovereign nation formally and emphatically declared that it intended to obliterate a nearby country, as well as one on the other side of the world?
Nuclear aspirations or not, Iran declares constantly that it will not rest until Israel is gone, along with every Jew who lives there. They declare that the United States is the "Great Satan," and that it will do the same to the U.S. in the event that it obtains the means to do so. It is also worth mentioning that neither Israel nor the U.S. has any animosity against Persia or its people, except in reaction to the atrocities with which we are all familiar.
This alone justifies the attacks on Iran, as well as the pursuit of any means necessary to prevent Iran from building the tools necessary to carry out its stated intentions.
The lack of expressions of outrage from the usual suspects at the U.N. is telling.
Seems to be a lack of courage on the part of your blob too.Do We Go to War to Prevent Iran from Having Nuclear Weapons?
I hate war. As a historian, I have read countless books about war, especially those over the past ce
With due respect to Mr. Lewis, I think he misses the point.
Has there ever been a time (in recent history) when a sovereign nation formally and emphatically declared that it intended to obliterate a nearby country, as well as one on the other side of the world?
Nuclear aspirations or not, Iran declares constantly that it will not rest until Israel is gone, along with every Jew who lives there. They declare that the United States is the "Great Satan," and that it will do the same to the U.S. in the event that it obtains the means to do so. It is also worth mentioning that neither Israel nor the U.S. has any animosity against Persia or its people, except in reaction to the atrocities with which we are all familiar.
This alone justifies the attacks on Iran, as well as the pursuit of any means necessary to prevent Iran from building the tools necessary to carry out its stated intentions.
The lack of expressions of outrage from the usual suspects at the U.N. is telling.
I dont know where the support is, because I dont see it
How did that work out for them? Look at them now. It turns out that threatening the US comes at a price.
Ah, the ole "one mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter" trope? Only fools repeat this clearly flawed argument.
Do you differentiate between "good" (state supported and politically correct) terror and "bad" (not state supported and politically incorrect) terror for your black and white definition? Is it not terror dropping those bunker busters on civilians to affect a regime change that you want? Just curious.
You voted for a man who assassinated General Qasem Soleimani of Iran. And why did he do that? It was because of his long and rich history of spreading terrorism throughout the Middle East that got a lot of Americans killed. Iran then sought to assassinated Trump in retaliation, but failed.
