Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No, the rest you don’t want to accept because you are angry your candidate didn’t win!I will leave Mac alone when he stops lying about "Trumpsters".
The rest is bald nonsense
No, the rest you don’t want to accept because you are angry your candidate didn’t win!
The only time the system isn’t cheating is when the candidate you voted for win the election and the rest of the time it is cheating for Deep State.
All Trump had to do is turn over everything and then fight it in court, but ateunp being Trump he knew those like you would go insane if he was raised by the FBI and bam the money start rolling in!
You didn't catch the funny part eh? Oh well
He said it in front of the camera crew when they were filming Trump trying to read from the US Constitution.
Again, this has been going on before you were even born but alas if Trump win in 2024 all will be good and you will sing Praises to the Heavens while the left screams “ He Cheated! “…I wasn't even rooting for Trump to be the candidate in 2024. A search of my posts will show this. I wanted DeSantis.
But you know what's worse than Biden, Trump, or anything?
An unelected cabal of bureaucrats who are not beholden to ANY of us and yet run everything.
You all are too dull or indoctrinated or who knows what to see THAT.
View attachment 687739
NO ONE ever called Trump a "mastermind" except himself, but YES, he is THAT stupid.
But a "genius" compared to his cult.
Sure..................just like Trump.I voted for Trump because of his policies and I can assure you that I am more intelligent and successful
That's true.than the vast majority of Democrats, particularly those that voted for Biden or didn’t vote for Trump because he is “orange” or whatever other grade school excuse they had.
Trump's policies benefitted Trump, not America or Americans, not even his cult.I don’t care if he is a mastermind or not, his policies made sense for the benefit of the US.
Maybe I'm just being naive but why give people LEGAL grounds to come after you?
That's like leaving a job, especially if involuntarily and deciding to keep one of the cell phones that you've been using for both work and personal calls and then refusing or not wanting to turn it over when asked for it. I understand that having your own personal items mixed in with your work items presents a dilemma but you don't deal with it by lying about what you're holding and then not turning over everything that is asked for.
Unless I'm missing something, does Trump or anyone else believe he's entitled to keep classified, top secret documents at his home? Why would he not turn these items over? Just general principle?
Former President Trump is asking a federal court to appoint a special master to review the documents the FBI seized from Mar-a-Lago this month during a court-authorized search.In a motion filed in federal court in Florida, Trump also is seeking to prevent the government from further reviewing the documents that were taken until a special master is appointed, and he wants the government to provide more details on items that were taken during the search.The legal action is the first from Trump's attorneys since FBI agents executed a search warrant at Mar-a-Lago two weeks ago."Law enforcement is a shield that protects Americans. It cannot be used as a weapon for political purposes," the filing says. "Therefore, we seek judicial assistance in the aftermath of an unprecedented and unnecessary raid on President Trump's home at Mar-a-Lago."Trump's attorneys argue that the search raises Fourth Amendment concerns and that the warrant used was overly broad. They also say the department took the unprecedented step of searching the former president's home despite what Trump's attorneys say was his voluntary assistance with investigators over several months.In a statement, Justice Department spokesman Anthony Coley reiterated that the search warrant at Mar-a-Lago was "authorized by a federal court upon the required finding of probable cause."The department is aware of Trump's motion, he said, and will file its response in court.Last Friday, the judge in the case, U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart, gave the Justice Department one week to provide a redacted copy of the affidavit used to justify the unprecedented search of Trump's residence. Multiple media organizations had asked the judge to unseal all documents related to the search, notably the affidavit laying out the reasoning and research. At a hearing last Thursday, the organizations said they do not want to release any information that would have a chilling effect on current or future witnesses, endanger people involved in the probe or compromise the investigation.
Politics The Justice Department argued at the hearing that redacting the affidavit would leave no information of substance to release and also noted that the search itself and release of the warrant last week had created a volatile situation where FBI agents have already received death threats.The Justice Department must give Reinhart their proposed redacted version by Thursday at noon. The judge has not said what, if anything, he will ultimately order made public.
While the Justice Department asked the court to unseal the warrant, citing intense public interest, it has argued strongly against releasing the affidavit, saying doing so could compromise its investigation, other probes, the possibility of future witness cooperation and the safety of agents and individuals named in the affidavit.The warrant shows that FBI agents retrieved documents labeled classified, secret, top secret and confidential as well potential presidential records. It also reveals that the Justice Department is investigating the potential violation of three federal statutes, including the Espionage Act and obstruction of justice.The genesis of the investigation comes from an unlikely source: the National Archives. This winter the agency, in charge of cataloguing and storing important government documents, retrieved 15 boxes of key presidential records that it said Trump was improperly and possibly illegally keeping at home.
www.fcw.com
No, it isn't.The answer is. He didn't keep anything.
They did.If he did then back in January why didn't they ask for them then?
Trump agreed to return some of the documents in January of 2022; NARA officials then retrieved fifteen boxes from Mar-a-Lago.National Archives recovered more than 100 classified documents from Trump in January
The more than 700 pages of classified material included documents relating to special access programs – some of the nation's most closely held secrets.
Back in January the national archives already asked for some documents back which they handed over, without a raid. If these raid documents were so important that it was worth a raid why didn't they ask for them 8 months ago?
Sure it is.It doesn't matter if he kept a cocktail napkin from the oval office where he scribbled down a reminder to have his dry cleaning picked up, they would have raided him because this isn't a out classified documents or anything. It's about a desperate play to do anything to keep him from running and sending a message to other Republicans "this is what happens when you mess with us".
I voted for Trump because of his policies and I can assure you that I am more intelligent and successful than the vast majority of Democrats, particularly those that voted for Biden or didn’t vote for Trump because he is “orange” or whatever other grade school excuse they had. I don’t care if he is a mastermind or not, his policies made sense for the benefit of the US.
Sure..................just like Trump.
"Actually, throughout my life, my two greatest assets have been mental stability and being, like, really smart," Trump tweeted. He added that being elected president "on my first try" should "qualify as not smart, but genius ... and a very stable genius at that!"
Average intelligent people don't vote for retards.
That's true.
Then again why would "intelligent" people vote for a lying, grifter?
That's stupidity.
Trump's policies benefitted Trump, not America or Americans, not even his cult.
Just like the Russian spy, Maria Butina.She quickly became a regular at Mara Lago.
So the ends justify the means? I find integrity, or what you refer to as personal crap, to be quite important. There was once a time when the right had integrity, too, but that was long before trump, and he made sure any remnants left of it in his party were competely expunged.You as a Prog concentrate on his personality. That is modern politics. I concentrated on the survival of a sovereign nation. The personal crap means little to Trump as he promoted less interference in an individual's life as compared to Progs. The governor of Michigan if lost in the hinterlands will never make it back to the hustle, bustle of modern lovable and rich Detroit.
So the ends justify the means? I find integrity, or what you refer to as personal crap, to be quite important. There was once a time when the right had integrity, too, but that was long before trump, and he made sure any remnants left of it in his party were competely expunged.
www.businessinsider.com
Well, as the late Associate Justice Scalia liked to say: criminals are stupid.Maybe I'm just being naive but why give people LEGAL grounds to come after you?
