Why can't we question election results?

[MaryL]

Well, democrats did it when Trump won in 2016. But questioning the 2020 election results is DOGMA? Why is that? Something isn't adding up. We have 330 million eligible voters. So a mere 10% voted for Biden...A demented old man with a PROVABLE crack addicted son that has Ukraine/China connections and a daughter with sexual issues. But Trump is "bad" because he is ALLEGED to have done stuff...Ok.

 

[fncceo]

Why can't we question election results?​

You can. You will just be shouted down by people who don't want any close examination of the election.

 

[BackAgain]

We can; but it upsets our liberals.

 

[Doc7505]

Well, democrats did it when Trump won in 2016. But questioning the 2020 election results is DOGMA? Why is that? Something isn't adding up. We have 330 million eligible voters. So a mere 10% voted for Biden...A demented old man with a PROVABLE crack addicted son that has Ukraine/China connections and a daughter with sexual issues. But Trump is "bad" because he is ALLEGED to have done stuff...Ok.

~~~~~~
Aux Contraire:
Democrats have questioned other elections vehemently since 2001.
However, they believe they only have the right to do so.

FACT: Dems Have Challenged Last Three Presidential Elections GOP Candidate Won

Democrats and their establishment media lapdogs are whining that Republicans plan to challenge electoral college ballots later this week when Congress meets in joint session to count them because they believe that in several states, voting rules were unconstitutionally changed ahead of Election...

trendingpolitics.com

 

[Sixties Fan]

Well, democrats did it when Trump won in 2016. But questioning the 2020 election results is DOGMA? Why is that? Something isn't adding up. We have 330 million eligible voters. So a mere 10% voted for Biden...A demented old man with a PROVABLE crack addicted son that has Ukraine/China connections and a daughter with sexual issues. But Trump is "bad" because he is ALLEGED to have done stuff...Ok.

1) Trump had his lawyers go to court 60 plus times. He lost or was dismissed for lack of case, etc.

Even the Supreme Court would not hear his case.
-----------------
Trump and his Republican allies lost more than 60 lawsuits in state and federal courts challenging President Joe Biden’s wins in Wisconsin and a handful of other key states. They petitioned the Supreme Court to hear a small number of these cases, and the justices either rejected them right away or didn’t take any action before Biden was sworn in on Jan. 20, a clear sign that they wouldn’t interfere.

Trump Has Officially Lost All Of His Post-Election Challenges In The Supreme Court

Trump argued a case he’d filed in Wisconsin wasn’t moot even after Biden took office. The Supreme Court refused to hear it.

www.buzzfeednews.com

--------------
2) Election results by numbers. What 10% are you talking about?

2020 United States presidential election - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

�

Nominee	Joe Biden	Donald Trump
Party	Democratic	Republican
Home state	Delaware	Floridahttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_United_States_presidential_election#cite_note-Florida_Residency-4

Electoral vote	306	232
States carried	25 + DC + NE-02	25 + ME-02
Popular vote	81,268,924[3]	74,216,154[3]
Percentage	51.3%	46.9%

 

[Sixties Fan]

Well, democrats did it when Trump won in 2016. But questioning the 2020 election results is DOGMA? Why is that? Something isn't adding up. We have 330 million eligible voters. So a mere 10% voted for Biden...A demented old man with a PROVABLE crack addicted son that has Ukraine/China connections and a daughter with sexual issues. But Trump is "bad" because he is ALLEGED to have done stuff...Ok.

330 Million is the total population of the USA. Not the number of eligible voters.

 

[MaryL]

I am not the sharpest crayon in the box. I admit it. But I can't reconcile how Biden "won" the election. When most of us know this poor old boy is unfit to wipe his ass. 168 million registered voters. And 81 million voted for Biden. That makes that out...carry the one, mmm lick my lips.. 2% . Hardly a majority, and not representative of a democracy.

 

[MaryL]

When can't you question the election of a complete nincompoop because 2% says it threatens them? That isn't a democracy.

 

[MisterBeale]

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Thomas Sowell’s answer to your question would be…
“It is usually futile to try to talk facts and analysis to people who are enjoying a sense of moral superiority in their ignorance.”

 

[MisterBeale]

Zuckerberg basically admits that the FB1 came to them leading up to the 2020 election and told them the Hunter laptop story was "Russian Disinformation." Note that this was at a point in which they had been in possession of the laptop for months and KNEW the TRUTH about what was on it.

Further note that Zucker's babbling about 3rd party people making the choices is about their censorship committee populated by government officials, former officials, and other far leftists.

 

[hunarcy]

Well, democrats did it when Trump won in 2016. But questioning the 2020 election results is DOGMA? Why is that? Something isn't adding up. We have 330 million eligible voters. So a mere 10% voted for Biden...A demented old man with a PROVABLE crack addicted son that has Ukraine/China connections and a daughter with sexual issues. But Trump is "bad" because he is ALLEGED to have done stuff...Ok.

We can't question election results because the Democrats can't defend the election results, because they know the way the election was done wasn't fair. They changed the rules for voting and used early voting/mail in voting as a way to ensure their victory (especially their dependence on "vote harvesting") and they can't defend it, so they use every tactic to shut down discussion of it.

Honestly, that's how I KNOW they cheated.

 

[Marener]

You can. You will just be shouted down by people who don't want any close examination of the election.

There was very close examination.

If you ask questions and refuse to accept the answers, then you aren’t really asking questions. You’re demanding a specific result.