- Mar 1, 2008
- 49,931
- 17,316
- 2,250
He is in denial mode.lolIt's not the specs of the missile. It's who controls the missile. There are already NATO "advisors" in Ukraine. We would not allow Russian military advisors in Mexico.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
He is in denial mode.lolIt's not the specs of the missile. It's who controls the missile. There are already NATO "advisors" in Ukraine. We would not allow Russian military advisors in Mexico.
I have a very serious hard time believing that about warmonger Obama,you got any evidence of thst.Obama didn't like NATO missiles pointed at Russia either.
I have a very serious hard time believing that about warmonger Obama,you got any evidence of thst.
We don't have any of those. That's why we don't care about the treaty that Russia was violating.Not talking about ukraine nukes. Talking about medium range ICBMs that you can easily slap a nuclear warhead on.
There are no nuclear missiles of any kind on his border, it's bullshit.Why Intermediate-Range Missiles Are a Focal Point in the Ukraine Crisis - War on the Rocks
In seeking to explain why there are currently 100,000 Russian troops on the Ukrainian border, commentators have invoked everything from the role of NATOwarontherocks.com