Zone1 why do some Protestants think that only they are Christians and the Catholics are not?

"The Romans" didn't want to execute Jesus. Pontius Pilot, in fact, bent over backwards trying to find a way to free Him because he found no fault in Him.
Sure, he saw no reason to execute a religious nutjob up until Jesus said, "My kingdom is not of this world", and Pilate replied, "So you are a king? which would have been be a challenge to the authority of Caesar, sedition.

They only executed Him at the demand of the people.

Right again. After the crowd cried out "we have no king but caesar." according to the story that is. (John 19:15)

 
Last edited:
No. I use it as an example for just how ridiculous your bastardization of the Bible is.
You are suffering from a terminal case of HOCD. Maybe you should pray to a lifeless piece of bread for help.

:eusa_pray:
 
Last edited:
Only in your make believe religion where sodomy is celebrated as normal.
Homosexual behavior is observed in a wide range of animal species, not just humans. Some notable examples include penguins, bonobos, dolphins, and lions. These behaviors manifest in various forms, such as same-sex mating, pair bonding, and even raising offspring together.

Here are some specific examples:
  • 1754932509422.webp

    Penguins:
    .
    Same-sex relationships, including pair bonding and even raising chicks, are well-documented in several penguin species, both in captivity and in the wild.

  • 1754932509465.webp

    Bonobos:
    .
    These primates are known for their high frequency of homosexual behavior, particularly between females. They engage in various forms of sexual activity, including genital rubbing, to reduce tension and build social bonds.


  • Dolphins:
    .
    Same-sex sexual behavior, including genital contact and mounting, has been observed in various dolphin species, particularly among males.

  • 1754932509507.webp

    Lions:
    .
    Male lions often form coalitions and engage in homosexual behavior, which can strengthen their bonds and help them compete for territory and females.


  • Other examples:
    .

    Same-sex behavior has also been documented in giraffes, mountain rams, albatrosses, and even certain fish species.


These examples demonstrate that homosexual behavior is a natural occurrence in the animal kingdom, with diverse expressions across different species.
 
Last edited:
You are suffering from a terminal case of HOCD. Maybe you should pray to a lifeless piece of bread for help.

:eusa_pray:
No. I suffer through your ridiculous rendering of the Bible.
 
Homosexual behavior is observed in a wide range of animal species, not just humans. Some notable examples include penguins, bonobos, dolphins, and lions. These behaviors manifest in various forms, such as same-sex mating, pair bonding, and even raising offspring together.

Here are some specific examples:
  • View attachment 1147786
    Penguins:
    .
    Same-sex relationships, including pair bonding and even raising chicks, are well-documented in several penguin species, both in captivity and in the wild.

  • View attachment 1147788
    Bonobos:
    .
    These primates are known for their high frequency of homosexual behavior, particularly between females. They engage in various forms of sexual activity, including genital rubbing, to reduce tension and build social bonds.


  • Dolphins:
    .
    Same-sex sexual behavior, including genital contact and mounting, has been observed in various dolphin species, particularly among males.

  • View attachment 1147787
    Lions:
    .
    Male lions often form coalitions and engage in homosexual behavior, which can strengthen their bonds and help them compete for territory and females.


  • Other examples:
    .

    Same-sex behavior has also been documented in giraffes, mountain rams, albatrosses, and even certain fish species.


These examples demonstrate that homosexual behavior is a natural occurrence in the animal kingdom, with diverse expressions across different species.
The subject was what the Bible says about human males butt ******* other human males.

What does Leviticus 18-22 say about that?
 
The subject was what the Bible says about human males butt ******* other human males.

What does Leviticus 18-22 say about that?
It says you should never kneel before another man and open your mouth to swallow his mangod. Its obscene!

An abomination that causes desolation.

As you so perfectly display.

Chump.
 
It says you should never kneel before another man and open your mouth to swallow his mangod. Its obscene!

An abomination that causes desolation.

As you so perfectly display.

Chump.
You find the command in Leviticus 18-22 to be offensive. That’s why you can’t state it honestly.
 
You find the command in Leviticus 18-22 to be offensive. That’s why you can’t state it honestly.
No, I see your interpretation of the law as perverse.

Offensive to claim that God who is Spirit gives a shit about the sexual preferences of consenting adult bipeds.

It is as ridiculous as you getting all bent out of shape by two male dolphins getting each other off. You are sick.

My God, the only living God, does not have the concerns of a carnal minded bigoted and lecherous petty old fart.
 
It says you should never kneel before another man and open your mouth to swallow his mangod. Its obscene!

An abomination that causes desolation.

As you so perfectly display.

Chump.
The first Christians only understood the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist after the resurrection of Christ. Which is why the first Christians practiced the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist after Christ was resurrected.
 
No, I see your interpretation of the law as perverse.

Offensive to claim that God who is Spirit gives a shit about the sexual preferences of consenting adult bipeds.

It is as ridiculous as you getting all bent out of shape by two male dolphins getting each other off. You are sick.

Not God.
What’s to interpret? Leviticus 18:22 is very clear. It’s as clear as the command to not have sex with one’s mother. Or does that command confuse you too?
 
The first Christians only understood the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist after the resurrection of Christ. Which is why the first Christians practiced the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist after Christ was resurrected.
The real presence of Jesus is in the teaching he received from God like bread from heaven that became his flesh

Every teacher is present in their teaching.

If that teaching is not in you you cannot have the life promised for complying with that teaching in you. Deado.
 
The real presence of Christ is in the teaching he received from God like bread from heaven. Every teacher is present in their teaching.

If that teaching is not in you you cannot have the life promised for complying with that teaching in you. Deado.
The first Christians practiced the Real Presence of Christ. It’s an historical fact.
 
The first Christians practiced the Real Presence of Christ. It’s an historical fact.
"He who eats and drinks WITHOUT DISCERNING THE BODY, eats and drinks judgment on himself"

1 Corinthians 11:29
 
"He who eats and drinks WITHOUT DISCERNING THE BODY, eats and drinks judgment on himself"

1 Corinthians 11:29
Which was Paul telling them to honor the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist.
 
Which was Paul telling them to honor the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist.
No it was telling them to not be deceived into 'believing' that the teachings of Jesus was edible.
 
15th post
No it was telling them to not be deceived into 'believing' that the teachings of Jesus was edible.
Incorrect. Try using google.

Try googling” what does 1 Corinthians 11:23-34 mean?”
 
No it was telling them to not be deceived into 'believing' that the teachings of Jesus was edible.

Early Christians universally believed in the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist, the belief that the bread and wine become the body and blood of Christ. This understanding is evident in the writings of early Church Fathers like Ignatius of Antioch, Irenaeus, and Justin Martyr, who all affirmed that the Eucharist was the flesh and blood of Christ. They viewed it not as a mere symbol, but as a true and real participation in the sacrifice and life of Christ.

Here's a more detailed explanation:

Early Church Fathers' Testimonies:
Early Church Fathers, such as Ignatius of Antioch, Irenaeus, Justin Martyr, Hippolytus, and Tertullian, all affirmed the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist.

Ignatius of Antioch:
In the first century, Ignatius of Antioch emphasized that the Eucharist was the flesh of Jesus Christ and used this belief to combat Docetists who denied the reality of Christ's body. He also connected the Eucharist to the unity of the Church and its life in Christ.

Irenaeus:
Irenaeus, writing in the second century, explicitly stated that the bread and wine become the body and blood of Christ.

Justin Martyr:
Justin Martyr, in the mid-second century, also believed that the Eucharist was the flesh and blood of Jesus Christ.

No Disputes:
There are no records of disputes among early Christians regarding the nature of the Eucharist, with no one denying the Real Presence.

Not Just a Symbol:
Early Christians understood the Eucharist not as a mere symbol, but as a participation in the body and blood of Christ, often described as the "medicine of immortality".

Sacrificial Understanding:
The early Church also viewed the Eucharist as a sacrifice, connecting it to the sacrifice of Christ and the fulfillment of Old Testament prophecies
 
. This understanding is evident in the writings of early Church Fathers like Ignatius of Antioch, Irenaeus, and Justin Martyr, who all affirmed that the Eucharist was the flesh and blood of Christ. They viewed it not as a mere symbol, but as a true and real participation in the sacrifice and life of Christ.
Tertullian disagrees.

Your Church, including over 30,000 denominations of Christianity itself, has the whole damn story all wrong. DUH You eat and drink, religiously, "without discerning the Body", and so have brought judgment UPON YOURSELF.

Thats the way the cookie crumbles. How is it that you don't know the right course to take? Where is your faith?

"He censures those who understood our Lord's words after the letter, (literally), as if they were to eat the carnal body. He expounds the spiritual thing which gives life as to be understood by the text: "the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit and they are life."

His word is the life-giving principle, therefore he called his flesh by the same appellation, so we are to "devour Him with the ear, RUMINATE on Him with the understanding, and digest Him by faith."

Tertullian. Ante-Nicene Fathers, Vol. III
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom