Why do poor communities exist in America?

[danielpalos]

You are correct. You do not have to prove anything. When I was last laid off, I did not have to prove anything either. I chose not to collect unemployment compensation, and so I was not required to do so.

I have standing and a case before the Court.

 

[danielpalos]

You have yet to show any abridgement of the at-will employment laws. The same rights are afforded everyone under the at-will employment laws.

Employment is at the will of either party; that means public policy has to follow the same intent and purpose.

 

[danielpalos]

That does not say that the laws of the at-will employment laws must be carried over into every public policy.

The unemployment compensation law has no effect on the at-will employment laws.

Yes, it does. California is not a for-cause employment State.

 

[danielpalos]

I can prove there is no abridgement of the at-will employment laws. When you quit your last job, were you fined or prosecuted? If someone is fired, for whatever reason, or for no reason, is the employer fined or prosecuted?

Not a very good analogy. It is like saying You are at fault but not the other person even in a no-fault insurance State.

 

[WinterBorn]

I have standing and a case before the Court.

So you say. Do you have a case name or number? Otherwise I consider it just as truthful as your other claims.

 

[WinterBorn]

Employment is at the will of either party; that means public policy has to follow the same intent and purpose.

No it does not.

 

[WinterBorn]

Yes, it does. California is not a for-cause employment State.

What effect does it have on at-will employment law?

 

[WinterBorn]

Not a very good analogy. It is like saying You are at fault but not the other person even in a no-fault insurance State.

It is not an analogy. It is asking directly about the at-will employment laws.

 

[danielpalos]

So you say. Do you have a case name or number? Otherwise I consider it just as truthful as your other claims.

Yes, I do. I am not a just plain liar like right-wingers. I should take your stories even less truthful.

 

[danielpalos]

No it does not.

Yes, it does since legal privileges and immunities can be enforced in Court.

 

[danielpalos]

What effect does it have on at-will employment law?

For-Cause criteria is ok in a for-cause employment State not an at-will employment State.

 

[danielpalos]

It is not an analogy. It is asking directly about the at-will employment laws.

I gave you a better analogy.

 

[K9Buck]

Show me an able-bodied person that is financially poor and, unless they're a missionary or something like that, I'll show you someone who has made poor life choices, including the choice (often times) to not work.

 

[danielpalos]

Show me an able-bodied person that is financially poor and, unless they're a missionary or something like that, I'll show you someone who has made poor life choices, including the choice (often times) to not work.

Our over a generation long War on Poverty infers you simply appeal to ignorance.

 

[K9Buck]

Our over a generation long War on Poverty infers you simply appeal to ignorance.

The "war on poverty" is a political slogan used to persuade poor people to vote for rich people that are indifferent to the lives of said poor people. You know, Democrats.

 

[danielpalos]

The "war on poverty" is a political slogan used to persuade poor people to vote for rich people that are indifferent to the lives of said poor people. You know, Democrats.

You really do appeal to ignorance. Right-wingers have been trying to find ways to criminalize poverty since the end of black codes.

 

[K9Buck]

You really do appeal to ignorance. Right-wingers have been trying to find ways to criminalize poverty since the end of black codes.

No one on the right has "criminalized" being poor. On the contrary, it's the right that advocates for less government interference and fewer government regulations so that free people can engage in a free market and be prosperous. You sound like one of those folks that believe that only government can lift people out of poverty but, if you were a student of history, you would know that the opposite is true.

 

[danielpalos]

No one on the right has "criminalized" being poor. On the contrary, it's the right that advocates for less government interference and fewer government regulations so that free people can engage in a free market and be prosperous. You sound like one of those folks that believe that only government can lift people out of poverty but, if you were a student of history, you would know that the opposite is true.

For-profit prisons are right-wingers modus operandi.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Requiring Cause for any public policy in an at-will employment State is an Abridgement of at-will employment law.

No it is not

 

[K9Buck]

For-profit prisons are right-wingers modus operandi.

That's a whole other thread.

It sounds like you dislike free markets. Is that accurate? Do you believe a state-managed economy is better for the people?