Wales has banned parents from stopping their children learning about sex, religion and LGBT people

I'm made this point in a number of posts: Liberals like you believe in 'thought crimes'....any views contrary to theirs, the orthodoxy.


Conservatives don't demand uniform views.



Know who does?

Nazis.

Communists.

Fascists.

You.

People who refer to themselves as "conservatives" demand lock-step conformity on every subject. One cannot speak of being pro-choice or on behalf of equality of the races, sexes, religions, or sexual orientations without being subjected to a barrage of name-calling and obscenity.

Anyway, this discussion does not involve crime of any sort. This guy can speak as long as he can find a venue. Piccadilly Circus maybe?

So what if my views are moderate-to-liberal? It depends on the issue. Am I committing a "thought crime"?



"People who refer to themselves as "conservatives" demand lock-step conformity on every subject."

Watch how simple it is to prove you a liar: as per the silencing of of the subject of the article I posted.....can you name a Liberal, Progressive, Democrat who has been treated in that way by conservatives?

No?

None?

Not a single one?????


Next time, take your shoe off before you put your foot in your mouth.

Treated what way? You posted it in post No. 75 without being prevented from doing so, false headline and all, didn't you? Who "silenced" what? I've read through all of the comments. They didn't involve silencing you. You got to speak your piece. You even got to liken me to a fascist, a communist, and a nazi, even though I never attempted to silence you.



"Treated what way? "


Let's check:

"At least five venues in the United Kingdom have cancelled events featuring Rev Franklin Graham after his Christian beliefs were deemed “discriminatory,” “repulsive” and “hateful”.

Life Site News reported that Graham’s plans to appear at ACC Liverpool stadium were overset after a group called the Liverpool Labour [Party] LGBT Network circulated a petition against his “platforming” and sent it to the Liverpool City Council.

The group objected to Graham’s Christian view of sexuality and claimed his “appearance may incite hateful mobilisation and risk the security of our LGBTQ+ community.” The petition gathered only 500 signatures."
Christianity BANNED in the United Kingdom · Caldron Pool



"....Graham’s Christian view of sexuality..."


His view....his opinion....his thoughts.....you Fascists can't allow that, huh?

He hasn't been denied free speech. He has simply been denied certain forums for exercising his rights because these venues don't want to assist him. He can perform in any venue that allows him to.



"He hasn't been denied free speech. He has simply been denied certain forums for exercising his rights....."


By people like you, with whom you agree.


Can you really be this dumb????
 
When have I interfered with anyone's free speech? Free speech involves the freedom to criticize the content of someone else's speech. Or does free speech require everyone else to applaud every comment made?

Free speech merely means there will be no laws limiting speech. It doesn't mean others must listen to you, or publish your views.



No one made such a claim.

It appears I've netted yet another Fascist who would rather alter the discussion rather than admitting is true nature.

Troll off.



"Truth is the mother of hatred."
By Ausonius


And another one bites the dust.

Piss off, troll.


Did you learn this method of discourse in government school, or simply the manner in which you were raised?
 
Free speech merely means there will be no laws limiting speech. It doesn't mean others must listen to you, or publish your views.



No one made such a claim.

It appears I've netted yet another Fascist who would rather alter the discussion rather than admitting is true nature.

Troll off.



"Truth is the mother of hatred."
By Ausonius


And another one bites the dust.

Piss off, troll.


Did you learn this method of discourse in government school, or simply the manner in which you were raised?

Listen, every single one of your posts resorts to personal insults and nonsensical jabs. You're a jerk. A troll. Piss off.
 
No one made such a claim.

It appears I've netted yet another Fascist who would rather alter the discussion rather than admitting is true nature.

Troll off.



"Truth is the mother of hatred."
By Ausonius


And another one bites the dust.

Piss off, troll.


Did you learn this method of discourse in government school, or simply the manner in which you were raised?

Listen, every single one of your posts resorts to personal insults and nonsensical jabs. You're a jerk. A troll. Piss off.


As soon as I provide the truth....and you realize you have no way to answer.....this is the result.

Let's review: I just put both of you in the same category with others who demand silence from those with whom they disagree: Bolsheviks, Nazis, Fascists.

Now....put down your right arm, and slither away.
 
Troll off.



"Truth is the mother of hatred."
By Ausonius


And another one bites the dust.

Piss off, troll.


Did you learn this method of discourse in government school, or simply the manner in which you were raised?

Listen, every single one of your posts resorts to personal insults and nonsensical jabs. You're a jerk. A troll. Piss off.


As soon as I provide the truth....and you realize you have no way to answer.....this is the result.

Let's review: I just put both of you in the same category with others who demand silence from those with whom they disagree: Bolsheviks, Nazis, Fascists.

Now....put down your right arm, and slither away.

Listen, I don't know whether your "persona" on here is for real or not. It's either a schtick that gives you giggles online, or you really are a jackass. Either way, I can't bring myself to take your posts, or your opinions, seriously. Learn some manners and I'll reconsider.

But rest assured, you are the WINNER of every thread you post in. Congrats!
 
Last edited:
"Truth is the mother of hatred."
By Ausonius


And another one bites the dust.

Piss off, troll.


Did you learn this method of discourse in government school, or simply the manner in which you were raised?

Listen, every single one of your posts resorts to personal insults and nonsensical jabs. You're a jerk. A troll. Piss off.


As soon as I provide the truth....and you realize you have no way to answer.....this is the result.

Let's review: I just put both of you in the same category with others who demand silence from those with whom they disagree: Bolsheviks, Nazis, Fascists.

Now....put down your right arm, and slither away.

Listen, I don't whether you're "persona" on here is for real or not. It's either a schtick that gives you giggles online, or you really are a jackass. Either way, I can't bring myself to take your posts, or your opinions, seriously. Learn some manners and I'll reconsider.

But rest assured, you are the WINNER of every thread you post in. Congrats!



Stop lying.

What you can't do is dispute my posts.


Teach a Democrat about history and liberty, and they look confused…and tilt their head like a Cocker Spaniel…so cute.
 
Silencing those with whom you disagree goes beyond having an opinion.
And Liberals are infamous for doing just that.

Hatred is not just an "opinion." It is an attempt to hurt others.

These venues have no obligation to give this fraud a forum. Judging from the posted link, the city councils concluded that his speech would offend their community values. He can go elsewhere to spew his hatred. Perhaps a local auditorium would rent to him.

His continued attempts to frame his views as representing the entire Christian faith is absolutely sickening. No matter what the headline screams (Christianity BANNED in the UK), there have been no reports that St. Paul's, Westminster Abbey, and Canterbury have been shut down.




I'm made this point in a number of posts: Liberals like you believe in 'thought crimes'....any views contrary to theirs, the orthodoxy.


Conservatives don't demand uniform views.



Know who does?

Nazis.

Communists.

Fascists.

You.


Lysistrata is a leftist, not a liberal. Actual liberals believe in free speech. These extreme authoritarian leftists like her do not.

When have I interfered with anyone's free speech? Free speech involves the freedom to criticize the content of someone else's speech. Or does free speech require everyone else to applaud every comment made?



Do you support the silencing of Rev Franklin Graham and his Christian beliefs ?


You certainly did in an earlier post.

In which post? Just give me the number. I have continually maintained that this fraudulent dickhead can perform wherever people are willing to have him and his circus.
 
Silencing those with whom you disagree goes beyond having an opinion.
And Liberals are infamous for doing just that.

Hatred is not just an "opinion." It is an attempt to hurt others.

These venues have no obligation to give this fraud a forum. Judging from the posted link, the city councils concluded that his speech would offend their community values. He can go elsewhere to spew his hatred. Perhaps a local auditorium would rent to him.

His continued attempts to frame his views as representing the entire Christian faith is absolutely sickening. No matter what the headline screams (Christianity BANNED in the UK), there have been no reports that St. Paul's, Westminster Abbey, and Canterbury have been shut down.




I'm made this point in a number of posts: Liberals like you believe in 'thought crimes'....any views contrary to theirs, the orthodoxy.


Conservatives don't demand uniform views.



Know who does?

Nazis.

Communists.

Fascists.

You.


Lysistrata is a leftist, not a liberal. Actual liberals believe in free speech. These extreme authoritarian leftists like her do not.

When have I interfered with anyone's free speech? Free speech involves the freedom to criticize the content of someone else's speech. Or does free speech require everyone else to applaud every comment made?
Silencing those with whom you disagree goes beyond having an opinion.
And Liberals are infamous for doing just that.

Hatred is not just an "opinion." It is an attempt to hurt others.

These venues have no obligation to give this fraud a forum. Judging from the posted link, the city councils concluded that his speech would offend their community values. He can go elsewhere to spew his hatred. Perhaps a local auditorium would rent to him.

His continued attempts to frame his views as representing the entire Christian faith is absolutely sickening. No matter what the headline screams (Christianity BANNED in the UK), there have been no reports that St. Paul's, Westminster Abbey, and Canterbury have been shut down.




I'm made this point in a number of posts: Liberals like you believe in 'thought crimes'....any views contrary to theirs, the orthodoxy.


Conservatives don't demand uniform views.



Know who does?

Nazis.

Communists.

Fascists.

You.


Lysistrata is a leftist, not a liberal. Actual liberals believe in free speech. These extreme authoritarian leftists like her do not.

When have I interfered with anyone's free speech? Free speech involves the freedom to criticize the content of someone else's speech. Or does free speech require everyone else to applaud every comment made?
Free speech seems to imply, in this instance, that US extremists can travel to foreign countries and expect those countries to provide them with a platform . Its nuts. The majority of Americans dont even share his views. Why should we allow him to come here and abuse our citizens ?

You in the UK are under no obligation to entertain whatever scumbags we send to you. Keep as many of them out as you can. Unfortunately, we have to take them back. Now if you want to do us a really big favor, take them to the beach and drown them.
 
Hatred is not just an "opinion." It is an attempt to hurt others.

These venues have no obligation to give this fraud a forum. Judging from the posted link, the city councils concluded that his speech would offend their community values. He can go elsewhere to spew his hatred. Perhaps a local auditorium would rent to him.

His continued attempts to frame his views as representing the entire Christian faith is absolutely sickening. No matter what the headline screams (Christianity BANNED in the UK), there have been no reports that St. Paul's, Westminster Abbey, and Canterbury have been shut down.




I'm made this point in a number of posts: Liberals like you believe in 'thought crimes'....any views contrary to theirs, the orthodoxy.


Conservatives don't demand uniform views.



Know who does?

Nazis.

Communists.

Fascists.

You.


Lysistrata is a leftist, not a liberal. Actual liberals believe in free speech. These extreme authoritarian leftists like her do not.

When have I interfered with anyone's free speech? Free speech involves the freedom to criticize the content of someone else's speech. Or does free speech require everyone else to applaud every comment made?



Do you support the silencing of Rev Franklin Graham and his Christian beliefs ?


You certainly did in an earlier post.

In which post? Just give me the number. I have continually maintained that this fraudulent dickhead can perform wherever people are willing to have him and his circus.


I posted this:

petition against his “platforming” and sent it to the Liverpool City Council.



The group objected to Graham’s Christian view of sexuality and claimed his “appearance may incite hateful mobilisation and risk the security of our LGBTQ+ community.” The petition gathered only 500 signatures.

Two days after the cancellation was announced, Liverpool Mayor Joe Anderson tweeted, saying: “Our City is a diverse City and proud of our LGBTQ+ community and always will be. We can not allow hatred and intolerance to go unchallenged by anyone including by religious groups or sects. It’s right we have banned from the M&S Arena Franklin Graham. #Love conquers hatred always”
Christianity BANNED in the United Kingdom · Caldron Pool


You responded:

Christianity wasn't "banned" in the UK. All that happened was that some venues banned a bigoted dickhead, who cannot be held to represent the Christian religion on any count. He's just an imposter who claims to be a Christian, but who is not. These venues may do what they wish, and they chose to not give a platform to such trash.



I wrote:

"Bigoted" means having a different opinion than you have?

Is that the Liberal-to-English definition?

Your post appears to have become a boomerang, huh?


You wrote:

Bigotry is an "opinion." Having a negative opinion about someone, or mistreating them, based solely on who they are is bigotry. graham is a bigoted dickhead. Maybe he can find some other venue to spew his filth.




Are you now claiming that you didn't support his being silenced?

Speak up, Ilsa!


images
 
Last edited:
People who refer to themselves as "conservatives" demand lock-step conformity on every subject. One cannot speak of being pro-choice or on behalf of equality of the races, sexes, religions, or sexual orientations without being subjected to a barrage of name-calling and obscenity.

Anyway, this discussion does not involve crime of any sort. This guy can speak as long as he can find a venue. Piccadilly Circus maybe?

So what if my views are moderate-to-liberal? It depends on the issue. Am I committing a "thought crime"?



"People who refer to themselves as "conservatives" demand lock-step conformity on every subject."

Watch how simple it is to prove you a liar: as per the silencing of of the subject of the article I posted.....can you name a Liberal, Progressive, Democrat who has been treated in that way by conservatives?

No?

None?

Not a single one?????


Next time, take your shoe off before you put your foot in your mouth.

Treated what way? You posted it in post No. 75 without being prevented from doing so, false headline and all, didn't you? Who "silenced" what? I've read through all of the comments. They didn't involve silencing you. You got to speak your piece. You even got to liken me to a fascist, a communist, and a nazi, even though I never attempted to silence you.



"Treated what way? "


Let's check:

"At least five venues in the United Kingdom have cancelled events featuring Rev Franklin Graham after his Christian beliefs were deemed “discriminatory,” “repulsive” and “hateful”.

Life Site News reported that Graham’s plans to appear at ACC Liverpool stadium were overset after a group called the Liverpool Labour [Party] LGBT Network circulated a petition against his “platforming” and sent it to the Liverpool City Council.

The group objected to Graham’s Christian view of sexuality and claimed his “appearance may incite hateful mobilisation and risk the security of our LGBTQ+ community.” The petition gathered only 500 signatures."
Christianity BANNED in the United Kingdom · Caldron Pool



"....Graham’s Christian view of sexuality..."


His view....his opinion....his thoughts.....you Fascists can't allow that, huh?

He hasn't been denied free speech. He has simply been denied certain forums for exercising his rights because these venues don't want to assist him. He can perform in any venue that allows him to.



"He hasn't been denied free speech. He has simply been denied certain forums for exercising his rights....."


By people like you, with whom you agree.


Can you really be this dumb????

As me and several others keep saying, while you stick your fingers in your ears and yell la la la, nobody is under any obligation to supply a forum to anyone. I can't believe how uncompromisingly stupid you are. If your bimbo finds a forum, he can denigrate anyone he wants to. I never said anything about silencing anyone.
 
I'm made this point in a number of posts: Liberals like you believe in 'thought crimes'....any views contrary to theirs, the orthodoxy.


Conservatives don't demand uniform views.



Know who does?

Nazis.

Communists.

Fascists.

You.


Lysistrata is a leftist, not a liberal. Actual liberals believe in free speech. These extreme authoritarian leftists like her do not.

When have I interfered with anyone's free speech? Free speech involves the freedom to criticize the content of someone else's speech. Or does free speech require everyone else to applaud every comment made?



Do you support the silencing of Rev Franklin Graham and his Christian beliefs ?


You certainly did in an earlier post.

In which post? Just give me the number. I have continually maintained that this fraudulent dickhead can perform wherever people are willing to have him and his circus.


I posted this:

petition against his “platforming” and sent it to the Liverpool City Council.



The group objected to Graham’s Christian view of sexuality and claimed his “appearance may incite hateful mobilisation and risk the security of our LGBTQ+ community.” The petition gathered only 500 signatures.

Two days after the cancellation was announced, Liverpool Mayor Joe Anderson tweeted, saying: “Our City is a diverse City and proud of our LGBTQ+ community and always will be. We can not allow hatred and intolerance to go unchallenged by anyone including by religious groups or sects. It’s right we have banned from the M&S Arena Franklin Graham. #Love conquers hatred always”
Christianity BANNED in the United Kingdom · Caldron Pool


You responded:

Christianity wasn't "banned" in the UK. All that happened was that some venues banned a bigoted dickhead, who cannot be held to represent the Christian religion on any count. He's just an imposter who claims to be a Christian, but who is not. These venues may do what they wish, and they chose to not give a platform to such trash.



I wrote:

"Bigoted" means having a different opinion than you have?

Is that the Liberal-to-English definition?

Your post appears to have become a boomerang, huh?


You wrote:

Bigotry is an "opinion." Having a negative opinion about someone, or mistreating them, based solely on who they are is bigotry. graham is a bigoted dickhead. Maybe he can find some other venue to spew his filth.




Are you now claiming that you didn't support his being silenced?

Speak up, Ilsa!


images
Everybody supports these venues in deciding to bar him. Nobody wants to be associated with him. He is welcome to stand outside and chunder on for hours if he likes. Might not be as profitable though. Now, you were going to explain how we had banned Christianity............................or are you still runing away from that nonsense ?
 
You in the UK are under no obligation to entertain whatever scumbags we send to you. Keep as many of them out as you can. Unfortunately, we have to take them back. Now if you want to do us a really big favor, take them to the beach and drown them.
That is a rather convoluted way to announce that you will not ever travel to the U.K.
 
"People who refer to themselves as "conservatives" demand lock-step conformity on every subject."

Watch how simple it is to prove you a liar: as per the silencing of of the subject of the article I posted.....can you name a Liberal, Progressive, Democrat who has been treated in that way by conservatives?

No?

None?

Not a single one?????


Next time, take your shoe off before you put your foot in your mouth.

Treated what way? You posted it in post No. 75 without being prevented from doing so, false headline and all, didn't you? Who "silenced" what? I've read through all of the comments. They didn't involve silencing you. You got to speak your piece. You even got to liken me to a fascist, a communist, and a nazi, even though I never attempted to silence you.



"Treated what way? "


Let's check:

"At least five venues in the United Kingdom have cancelled events featuring Rev Franklin Graham after his Christian beliefs were deemed “discriminatory,” “repulsive” and “hateful”.

Life Site News reported that Graham’s plans to appear at ACC Liverpool stadium were overset after a group called the Liverpool Labour [Party] LGBT Network circulated a petition against his “platforming” and sent it to the Liverpool City Council.

The group objected to Graham’s Christian view of sexuality and claimed his “appearance may incite hateful mobilisation and risk the security of our LGBTQ+ community.” The petition gathered only 500 signatures."
Christianity BANNED in the United Kingdom · Caldron Pool



"....Graham’s Christian view of sexuality..."


His view....his opinion....his thoughts.....you Fascists can't allow that, huh?

He hasn't been denied free speech. He has simply been denied certain forums for exercising his rights because these venues don't want to assist him. He can perform in any venue that allows him to.



"He hasn't been denied free speech. He has simply been denied certain forums for exercising his rights....."


By people like you, with whom you agree.


Can you really be this dumb????

As me and several others keep saying, while you stick your fingers in your ears and yell la la la, nobody is under any obligation to supply a forum to anyone. I can't believe how uncompromisingly stupid you are. If your bimbo finds a forum, he can denigrate anyone he wants to. I never said anything about silencing anyone.



OK...OK....stop begging: I'll provide the ethical upbringing that you seem to have missed out on.

If you disagree with what the preacher was saying, there are two acceptable responses from those who believe in the first amendment, liberty, and rectitude.

1. Simply ignore the preacher: don't attend his venue.

2. Speak, write, publish, support, the dissemination of your view. Dispute and/or rebut his.



Liberals, Progressives, Nazis, Fascists, Democrats, Antifa, the KKK, Bolsheviks will do whatever necessary to silence opposing voices, and ideas/

This is largely because, in the market place of ideas, conservatives eat Liberals' lunch.

And one result is that violence becomes the Liberals, Progressives, Nazis, Fascists, Democrats, Antifa, the KKK, Bolsheviks, method of discourse.

Historic review: every presidential assassin in the history of the nation has been a liberal- or has not been associated with a political outlook- none were right-wingers.


Now....look in the mirror, and recognize what you have become.
And admit it.
 
"People who refer to themselves as "conservatives" demand lock-step conformity on every subject."

Watch how simple it is to prove you a liar: as per the silencing of of the subject of the article I posted.....can you name a Liberal, Progressive, Democrat who has been treated in that way by conservatives?

No?

None?

Not a single one?????


Next time, take your shoe off before you put your foot in your mouth.

Treated what way? You posted it in post No. 75 without being prevented from doing so, false headline and all, didn't you? Who "silenced" what? I've read through all of the comments. They didn't involve silencing you. You got to speak your piece. You even got to liken me to a fascist, a communist, and a nazi, even though I never attempted to silence you.



"Treated what way? "


Let's check:

"At least five venues in the United Kingdom have cancelled events featuring Rev Franklin Graham after his Christian beliefs were deemed “discriminatory,” “repulsive” and “hateful”.

Life Site News reported that Graham’s plans to appear at ACC Liverpool stadium were overset after a group called the Liverpool Labour [Party] LGBT Network circulated a petition against his “platforming” and sent it to the Liverpool City Council.

The group objected to Graham’s Christian view of sexuality and claimed his “appearance may incite hateful mobilisation and risk the security of our LGBTQ+ community.” The petition gathered only 500 signatures."
Christianity BANNED in the United Kingdom · Caldron Pool



"....Graham’s Christian view of sexuality..."


His view....his opinion....his thoughts.....you Fascists can't allow that, huh?

He hasn't been denied free speech. He has simply been denied certain forums for exercising his rights because these venues don't want to assist him. He can perform in any venue that allows him to.



"He hasn't been denied free speech. He has simply been denied certain forums for exercising his rights....."


By people like you, with whom you agree.


Can you really be this dumb????

As me and several others keep saying, while you stick your fingers in your ears and yell la la la, nobody is under any obligation to supply a forum to anyone. I can't believe how uncompromisingly stupid you are. If your bimbo finds a forum, he can denigrate anyone he wants to. I never said anything about silencing anyone.



No, you Nazi....no one ever said "any obligation to supply a forum."

It's allow a forum.

Your sort pressured those forums to fold.
 
Lysistrata is a leftist, not a liberal. Actual liberals believe in free speech. These extreme authoritarian leftists like her do not.

When have I interfered with anyone's free speech? Free speech involves the freedom to criticize the content of someone else's speech. Or does free speech require everyone else to applaud every comment made?



Do you support the silencing of Rev Franklin Graham and his Christian beliefs ?


You certainly did in an earlier post.

In which post? Just give me the number. I have continually maintained that this fraudulent dickhead can perform wherever people are willing to have him and his circus.


I posted this:

petition against his “platforming” and sent it to the Liverpool City Council.



The group objected to Graham’s Christian view of sexuality and claimed his “appearance may incite hateful mobilisation and risk the security of our LGBTQ+ community.” The petition gathered only 500 signatures.

Two days after the cancellation was announced, Liverpool Mayor Joe Anderson tweeted, saying: “Our City is a diverse City and proud of our LGBTQ+ community and always will be. We can not allow hatred and intolerance to go unchallenged by anyone including by religious groups or sects. It’s right we have banned from the M&S Arena Franklin Graham. #Love conquers hatred always”
Christianity BANNED in the United Kingdom · Caldron Pool


You responded:

Christianity wasn't "banned" in the UK. All that happened was that some venues banned a bigoted dickhead, who cannot be held to represent the Christian religion on any count. He's just an imposter who claims to be a Christian, but who is not. These venues may do what they wish, and they chose to not give a platform to such trash.



I wrote:

"Bigoted" means having a different opinion than you have?

Is that the Liberal-to-English definition?

Your post appears to have become a boomerang, huh?


You wrote:

Bigotry is an "opinion." Having a negative opinion about someone, or mistreating them, based solely on who they are is bigotry. graham is a bigoted dickhead. Maybe he can find some other venue to spew his filth.




Are you now claiming that you didn't support his being silenced?

Speak up, Ilsa!


images
Everybody supports these venues in deciding to bar him. Nobody wants to be associated with him. He is welcome to stand outside and chunder on for hours if he likes. Might not be as profitable though. Now, you were going to explain how we had banned Christianity............................or are you still runing away from that nonsense ?



"....deciding to bar him. "


He would have had full audiences.

That's the reason you Nazis had to pressure the venues to "ban" him.
 
Last edited:
You in the UK are under no obligation to entertain whatever scumbags we send to you. Keep as many of them out as you can. Unfortunately, we have to take them back. Now if you want to do us a really big favor, take them to the beach and drown them.
That is a rather convoluted way to announce that you will not ever travel to the U.K.

I have been, several times, and hope to visit again soon. There are many places I haven't seen, and I love the British Museum. Maybe Tommy will take me on a pub crawl if I ever get to Wales (nearest place I've been is Somerset). Tell me if the Christians are going to shut down Canterbury Cathedral. I once walked around it at midnight in hopes that Becket's ghost would show up. Disappointing. Visit the UK. It's great.
 
Wales has banned parents from stopping their children learning about sex, religion and LGBT people

Wales has removed the rights of parents to prevent their children from learning about different types of relationships.

Parents have long had the right to withdraw children from relationship and sexuality education (RSE) and religious education (RE), but Welsh education minister Kirsty Williams announced on Tuesday that parents will no longer be permitted to deny their kids access to teaching about relationships and different religions.

Very proud Welshman here. We will have a more tolerant and civil society.
Thats nothing tommy, here we're teaching kids balloons and straws are unsafe while teaching them that replacing them with free hypodermic needles for addicts is safer, beat that.
 
Bigotry is an "opinion." Having a negative opinion about someone, or mistreating them, based solely on who they are is bigotry. graham is a bigoted dickhead. Maybe he can find some other venue to spew his filth.



Silencing those with whom you disagree goes beyond having an opinion.
And Liberals are infamous for doing just that.

Hatred is not just an "opinion." It is an attempt to hurt others.

These venues have no obligation to give this fraud a forum. Judging from the posted link, the city councils concluded that his speech would offend their community values. He can go elsewhere to spew his hatred. Perhaps a local auditorium would rent to him.

His continued attempts to frame his views as representing the entire Christian faith is absolutely sickening. No matter what the headline screams (Christianity BANNED in the UK), there have been no reports that St. Paul's, Westminster Abbey, and Canterbury have been shut down.




I'm made this point in a number of posts: Liberals like you believe in 'thought crimes'....any views contrary to theirs, the orthodoxy.


Conservatives don't demand uniform views.



Know who does?

Nazis.

Communists.

Fascists.

You.


Lysistrata is a leftist, not a liberal. Actual liberals believe in free speech. These extreme authoritarian leftists like her do not.



Well, in that case, there are no 'actual Liberals' left.

Any who vote Democrat support what that one posts.....they believe in thought crimes and ending free speech.

Hussein put an anti-free speech Liberal on the Supreme Court.


"In her 1993 article "Regulation of Hate Speech and Pornography After R.A.V," for the University of Chicago Law Review, Kagan writes:

"I take it as a given that we live in a society marred by racial and gender inequality, that certain forms of speech perpetuate and promote this inequality, and that the uncoerced disappearance of such speech would be cause for great elation."

In a 1996 paper, "Private Speech, Public Purpose: The Role of Governmental Motive in First Amendment Doctrine," Kagan argued it may be proper to suppress speech because it is offensive to society or to the government.
That paper asserted First Amendment doctrine is comprised of "motives and ... actions infested with them" and she goes so far as to claim that "First Amendment law is best understood and most readily explained as a kind of motive-hunting."

Kagan's name was also on a brief, United States V. Stevens, dug up by the Washington Examiner, stating: "Whether a given category of speech enjoys First Amendment protection depends upon a categorical balancing of the value of the speech against its societal costs."
If the government doesn't like what you say, Elena Kagan believes it is the duty of courts to tell you to shut up. If some pantywaist is offended by what you say, Elena Kagan believes your words can be "disappeared".
WyBlog -- Elena Kagan's America: some speech can be "disappeared"

Elena Kagan Radical anti-gun nut?

Brandenburg v. Ohio - Wikipedia





5. “Earlier this week, Obama-appointed Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan wrote in her minority dissent to the Janus ruling that the Court had “weaponized the First Amendment.”

The majority opinion dwelt on issues of compelled speech, noting that “because such compulsion so plainly violates the Constitution, most of our free speech cases have involved restrictions on what can be said, rather than laws compelling speech. But measures compelling speech are at least as threatening.”

Kagan, however, has other ideas and claimed in her dissent that

“The First Amendment was meant for better things,” she concluded.

Kagan’s fantastical notion of “black-robed rulers overriding citizens’ choices” by “weaponizing the First Amendment” is puzzling. Citizens in non-right-to-work states are completely free to join a union if they so wish, and in doing so, commit to paying union dues. The only change here is that unions can no longer extort dues from non-members in any state.

Citizens’ choices have not been overridden; indeed, citizen choice is expanded under this ruling. They can join a union or not join a union, those who do not join cannot be compelled to pay union dues, but they are also not barred from doing so if they wish.

Her point about “weaponizing the First Amendment” is equally confounding. The Founders intendedthe First Amendment to be a weapon . . . against government tyranny and oppression. They were insistent that freedom of speech was required to check government and to maintain a free and independent citizenry.” Who's afraid of the 1st Amendment?




Sooo.....who put Obama in office....Liberals or Leftists?
Domestic terrorists and a Communist Hungarian Jew
 
If you disagree with what the preacher was saying, there are two acceptable responses from those who believe in the first amendment, liberty, and rectitude.

1. Simply ignore the preacher: don't attend his venue.

2. Speak, write, publish, support, the dissemination of your view. Dispute and/or rebut his.

You're talking with leftists though. Lol. They want to ban or get rid of everything they hate, but force their own views on everyone else. They are entitled little brats, basically.
 

Forum List

Back
Top