A 103-year old World War II veteran who voted last week for Kamala Harris and Sherrod Brown in Ohio.

[lafayette]

OP posted a WW2 vet who endorses Harris.

I posted a famous astronaut who endorses Trump.

If one is legitimate, so is the other.

For every famous person OP creates a new thread for, I can name another famous person who thinks otherwise.

Who cares?

fallacy of false equivalency

 

[para bellum]

fallacy of false equivalency

Except it's not a false equivalence. They are the exact same thing.

The endorsement of a political candidate by a couple old guys...

 

[lafayette]

Except it's not a false equivalence. They are the exact same thing.

The endorsement of a political candidate by a couple old guys...

Nope, they are a fallacy of false equivalence. You saying 'no' does not make it so.

 

[Lastamender]

Thank you, Sir, for your service and patriotism! What do you think?

Dementia, no doubt.

 

[para bellum]

Nope, they are a fallacy of false equivalence. You saying 'no' does not make it so.

Wrong, and you saying it is does not make it so.

A false equivalence or false equivalency is an informal fallacy in which an equivalence is drawn between two subjects based on flawed or false reasoning. This fallacy is categorized as a fallacy of inconsistency.[1] Colloquially, a false equivalence is often called "comparing apples and oranges."

I am not "comparing apples and oranges". I am comparing apples and apples...

Better luck next time dummy.

 

[Kilroy2]

What's to "attack"? Trump wants to repair Democracy. Do you know what that is? I don't think you do. How many people will vote for Harris? Do you think the Republicans are bent on "attacking" each and every one of them? Your friends are waiting for you in the sand box. Run along now.

Trump wants to destroy democracy. That why he question a legitimate election where he lost.

The riot was an example

How many peoples lives were destroyed because of him?

Harris will beat Trump because people have had enough of the Trump

I see your already in a sandbox and Trump sold it to you as is.

 

[Kilroy2]

What's to "attack"? Trump wants to repair Democracy. Do you know what that is? I don't think you do. How many people will vote for Harris? Do you think the Republicans are bent on "attacking" each and every one of them? Your friends are waiting for you in the sand box. Run along now.

Repair democracy, Trump style

Yeah I bet you feel bad that you could not be there for him 4 years ago at the riot.

 

[Kilroy2]

You're a hack...I mean where is the dudes glasses ?

I hope they took his car keys away.

Mack the hack

Try to say something if your going to post.

 

[lafayette]

Wrong, and you saying it is does not make it so.

A false equivalence or false equivalency is an informal fallacy in which an equivalence is drawn between two subjects based on flawed or false reasoning. This fallacy is categorized as a fallacy of inconsistency.[1] Colloquially, a false equivalence is often called "comparing apples and oranges."

I am not "comparing apples and oranges". I am comparing apples and apples...

Better luck next time dummy.

Your posting shows it is a false equivalence based on your failure in reasoning. You are comparing boulders and pee wees.

 

[para bellum]

You are comparing boulders and pee wees.

No idiot, I am comparing political endorsements.

One is for Harris, one is for Trump.

You obviously never took a logic class.

OP creates at least one new thread every day, touting someone who endorses Harris. Not that it should convince anyone capable of making their own decisions, but his theory is that these people should be influential due to some characteristic like their fame or some other life achievement.

This thread is about a WW2 vet who endorses Harris. His credibility is (in theory) based on the fact that he is respected as a WW2 vet.

My post of Aldrin's endorsement is equally valid. Aldrin is also a military veteran, at least as equally respected for his service to the country. It just so happens that he endorses Trump.

So get over your butt-hurt, the comparison is perfectly reasonable.

 

[lafayette]

No idiot, I am comparing political endorsements.

One is for Harris, one is for Trump.

You obviously never took a logic class.

OP creates at least one new thread every day, touting someone who endorses Harris. Not that it should convince anyone capable of making their own decisions, but his theory is that these people should be influential due to some characteristic like their fame or some other life achievement.

This thread is about a WW2 vet who endorses Harris. His credibility is (in theory) based on the fact that he is respected as a WW2 vet.

My post of Aldrin's endorsement is equally valid. Aldrin is also a military veteran, at least as equally respected for his service to the country. It just so happens that he endorses Trump.

So get over your butt-hurt, the comparison is perfectly reasonable.

You don't understand logic. The word 'equivalence' is what is escaping you. One vet does not a proof make.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Thank you, Sir, for your service and patriotism! What do you think?

I think many veterans have also voted for Trump..so..

 

[para bellum]

You don't understand logic. The word 'equivalence' is what is escaping you. One vet does not a proof make.

Lol. You are the one claiming the false equivalence, retard.

OP and myself each posted a political endorsement.

You are trying to say one is legit and the other isn't, or some other idiotic conclusion that you cannot even articulate. Boulders and pee-wees? WTF is that supposed to mean?

Tell us why Aldrin's endorsement cannot be compared to the OP's WW2 vet.

I only explained why there is no false equivalence. You have yet to make the case that it is, or why Aldrin's endorsement is qualitatively different than the one from the WW2 vet.

Get a ******* clue- they are the exact same thing.

 

[lafayette]

Be polite, and don't be triggered; it's not worth it.

You have shifted a one to one comparison, and I can accept that.

I wonder who it will be next week? I have my desire but really don't know.

 

[GLASNOST]

Trump wants to destroy democracy. .

You poor idiot.

 

[GLASNOST]

... I bet you feel bad that you could not be there for him 4 years ago at the riot.

You poor idiot.

 

[Kilroy2]

Senility strikes the elderly. We've also seen it in Biden so we know how it works.

You poor idiot

 

[GLASNOST]

You poor idiot

You are an idiot no matter how poor you are.

 

[Kilroy2]

You are an idiot no matter how poor you are.

You are an idiot and live with your mother.

 

[Kilroy2]

You poor idiot.

You poor idiot