Mac-7
Diamond Member
- Oct 9, 2019
- 62,654
- 45,606
- 3,565
I dont doubt that she said itI watched her say it on tv too.
but no link that I have seen leads to the video of her saying it
and in this day and age of fake news it must be demonstrated
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I dont doubt that she said itI watched her say it on tv too.
Fuck the Supreme CourtProviding private security is not the same as engaging active criminal behavior that is right in front of you.I watched her say it on tv too.Where is the video of the police chief saying that?
'If there is a chance myself or one of my police officers
will get hurt in the line of duty...uh-uh, baby! I will not
send my officers out to protect the businesses and the
city of Raleigh! If windows get broken and the city is
set ablaze, all I got to say is 'Burn, baby, burn'!'
She also said that it is hard to identify the white supremacist in the crowd when there are a thousand others attending the event, looting, destroying, burning....
Bwuhahahaha....
You're On Your Own: Raleigh Police Chief Says She Will Not Put Officers in Harm's Way to Protect Property
Raleigh Police Chief Cassandra Deck-Brown held a press conference on Sunday morning after the mass violence and looting by leftist protesters overnight. Deck-Brown called the mass destruction “disgusting and unacceptable.” Chief Cassandra Deck-Brown then lectured on white supremacy in front of...www.thegatewaypundit.com
I followed the link provided and found no supporting evidence
It is astonishing that she still has a job after CLEARLY defying her constitutional oath.Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone (Published 2005)
Supreme Court rules that police do not have constitutional duty to protect person from harm, even woman who obtained court-issued protective order against violent husband which made arrest mandatory for violation; decision overturns ruling by federal appeals court in Colorado; it had permitted...www.nytimes.com
Coming to the aid of a person who calls the police is not private security.
REad the article. If the cops have no legal obligation to come to the aid of a woman being assaulted by a person on whom she has a legal restraining order why do they have to protect the property of some shop owner?
The Supreme Court coud not have made it more clear.
THE COPS DO NOT HAVE TO COME TO THE AID OF ANYONE...... PERIOD.
Fuck the Supreme CourtProviding private security is not the same as engaging active criminal behavior that is right in front of you.I watched her say it on tv too.Where is the video of the police chief saying that?
'If there is a chance myself or one of my police officers
will get hurt in the line of duty...uh-uh, baby! I will not
send my officers out to protect the businesses and the
city of Raleigh! If windows get broken and the city is
set ablaze, all I got to say is 'Burn, baby, burn'!'
She also said that it is hard to identify the white supremacist in the crowd when there are a thousand others attending the event, looting, destroying, burning....
Bwuhahahaha....
You're On Your Own: Raleigh Police Chief Says She Will Not Put Officers in Harm's Way to Protect Property
Raleigh Police Chief Cassandra Deck-Brown held a press conference on Sunday morning after the mass violence and looting by leftist protesters overnight. Deck-Brown called the mass destruction “disgusting and unacceptable.” Chief Cassandra Deck-Brown then lectured on white supremacy in front of...www.thegatewaypundit.com
I followed the link provided and found no supporting evidence
It is astonishing that she still has a job after CLEARLY defying her constitutional oath.Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone (Published 2005)
Supreme Court rules that police do not have constitutional duty to protect person from harm, even woman who obtained court-issued protective order against violent husband which made arrest mandatory for violation; decision overturns ruling by federal appeals court in Colorado; it had permitted...www.nytimes.com
Coming to the aid of a person who calls the police is not private security.
REad the article. If the cops have no legal obligation to come to the aid of a woman being assaulted by a person on whom she has a legal restraining order why do they have to protect the property of some shop owner?
The Supreme Court coud not have made it more clear.
THE COPS DO NOT HAVE TO COME TO THE AID OF ANYONE...... PERIOD.
they are educated fools
I understand the legal hair-splitting that prevents lawsuits against the police dept by ambulance chasing lib lawyers
but the reason to have a police dept is to protect life and property
Fuck the Supreme CourtProviding private security is not the same as engaging active criminal behavior that is right in front of you.I watched her say it on tv too.Where is the video of the police chief saying that?
'If there is a chance myself or one of my police officers
will get hurt in the line of duty...uh-uh, baby! I will not
send my officers out to protect the businesses and the
city of Raleigh! If windows get broken and the city is
set ablaze, all I got to say is 'Burn, baby, burn'!'
She also said that it is hard to identify the white supremacist in the crowd when there are a thousand others attending the event, looting, destroying, burning....
Bwuhahahaha....
You're On Your Own: Raleigh Police Chief Says She Will Not Put Officers in Harm's Way to Protect Property
Raleigh Police Chief Cassandra Deck-Brown held a press conference on Sunday morning after the mass violence and looting by leftist protesters overnight. Deck-Brown called the mass destruction “disgusting and unacceptable.” Chief Cassandra Deck-Brown then lectured on white supremacy in front of...www.thegatewaypundit.com
I followed the link provided and found no supporting evidence
It is astonishing that she still has a job after CLEARLY defying her constitutional oath.Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone (Published 2005)
Supreme Court rules that police do not have constitutional duty to protect person from harm, even woman who obtained court-issued protective order against violent husband which made arrest mandatory for violation; decision overturns ruling by federal appeals court in Colorado; it had permitted...www.nytimes.com
Coming to the aid of a person who calls the police is not private security.
REad the article. If the cops have no legal obligation to come to the aid of a woman being assaulted by a person on whom she has a legal restraining order why do they have to protect the property of some shop owner?
The Supreme Court could not have made it more clear.
THE COPS DO NOT HAVE TO COME TO THE AID OF ANYONE...... PERIOD.
they are educated fools
I understand the legal hair-splitting that prevents lawsuits against the police dept by ambulance chasing lib lawyers
but the reason to have a police dept is to protect life and property
That may be the result of the growing power of governmentFuck the Supreme CourtProviding private security is not the same as engaging active criminal behavior that is right in front of you.I watched her say it on tv too.Where is the video of the police chief saying that?
'If there is a chance myself or one of my police officers
will get hurt in the line of duty...uh-uh, baby! I will not
send my officers out to protect the businesses and the
city of Raleigh! If windows get broken and the city is
set ablaze, all I got to say is 'Burn, baby, burn'!'
She also said that it is hard to identify the white supremacist in the crowd when there are a thousand others attending the event, looting, destroying, burning....
Bwuhahahaha....
You're On Your Own: Raleigh Police Chief Says She Will Not Put Officers in Harm's Way to Protect Property
Raleigh Police Chief Cassandra Deck-Brown held a press conference on Sunday morning after the mass violence and looting by leftist protesters overnight. Deck-Brown called the mass destruction “disgusting and unacceptable.” Chief Cassandra Deck-Brown then lectured on white supremacy in front of...www.thegatewaypundit.com
I followed the link provided and found no supporting evidence
It is astonishing that she still has a job after CLEARLY defying her constitutional oath.Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone (Published 2005)
Supreme Court rules that police do not have constitutional duty to protect person from harm, even woman who obtained court-issued protective order against violent husband which made arrest mandatory for violation; decision overturns ruling by federal appeals court in Colorado; it had permitted...www.nytimes.com
Coming to the aid of a person who calls the police is not private security.
REad the article. If the cops have no legal obligation to come to the aid of a woman being assaulted by a person on whom she has a legal restraining order why do they have to protect the property of some shop owner?
The Supreme Court coud not have made it more clear.
THE COPS DO NOT HAVE TO COME TO THE AID OF ANYONE...... PERIOD.
they are educated fools
I understand the legal hair-splitting that prevents lawsuits against the police dept by ambulance chasing lib lawyers
but the reason to have a police dept is to protect life and property
The base reason for a police force is to provide the State with a method to enforce its control on the powers of justice and arbitration. We give the government the power to settle disputes, both civil and criminal instead of people handling on their own.
If the government via the police decides they don't want to or can't do that anymore, then the right to handle it falls back to the people.
We don't want that, but we have the right to do it.
you are quoting a legal ruling by 5 fools in black robesFuck the Supreme CourtProviding private security is not the same as engaging active criminal behavior that is right in front of you.I watched her say it on tv too.Where is the video of the police chief saying that?
'If there is a chance myself or one of my police officers
will get hurt in the line of duty...uh-uh, baby! I will not
send my officers out to protect the businesses and the
city of Raleigh! If windows get broken and the city is
set ablaze, all I got to say is 'Burn, baby, burn'!'
She also said that it is hard to identify the white supremacist in the crowd when there are a thousand others attending the event, looting, destroying, burning....
Bwuhahahaha....
You're On Your Own: Raleigh Police Chief Says She Will Not Put Officers in Harm's Way to Protect Property
Raleigh Police Chief Cassandra Deck-Brown held a press conference on Sunday morning after the mass violence and looting by leftist protesters overnight. Deck-Brown called the mass destruction “disgusting and unacceptable.” Chief Cassandra Deck-Brown then lectured on white supremacy in front of...www.thegatewaypundit.com
I followed the link provided and found no supporting evidence
It is astonishing that she still has a job after CLEARLY defying her constitutional oath.Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone (Published 2005)
Supreme Court rules that police do not have constitutional duty to protect person from harm, even woman who obtained court-issued protective order against violent husband which made arrest mandatory for violation; decision overturns ruling by federal appeals court in Colorado; it had permitted...www.nytimes.com
Coming to the aid of a person who calls the police is not private security.
REad the article. If the cops have no legal obligation to come to the aid of a woman being assaulted by a person on whom she has a legal restraining order why do they have to protect the property of some shop owner?
The Supreme Court could not have made it more clear.
THE COPS DO NOT HAVE TO COME TO THE AID OF ANYONE...... PERIOD.
they are educated fools
I understand the legal hair-splitting that prevents lawsuits against the police dept by ambulance chasing lib lawyers
but the reason to have a police dept is to protect life and property
Sure it's the reason but the reality is the cops have no legal obligation to come to the aid of the public.
That may be the result of the growing power of governmentFuck the Supreme CourtProviding private security is not the same as engaging active criminal behavior that is right in front of you.I watched her say it on tv too.Where is the video of the police chief saying that?
'If there is a chance myself or one of my police officers
will get hurt in the line of duty...uh-uh, baby! I will not
send my officers out to protect the businesses and the
city of Raleigh! If windows get broken and the city is
set ablaze, all I got to say is 'Burn, baby, burn'!'
She also said that it is hard to identify the white supremacist in the crowd when there are a thousand others attending the event, looting, destroying, burning....
Bwuhahahaha....
You're On Your Own: Raleigh Police Chief Says She Will Not Put Officers in Harm's Way to Protect Property
Raleigh Police Chief Cassandra Deck-Brown held a press conference on Sunday morning after the mass violence and looting by leftist protesters overnight. Deck-Brown called the mass destruction “disgusting and unacceptable.” Chief Cassandra Deck-Brown then lectured on white supremacy in front of...www.thegatewaypundit.com
I followed the link provided and found no supporting evidence
It is astonishing that she still has a job after CLEARLY defying her constitutional oath.Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone (Published 2005)
Supreme Court rules that police do not have constitutional duty to protect person from harm, even woman who obtained court-issued protective order against violent husband which made arrest mandatory for violation; decision overturns ruling by federal appeals court in Colorado; it had permitted...www.nytimes.com
Coming to the aid of a person who calls the police is not private security.
REad the article. If the cops have no legal obligation to come to the aid of a woman being assaulted by a person on whom she has a legal restraining order why do they have to protect the property of some shop owner?
The Supreme Court coud not have made it more clear.
THE COPS DO NOT HAVE TO COME TO THE AID OF ANYONE...... PERIOD.
they are educated fools
I understand the legal hair-splitting that prevents lawsuits against the police dept by ambulance chasing lib lawyers
but the reason to have a police dept is to protect life and property
The base reason for a police force is to provide the State with a method to enforce its control on the powers of justice and arbitration. We give the government the power to settle disputes, both civil and criminal instead of people handling on their own.
If the government via the police decides they don't want to or can't do that anymore, then the right to handle it falls back to the people.
We don't want that, but we have the right to do it.
but it was not the intent of the settlers who founded the country and the police departments
SureThat may be the result of the growing power of governmentFuck the Supreme CourtProviding private security is not the same as engaging active criminal behavior that is right in front of you.I watched her say it on tv too.Where is the video of the police chief saying that?
'If there is a chance myself or one of my police officers
will get hurt in the line of duty...uh-uh, baby! I will not
send my officers out to protect the businesses and the
city of Raleigh! If windows get broken and the city is
set ablaze, all I got to say is 'Burn, baby, burn'!'
She also said that it is hard to identify the white supremacist in the crowd when there are a thousand others attending the event, looting, destroying, burning....
Bwuhahahaha....
You're On Your Own: Raleigh Police Chief Says She Will Not Put Officers in Harm's Way to Protect Property
Raleigh Police Chief Cassandra Deck-Brown held a press conference on Sunday morning after the mass violence and looting by leftist protesters overnight. Deck-Brown called the mass destruction “disgusting and unacceptable.” Chief Cassandra Deck-Brown then lectured on white supremacy in front of...www.thegatewaypundit.com
I followed the link provided and found no supporting evidence
It is astonishing that she still has a job after CLEARLY defying her constitutional oath.Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone (Published 2005)
Supreme Court rules that police do not have constitutional duty to protect person from harm, even woman who obtained court-issued protective order against violent husband which made arrest mandatory for violation; decision overturns ruling by federal appeals court in Colorado; it had permitted...www.nytimes.com
Coming to the aid of a person who calls the police is not private security.
REad the article. If the cops have no legal obligation to come to the aid of a woman being assaulted by a person on whom she has a legal restraining order why do they have to protect the property of some shop owner?
The Supreme Court coud not have made it more clear.
THE COPS DO NOT HAVE TO COME TO THE AID OF ANYONE...... PERIOD.
they are educated fools
I understand the legal hair-splitting that prevents lawsuits against the police dept by ambulance chasing lib lawyers
but the reason to have a police dept is to protect life and property
The base reason for a police force is to provide the State with a method to enforce its control on the powers of justice and arbitration. We give the government the power to settle disputes, both civil and criminal instead of people handling on their own.
If the government via the police decides they don't want to or can't do that anymore, then the right to handle it falls back to the people.
We don't want that, but we have the right to do it.
but it was not the intent of the settlers who founded the country and the police departments
it was the intent of the framers of local government in the Constitutional era.
Instead of farmer bob and farmer smith shooting it out over stolen pigs, the government decides who is the criminal and who is the victim. The police (or Sheriff/constable/milita back then) were just a neutral party that enforced the power of the courts.
SureThat may be the result of the growing power of governmentFuck the Supreme CourtProviding private security is not the same as engaging active criminal behavior that is right in front of you.I watched her say it on tv too.Where is the video of the police chief saying that?
'If there is a chance myself or one of my police officers
will get hurt in the line of duty...uh-uh, baby! I will not
send my officers out to protect the businesses and the
city of Raleigh! If windows get broken and the city is
set ablaze, all I got to say is 'Burn, baby, burn'!'
She also said that it is hard to identify the white supremacist in the crowd when there are a thousand others attending the event, looting, destroying, burning....
Bwuhahahaha....
You're On Your Own: Raleigh Police Chief Says She Will Not Put Officers in Harm's Way to Protect Property
Raleigh Police Chief Cassandra Deck-Brown held a press conference on Sunday morning after the mass violence and looting by leftist protesters overnight. Deck-Brown called the mass destruction “disgusting and unacceptable.” Chief Cassandra Deck-Brown then lectured on white supremacy in front of...www.thegatewaypundit.com
I followed the link provided and found no supporting evidence
It is astonishing that she still has a job after CLEARLY defying her constitutional oath.Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone (Published 2005)
Supreme Court rules that police do not have constitutional duty to protect person from harm, even woman who obtained court-issued protective order against violent husband which made arrest mandatory for violation; decision overturns ruling by federal appeals court in Colorado; it had permitted...www.nytimes.com
Coming to the aid of a person who calls the police is not private security.
REad the article. If the cops have no legal obligation to come to the aid of a woman being assaulted by a person on whom she has a legal restraining order why do they have to protect the property of some shop owner?
The Supreme Court coud not have made it more clear.
THE COPS DO NOT HAVE TO COME TO THE AID OF ANYONE...... PERIOD.
they are educated fools
I understand the legal hair-splitting that prevents lawsuits against the police dept by ambulance chasing lib lawyers
but the reason to have a police dept is to protect life and property
The base reason for a police force is to provide the State with a method to enforce its control on the powers of justice and arbitration. We give the government the power to settle disputes, both civil and criminal instead of people handling on their own.
If the government via the police decides they don't want to or can't do that anymore, then the right to handle it falls back to the people.
We don't want that, but we have the right to do it.
but it was not the intent of the settlers who founded the country and the police departments
it was the intent of the framers of local government in the Constitutional era.
Instead of farmer bob and farmer smith shooting it out over stolen pigs, the government decides who is the criminal and who is the victim. The police (or Sheriff/constable/milita back then) were just a neutral party that enforced the power of the courts.
whats wrong with that?
You think it matters how the public sees it?you are quoting a legal ruling by 5 fools in black robesFuck the Supreme CourtProviding private security is not the same as engaging active criminal behavior that is right in front of you.I watched her say it on tv too.Where is the video of the police chief saying that?
'If there is a chance myself or one of my police officers
will get hurt in the line of duty...uh-uh, baby! I will not
send my officers out to protect the businesses and the
city of Raleigh! If windows get broken and the city is
set ablaze, all I got to say is 'Burn, baby, burn'!'
She also said that it is hard to identify the white supremacist in the crowd when there are a thousand others attending the event, looting, destroying, burning....
Bwuhahahaha....
You're On Your Own: Raleigh Police Chief Says She Will Not Put Officers in Harm's Way to Protect Property
Raleigh Police Chief Cassandra Deck-Brown held a press conference on Sunday morning after the mass violence and looting by leftist protesters overnight. Deck-Brown called the mass destruction “disgusting and unacceptable.” Chief Cassandra Deck-Brown then lectured on white supremacy in front of...www.thegatewaypundit.com
I followed the link provided and found no supporting evidence
It is astonishing that she still has a job after CLEARLY defying her constitutional oath.Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone (Published 2005)
Supreme Court rules that police do not have constitutional duty to protect person from harm, even woman who obtained court-issued protective order against violent husband which made arrest mandatory for violation; decision overturns ruling by federal appeals court in Colorado; it had permitted...www.nytimes.com
Coming to the aid of a person who calls the police is not private security.
REad the article. If the cops have no legal obligation to come to the aid of a woman being assaulted by a person on whom she has a legal restraining order why do they have to protect the property of some shop owner?
The Supreme Court could not have made it more clear.
THE COPS DO NOT HAVE TO COME TO THE AID OF ANYONE...... PERIOD.
they are educated fools
I understand the legal hair-splitting that prevents lawsuits against the police dept by ambulance chasing lib lawyers
but the reason to have a police dept is to protect life and property
Sure it's the reason but the reality is the cops have no legal obligation to come to the aid of the public.
but that is not how the public sees it
And the Raleigh couldn't read from prepared statement without sounding like Joe Biden...or worse.
'If there is a chance myself or one of my police officers
will get hurt in the line of duty...uh-uh, baby! I will not
send my officers out to protect the businesses and the
city of Raleigh! If windows get broken and the city is
set ablaze, all I got to say is 'Burn, baby, burn'!'
She also said that it is hard to identify the white supremacist in the crowd when there are a thousand others attending the event, looting, destroying, burning....
Bwuhahahaha....
You're On Your Own: Raleigh Police Chief Says She Will Not Put Officers in Harm's Way to Protect Property
Raleigh Police Chief Cassandra Deck-Brown held a press conference on Sunday morning after the mass violence and looting by leftist protesters overnight. Deck-Brown called the mass destruction “disgusting and unacceptable.” Chief Cassandra Deck-Brown then lectured on white supremacy in front of...www.thegatewaypundit.com
Nope. It was a rather simple instance. They showed up and did nothing. It is exactly what I expect from the police unless you are double parked - THAT they will take care of in seconds out here.Thats hard to believeWhen they showed up they refused to enter the house.
there must be more to the story than that
This really will put to rest any meaningful call for more strict gun laws for at least another decade.Fuck the Supreme CourtProviding private security is not the same as engaging active criminal behavior that is right in front of you.I watched her say it on tv too.Where is the video of the police chief saying that?
'If there is a chance myself or one of my police officers
will get hurt in the line of duty...uh-uh, baby! I will not
send my officers out to protect the businesses and the
city of Raleigh! If windows get broken and the city is
set ablaze, all I got to say is 'Burn, baby, burn'!'
She also said that it is hard to identify the white supremacist in the crowd when there are a thousand others attending the event, looting, destroying, burning....
Bwuhahahaha....
You're On Your Own: Raleigh Police Chief Says She Will Not Put Officers in Harm's Way to Protect Property
Raleigh Police Chief Cassandra Deck-Brown held a press conference on Sunday morning after the mass violence and looting by leftist protesters overnight. Deck-Brown called the mass destruction “disgusting and unacceptable.” Chief Cassandra Deck-Brown then lectured on white supremacy in front of...www.thegatewaypundit.com
I followed the link provided and found no supporting evidence
It is astonishing that she still has a job after CLEARLY defying her constitutional oath.Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone (Published 2005)
Supreme Court rules that police do not have constitutional duty to protect person from harm, even woman who obtained court-issued protective order against violent husband which made arrest mandatory for violation; decision overturns ruling by federal appeals court in Colorado; it had permitted...www.nytimes.com
Coming to the aid of a person who calls the police is not private security.
REad the article. If the cops have no legal obligation to come to the aid of a woman being assaulted by a person on whom she has a legal restraining order why do they have to protect the property of some shop owner?
The Supreme Court coud not have made it more clear.
THE COPS DO NOT HAVE TO COME TO THE AID OF ANYONE...... PERIOD.
they are educated fools
I understand the legal hair-splitting that prevents lawsuits against the police dept by ambulance chasing lib lawyers
but the reason to have a police dept is to protect life and property
The base reason for a police force is to provide the State with a method to enforce its control on the powers of justice and arbitration. We give the government the power to settle disputes, both civil and criminal instead of people handling on their own.
If the government via the police decides they don't want to or can't do that anymore, then the right to handle it falls back to the people.
We don't want that, but we have the right to do it.
Bring it, moronwell.....look for the people of Raleigh to make democrat terrorist worm bait .sad ...very sad .... but hat choice do the citizens have now ?? the only choice is to defend themselves their families and their properties from communist extremists.
Well, apparently you do if you have a Dimocrat mayor.As a citizen, I don't pay police to sit on their ass, to WATCH stores being looted and burned.
View attachment 344001
Besides her police might have to throw her son or daughter in jail if they started arresting people.
*****SMILE*****
This really will put to rest any meaningful call for more strict gun laws for at least another decade.Fuck the Supreme CourtProviding private security is not the same as engaging active criminal behavior that is right in front of you.I watched her say it on tv too.Where is the video of the police chief saying that?
'If there is a chance myself or one of my police officers
will get hurt in the line of duty...uh-uh, baby! I will not
send my officers out to protect the businesses and the
city of Raleigh! If windows get broken and the city is
set ablaze, all I got to say is 'Burn, baby, burn'!'
She also said that it is hard to identify the white supremacist in the crowd when there are a thousand others attending the event, looting, destroying, burning....
Bwuhahahaha....
You're On Your Own: Raleigh Police Chief Says She Will Not Put Officers in Harm's Way to Protect Property
Raleigh Police Chief Cassandra Deck-Brown held a press conference on Sunday morning after the mass violence and looting by leftist protesters overnight. Deck-Brown called the mass destruction “disgusting and unacceptable.” Chief Cassandra Deck-Brown then lectured on white supremacy in front of...www.thegatewaypundit.com
I followed the link provided and found no supporting evidence
It is astonishing that she still has a job after CLEARLY defying her constitutional oath.Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone (Published 2005)
Supreme Court rules that police do not have constitutional duty to protect person from harm, even woman who obtained court-issued protective order against violent husband which made arrest mandatory for violation; decision overturns ruling by federal appeals court in Colorado; it had permitted...www.nytimes.com
Coming to the aid of a person who calls the police is not private security.
REad the article. If the cops have no legal obligation to come to the aid of a woman being assaulted by a person on whom she has a legal restraining order why do they have to protect the property of some shop owner?
The Supreme Court coud not have made it more clear.
THE COPS DO NOT HAVE TO COME TO THE AID OF ANYONE...... PERIOD.
they are educated fools
I understand the legal hair-splitting that prevents lawsuits against the police dept by ambulance chasing lib lawyers
but the reason to have a police dept is to protect life and property
The base reason for a police force is to provide the State with a method to enforce its control on the powers of justice and arbitration. We give the government the power to settle disputes, both civil and criminal instead of people handling on their own.
If the government via the police decides they don't want to or can't do that anymore, then the right to handle it falls back to the people.
We don't want that, but we have the right to do it.