...Wait....WHAT?! 'You’re On Your Own': Raleigh Police Chief Tells Citizens She Will Not Put Officers in Harm’s Way to Protect Property

Desperado

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2012
Messages
30,816
Reaction score
4,680
Points
1,140


'If there is a chance myself or one of my police officers
will get hurt in the line of duty...uh-uh, baby! I will not
send my officers out to protect the businesses and the
city of Raleigh! If windows get broken and the city is
set ablaze, all I got to say is 'Burn, baby, burn'!'



She also said that it is hard to identify the white supremacist in the crowd when there are a thousand others attending the event, looting, destroying, burning....

Bwuhahahaha....



They are OK
THE CASTLE DOCTRINE
Further, North Carolina is one of the few states to adopt the Castle Doctrine, which is a version of a stand your ground law. This restricts the terms in which a person can use deadly force to protect himself or herself. Under the Castle Doctrine, a home is a “castle,” so that means a person has the right to use deadly force to protect that castle from siege. If an intruder invades a person’s space, the property owner can legally use deadly force against him or her, with no legal obligation to back down. This right extends not only to a person’s home but also his or her vehicle and workplace under North Carolina law.
The police just have to pick up the looters bodies and I think there is no risk to the cops
 

WEATHER53

Gold Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2017
Messages
9,664
Reaction score
2,128
Points
290
While they engage in selective law enforcement we the lawful will begin to engage in selective law obedience and some enforcement ourselves.
Harms way is part of the job end of month momma
 

FA_Q2

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2009
Messages
18,692
Reaction score
2,958
Points
290
Location
Washington State
The officers job is not to protect. They're revenue collectors with a quota they are unable to make due to the rioting
Thats not true

the cops have many jobs and protecting the public is a primary mission

along with collecting fines from speeders
This is false. They want you to think this so that you tolerate some of the more egregious things they do but at the end of the day the police are only there to clean up the mess afterward.

 

Likkmee

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2015
Messages
8,858
Reaction score
1,853
Points
215
The officers job is not to protect. They're revenue collectors with a quota they are unable to make due to the rioting
Thats not true

the cops have many jobs and protecting the public is a primary mission

along with collecting fines from speeders
Then they always fail the first and succeed at the latter. Unless, of course, something prevents them from "doing their jobs"
 

Andylusion

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2014
Messages
18,019
Reaction score
3,777
Points
290
Location
Central Ohio


'If there is a chance myself or one of my police officers
will get hurt in the line of duty...uh-uh, baby! I will not
send my officers out to protect the businesses and the
city of Raleigh! If windows get broken and the city is
set ablaze, all I got to say is 'Burn, baby, burn'!'



She also said that it is hard to identify the white supremacist in the crowd when there are a thousand others attending the event, looting, destroying, burning....

Bwuhahahaha....



So wait... she is saying that white supremacists in the crowd are the ones looting, destroying and burning? And that she has no intention of helping innocent people being victimized by them?

Ok, she need fired.
 

Mac-7

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Messages
11,094
Reaction score
5,201
Points
290
The officers job is not to protect. They're revenue collectors with a quota they are unable to make due to the rioting
Thats not true

the cops have many jobs and protecting the public is a primary mission

along with collecting fines from speeders
This is false. They want you to think this so that you tolerate some of the more egregious things they do but at the end of the day the police are only there to clean up the mess afterward.

The court ruling only protects the police from lawsuits lainched by ambulance chasing lawyers
 

Mac-7

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Messages
11,094
Reaction score
5,201
Points
290


'If there is a chance myself or one of my police officers
will get hurt in the line of duty...uh-uh, baby! I will not
send my officers out to protect the businesses and the
city of Raleigh! If windows get broken and the city is
set ablaze, all I got to say is 'Burn, baby, burn'!'



She also said that it is hard to identify the white supremacist in the crowd when there are a thousand others attending the event, looting, destroying, burning....

Bwuhahahaha....



So wait... she is saying that white supremacists in the crowd are the ones looting, destroying and burning? And that she has no intention of helping innocent people being victimized by them?

Ok, she need fired.
There is no video of her saying that
 

Andylusion

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2014
Messages
18,019
Reaction score
3,777
Points
290
Location
Central Ohio


'If there is a chance myself or one of my police officers
will get hurt in the line of duty...uh-uh, baby! I will not
send my officers out to protect the businesses and the
city of Raleigh! If windows get broken and the city is
set ablaze, all I got to say is 'Burn, baby, burn'!'



She also said that it is hard to identify the white supremacist in the crowd when there are a thousand others attending the event, looting, destroying, burning....

Bwuhahahaha....



So wait... she is saying that white supremacists in the crowd are the ones looting, destroying and burning? And that she has no intention of helping innocent people being victimized by them?

Ok, she need fired.
There is no video of her saying that
“I will not put an officer in harms way to protect the property inside of a building,” says the Raleigh

It was in her tweet.

What if I'm inside the building? Just die I guess.
 

Mac-7

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Messages
11,094
Reaction score
5,201
Points
290


'If there is a chance myself or one of my police officers
will get hurt in the line of duty...uh-uh, baby! I will not
send my officers out to protect the businesses and the
city of Raleigh! If windows get broken and the city is
set ablaze, all I got to say is 'Burn, baby, burn'!'



She also said that it is hard to identify the white supremacist in the crowd when there are a thousand others attending the event, looting, destroying, burning....

Bwuhahahaha....



So wait... she is saying that white supremacists in the crowd are the ones looting, destroying and burning? And that she has no intention of helping innocent people being victimized by them?

Ok, she need fired.
There is no video of her saying that
“I will not put an officer in harms way to protect the property inside of a building,” says the Raleigh

It was in her tweet.

What if I'm inside the building? Just die I guess.
Ok, I get it and maybe Should have been quicker on the take

thanks
 

FA_Q2

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2009
Messages
18,692
Reaction score
2,958
Points
290
Location
Washington State
The officers job is not to protect. They're revenue collectors with a quota they are unable to make due to the rioting
Thats not true

the cops have many jobs and protecting the public is a primary mission

along with collecting fines from speeders
This is false. They want you to think this so that you tolerate some of the more egregious things they do but at the end of the day the police are only there to clean up the mess afterward.

The court ruling only protects the police from lawsuits lainched by ambulance chasing lawyers
And it means officers are not liable for not protecting people.

It is a hard fact - police officers are not duty bound to protect anyone.
 

Mac-7

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Messages
11,094
Reaction score
5,201
Points
290
The officers job is not to protect. They're revenue collectors with a quota they are unable to make due to the rioting
Thats not true

the cops have many jobs and protecting the public is a primary mission

along with collecting fines from speeders
This is false. They want you to think this so that you tolerate some of the more egregious things they do but at the end of the day the police are only there to clean up the mess afterward.

The court ruling only protects the police from lawsuits lainched by ambulance chasing lawyers
And it means officers are not liable for not protecting people.

It is a hard fact - police officers are not duty bound to protect anyone.
Ok if you insist

that strengthens the argument for the 2nd Amendment and gun ownership
 
OP
easyt65

easyt65

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2015
Messages
62,608
Reaction score
17,113
Points
2,290
And it means officers are not liable for not protecting people.

It is a hard fact - police officers are not duty bound to protect anyone.
No, this means this fat, black female POS criminal sympathizer should not be Chief of police....or a policewoman at all.

'Protect and Serve' is EXACTLY what police are supposed to do.

Her lazy, racist statement that she refuses to do her duty or allow her officers to do their duty at all because she can't pick the / a white supremacist out of the thousand criminals and terrorists looting, attacking, and burning down businesses is mind-numbing bullshit.

.
 

FA_Q2

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2009
Messages
18,692
Reaction score
2,958
Points
290
Location
Washington State
The officers job is not to protect. They're revenue collectors with a quota they are unable to make due to the rioting
Thats not true

the cops have many jobs and protecting the public is a primary mission

along with collecting fines from speeders
This is false. They want you to think this so that you tolerate some of the more egregious things they do but at the end of the day the police are only there to clean up the mess afterward.

The court ruling only protects the police from lawsuits lainched by ambulance chasing lawyers
And it means officers are not liable for not protecting people.

It is a hard fact - police officers are not duty bound to protect anyone.
Ok if you insist

that strengthens the argument for the 2nd Amendment and gun ownership
Yes, it does.

The old call the cops motto is idiotic - it is your own responsibility to protect yourself.

My old boss had a break in while he was out and called the cops. When they showed up they refused to enter the house. He had to get his gun out of his car and clear the damn thing himself. One wonders why you would even bother calling them.
 

FA_Q2

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2009
Messages
18,692
Reaction score
2,958
Points
290
Location
Washington State
And it means officers are not liable for not protecting people.

It is a hard fact - police officers are not duty bound to protect anyone.
No, this means this fat, black female POS criminal sympathizer should not be Chief of police....or a policewoman at all.

'Protect and Serve' is EXACTLY what police are supposed to do.

Her lazy, racist statement that she refuses to do her duty or allow her officers to do their duty at all because she can't pick the / a white supremacist out of the thousand criminals and terrorists looting, attacking, and burning down businesses is mind-numbing bullshit.

.
That is what they are supposed to do from our standpoint but legal case after legal case has proven that they dropped that duty a long time ago.
 

Silver Cat

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2020
Messages
877
Reaction score
183
Points
45
Location
Absaroka
Spotted in Jasper, AL today on top of Young's Jewelry. Sniper team. Given how the rifleman is wearing a shirt with the Blackwater emblem on it, Blackwater no longer existing, may be it's the owner or a friend of the owner.
SAVE_20200602_094325.jpg
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top