Vote for Kav = Buh Bye Susie Collins

[Sunsettommy]

Dem have always been nutless. Casteration not needed.

NO!

They were not always this way, it is a fairly recent development that began quietly in the 1970's when their leftist Senator got smashed by Nixon in 1972, which they have NEVER forgotten especially when Nixon stupidly tried hard to cover up a break-in called Watergate. Leftism came to the forefront in the 1990's in the Congress when they greatly increased the partisan attacks on the Republicans who behaved like the deer in headlights, which was vividly shown in the budget showdown in the Clinton administration.

John F. Kennedy was the last CLASSIC Liberal in the White House, the last Democrat to promote Tax cuts, the last Democrat to be very civil with his counterparts. Jimmy Carter was the very last Democrat to be decent and civil with his opponents, unfortunately he was a weak leader. Ever since then Clinton and especially Obama have been very ugly leaders to people around them and to the nation. Democrats used to be a decent party, with Scoop Jackson, Mike Wallace, Warren Magnussen, Mike Mansfield, Tip Oneill and so on. Now we have ugly men in Durban, Reid, Schumer and more who are partisan hacks, they are UGLY men.

I was a Classic Democrat until the early 1990's when the ongoing internal rot of the Democrat party became too hard to ignore, left it to become an Independent over time. No longer support any political parties, sometimes not even vote at all, I didn't vote for Trump because I couldn't be sure of anything, didn't vote for McCain either who ran a poor Presidential campaign, lacked true leadership.

Now I will much more likely vote for Republicans because of the inner leftist ugliness that are now too much for me to overlook, which is why I will Vote from Trump in 2020 and vote for Republicans and occasionally Libertarian. I am unhappy at how ugly democrat party has become that should get (DESERVE!) a smackdown in future elections to drive out the slime that has accumulated in it, then hopefully Classic Liberals can once again regain their rightful place as the mainstay of the party, then I might reconsider rejoining them, if I live long enough.

 

[MisterBeale]

The Dimms constiuency are now women who accuse men of rape without ANY evidence or witnesses.

Brilliant.

Once those few man hating Lesbians die off, what will be left?

Oh. So if you can't provide physical proof of rape it's ok to rape someone...is that what the Republicans are about today?

Pretty much. It is okay to do any crime if there is no proof to prove you did it.



If the bank in your town ends up missing several thousand dollars and claims YOU stole it, can they put you in jail with out evidence based solely on their claim?

NO.


Stop being stupid. No one believes it is "ok to rape someone." At the same time, nobody believes it is ok to just punish someone based on solely on accusations, right?



The is the premise of crime. Democrats are always telling foreigners, if you don't get caught, sure, come on over to America without going through the process, rape the system.

Well stop being stupid yourself. There was no full investigation. There was no conclusive evidence, but enough to suggest something had happened. In fact most agreed something DID happen. Not enough to, as was brought up in another case - to allow a prosecuter to make a reasonable case. And that is fair assuming a full investigation reaches the same conclusions. I have issues with the way it was handled in such a public manner, that should never have happened. Nor should it have been ignored. Ford's name should never have been disclosed, and the investigation should have been thorough and quiet until concluded. THAT was shameful and GROSSLY unfair to both Kavannaugh and Ford. BOTH have been publically shredded and humiliated. The President himself partook of the public shredding of a civilian. That is unforgiveable. Each time when I think one side or the other can't get any worse they do. And the Republicans are no better.

My apologies dear.

What I meant by stupid was, that you can't possibly believe someone should be sanctioned and have their character and career destroyed on an accusation alone? Who ever leaked this wanted to make sure that you would feel this way, that the corporate media would make you feel this way.

You don't actually think that, right?

I don't think sexual assault is an issue that should be politicized and used as a political weapon, I believe that the establishment is cheapening it. Folks will no longer take it seriously, like the boy who cried wolf. The leaker did this for precisely this purpose, b/c they knew how certain folks would react.

What ever the case may be, we are in total agreement, the situation was handled completely horribly. Utterly atrocious. I'm pretty sure, the reason it was leaked, is to make an issue of something where no evidence would ever have been found, to MAKE IT POLITICAL, to tie him to something that was in all likelihood, either a false memory, or an incident that had two sides of a story. If they hadn't leaked it, it would have never gone public and we would not now be having this conversation. If it weren't a false memory, it is likely a misunderstanding or an exaggeration. Who knows?

When I think about the fact that Ginsburg was confirmed on a vote of 96 to 3 and Scalia was confirmed on a vote of 98 to 0 I wonder what is happening to this nation.

I totally agree. But I also never thought they would pull the stunt they did with Garland.

I was a bit surprised by that too.

I wasn't aware that it was a tradition to stall on nominations during an election years if the opposing party held the Senate.

Let's be honest though, you know as well as I, if the Democrats hold the Senate, and the Republicans hold the oval office, that will happen again, and vice versa.

Most folks that follow this think the most outrageous act of all was when, to get his way on all of his agenda, FDR attempted to pack the courts. Will of the people, and constitution be damned.

It's all seriously some shady shit.

File:FDR Chat Mar 37.ogg - Wikipedia

 

[Sun Devil 92]

The women in this country are throwing your sorry ass out in 2020.


Democratic Nominee for SenatePotential candidate for ME, U.S. Senate, 2020 Primary Election
$1,951,677
From 68,315 pledges on Crowdpac

98% of $2,000,000 goal

View attachment 220521
.
.
.

Every commercial, every ad, every speech against her; all will feature this “yes” vote if she ends up deciding to put party over country.

I am sure she is shaking in her boots.

You guys keep consoling yourselves when you get your asses kicked again.

Your frontmen behave like totally pricks.

 

[ptbw forever]

The women in this country are throwing your sorry ass out in 2020..

Highly unlikely. Collins has always had a relatively easy reelection and by 2020 nobody will even care about this anymore. Two years is a lifetime in politics.

In 2020 Collins will be riding the Trump train to an easy victory.

 

[Lumpy 1]

The women in this country are throwing your sorry ass out in 2020..

Highly unlikely. Collins has always had a relatively easy reelection and by 2020 nobody will even care about this anymore. Two years is a lifetime in politics.

In 2020 Collins will be riding the Trump train to an easy victory.

How quickly they spin to hate fueled politics when they don't get their way... . . where's my check?
.


.

 

[FA_Q2]

She's basically a Democrat. A RINO turd. Good riddance.

She is a Republican first and a Senator 2nd. She needs to lose.

So far, the only losers are your ilk, for at least the last 23 months or so.

I don’t think so. Ever heard of over reach? We won’t forget what you did to Garland and which you still fully justify.

That is the problem here.

This is now the permanent method that we use to select SC nominees.

If the partisanship of the court bothers you now, it is going to get 1000 times worse.

 

[AntonToo]

Primitive defecation habbits and arguments usually go hand in hand.

Translation~ you ok with bribery as long as you don't get thrown in jail.

Can you even name the candidate of hers getting the money, Vito Corleone ?

No dummy, I'm not for law breaking, I'm for very legal and apropriate voting of Collins out of office.

Why? Because she didn't cave to the Gestapo tactics of the Democrats? That would be a good reason to vote her back in, she showed a backbone and stuck to the facts.

Because she just agreed to vote for a lying ass partisan politico to a lifeitme appointment to SCOTUS. Ford was way more credible than our beer gulping, Clinton conspiracy theory slinging, virgin choir boy.

And Gestapo? You need to get a fucking grip on reality buddy.

Not one word of hers could be backed up by a single fact.

I see you've been working on your Trumpian hyperbole.

 

[AntonToo]

Primitive defecation habbits and arguments usually go hand in hand.

Translation~ you ok with bribery as long as you don't get thrown in jail.

Can you even name the candidate of hers getting the money, Vito Corleone ?

No dummy, I'm not for law breaking, I'm for very legal and apropriate voting of Collins out of office.

Why? Because she didn't cave to the Gestapo tactics of the Democrats? That would be a good reason to vote her back in, she showed a backbone and stuck to the facts.

Because she just agreed to vote for a lying ass partisan politico to a lifeitme appointment to SCOTUS. Ford was way more credible than our beer gulping, Clinton conspiracy theory slinging, virgin choir boy.

And Gestapo? You need to get a fucking grip on reality buddy.

So with that post you insulted 50 million plus beer drinkers in America, congrats..
.

No, just the stupid ones that don't read the full sentence or place it context of Kavanaugh's testimony.

He was full of crap.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Translation~ you ok with bribery as long as you don't get thrown in jail.

Can you even name the candidate of hers getting the money, Vito Corleone ?

No dummy, I'm not for law breaking, I'm for very legal and apropriate voting of Collins out of office.

Why? Because she didn't cave to the Gestapo tactics of the Democrats? That would be a good reason to vote her back in, she showed a backbone and stuck to the facts.

Because she just agreed to vote for a lying ass partisan politico to a lifeitme appointment to SCOTUS. Ford was way more credible than our beer gulping, Clinton conspiracy theory slinging, virgin choir boy.

And Gestapo? You need to get a fucking grip on reality buddy.

So with that post you insulted 50 million plus beer drinkers in America, congrats..
.

No, just the stupid ones that don't really understand what they read.

Hey it doesn't bother me if you guys keep cutting your own throat .


.

 

[ptbw forever]

She's basically a Democrat. A RINO turd. Good riddance.

She is a Republican first and a Senator 2nd. She needs to lose.

So far, the only losers are your ilk, for at least the last 23 months or so.

I don’t think so. Ever heard of over reach? We won’t forget what you did to Garland and which you still fully justify.

That is the problem here.

This is now the permanent method that we use to select SC nominees.

If the partisanship of the court bothers you now, it is going to get 1000 times worse.

After Barret is confirmed to replace Ginsberg and some nut tries to kill Amy, Mitch will outlaw some of the methods Democrats used.

 

[Auld Phart]

Ford was way more credible

how do you figure?

She couldn't remember when, where, who, or much of anything else.

 

[miketx]

Just think! If $2M can be raised in a month and the election is two years away, we'll wipe her ugly mug off the Senate floor easily.

I hope other groups take the lead like the women in Maine have, and do the same damn thing.

.
.
..

So you saying your going to be buying votes now? That's a felony, crime party.

I suspect raising money that way for candidates is a felony too. Probably violates campaign finance law

You’ve Been doing it for quite some time....

He has? Ban him.

 

[eagle1462010]

Idiots believe that the average American is going to vote for the one spending the most money.......the last election proved that BS wrong.....................Hillary spent twice as much............tried to use every dirty trick in the book to win and still lost..........

Americans are far smarter than the idiot politicians give them credit for.......................

The Dems are losing Blue Dogs............losing Union workers.................and the illegal vote is getting crushed on the border...............

Guess they need to do more grave digging for votes.

 

[MrShangles]

Just think! If $2M can be raised in a month and the election is two years away, we'll wipe her ugly mug off the Senate floor easily.

I hope other groups take the lead like the women in Maine have, and do the same damn thing.

.
.
..

The nerve she has, can you believe she actually wants some evidence, what is she thinking


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Well Dimocrats ?

When will the "women in this country" believe the "survivor" of their party's co-chair, and throw him out ?

 

[WaitingFor2020]

CrowdPac Update
Saturday October 6, 9:00am EST

$2,925,546
From 100,496 pledges on Crowdpac

$1,000,000 raised in the 18 hours since Collins opened her pie hole on the Senate floor!

.
.

 

[Cecilie1200]

She's basically a Democrat. A RINO turd. Good riddance.

She is a Republican first and a Senator 2nd. She needs to lose.

So far, the only losers are your ilk, for at least the last 23 months or so.

I don’t think so. Ever heard of over reach? We won’t forget what you did to Garland and which you still fully justify.

. . . Because it was fully justified.

And frankly, listening to someone whine about "overreach" and how horribly Republicans acted after staunchly defending the vicious, hysterical character assassination of Brett Kavanaugh is hilarious. Wait, let me get some popcorn and get comfortable before you contort yourself entirely into a pretzel.

 

[Cecilie1200]

The Dimms constiuency are now women who accuse men of rape without ANY evidence or witnesses.

Brilliant.

Once those few man hating Lesbians die off, what will be left?

Oh. So if you can't provide physical proof of rape it's ok to rape someone...is that what the Republicans are about today?

Pretty much. It is okay to do any crime if there is no proof to prove you did it.



If the bank in your town ends up missing several thousand dollars and claims YOU stole it, can they put you in jail with out evidence based solely on their claim?

NO.


Stop being stupid. No one believes it is "ok to rape someone." At the same time, nobody believes it is ok to just punish someone based on solely on accusations, right?



The is the premise of crime. Democrats are always telling foreigners, if you don't get caught, sure, come on over to America without going through the process, rape the system.

Well stop being stupid yourself. There was no full investigation. There was no conclusive evidence, but enough to suggest something had happened. In fact most agreed something DID happen. Not enough to, as was brought up in another case - to allow a prosecuter to make a reasonable case. And that is fair assuming a full investigation reaches the same conclusions. I have issues with the way it was handled in such a public manner, that should never have happened. Nor should it have been ignored. Ford's name should never have been disclosed, and the investigation should have been thorough and quiet until concluded. THAT was shameful and GROSSLY unfair to both Kavannaugh and Ford. BOTH have been publically shredded and humiliated. The President himself partook of the public shredding of a civilian. That is unforgiveable. Each time when I think one side or the other can't get any worse they do. And the Republicans are no better.

My apologies dear.

What I meant by stupid was, that you can't possibly believe someone should be sanctioned and have their character and career destroyed on an accusation alone? Who ever leaked this wanted to make sure that you would feel this way, that the corporate media would make you feel this way.

You don't actually think that, right?

I don't think sexual assault is an issue that should be politicized and used as a political weapon, I believe that the establishment is cheapening it. Folks will no longer take it seriously, like the boy who cried wolf. The leaker did this for precisely this purpose, b/c they knew how certain folks would react.

What ever the case may be, we are in total agreement, the situation was handled completely horribly. Utterly atrocious. I'm pretty sure, the reason it was leaked, is to make an issue of something where no evidence would ever have been found, to MAKE IT POLITICAL, to tie him to something that was in all likelihood, either a false memory, or an incident that had two sides of a story. If they hadn't leaked it, it would have never gone public and we would not now be having this conversation. If it weren't a false memory, it is likely a misunderstanding or an exaggeration. Who knows?

When I think about the fact that Ginsburg was confirmed on a vote of 96 to 3 and Scalia was confirmed on a vote of 98 to 0 I wonder what is happening to this nation.

I totally agree. But I also never thought they would pull the stunt they did with Garland.

The nefarious "Using a Senate majority to reject a nominee they didn't like" stunt that's . . . I dunno, their prerogative under the Constitution?

 

[Auld Phart]

CrowdPac Update
Saturday October 6, 9:00am EST

$2,925,546
From 100,496 pledges on Crowdpac

$1,000,000 raised in the 18 hours since Collins opened her pie hole on the Senate floor!

.
.

Run Hillary against her


she's good at spending money on elections.



(and getting nothing)

 

[Coyote]

Wrong but if true at least he doesn’t want them raoed like you do.

All women think exactly the same? Is that what you are saying?

Absurd

All men think the same, using their little head instead of the big one.
Or in the case of Trump, the mushroom head. (Thanks, Stormy!)
LOL!

.
.
.

If the goal is to de-nut Men, you suceeded with Democrats. We aren’t gonna be quite that easy cuckboy

We don’t like out of control nuttests. Sexual assault is no longer an acceptable means of communication.

We don’t like real victims of sexual assaults insulted by your made up victims.

You’ll learn that this November.

She wasn’t made up. And if you had paid any attention to Susan Collin’s speech, she said there was no doubt something had happened to her.