Time for Republicans to get treated to a few conspiracies

R

rdean

Guest
The reason we can't find Bin Laden is because Republicans let him go. They know that war makes money. They have always known where he is. He sends out video tapes and they scare the nation, doing his work. He even gets a cut. He's not living in some cave. He used to live in the mansion owned by the Family, but now he lives in a villa in Pakistan.

--------------------

Republicans want to bring down Obama because they feel, since he's black, it would be easier to "take over" and make this country a "religious, Iranian style" government with the clergy in charge. They already have a huge stockpile of weapons. The Patriot Act was only to identify possible trouble makers and college professors. They will be the first to go.

---------------------

Iraq was only for the oil

--------------------

Secret Russian agents infiltrated Evangelical churches and the Republican Party years ago. They have been trying to delegitimize "science". They're the ones behind "ID" and "anti-science" and "science is a religion". They know that if they can get America to turn away from science and dumb down the country, we will become a broken and dumb third world country, ripe for take-over. They already own a political party; it's called the "Confederate Republican Party" at their secret meetings.

------------------------

Sarah Palin is the anti-Christ. Her pastor practices witchcraft. The reason no one understands her is because she speaks in tongues. The only people who can understand what she says are those who have already given their souls to Satan, her father. Her pastor is a "domestic terrorist". He has tried to kill once before, but was blocked by angels. The next time, he will succeed.

-------------------------

Oh man, this is fun. No wonder conservatives make up so many conspiracies. I'll have to think up some more.
 
I feel sad this thread's not taking off.:confused:



Elvis Lives.

Too many Democrats live in the "real world". They tend to not take conspiracies seriously and are always surprised Republicans do.

Making up conspiracies are one of the reasons Republicans are so effective. They throw a hundred out there, and if one resonates, they take off with it. You gotta admire them for that.

Too bad they don't put that same drive towards something constructive. Something worth the time.
 
I would love for the republican party to become so smart and honest that I wanted to change parties.

I would gladly do it.
 
Rdean sort of misses out on a lot of things as to why these things develop.
Mostly it is like the game of telephone from kindergarten. Important facts are missed or misunderstood by the press and further misunderstood by people who don't know what is going on, but do know that was is being reported is bogus or nonsense.

For instance, in the case of Oswald, the press reported he was a sharpshooter. The press people who reported that assumed that equaled sniper. Actually, it is the lowest classification of proficiency. The conspiracy cranks then assumed that since he only had the lowest classification, he was therefore incompetent with a rifle, and therefore unable to hit that target. Instead Oswald just missed Marksman by one point. He could hit that target, but he wasn't the super good shot initial reports made out. So the conspiracy cranks latched onto "They Lied."

Also the press goofed on Oswald's rifle. the conspiracy cranks also miss describe the thing. If it were as both initially described, getting off three shots in 8 seconds would be impossible. The actual rifle, getting off 5 shots would have been easy.

Also with the twin towers thing. I have seen many weird "experiments" trying to prove kerosene can't melt steel. Therefore the fall of the WTC was controlled demolition. I mean it is so obvious who can doubt it? Of course the folks who are making these experiments don't understand that steel fails at much lower temperatures than it melts at, and that there are large loads their "experiments" don't model.

As the poem goes:
"A little learning is a dangerous thing; drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring: there shallow draughts intoxicate the brain, and drinking largely sobers us again."
 
I feel sad this thread's not taking off.:confused:



Elvis Lives.

Too many Democrats live in the "real world". They tend to not take conspiracies seriously and are always surprised Republicans do.

Making up conspiracies are one of the reasons Republicans are so effective. They throw a hundred out there, and if one resonates, they take off with it. You gotta admire them for that.

Too bad they don't put that same drive towards something constructive. Something worth the time.

Um......so you're saying that EVUL Republicans invented Big Foot as part of a Vast Right Wing Conspiracy to Capture The Executive and Legislative Branches of the US Government by Scaring the American Voting Public with Large Ape-like Creatures Roaming National Parks?

I admit, Dick Cheney can be intimidating when he's nekkid.
 
Last edited:
46635326.BoxofRocksWhite.jpg


"RDean copied off me on an IQ test and I still doubled his score"
 
It might be worth noting that most conspiracy cranks I am aware of are liberals.

It would be interesting to know just what "conspiracies" he is referring to.
 
I would love for the republican party to become so smart and honest that I wanted to change parties.

I would gladly do it.

What makes you think they want you?

Oh and if you want a 'smart' and 'honest' party, why are you a democrat?

Because they are smarter and more honest than the republicans.

Why wont you respond to the history threads with anything but insults?

Because they trash your whole perspective with facts.
 

Because they are smarter and more honest than the republicans.


Why wont you respond to the history threads with anything but insults?

Because they trash your whole perspective with facts.
Oh, so now we're parsing on perceived levels of alleged smartness and honesty?

Neither smart nor honest, in any way, shape or manner....Doesn't demonstrate that the truth matters to you at all, either.
 
I would love for the republican party to become so smart and honest that I wanted to change parties.

I would gladly do it.

What makes you think they want you?

Oh and if you want a 'smart' and 'honest' party, why are you a democrat?

Because they are smarter and more honest than the republicans.

Why wont you respond to the history threads with anything but insults?

Because they trash your whole perspective with facts.

I see no facts. I see opinions masquerading as facts. It's not my fault your dumb enough to believe that claiming the democrats are smarter and more honest. They aren't. They are no better than the republicans.... in my opinion, the current democratic party is considerably worse than the republicans.... and that is saying something!
 
I would love for the republican party to become so smart and honest that I wanted to change parties.

I would gladly do it.

What makes you think they want you?

Oh and if you want a 'smart' and 'honest' party, why are you a democrat?

CG, just tell'em to "Fuck-Off"

****I lurve it when she talks durty****

It's cuz I get so few opportunities in my working life to tell people to fuck off that when I'm here I just can't help it. It's theraputic. :lol::lol: Stops me killing anyone! :eek:
 
It might be worth noting that most conspiracy cranks I am aware of are liberals.

It would be interesting to know just what "conspiracies" he is referring to.

Yea, it's the liberals that come up with:

Death Panels
He's a socialist/nazi/facist/communist
He wasn't born in this country
Liberals are on the side of the terrorists
government wants to control you
Obama wants to kill your grandma
and on
and on
and on
and on
 
What makes you think they want you?

Oh and if you want a 'smart' and 'honest' party, why are you a democrat?

CG, just tell'em to "Fuck-Off"

****I lurve it when she talks durty****

It's cuz I get so few opportunities in my working life to tell people to fuck off that when I'm here I just can't help it. It's theraputic. :lol::lol: Stops me killing anyone! :eek:

I thought it was "fear" of "eternal damnation".
 
I would love for the republican party to become so smart and honest that I wanted to change parties.

I would gladly do it.

What makes you think they want you?

Oh and if you want a 'smart' and 'honest' party, why are you a democrat?

Because they are smarter and more honest than the republicans.

Why wont you respond to the history threads with anything but insults?

Because they trash your whole perspective with facts.

You are so blinded by regurgitated rhetoric you wouldn't know a fact if you had sex with it and reproduced two additional facts.
 
Rdean sort of misses out on a lot of things as to why these things develop.
Mostly it is like the game of telephone from kindergarten. Important facts are missed or misunderstood by the press and further misunderstood by people who don't know what is going on, but do know that was is being reported is bogus or nonsense.

For instance, in the case of Oswald, the press reported he was a sharpshooter. The press people who reported that assumed that equaled sniper. Actually, it is the lowest classification of proficiency. The conspiracy cranks then assumed that since he only had the lowest classification, he was therefore incompetent with a rifle, and therefore unable to hit that target. Instead Oswald just missed Marksman by one point. He could hit that target, but he wasn't the super good shot initial reports made out. So the conspiracy cranks latched onto "They Lied."

Also the press goofed on Oswald's rifle. the conspiracy cranks also miss describe the thing. If it were as both initially described, getting off three shots in 8 seconds would be impossible. The actual rifle, getting off 5 shots would have been easy.

Also with the twin towers thing. I have seen many weird "experiments" trying to prove kerosene can't melt steel. Therefore the fall of the WTC was controlled demolition. I mean it is so obvious who can doubt it? Of course the folks who are making these experiments don't understand that steel fails at much lower temperatures than it melts at, and that there are large loads their "experiments" don't model.

As the poem goes:
"A little learning is a dangerous thing; drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring: there shallow draughts intoxicate the brain, and drinking largely sobers us again."

The steel didn't need to melt. Simple physics. If you take a glass and put it in cold water and slowly heat the water to boiling, the glass won't crack. Now take that hot glass and put half in cold water and it shatters. The might only be a difference of a hundred and fifty degrees and the glass will shatter.

Sure cement is stronger. But over here was room temperature and over there was over 1500 degrees and over there was room temperature and over there was 1600 degrees. The areas of hot and cool created so much "stress" the walls themselves fractured and cracked. The steel beams are not used to hold they building up and bear all the weight, they are there to strengthen the cement. Once the cement was gone, the steel by itself couldn't bear the weight.

If you are in school perhaps ask your teacher if it's possible to visit UL (Underwriters Labs) if there is one near you, the next time they have a "full scale" fire test. Then you could actually watch it happen live and up close. They build entire buildings, fill them with cameras and burn them down to test materials.

The builders of the WTC didn't plan for jets to be completely filled to the max with fuel. They thought if someone ever did this, they would be coming from overseas with tanks nearly empty.
 

Forum List

Back
Top