For the record: He never said it and he never will.



Original Poster must be suffering from a bad mix of stupid and blind.

Trump wouldn't be firing Wray and nominating completely unqualified politico Trumptard bullshit peddlers to run FBI and DOJ if competent, non-partisan administration of justice was on his mind.
 
Last edited:
Is that what justice is called? "Revenge"? Suit yourself.
Since when is justice expressed via: 'I will go after you" ??? - that is primarily in view of seeking revenge
Seeking justice is: - I will report you, aka I will take you to court.

There are thousands of posts on this Forum - where scumbag supporters are constantly threatening, hoping and praying for revenge - and NOT Justice.

And the scumbag who evidently tried to manipulate the results of the 2020 election, called and incited for an insurrection, committed financial fraud, did not secure the border during his term, and so on - now according to your words, seeks justice :cuckoo:
 

Original Poster must be suffering from a bad mix of stupid and blind.

Trump wouldn't be nominating completely unqualified politico Trumptard bullshit peddlers to run FBI and DOJ if competent, non-partisan administration of justice was on his mind.
If trump wanted to send a message the whole retribution thing was just campaign rhetoric to gin up the minions he would be keeping Wray on as his 10 year term calls for. And he wouldn't have replaced a batshyte crazy, unqualified, sex offender with a sycophant who has parroted his calls for prosecuting political enemies.

The thread was started to serve as a rationalization for supporting someone has repeatedly said his admin will engage in revenge on a list of political enemies. Bondi wouldn't have been nominated if she opposed the plan.
 
Should we just ignore what politicians say?
That happened when Biden claimed he secured the border. And his henchman kept repeating the big lie.
 
Nonsense. At least you admit that he posted it. We are talking about what Trump said, Foxfyre, not what his enemies are going to do.
I said nothing about what his enemies are going to do. I AM focused on what he said in its full context and stated intent. You and your ilk are trying to put words/intent in his mouth that simply are not there. Read the OP. Read the OP. Read the OP.
 
I said nothing about what his enemies are going to do. I AM focused on what he said in its full context and stated intent. You and your ilk are trying to put words/intent in his mouth that simply are not there. Read the OP. Read the OP. Read the OP.
The context was and is clear, and you are back to defending the indefensible.
 
Yeah, you have admitted he said, and now are defending it.
I defend what is defensible. I do not defend the indefensible.

I do not twist people's words into something they did not say or intend and then try to make others believe they said or intended something that they did not say or intend.

I wish people like you were more like me in that regard.
 
Nonsense. At least you admit that he posted it. We are talking about what Trump said, Foxfyre, not what his enemies are going to do.
he posted what? I already gave you the fking quote you fking asshole.
 
I defend what is defensible. I do not defend the indefensible.

I do not twist people's words into something they did not say or intend and then try to make others believe they said or intended something that they did not say or intend.

I wish people like you were more like me in that regard.
Wonderful parry. No doubt he is now bleeding from the eyes.
 
I defend what is defensible. I do not defend the indefensible.

I do not twist people's words into something they did not say or intend and then try to make others believe they said or intended something that they did not say or intend.

I wish people like you were more like me in that regard.
I am far more what you would like to be than you, yes. I give credit where I can, and I have to you on occasion. This is not one of those times.
 

Forum List

Back
Top