Asclepias
Diamond Member
You ignored part of a definition in order to pretend like a word only had one meaning. VERY dishonest and unworthy of my further attentions.
Just like you ignored the meaning and focused on admittedly alternate meanings. Then you ignored that none of the words still fit his actions.
I didn't ignore ANYTHING. You see my remark was that I didn't see where thug HAD to mean violent criminal. Had I said " I don't see where thug can possibly mean violent criminal" you would have had a leg to stand on, but as it stands, you have been outwitted. Best to just walk away at this point.
Oh, I also posted much earlier in the thread that I don't believe one incident makes this guy a thug, so your claim of I ignore where what he did didn't make him a thug is irrelevant to me.
How did you miss it as the primary definition? Do you know how to use a dictionary? I did not see the word HAD in your original post. Do you see it? These are your words.
I wasn't aware that thug meant violent criminal.
Begging me to leave you alone only makes you look like a sissy. Thats not a good look. Be a man and admit you were stupid and stop attempting to move the goal posts.
Last edited: