He thinks the earth is 6,000 years old and denies evolution. I’m pretty sure being rational isn’t in his wheelhouse.Don't put something equally irrational in its place
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He thinks the earth is 6,000 years old and denies evolution. I’m pretty sure being rational isn’t in his wheelhouse.Don't put something equally irrational in its place
What do you believe is the physical evidence of the Big Bang?You should never be certain about there only being one answer when it comes to the universe. There are far too many things we dont understand. We dont even truly understand all aspects of radiation either. We dont know whats possible or impossible at this point.
Doesnt the bible say that god created everything within a few days? That is definitely not true, and dont give me this "whats a day to god" garbage. He cant be all knowing, create everything, yet also suck at communication with the humans he created.And yet they were remarkably accurate and well ahead of science when it came to believing the universe was created, had a beginning and logically evolved sequentially over time. That’s what the creation account is saying in an allegorical fashion.
Do you even know what a singularity is? Most people don’t but I do.Eruption from Another Universe. All Is Lava.
That refers only to this universe. It's also illogical; the "singularity" before the imaginary "big bang" was an impossible concentration.
Postmodern Science is as much a fantasy as Theism. Irrational megalomaniacs can't help themselves, whether they're preachers or physicists.
The expansion of the universe seems like a good indication, but what do i know? Im not an astro physicist.What do you believe is the physical evidence of the Big Bang?

No. Read it closely. The only thing God created is the heavens and the earth which most reasonable people take to mean the universe or existence. Everything after that is “let there be.” As in it appears. It does not say created. So basically what this is showing is that things appeared or evolved over time in a sequential and logical fashion.Doesnt the bible say that god created everything within a few days? That is definitely not true, and dont give me this "whats a day to god" garbage. He cant be all knowing, create everything, yet also suck at communication with the humans he created.
Elmer FudgeGod gave you a brain. Use it.
How accurate do you think Jonah and the Whale is? I mean, come on man.No. Read it closely. The only thing God created is the heavens and the earth which most reasonable people take to mean the universe or existence. Everything after that is “let there be.” As in it appears. It does not say created. So basically what this is showing is that things appeared or evolved over time in a sequential and logical fashion.
These authors were so far ahead of their time it’s not even funny. I think the only way they could have gotten this right is through divine revelation.
And remember these accounts originated in a time when polytheism was the dominant belief of the day. So these accounts were radical thoughts back in those times.
Of course God can create from nothing, as He did. The big bang speaks to something from something. Not something from nothing.
The Big Bang says creation was created from nothing. The Big Bang confirms the creation account. It does not refute it.Simply God creating from nothing.
Google its meaning and then get back to me. Lots of people get confused because of the embellishments and allegory in Genesis.How accurate do you think Jonah and the Whale is? I mean, come on man.
How accurate do you think Jonah and the Whale is? I mean, come on man.
www.nbcboston.com
The expansion is evidence of a beginning not the cause. The CMB is the evidence of the cause.The expansion of the universe seems like a good indication, but what do i know? Im not an astro physicist.![]()
I’m debating a guy that thinks the earth is 6,000 years old. I think telling him to use his brain is spot on.Elmer Fudge
Quit using Ptolemaic epicycles. Your explanation is elaborate rigging, a contraption made up to fit the conclusion your Postmodern professors order you to come back to.
VolcanicWhat do you believe is the physical evidence of the Big Bang?
Now you are just trolling because that’s just dumb.Volcanic
So you know which stories are true, and which ones are just moral lessons?Google its meaning and then get back to me. Lots of people get confused because of the embellishments and allegory in Genesis.
I didn’t have you pegged as a young earth creationist. Color me surprised.Volcanic
Did that guy live in the fish for awhile too? He ate his meals in there and just hung out?![]()
‘Oh My God, I'm in the Mouth of a Whale': What It's Like Being Swallowed by a Humpback
A Massachusetts commercial lobster diver is recovering from his injuries after being swallowed by a humpback whale off the coast of Cape Cod Friday.www.nbcboston.com

It’s more than that though. Yes, they have a moral element but they are also passing on historical information. These accounts are embellished to make them more memorable so they are easier to remember and pass down. Because that’s how they passed down knowledge 6,000 years ago. For instance there was a great and extraordinary flood that really did happen. It was probably the Burkle meteor. Was it exactly like it was described? No. But it was an out of the ordinary event that they passed down orally from generation to generation for thousands of years before they were recorded in writing. That was the point of that account. To pass down the historical event of an extraordinary flood. People get confused by the embellishments and moral messages but those were secondary to passing down the history. These accounts were not written as the word of God. That came later. That was Moses.So you know which stories are true, and which ones are just moral lessons?