Zone1 Is A Re-Birth Of Religiosity Just Around The Corner?

[ding]

Extermination is extreme and not my implication at all. It is yours alone. Why is it that you see the only means of overcoming differences that result in human suffering is more human suffering?

I don't believe you really believe the survival of mankind is at stake.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

Do you believe the continued survival of mankind is at stake or not? Think about what you are saying. You are saying the survival of mankind depends on eliminating religion. The only way you are going to accomplish that is to kill every man, woman and child that is religious.

Not at all.
It simply requires education and the reduction of perpetuating fantasies people fabricate because they do not understand the universe around them. it is a comfort blanket. Or for many, it instill a feeling of superiority. That human life is omnipotent.

Religion has had positive effects on mankind and negative effects. Both of which never required religious beliefs to exist.
I believe if humanity is ever to evolve to the next higher plane, it will involve moving past antiquated beliefs in things that have no evidence of existing.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Then you must be a non sequitur because you never make sense.

Yes, one isnt expected to intuitively understand basic rules of.logic logic or what a non sequitur is. That's why there are college classes that teach us these things.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

I don't believe you really believe the survival of mankind is at stake.

I believe humans are not wise enough to handle their differences and in the long run, survival of the species may depend on our ability to assimilate and work together.....not kill each other off.

 

[ding]

Not at all.
It simply requires education and the reduction of perpetuating fantasies people fabricate because they do not understand the universe around them. it is a comfort blanket.

Russia and China tried to end religion and failed. I'm afraid if you want to save mankind, you're just going to have to get your hands bloody.

 

[ding]

I believe humans are not wise enough to handle their differences and in the long run, survival of the species may depend on our ability to assimilate and work together.....not kill each other off.

We must be looking at a different set of humans. Humans are basically selfish, dumb and short sighted. That is especially true for militant atheists.

 

[ding]

I believe humans are not wise enough to handle their differences and in the long run, survival of the species may depend on our ability to assimilate and work together.....not kill each other off.

Atheism at it simplest is a belief in only a material existence. Nothing else exists but the material world. As such they see no distinction between good and evil. The only thing that matters to an atheist is satisfaction of material needs and carnal instincts. Any atheist that says otherwise is a wannabe fake Christian.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Atheism at it simplest is a belief in only a material existence. Nothing else exists but the material world. As such they see no distinction between good and evil

In what the rest of us call the real world, the average 7 year old has far superior morality to what is found in the Bible, for example.

 

[HikerGuy83]

View attachment 1220971

We refer to it as the pride cycle.

Thank you for sharing it.

 

[ding]

Yes, one isnt expected to intuitively understand basic rules of.logic logic or what a non sequitur is. That's why there are college classes that teach us these things.

You are all fur coat and no knickers.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

Atheism at it simplest is a belief in only a material existence. Nothing else exists but the material world. As such they see no distinction between good and evil. The only thing that matters to an atheist is satisfaction of material needs and carnal instincts. Any atheist that says otherwise is a wannabe fake Christian.

Can someone who does not believe in any form of a God, still not be a good, decent and kind person?

 

[HikerGuy83]

Still no direct response.

I believe what you described in your OP fits into ding's chart.

So, I am not sure how that isn't a response.

 

[Zincwarrior]

"From each according to his ability....."

Here me Mars, arise Mars, God of Vengeance, Arise Mars!

 

[HikerGuy83]

In what the rest of us call the real world, the average 7 year old has far superior morality to what is found in the Bible, for example.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

We must be looking at a different set of humans. Humans are basically selfish, dumb and short sighted. That is especially true for militant atheists.

This is difficult to deny.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

We refer to it as the pride cycle.

Thank you for sharing it.

I call it "self fellation".

 

[ding]

In what the rest of us call the real world, the average 7 year old has far superior morality to what is found in the Bible, for example.

Only because you read the bible like a 7 year old.

The ancient Israelites and later Jewish tradition deliberately crafted narratives of historical events from the Hebrew Bible (Tanakh) to teach crucial religious, moral, and national lessons, viewing history as a primary way God revealed Himself and shaped their identity, even incorporating theological interpretation into seemingly factual accounts. These stories, like the Exodus, weren't just records but powerful tools for transmitting core values, emphasizing themes of covenant, obedience, consequences, and God's faithfulness across generations, making history a continuous dialogue.

How Israelites Used History for Teaching:

• Divine Revelation: History was seen as the arena where God actively intervened, making events like the Exodus or the establishment of the Kingdom central to understanding God's nature and relationship with Israel.
• National Identity & Covenant: Narratives reinforced a unique identity, linking their destiny to Abraham's covenant and the promised land, fostering a collective memory and purpose.
• Moral & Theological Lessons: Stories taught lessons about sin (like the Golden Calf) and redemption, showing the consequences of actions and God's justice, as seen in the cycles of judges and kings.
• Oral Tradition & Family: The Torah commands parents to retell these stories at home, ensuring each generation internalizes these lessons, creating diverse interpretations (Midrash).
• Compilation & Interpretation: The Bible itself is a compilation of varied traditions, edited over time to serve specific theological aims, presenting history through a lens of divine purpose.

Examples in Biblical Texts:

• Exodus: Not just an escape, but a foundational story of liberation and God's power, repeated in festivals.
• Book of Judges: Cycles of falling away, oppression, and deliverance, teaching about Israel's recurring failures and God's mercy.
• Job: Sometimes viewed as a philosophical parable (not strictly history) to explore suffering and faith.

In essence, Israelite narratives used historical events to create a living, teachable past, ensuring their people understood their unique relationship with God and their ongoing story.

 

[SaxonJackson]

1.AI Overview
Based on his speech at the
Munich Security Conference on February 14, 2026, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio argued that Western civilization is forged by a shared history and Christian faith, which he described as a "sacred inheritance" linking the U.S. and Europe.
While some reports and commentaries specifically highlighted his reference to a "Judeo-Christian inheritance" or tradition in the context of defending Western civilization against cultural erosion,....

This is what government school did not teach you.




2.There are some indications that this may be bottom-up....

AI Overview
Yes, data from 2025 indicates that Bible sales hit record highs, with 2025 being described as having the highest Bible sales in recent history (or at least a 21-year high) in the United States and the United Kingdom




3. Could this be
a. due to Covid keeping children from the communst influence of government schooling
and/or
b. science beginning to accept the Bible as essentially factual?





4. In fact, science has come more in line with the Bible. Dennis Prager writes:
“In my lifetime alone, science went from positing a universe that always existed to positing a universe that had a beginning (the Big Bang). So, in jut one generation [the Bible], in describing a beginning to the universe, went from conflicting with science to agreeing with science….[The Bible] should not violate essential truths (for example, it accurately depicts human beings as the last creation).”
.




5. And even more astounding:
Scientist, Palmer, wrote a book about the astounding accuracy of the Bible, 3 thousand years ago, stating the order of the evolution of life on or planet….exactly the presentation that science now accepts as the fact.

Dr. Andrew Palmer, Oxford biologist, whose book, "The Genesis Enigma," states that the writer of the book of Genesis provides an uncannily similar synopsis of the events in the creation as compared to that accepted by modern science today.
scientist, Palmer, wrote a book about the astounding accuracy of the Bible, 3 thousand years ago, stating the order of the evolution of life on or planet….exactly the presentation that science now accepts as the fact.

Dr. Andrew Palmer, Oxford biologist, whose book, "The Genesis Enigma," states that the writer of the book of Genesis provides an uncannily similar synopsis of the events in the creation as compared to that accepted by modern science today.
scientist, Palmer, wrote a book about the astounding accuracy of the Bible, 3 thousand years ago, stating the order of the evolution of life on or planet….exactly the presentation that science now accepts as the fact.

Dr. Andrew Palmer, Oxford biologist, whose book, "The Genesis Enigma," states that the writer of the book of Genesis provides an uncannily similar synopsis of the events in the creation as compared to that accepted by modern science today.



Rather than ridicule the Bible, those very same secular, atheistic scientists have come around to accept the very order that the Old Testament claimed was the course of creation:
The idea of the miraculous confluence of the first chapter of Genesis and the sequence advanced by modern science is as follows:


a. The Old Testament was written, although not compiled, almost three millennia ago. It is extraordinary that the writer of the creation account in Genesis, chapter one, got it right in his exposition of the series of events: his sequence turns out to be scientifically accurate in terms of contemporary knowledge.


b. From a water covered planet, to terrestrial life. The images in that writer’s mind of how our planet and life came to be must have seemed curious for the knowledge and experience of the time! Yet….he presented it as though it had been dictated to him, as though he had been spoken to by God.


c. If it is not evidence for the God, then the author of Genesis 1, or Moses, perhaps, must have understood that the universe formed first, …then the seas appeared on earth, …and that life forms were photosynthetic.

d. Following that, he had to have realized that an eye evolved in an early animal in the geological past, which triggered the evolution of all the major groups of animals that exist today.

e. Still further, he must have felt that all of this occurred in the seas, before animals moved onto land, and only when they did move out of the water did mammals and birds evolve.

The above largely from chapter nine of zoologist Andrew Parker’s “The Genesis Enigma.”





Wow! What an incredibly lucky guess! What a considerable stroke of good fortune!

Or…an alternative explanation: divine intervention.

Often times when a people become so depressed or oppressed that they feel helpless and/or fearful, they turn to God for help and guidance. America is clearly heading in that direction. We're currently leaderless. The people "running the show" work for another nation and have THEIR best interests at heart. It's disheartening, degrading, insulting, and worst of all, demoralizing.

My recent "black pill" experience helped put my focus back on Jesus Christ. He's the ONLY one who can save us as individuals and save humanity, as a whole. There's not another soul on earth who can fix America or any other nation on earth. Satan is having his "heyday" and is rearing his ugly head for the last time. It's all or nothing from his point of view and he has the rich, famous, and powerful in his hip pocket. It sounds horrible but anyone who believes and trusts biblical prophecy knows Who wins in the end.

Keep praying and remain faithful. Christ is our only hope.

 

[ding]

Can someone who does not believe in any form of a God, still not be a good, decent and kind person?

Double negatives are tricky. But yes, they can. So what? How does that change what I wrote?

Can anyone who condemns respect for other people because of race, color or creed be a good person?

 

[ding]

I call it "self fellation".

That's because you are so severely biased that you have become borderline retarded.