Zone1 Is A Re-Birth Of Religiosity Just Around The Corner?

Did I quote the Bible accurately?
The Law has nothing to do with the Zionist Khazars claim to be "Jews."

The Law belongs to God. It's HIS Law and he had Moses (a member of the tribe of Levi) write it in stone. The Old Testament looked forward to the New Testament. The Old Covenant has been replaces by the New Covenant.

Hebrews 8:7-10, "For if that first covenant had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second. For finding fault with them, he saith, Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah: Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because they continued not in my covenant, and I regarded them not, saith the Lord. For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people:"

(Please note that there are two groups spoken of above: "The House of Israel" and "the House of Judah.")

And nowhere in the Bible will you ever find the term, "Judeo-christian." You will, however, find the term Christian or Christians:

1 Peter 4:16, "Yet if any man suffer as a Christian, let him not be ashamed; but let him glorify God on this behalf."

Acts 11:26, "And when he had found him, he brought him unto Antioch. And it came to pass, that a whole year they assembled themselves with the church, and taught much people. And the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch."
 
The Law has nothing to do with the Zionist Khazars claim to be "Jews."

The Law belongs to God. It's HIS Law and he had Moses (a member of the tribe of Levi) write it in stone. The Old Testament looked forward to the New Testament. The Old Covenant has been replaces by the New Covenant.

Hebrews 8:7-10, "For if that first covenant had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second. For finding fault with them, he saith, Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah: Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because they continued not in my covenant, and I regarded them not, saith the Lord. For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people:"

(Please note that there are two groups spoken of above: "The House of Israel" and "the House of Judah.")

And nowhere in the Bible will you ever find the term, "Judeo-christian." You will, however, find the term Christian or Christians:

1 Peter 4:16, "Yet if any man suffer as a Christian, let him not be ashamed; but let him glorify God on this behalf."

Acts 11:26, "And when he had found him, he brought him unto Antioch. And it came to pass, that a whole year they assembled themselves with the church, and taught much people. And the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch."
t appears that Jesus has a far different view from you and your anti-Semitism.

Let's check:


Jesus was born a Jew, died a Jew and never denied his lineage.

Matthew 5:18, the eighteenth verse of the fifth chapter of the Gospel of Matthew in the New Testament and is part of the Sermon on the Mount. Jesus has just reported that he came not to destroy the law, but fulfil it. In this verse this claim is reinforced.

Matthew 5:17–18 is a key text for interpreting the Sermon on the Mount and the entire gospel of Matthew:

Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. For truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the Law until all is accomplished.

Here Jesus says that not one iota (jot) or dot (tittle) will pass away from the law. These most likely refer to the smallest strokes of the Hebrew alphabet, indicating that the Old Testament is completely trustworthy, even to the smallest detail. This is consistent with Jesus’ attitude elsewhere. Never do we find Jesus disagreeing with Scripture.




There is a single religion based on the Ten Commandments......the Judeo-Christian faith.




Clearly Jesus said the very opposite of what you say.


Why is that?
 
Because it couldn't be possible that the Israelites believed God was on their side so they crafted narratives of historical events to teach lessons about the covenant, obedience, justice and Israel's special relationship to God?

Have you tried googling it?
It's also possible that is totally false.

Again, you're really not getting this.
 
The "connection" is not by dna, books or tradition. The connection is by personal revelation and acceptance.
 
Back
Top Bottom