Zincwarrior
Diamond Member
Which one?Did I quote the Bible accurately?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Which one?Did I quote the Bible accurately?
There’s more than one?Which one?
The Law has nothing to do with the Zionist Khazars claim to be "Jews."Did I quote the Bible accurately?
Yes.There’s more than one?
t appears that Jesus has a far different view from you and your anti-Semitism.The Law has nothing to do with the Zionist Khazars claim to be "Jews."
The Law belongs to God. It's HIS Law and he had Moses (a member of the tribe of Levi) write it in stone. The Old Testament looked forward to the New Testament. The Old Covenant has been replaces by the New Covenant.
Hebrews 8:7-10, "For if that first covenant had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second. For finding fault with them, he saith, Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah: Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because they continued not in my covenant, and I regarded them not, saith the Lord. For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people:"
(Please note that there are two groups spoken of above: "The House of Israel" and "the House of Judah.")
And nowhere in the Bible will you ever find the term, "Judeo-christian." You will, however, find the term Christian or Christians:
1 Peter 4:16, "Yet if any man suffer as a Christian, let him not be ashamed; but let him glorify God on this behalf."
Acts 11:26, "And when he had found him, he brought him unto Antioch. And it came to pass, that a whole year they assembled themselves with the church, and taught much people. And the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch."
It's also possible that is totally false.Because it couldn't be possible that the Israelites believed God was on their side so they crafted narratives of historical events to teach lessons about the covenant, obedience, justice and Israel's special relationship to God?
Have you tried googling it?
1.AI Overview
Based on his speech at the
Munich Security Conference on February 14, 2026, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio argued that Western civilization is forged by a shared history and Christian faith, which he described as a "sacred inheritance" linking the U.S. and Europe.
While some reports and commentaries specifically highlighted his reference to a "Judeo-Christian inheritance" or tradition in the context of defending Western civilization against cultural erosion,....
This is what government school did not teach you.
2.There are some indications that this may be bottom-up....
AI Overview
Yes, data from 2025 indicates that Bible sales hit record highs, with 2025 being described as having the highest Bible sales in recent history (or at least a 21-year high) in the United States and the United Kingdom
3. Could this be
a. due to Covid keeping children from the communst influence of government schooling
and/or
b. science beginning to accept the Bible as essentially factual?
4. In fact, science has come more in line with the Bible. Dennis Prager writes:
“In my lifetime alone, science went from positing a universe that always existed to positing a universe that had a beginning (the Big Bang). So, in jut one generation [the Bible], in describing a beginning to the universe, went from conflicting with science to agreeing with science….[The Bible] should not violate essential truths (for example, it accurately depicts human beings as the last creation).”
.
5. And even more astounding:
Scientist, Palmer, wrote a book about the astounding accuracy of the Bible, 3 thousand years ago, stating the order of the evolution of life on or planet….exactly the presentation that science now accepts as the fact.
Dr. Andrew Palmer, Oxford biologist, whose book, "The Genesis Enigma," states that the writer of the book of Genesis provides an uncannily similar synopsis of the events in the creation as compared to that accepted by modern science today.
scientist, Palmer, wrote a book about the astounding accuracy of the Bible, 3 thousand years ago, stating the order of the evolution of life on or planet….exactly the presentation that science now accepts as the fact.
Dr. Andrew Palmer, Oxford biologist, whose book, "The Genesis Enigma," states that the writer of the book of Genesis provides an uncannily similar synopsis of the events in the creation as compared to that accepted by modern science today.
scientist, Palmer, wrote a book about the astounding accuracy of the Bible, 3 thousand years ago, stating the order of the evolution of life on or planet….exactly the presentation that science now accepts as the fact.
Dr. Andrew Palmer, Oxford biologist, whose book, "The Genesis Enigma," states that the writer of the book of Genesis provides an uncannily similar synopsis of the events in the creation as compared to that accepted by modern science today.
Rather than ridicule the Bible, those very same secular, atheistic scientists have come around to accept the very order that the Old Testament claimed was the course of creation:
The idea of the miraculous confluence of the first chapter of Genesis and the sequence advanced by modern science is as follows:
a. The Old Testament was written, although not compiled, almost three millennia ago. It is extraordinary that the writer of the creation account in Genesis, chapter one, got it right in his exposition of the series of events: his sequence turns out to be scientifically accurate in terms of contemporary knowledge.
b. From a water covered planet, to terrestrial life. The images in that writer’s mind of how our planet and life came to be must have seemed curious for the knowledge and experience of the time! Yet….he presented it as though it had been dictated to him, as though he had been spoken to by God.
c. If it is not evidence for the God, then the author of Genesis 1, or Moses, perhaps, must have understood that the universe formed first, …then the seas appeared on earth, …and that life forms were photosynthetic.
d. Following that, he had to have realized that an eye evolved in an early animal in the geological past, which triggered the evolution of all the major groups of animals that exist today.
e. Still further, he must have felt that all of this occurred in the seas, before animals moved onto land, and only when they did move out of the water did mammals and birds evolve.
The above largely from chapter nine of zoologist Andrew Parker’s “The Genesis Enigma.”
Wow! What an incredibly lucky guess! What a considerable stroke of good fortune!
Or…an alternative explanation: divine intervention.