500M year old footprint?

TNHarley

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2012
Messages
101,444
Reaction score
65,262
Points
2,605

A discovery made over half a century ago in Antelope Springs, Utah, continues to raise eyebrows in the scientific community. In 1968, amateur fossil hunter William J. Meister claimed to have found what appears to be a fossilized human footprint.
The footprint, reportedly about the size of a US men’s size 13 (approximately 3.5″ wide by 10.25″ long), stunned onlookers and researchers alike due to its impossible timing. If genuine, it would imply that a human stepped on a living trilobite hundreds of millions of years before the emergence of homo sapiens.
Trilobites, ancient marine arthropods related to modern crabs and shrimps, went extinct long before any hominids are known to have evolved. The notion that someone wearing footwear could have existed during the Cambrian period contradicts everything currently accepted about the evolutionary timeline.

“This amazing find,” as the article recalls, was publicly presented in 1973 during a creation-evolution debate at California State University in Sacramento. Reverend Boswell, a member of the creationist team, stated: “I have here something that pretty much destroys the entire geological column. It has been studied by three laboratories around the world and it’s been tested and found valid.”

“These particular strata are dated Cambrian, supposedly 500 million years extinct before man arrived on the face of the earth.” Boswell added.
Shortly after Meister’s find, Dr. Clifford Burdick, a consulting geologist from Tucson, Arizona, discovered what appeared to be a child’s barefoot impression in shale, also in Antelope Springs. The impression, roughly six inches long, featured spreading toes and lacked an arch, consistent with a young child who had never worn shoes.



Well that certainly would change things. Is everything we know about human history wrong?
 
The notion that someone wearing footwear could have existed during the Cambrian period contradicts everything currently accepted about the evolutionary timeline.

Because evolution is a hoax
 
The notion that someone wearing footwear could have existed during the Cambrian period contradicts everything currently accepted about the evolutionary timeline.

Because evolution is a hoax
Evolution is a fact. It is recorded.
Is the theory correct about humans? IDK Seems very possible.
 
Evolution is a fact. It is recorded.
Is the theory correct about humans? IDK Seems very possible.
While evolution within species is a proven fact, there is no evidence whatsoever for blob-of-protoplam-to-self-aware-life evolution.
 
Last edited:
Well, they thought it was BS 50 years ago and I see nothing else now that says it isn't.

AA1CU3l7.img
 
While evolution within species is a proven fact, there is no evidence whatsoever for blob-of-protoplam-to-self-aware-life evolution.
*Except for every observation ever made and all the evidence collected across every field of science
 
The notion that someone wearing footwear could have existed during the Cambrian period contradicts everything currently accepted about the evolutionary timeline.

Because evolution is a hoax
The infinitely more rational approach is to realize that, considering the overwhelming evidence collected so far all being mutually supportive and supportive of current theory, this one observation/claim is an error.
 
Back
Top Bottom