Zone1 The JEW From JUDEA ISRAEL [Jesus]

Nazareth [Judaea] or Bethlehem [Judaea]?

  • Nazareth

    Votes: 5 71.4%
  • Bethlehem

    Votes: 2 28.6%

  • Total voters
    7
No madam, I will help you understand.

I have copies of historic documents here on my desk, one is the Mandate for Palestine from 1922, it contains this text:



See? the word is in that document and does not refer to a Jew as is clear. This is from 1922 rather earlier that 1960. There are other examples too, earlier than that, would you like to see them?

So please stop with the lies, we're so tired of Zionist lies.

You'll find this document on the UN website, here:

What right

do grandchildren of Arab immigrants, have,

to Jews' historic land?
 
LOL a debate amongst “scholars”, yet none of them argue in favor of Jesus being the Messiah.
Jesus is not mentioned in the Talmud except in an oblique
way by a talmudist of approx 300 AD by the interesting
name ISHMAEL-----(he was born before the rapist of
Mecca became an issue) and was stationed in a then
famous Yeshiva in KABUL AFGHANISTAN---isn't that
interesting? I never heard the word "Jesus" in a
synagogue. Unlike me---hubby was born in a land with
no christians----- a shariah shit hole. He still forgets
what christmas and easter is all about----I remind him
every year. Christians are obsessed with "JEW"---the
only time "JESUS" comes up for jews is when christians
claim "YOU KILLED HIM"
 
What right

do grandchildren of Arab immigrants, have,

to Jews' historic land?
Tell me, how do you establish true ownership of land? and why did you say the term was first used in 1960 when I showed a usage from 1922?
 
Jesus is not mentioned in the Talmud except in an oblique
way by a talmudist of approx 300 AD by the interesting
name ISHMAEL-----(he was born before the rapist of
Mecca became an issue) and was stationed in a then
famous Yeshiva in KABUL AFGHANISTAN---isn't that
interesting? I never heard the word "Jesus" in a
synagogue. Unlike me---hubby was born in a land with
no christians----- a shariah shit hole. He still forgets
what christmas and easter is all about----I remind him
every year. Christians are obsessed with "JEW"---the
only time "JESUS" comes up for jews is when christians
claim "YOU KILLED HIM"
Of course they wouldn’t mention him, they want the world to forget Jesus.

Just like I said before, the point of the Talmud is to lead people away from the truth of Jesus…..which is to hell.
 
No madam, I will help you understand.

I have copies of historic documents here on my desk, one is the Mandate for Palestine from 1922, it contains this text:



See? the word is in that document and does not refer to a Jew as is clear. This is from 1922 rather earlier that 1960. There are other examples too, earlier than that, would you like to see them?

So please stop with the lies, we're so tired of Zionist lies and your hatred of Arabs and Palestinians.

You'll find this document on the UN website, here:

read it again----where do you see a provision for muslims or christians or zoroastrians or hindus to be declared PALESTINIAN CITIZENS. You are waxing dull....take a nap
 
Jesus is not mentioned in the Talmud except in an oblique
way by a talmudist of approx 300 AD by the interesting
name ISHMAEL-----(he was born before the rapist of
Mecca became an issue) and was stationed in a then
famous Yeshiva in KABUL AFGHANISTAN---isn't that
interesting? I never heard the word "Jesus" in a
synagogue. Unlike me---hubby was born in a land with
no christians----- a shariah shit hole. He still forgets
what christmas and easter is all about----I remind him
every year. Christians are obsessed with "JEW"---the
only time "JESUS" comes up for jews is when christians
claim "YOU KILLED HIM"
1. Fanatical Christians like the Jew...on the cross.

2. Islamofascists
(Sherlock_holmes /TruthNotBS etc.) just like to agitate both...
 
Last edited:
He never said anyone will be enslaved. That's your invention and a lie. Your "essentially" claim is wrong. Your claim that "physically by default" makes zero sense if you paid attention. Do you see any compulsion in what he says? He is discussing what will happen, but he doesn't say that a cultural genocide will be commited. In fact, he says that non-Jews WON'T be destroyed but their identities (as distinct nations/religions) will cease to exist. The consequence of that, he says, is labeled by progressives as "cultural genocide." Are you a progressive?

see, you have turned what he said into an action when what he said reflected no action by anyone. Try again. Maybe listen more closely and stop inserting your bias into the content.

Yes, massive world wars will do that.

Oof, more ignorance from you. He says that in the messianic era, another nation will come in and destroy Edom and Ishmael and the nations of the world will protect Israel (4:50). Go rail against that OTHER nation. I dare you.

no, "Allah" has no part in this.

really? Where does it say that?

well, Mizrachi says that idolatry will be wiped out. That offends you? I guess you like idolatry. Also, Mizrachi is not held in high regard by mainstream Orthodoxy


her understanding is that Ishmael will destroy Edom. Are you offended at the claim of the military prowess of Ishmael?

no one said that. This is another of your inventions.

no one said that

no one said that

So, more of you inventions, plus an ignorance of Hebrew (unless you think you know Hebrew slang)

and now you just have a paragraph of biased and unsubstantiated claims. Imagine if I were to take the exact same paragraph and present it like this: "The Mulims lied, taking truth and falsehood, mixing it, for political reasons, centuries before the prophet Jesus. Lying about Ishmael, about Moses, slandering the holy prophets of Israel, exaggerating everything including their relationship with Allah and with the rest of mankind. Arrogance, pride, stiff-necked, xenophobic, vindictive..etc. Incredible. They suffer from an "inflationary disease" that causes their heads to inflate. Inflated heads."

and I never claimed Jews have never misbehaved. If you are going to take a voice or two, snip out a phrase and decide it represents the whole of Judaism, why do you have a problem if anbyone does the same for Islam?

more inventions by you. No proof.

really? Says who? Oh, wait. That's just another thing you invented.

Oh, sure. After saying that Jews are horrible etc, you would be in favor of defending them. Except you wouldn't because you have already decided that Jews are evil etc. Can't wait to hear you speak up...

Yeah..."if". LOL. Somehow you bought a pair of blinders.

oh, so tolerance means "ghetto." Good to know.

There are still Jews DESPITE Sharia, not because of it.

except for all of your vitriol and delusional claims about Judaism and Jews. It is easier for you to dismiss a religion you don't understand and then say that it isn't the "real" one so you can justify your hate.

can you show me some text that says that Muhammed established a village specifically for transsexuals? And you do realize that modern Israel is not a Jewish ethno state, right? It is a democracy with many members of it pushing their versions of religion into the political sphere. There are Muslim members of the Parliament and Supreme Court. If the "government" is allowing these parades, then the Muslim members of government are equally culpable. Right? Right

jeepers. From those videos I learned about Pakistan that "there are good and bad people most of them are bad there are fewer good people" (from the transcript of the second video) and I found that trans people live in fear (Transgender woman Gul Panra shot dead, friend wounded in Peshawar)

Untrue. You have corporal punishment. Jews don't. You have amputations and executions. Jews don't. Who is more violent?

Actually, with glee we talk of a future in which other countries fight amongst themselves and finally come to understand the supremacy of God and they change from their idolatrous ways to embrace God. You must not like that.

Meaning more stuff you don't understand so you just dismiss it. Truth is inconvenient, isn't it?
But no doubt, paying bills for you is a full time job so you have no time to learn anything.

More dishonest claptrap. The Jewish State is for the Jews, not the goyimmmmmmmmmm. Goyyyyyyy....

The 2018 Jewish Nation-State Law passed by the Knesset in Israel...

  1. Defining Israel as the Nation-State of the Jewish People:
    • The law asserts that the right to national self-determination in Israel is unique to the Jewish people.
  2. Language and Cultural Identity:
    • Hebrew is established as the state's official language, while Arabic is given a "special status." This marked a downgrade of Arabic from being an official language of the state as it was before.
  3. Settlement as a National Value:
    • The law emphasizes that Jewish settlement is a national value and encourages its development and establishment. Hence all of the Jewish settlements in the West Bank, considered Palestinian land according to international law.
  4. Symbols of the State:
    • It reiterates symbols like the flag, national anthem, and Jewish holidays as integral to Israel's identity. It should all be Jewish, not the symbols of the goyimmmmmmmm. Da'Goyyyyyyyyyyy.......


    • Netanyahu says:
      "We will always ensure equal rights for all citizens of Israel, regardless of religion, race, or gender. But Israel is the nation-state of the Jewish people—and only the Jewish people."

    • In 2019, Netanyahu reiterated:
      "Israel is a Jewish and democratic state. Individual rights are anchored in a series of laws, including Basic Law: Human Dignity and Liberty. No one has harmed—or plans to harm—these individual rights, but without the Nation-State Law, it will be impossible to ensure for generations the future of Israel as a Jewish nation-state."

The above is fuzzy logic, double speak. If you're not Jewish in a Jewish State you're a second class citizen by default, at best. Your non-Jewish community will always be seen as a threat to the Jewish character of the state. Have too many babies and you're in trouble.

It's not a nation for all of its citizens, hence it's not a democracy, it's a Jewocracy. The parliament has a few token Arabs, but they're not in charge, the Jews are. To pretend otherwise is ridiculous. Israel is a Jewocracy for Jews, and its Muslim goyyyyyyyy.....citizens are just on board for the ride, without much say on where the vehicle is going. The Jews are at the wheel. Non-Jews are seen as a demographic threat to the Jewish character of the state.

The TeNaK is clear that at the end of days, the goyim are going to serve Israel, paying tribute to them under threat of annihilation. YHWH will destroy the nations that aren't in subjection to Israel. We will all eat gefilte fish forever, until the end of time.



Da'Goyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
 
Last edited:
read it again----where do you see a provision for muslims or christians or zoroastrians or hindus to be declared PALESTINIAN CITIZENS. You are waxing dull....take a nap
The claim in Post #2 is false, I refuted that claim which was:

The term "Palestinian" was adopted in the 1960 by the grandchildren of Arab immigrants

The claim in Post #263 is false, I refuted that claim which was:

...you will find that the ONLY usage of that term is-----a JEW LIVING in the area of the world which had been called "PALESTINE"...
 
Racist Imam Hitler fan TruthNotBS



1000006179.jpg





TruthNotBS said:
More dishonest ..
 
More dishonest claptrap. The Jewish State is for the Jews, not the goyimmmmmmmmmm. Goyyyyyyy....

The 2018 Jewish Nation-State Law passed by the Knesset in Israel...

  1. Defining Israel as the Nation-State of the Jewish People:
    • The law asserts that the right to national self-determination in Israel is unique to the Jewish people.
  2. Language and Cultural Identity:
    • Hebrew is established as the state's official language, while Arabic is given a "special status." This marked a downgrade of Arabic from being an official language of the state as it was before.
  3. Settlement as a National Value:
    • The law emphasizes that Jewish settlement is a national value and encourages its development and establishment. Hence all of the Jewish settlements in the West Bank, considered Palestinian land according to international law.
  4. Symbols of the State:
    • It reiterates symbols like the flag, national anthem, and Jewish holidays as integral to Israel's identity. It should all be Jewish, not the symbols of the goyimmmmmmmm. Da'Goyyyyyyyyyyy.......
It's not a nation for all of its citizens, hence it's not a democracy, it's a Jewocracy. The parliament has a few token Arabs, but they're not in charge, the Jews are. To pretend otherwise is ridiculous. Israel is a Jewocracy for Jews, and its Muslim goyyyyyyyy.....citizens are just on board for the ride, without much say on where the vehicle is going. The Jews are at the wheel. Non-Jews are seen as a demographic threat to the Jewish character of the state.

The TeNaK is clear that at the end of days, the goyim are going to serve Israel, paying tribute to them under threat of annihilation. YHWH will destroy the nations that aren't in subjection to Israel. We will all eat gefilte fish forever, until the end of time.


SO? anglicanism is the STATE RELIGION OF ---merry old england. what else is new? Did you ever come across
the TERM ISLAMIC STATE? CHRISTIAN STATE? I have family background in England----my paternal grandmother drank
TEA incessantly. My father (born in the USA) called FRENCH
FRIES----"chips" (oy veh)
 
rosends and irosie91 should call into Sam’s show and debate him.

He proves to Jews all the time that the Torah shows the Trinity:



Jews have a hard time accepting what is written in the Torah.

honestly, that was simultaneously the funniest and saddest thing I have seen in a while. Two people who are limiting themselves to the literal text arguing about meaning. Most of that conversation was anticipated and addressed a long, long time ago. MikraotGedolot – AlHaTorah.org

seriously -- that was ridiculous.
 
The claim in Post #2 is false, I refuted that claim which was:



The claim in Post #263 is false, I refuted that claim which was:
My statement is true-----find a NON JEW----living in PALESTINE----whose government papers describe him
as a PALESTINIAN----before 1960------you won't----you
are very confused by islamo-nazi propaganda. The information YOU POSTED does not refute my CORRECT
STATEMENT. btw---Jesus was a JUDEAN ----if he had
continued to LIVE forever as I was told he would have had
he not be KILLED BY DA JOOOOS-----he would have come
to be called a PALESTINIAN in the second century CE.
Had ARAFART survived AIDS----he would have called himself a 'PALESTINIAN' but was not so considered when he was born
 
LOL a debate amongst “scholars”, yet none of them argue in favor of Jesus being the Messiah.
imagine that -- arguing and debating all sorts of possibilities, but not that. I guess they knew it wasn't a possibility.
 
15th post
Tell me, how do you establish true ownership of land? and why did you say the term was first used in 1960 when I showed a usage from 1922?
Your citation showed the usage FOR JEWS----read it again
 
More dishonest claptrap. The Jewish State is for the Jews, not the goyimmmmmmmmmm. Goyyyyyyy....
nice dancing away from everything I said.
It's not a nation for all of its citizens, hence it's not a democracy, it's a Jewocracy.
a silly word for a silly argument. It is a democracy.
The parliament has a few token Arabs, but they're not in charge, the Jews are.
Now you are diminishing the contributions of the Arab members of Parliament who got there based on open and free elections. Fascinating. I guess the Arabs on the Supreme Court are tokens also.
The TeNaK is clear that at the end of days, the goyim are going to serve Israel,
show me the text that says they will "serve" them (in the Hebrew, please)
paying tribute to them under threat of annihilation.
show me the text that says that. So far you haven't.
YHWH will destroy the nations that aren't in subjection to Israel. We will all eat gefilte fish forever, until the end of time.
show me a textual proof.
 
Your citation showed the usage FOR JEWS----read it again
Here's the entire paragraph from the 1922 Mandate:

The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.

That's not a "usage for Jews" but a commitment to provide Palestinian citizenship to Jews who immigrate to Palestine.

There's no evidence that at that time only Jewish people possessed "Palestinian citizenship".

But there's more, let us now look at a British Intelligence document from 1919, this is one of the earliest historic records of the Zionist planning for ethnic cleansing of Palestinians but NOT Jews, emphasis mine:

Major Rothschild also suggested that it would be well if His Majesty's Government would also later consider whether some comprehensive emigration scheme to the south (Egypt) as well as to the North (Damascus) could not be arranged for the Arab Palestinian peasantry in conjunction with schemes for the immigration of the Jews.

It was pointed out that is was not impossible to move Arab peasantry from their lands as had been shown when the original Zionist colonies were established.

Even you must now admit you were wrong. Not only is the phrase "Arab Palestinian" clear it is also clear that those Palestinians were to be moved out as Jews were moved in so how can that usage be reconciled with your claim that it only ever referred to Jews?

You can also see clear PROOF that the Arabs lived on "their" land and that the Zionists were creating COLONIES on that land.

So **** you and **** your hubby for lying all the time about the true nature of the despicable Zionist colony that today masquerades as the "State of Israel". The more you lie here the more I'll expose you, shine a light on the evil Zionist darkness.

You'll find this document here.

 
Last edited:
Here's the entire paragraph from the 1922 Mandate:



That's not a "usage for Jews" but a commitment to provide Palestinian citizenship to Jews who immigrate to Palestine.

There's no evidence that at that time only Jewish people possessed "Palestinian citizenship".

But there's more, let us now look at a British Intelligence document from 1919, this is one of the earliest historic records of the Zionist planning for ethnic cleansing of Palestinians but NOT Jews, emphasis mine:



Even you must now admit you were wrong. Not only is the phrase "Arab Palestinian" clear it is also clear that those Palestinians were to be moved out as Jews were moved in so how can that usage be reconciled with your claim that it only ever referred to Jews?

You'll find this document here.

Palestinian meant "JEW" so Rothchild made a mistake
Here's the entire paragraph from the 1922 Mandate:



That's not a "usage for Jews" but a commitment to provide Palestinian citizenship to Jews who immigrate to Palestine.

There's no evidence that at that time only Jewish people possessed "Palestinian citizenship".

But there's more, let us now look at a British Intelligence document from 1919, this is one of the earliest historic records of the Zionist planning for ethnic cleansing of Palestinians but NOT Jews, emphasis mine:



Even you must now admit you were wrong. Not only is the phrase "Arab Palestinian" clear it is also clear that those Palestinians were to be moved out as Jews were moved in so how can that usage be reconciled with your claim that it only ever referred to Jews?

So **** you and **** your hubby for lying all the time about the true nature of the despicable Zionist colony. The more you lie here the more I'll expose you, shine a light on the evil Zionist darkness.

You'll find this document here.

In what language was this document written? You continue to shine a light on your islamo-nazi STENCH
 
Back
Top Bottom