You are the mistaken one here madam, not Rothschild. The usage is not confined to this single document, there are others you idiot.
It is a British document so it is written in English, as you can see if you look at it.
I looked at it and thousands of others----I read a book in which people from OKLAHOMA were called OAKIEs----but it was not a legal term-----do you know what muzzie dogs call JOOOS? ---In 1922 muslims in "PALESTINE" were called ARABS---actually sometimes SYRIANS----because they did not want to be called "PALESTINIANS" Palestinians were jews----Rothschild insulted them assuming someone did not do a typo. Did you know that "MUSLIMS" do not want to be called "MOSLEMS"
1 question, one comment please:
Go back to licking the stinking ass of the rapist dog of mecca
But how can it be cleansing if it was not supposed to get rid of all of the group?
That is not the sole historic document upon which the claim of ethnic cleansing is based. I described it as one of the earliest.
Even Churchill asserted about Arab immigration flooding the land of the JewsSherlock Holmes said:
winstonchurchill.org
No Sir, I'm disagreeing and providing historic records that undermine many of the specious claims made by you and the extreme Jewish nationalist irosie91
What evidence is there for that? Are you saying that people of the Middle East are less likely to descend from Abraham, who was born in Ur of Chaldea, now Kuwait, than the Jews from Poland and Ukraine? Really? You're such a genius! Ashkenazi Jews from Europe, are more Semitic, Middle Eastern, than people from the region Abraham was born in. Are you suggesting that in the Levant, what is today the Holy Land, Lebanon, Syria and Jordan, was empty? No one was living there other than what? Jews? You're so confused.
That's the best you can do, a feeble baseless rejection?
oh boy...this claims that GOD will do the destroying. If you don't like Isaiah's prophecy, that's fine. Maybe you can complain to God about his genocide.
15 to 17 are about what GOD will do (מאת ה׳ מן השמים). Verse 18 is, according to some, a literal propehcy of an end times war between Gog and Magog, and according to others, a metaphor about the destruction of the attributes of the house of Eisav. Another explanation is that the metaphor expresses how the war will go -- because one side will act like fire and the other will be weak, like straw ("ובית עשו יהיו חלשים כקש"). One commentator understands it to mean that, like straw, one will ignite the other (so the fire only has to set one piece of straw on fire and the fire will be transmitted internally). Feel free to explore the options.
so you are angry that God says how things will be. Your anger should be towards God, unless you deny his word. Remember, this is what they want to do. They realize that enslaving Jews was wrong so now they will help raise the children. None of this is done by the Jews. This is all done after the realization of God.
So here are more examples of why you must either be angry at God, or you reject the content of the Tanach. If it is the former, write him a letter about how he is unfair and mean. If the latter, then there is littleto discuss. You have your texts, and I have the Torah.
What is the purpose mankind? What happens to you after you die? what is the purpose of the law? I'm interested in hearing your beliefs.
Any rational reader here can see from my posts, that I have no association or affinity with Islam or Islamism.
