The false claim that Trump was in wrongful possession of confidential documents

[Indeependent]

C

Cite?

It's called AP New and Reuters...News sites you'll never visit.
And no, I don't save every Link for lazy ass commies such as yourself.

 

[konradv]

Yeah, that was impeachment 1 and 2. Democrats don't need to prove your accusations, he has to prove he's innocent. And you aren't listening.

You are a Democrat, and a Soviet

He has to prove the documents belong to him. He made the claim; it’s up to him to provide the evidence.

 

[kaz]

Cite?

You seriously don't remember Hillary taking documents? Wow, just wow. I'll tell you what, document any of your claims and get back to me.

 

[konradv]

It's called AP New and Reuters...News sites you'll never visit.
And no, I don't save every Link for lazy ass commies such as yourself.

Documents or emails? They aren’t the same.

 

[Indeependent]

He has to prove the documents belong to him. He made the claim; it’s up to him to provide the evidence.

It's obvious you don't follow AP News and Reuters.
The fact is that Trump is not doing what Obama did...send the papers to NARA.
In this respect, Trump is wrong.

 

[konradv]

You seriously don't remember Hillary taking documents? Wow, just wow. I'll tell you what, document any of your claims and get back to me.

I remember emails. You got a cite for documents.

 

[bripat9643]

Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before bringing charges. There are obvious considerations, like the strength of the evidence, especially regarding intent. Responsible decisions also consider the context of a person’s actions, and how similar situations have been handled in the past.

In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here.

Yeah, we hear his bullshit excuse. The statute explicitly state whether it was "willful" or "intentional" doesn't matter.
Comey is a sleazy douchebag. The government will never be able to prove that such cases are or "willful" or "intentional," so they can never win a prosecution against anyone for this violation again.

 

[kaz]

He has to prove the documents belong to him. He made the claim; it’s up to him to provide the evidence.

You really are just the dumbest fucks in the world claiming that Trump can declassify the documents but didn't. And wow, the hypocrisy over your a Democrat is never guilty policy. The stupid is shocking

 

[Lesh]

Good thing it was before his term was over then, isn't it Scooby?

Supposedly he did so using the Vulcan Mind Meld...but irrelevant because taking and retaining those national security docs is still illegal once he leaves office

 

[Indeependent]

Documents or emails? They aren’t the same.

Classified Documents.

Classified e-mails?
Do you have a problem with Hillary supposedly deleting hers?

On the other hand, the FBI is pretty incompetent if they can't recover an e-mail.

 

[kaz]

I remember emails. You got a cite for documents.

OMG, you don't know what "documents" means. E-mails ARE documents. I thought you couldn't be any more stupid, and you just blew it away. Fucking amazing

 

[konradv]

It's obvious you don't follow AP News and Reuters.
The fact is that Trump is not doing what Obama did...send the papers to NARA.
In this respect, Trump is wrong.

What do Reuters and AP have to do with anything? Either he can prove he declassified documents or he can’t.

 

[AntonToo]

You must be willfully blind if you haven't seen the links. But then it's not like you ever bothered to read any of them anyway.

Since you bring up the topic of being dropped on your head, it must be based on your own personal experience.

? I was talking to Kaz, not sure what you read.

 

[Indeependent]

What do Reuters and AP have to do with anything? Either he can prove he declassified documents or he can’t.

They are news sites that report on the case and if you read past the headline, you learn that you are wrong in regard to the law.
Are you inferring that you hang out with the FBI and know something I don't know?

 

[konradv]

OMG, you don't know what "documents" means. E-mails ARE documents. I thought you couldn't be any more stupid, and you just blew it away. Fucking amazing

Email’s aren’t documents. One is a physical object, while the other is digital ephemera.

 

[konradv]

They are news sites that report on the case and if you read past the headline, you learn that you are wrong in regard to the law.
Are you inferring that you hang out with the FBI and know something I don't know?

Still no cite, eh? Wouldn’t that take less time than posting the same thing over and over?

 

[Indeependent]

Email’s aren’t documents. One is a physical object, while the other is digital ephemera.

A document is the result of a printed digital character.
You cannot delete information from a hard drive as hard drives are not comprised of grooves.
There is software that can recover a hard drives that has been subject to a full format over 30 times.

 

[Indeependent]

Still no cite, eh? Wouldn’t that take less time than posting the same thing over and over?

Where are your Links?
How old are you?
15?

If I posted a Link you would spend the rest of your life saying the article is bullshit.
Face it, you are mentally ill and lazy as dog shit.

 

[Billy000]

There's nothing "knee-jerk" about it, asshole. I know from long experience that all prog attacks on Trump are lies.

Well this very much was a lie because Trump never declassified those docs. Even if he did, it didn’t give him the right to steal them lol

 

[bripat9643]

Well this very much was a lie because Trump never declassified those docs. Even if he did, it didn’t give him the right to steal them lol

"He didn't declassify them, but if he did he is stealing them, but if he's not taking them then he's still stealing them . . . . . . yada, yada, yada"