The false claim that Trump was in wrongful possession of confidential documents

[konradv]

You really are just the dumbest ***** in the world claiming that Trump can declassify the documents but didn't. And wow, the hypocrisy over your a Democrat is never guilty policy. The stupid is shocking

What’s dumb about it? I’ll bet you’re still confused by the “steal your nose“ game and peekaboo.

 

[Billy000]

"He didn't declassify them, but if he did he is stealing them, but if he's not taking them then he's still stealing them . . . . . . yada, yada, yada"

Lol huh? Dude this logic is not hard to figure out. There is no evidence he declassified them. Declassified or not, however, it was illegal to take them. What’s complicated about that? You’re just adding your own words and phrases that are meaningless.

 

[AntonToo]

"He didn't declassify them, but if he did he is stealing them, but if he's not taking them then he's still stealing them . . . . . . yada, yada, yada"

Dummy there is nothing preventing both from being true at the same time.

Classification status is completely irrelavant to who lawfuly owns the presidential records - the National Achives, not Trump.

 

[bripat9643]

Lol huh? Dude this logic is not hard to figure out. There is no evidence he declassified them. Declassified or not, however, it was illegal to take them. What’s complicated about that? You’re just adding your own words and phrases that are meaningless.

That's me paraphrasing you, asshole. It isn't hard to figure out that you're a moron who does nothing but lie and make things up.

 

[bripat9643]

Dummy, there is nothing preventing both from being true at the same time.

Except the fact that neither is.

 

[Billy000]

That's me paraphrasing you, asshole. It isn't hard to figure out that you're a moron who does nothing but lie and make things up.

Lol what I said is 100% true. You choosing not to believe the truth does not change it.

 

[bripat9643]

Lol what I said is 100% true. You choosing not to believe the truth does not change it.

Nothing you have ever posted is true.

 

[AntonToo]

Except the fact that neither is.

You just can't sanely explain why you think so.

You never can. You just say shit because you emotionaly like how it sounds, rationality be damned.

The National Achives is the legal custodian of the presidential documents and records. Thats a basic fact you can't refute, just like you can't refute that Trump kept them at Mar-a-lago past any reasonable timeframe of turning them in.

Does it effect your assertions in any way? Nope, you just keep saying whatever feels good.

 

[Dragonlady]

? I was talking to Kaz, not sure what you read.

I was responding to Kaz, not sure how I ended up quoting you!!

 

[bripat9643]

You just can't sanely explain why you think so.

You never can. You just say shit because you emotionaly like how it sounds, rationality be damned.

The National Achives is the legal custodian of the presidential documents and records. Thats a basic fact you can't refute, just like you can't refute that Trump kept them at Mar-a-lago past any reasonable timeframe of turning them in.

Does it effect your assertions in any way? Nope, you just keep saying whatever feels good.

 

[bodecea]

What’s dumb about it? I’ll bet you’re still confused by the “steal your nose“ game and peekaboo.

Where's the paper trail?

 

[Mac1958]

Dummy there is nothing preventing both from being true at the same time.

Classification status is completely irrelavant to who lawfuly owns the presidential records - the National Achives, not Trump.

Trump is above that. He loves them. They've very special.

It's true that normal Presidents need to follow a process to declassify documents. And it's true that Presidents don't own Presidential documents. But those rules apply to normal Presidents, not the Son of Man, the Christ.

 

[bripat9643]

Trump is above that. He loves them. They've very special.

It's true that normal Presidents need to follow a process to declassify documents. And it's true that Presidents don't own Presidential documents. But those rules apply to normal Presidents, not the Son of Man, the Christ.

Obama has tons of classified documents in a warehouse in Chitcago.

 

[Mac1958]

Obama has tons of classified documents in a warehouse in Chitcago.

In the orange universe, yes.

National Archives rejects Trump's claim that Obama took classified documents

The National Archives said it "assumed exclusive legal and physical custody" of Obama's presidential records after he left office.

www.axios.com

 

[Seymour Flops]

Dummy there is nothing preventing both from being true at the same time.

Classification status is completely irrelavant to who lawfuly owns the presidential records - the National Achives, not Trump.

The National archive can't claim every single copy in existence of every document ever produced in or delivered to the White House.

If your local library is missing a copy of "Gender Queer 2: Electric Boogaloo" and you have some pages you Xeroxed at the library, are you a thief?

 

[Dragonlady]

Yeah, that was impeachment 1 and 2. Democrats don't need to prove your accusations, he has to prove he's innocent. And you aren't listening.

You are a Democrat, and a Soviet

Democrats proved their accusations in both impeachments. Republicans even admitted Trump was guilty but they were afraid to condemn him and lose their base.

You seem to be forgetting/ignoring the bald fact that the people who are accusing Trump of these crimes, and providing the DOJ with evidence, and in the case of the Mar-a-Lago search, the probable cause for the search. Trump's own people are turning him in and testifying against him, and that includes Jared and Ivanka.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It's called AP New and Reuters...News sites you'll never visit.
And no, I don't save every Link for lazy ass commies such as yourself.

Oh stop your pathetic lying.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The National archive can't claim every single copy in existence of every document ever produced in or delivered to the White House.

Irrelevant. Cult straw grasping

 

[AntonToo]

The National archive can't claim every single copy in existence of every document ever produced in or delivered to the White House.

If your local library is missing a copy of "Gender Queer 2: Electric Boogaloo" and you have some pages you Xeroxed at the library, are you a thief?

Thats not a serious conversation.

Copies are subject to COPY RIGHTS. If you have a legal right to make copies of documents then no, you are not a theif. And no, you are not allowed to return copies you made instead of the originals you took from the library.

Trump was in possetion of original Presidential documents he recieved, like for example letters from Kim Jong Un.

 

[meaner gene]

Thats not a serious conversation.

Copies are subject to COPY RIGHTS. If you have a legal right to make copies of documents then no, you are not a theif. And no, you are not allowed to return copies you made instead of the originals you took.

Trump was in possetion of original Presidential documents he recieved, like for example letters from Kim Jong Un.

I can just imagine if Trump had been one of the original signers of the Constitution. He would have kept that too.