Kinda feels like the wheels have come off.

[j-mac]

Another post from the cult ^^^^^

See, I think you’re in a cult…..

 

[Mac1958]

One just has to read some of the posters here to see them being the stupidest versions of themselves.

This place has been very helpful. It's a one-stop shop for their beliefs and tactics.

I make a point about them, and they jump in to illustrate it for me. No charge.

This has been one amazing amateur psychological/sociological study, for sure.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Lame…to call people of an opposing political belief from yours as being in a cult just shows how lazy and unhinged you are.

Oh, I have done more than just point out that you are a mindless, programmed cultist. I have argued it with reason and evidence.
And the history books will record your cult and your embarrassing,cultish behavior, using reason and evidence.

Your tantrums won't help you.

 

[j-mac]

Oh, I have done more than just point out that you are a mindless, programmed cultist. I have argued it with reason and evidence.
And the history books will record your cult and your embarrassing,cultish behavior, using reason and evidence.

Your tantrums won't help you.

Maybe in your own mind…But then again most of you progressive liberals in here are narcissistic assholes who think the world should stop and listen to them…

I have no use for that kind of back and forth. All it is, is childish name calling, that’s why generally I just ignore your type.

 

[j-mac]

This place has been very helpful. It's a one-stop shop for their beliefs and tactics.

I make a point about them, and they jump in to illustrate it for me. No charge.

This has been one amazing amateur psychological/sociological study, for sure.

And you think that you’re a psychologist, or sociologists? Push-Leeze!

 

[otto105]

Maybe in your own mind…But then again most of you progressive liberals in here are narcissistic assholes who think the world should stop and listen to them…

I have no use for that kind of back and forth. All it is, is childish name calling, that’s why generally I just ignore your type.

Every maga post is a confession.

A narcissistic asshole just had to remove his name from the John F. Kennedy Center.

 

[j-mac]

Every maga post is a confession.

A narcissistic asshole just had to remove his name from the John F. Kennedy Center.

He sure knows how to trigger you morons…

 

[otto105]

He sure knows how to trigger you morons…

Every maga post is a confession.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Maybe in your own mind…But then again most of you progressive liberals in here are narcissistic assholes who think the world should stop and listen to them…

Yes, I am also aware that you cultists have all manner of excuses lined up to justify your own, poor behavior.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Every maga post is a confession.

Every time.

Why are you such a dumb asshole? "Because libtards are!"

Rinse, repeat

 

[otto105]

Maybe in your own mind…But then again most of you progressive liberals in here are narcissistic assholes who think the world should stop and listen to them…

I have no use for that kind of back and forth. All it is, is childish name calling, that’s why generally I just ignore your type.

Quiet piggy

 

[Mick2]

That was never the argument. Having the authority to approve a nominee has nothing to do with whether the nominee is statutorily allowed to hold a position.

This has to be the dumbest statement of all time here!

Being nominated by the President and subsequently confirmed by the Senate as worthy is exactly what makes someone "statutorily allowed" to hold a cabinet position you pea-brained moron! The duly-elected Senators are the ONLY authority that gets the make the final call here. Not deranged left-wingers who are mad. There is literally no other way with which someone qualifies.

Geezus, you TDS-inflicted wingers have zero idea on how our systems of checks and balances works. Literal lawmakes determine if these nominess meet the qualfications by law. You've got to be a plant here. No other explanation.

 

[berg80]

You only use the term “plurality” because you want to diminish his clear victory of the election, and make it somehow look like he didn’t really take a majority of votes in this election. It’s a dirty lie.

I used the word plurality because it accurately describes the fact that he did not get a majority of the vote.............as you erroneously asserted. I suppose you did so to create the false impression he had, or has, majority support in this country. A claim that has never been true and never will be.

 

[berg80]

Oh, it's more than a feeling. The consequences of stacking the government with unqualified, unscrupulous people are really starting to show. This is a downward spiral, and this is just the beginning.

One thing to watch is how the new Fed chair behaves. Inflation is up, and jobs reports are climbing out of the sewer, possibly.

If the Fed lowers rates in its next meeting, we will know definitely that Trump's corruption has infected the Federal Reserve.

The Fed chairman does not possess the power to overrule the majority of governors who will not support a rate cut with inflation on the rise.

 

[berg80]

Being nominated by the President and subsequently confirmed by the Senate as worthy is exactly what makes someone "statutorily allowed" to hold a cabinet position you pea-brained moron!

I was right. I'm going to need crayons and small words to get through your thick skull. I made the point that the position of DNI is the only cabinet level position with a statutory requirement the nominee have prior experience in order to legally fill the job.

• Legal Requirement: Title 50, Section 3023 of the U.S. Code explicitly mandates that nominees for the DNI post possess extensive national security expertise to ensure the head of the Intelligence Community can properly advise the President. [1, 2]

A fact you keep confusing with the constitutional process of Senate confirmation. Which does not magically make a DNI "worthy" or "statutorily allowed" to hold the job absent said experience.

Is it possible enough senators will confirm Clayton in violation of the law? Yes. Does his confirmation miraculously bestow on him the necessary job experience to make him legally qualified for the job? No. Are you a nitwit? Yes.

 

[berg80]

I make a point about them, and they jump in to illustrate it for me. No charge.

Happens all the time.

 

[j-mac]

I used the word plurality because it accurately describes the fact that he did not get a majority of the vote.............as you erroneously asserted. I suppose you did so to create the false impression he had, or has, majority support in this country. A claim that has never been true and never will be.

He has more support than democrats do…That’s just a fact.

 

[berg80]

He has more support than democrats do…That’s just a fact.

The positions D's hold on virtually every major policy issue facing the nation are supported by a majority of Americans. That's just a fact.

 

[j-mac]

The positions D's hold on virtually every major policy issue facing the nation are supported by a majority of Americans. That's just a fact.

If that were true then why is their approval in the dumper?

 

[berg80]

He sure knows how to trigger you morons…

He got ***** slapped for trying to put his name where it doesn't belong. Most Americans are pleased about that. Is that what you mean by triggered?