Supreme Court overturns Texas abortion law

[Political Junky]

Just in on TV

 

[WillowTree]

I see! So it's okay for abortion clinics to give substandard care to liberal women. I can handle that.

 

[Vigilante]

Let us hope more women need medical care and don't make it to a hospital......Liberal logic and their CARING on display!

 

[Valerie]

I see! So it's okay for abortion clinics to give substandard care to liberal women. I can handle that.

what "substandard" care is that, exactly...?

 

[daws101]

U.S. Supreme Court strikes down restrictive Texas abortion law

 

[Vigilante]

I see! So it's okay for abortion clinics to give substandard care to liberal women. I can handle that.

what "substandard" care is that, exactly...?

Why not search Abortions Kill?

 

[daws101]

I see! So it's okay for abortion clinics to give substandard care to liberal women. I can handle that.

Bullshit!
When you get any in office procedure at your doctor, you do realize that the office is not up to hospital standards.
Not to mention most hospitals aren't either.

 

[WorldWatcher]

>


Not a surprise. If Texas had passed a law that says any clinic that provided oral pills and performed outpatient procedures (i.e. oral surgery, liposuction, colonoscopies, cosmetic surgery, etc.) had to have (a) admitting privileges, (c) surgical physical requirements (door size, hallway width, etc. ) and (b) located withing "X" miles from a hospital - then that would have been Constitutional.

But to target only abortion clinics for these new requirements? That it's for the "health of the woman" is hogwash. It was intended to place a burden on the woman and interfere with access.

At least be honest with the purpose of the law.



>>>>

 

[daws101]

I see! So it's okay for abortion clinics to give substandard care to liberal women. I can handle that.

what "substandard" care is that, exactly...?

Why not search Abortions Kill?

Why?
Don't you understand what abortion means?

 

[WorldWatcher]

I see! So it's okay for abortion clinics to give substandard care to liberal women. I can handle that.

Why is it OK for Dentist Offices, Outpatient Cosmetic Surgery Clinics, Colonoscopy providers, and any Doctor that provides a pill to a patient provide substandard care by not having to follow the same rules?


>>>>

 

[Vigilante]

I see! So it's okay for abortion clinics to give substandard care to liberal women. I can handle that.

Bullshit!
When you get any in office procedure at your doctor, you do realize that the office is not up to hospital standards.
Not to mention most hospitals aren't either.

How many in office procedures can be life threatening as an abortion can be?

 

[WillowTree]

I see! So it's okay for abortion clinics to give substandard care to liberal women. I can handle that.

what "substandard" care is that, exactly...?

If something goes wrong in your outpatient murder mill they are not required to have a hospital nearby nor privileges in that hospital. Your baby is already dead now you can die too because they don't think it necessary for your doctor to have access to and privileges in a hospital. Enjoy!

 

[Vigilante]

I see! So it's okay for abortion clinics to give substandard care to liberal women. I can handle that.

what "substandard" care is that, exactly...?

Why not search Abortions Kill?

Why?
Don't you understand what abortion means?

Yes it is legal murder...Next question!

 

[WillowTree]

I see! So it's okay for abortion clinics to give substandard care to liberal women. I can handle that.

what "substandard" care is that, exactly...?

Why not search Abortions Kill?

Why?
Don't you understand what abortion means?

Sure I do. It means dead babies.

 

[daws101]

I see! So it's okay for abortion clinics to give substandard care to liberal women. I can handle that.

Bullshit!
When you get any in office procedure at your doctor, you do realize that the office is not up to hospital standards.
Not to mention most hospitals aren't either.

How many in office procedures can be life threatening as an abortion can be?

To who?
Besides most all of them?
I guess you don't understand bacterial infection.

 

[WillowTree]

>


Not a surprise. If Texas had passed a law that says any clinic that provided oral pills and performed outpatient procedures (i.e. oral surgery, liposuction, colonoscopies, cosmetic surgery, etc.) had to have (a) admitting privileges, (c) surgical physical requirements (door size, hallway width, etc. ) and (b) located withing "X" miles from a hospital - then that would have been Constitutional.

But to target only abortion clinics for these new requirements? That it's for the "health of the woman" is hogwash. It was intended to place a burden on the woman and interfere with access.

At least be honest with the purpose of the law.



>>>>

Works for me. If liberal women want to be at risk to have easy access, well, it works for me.

 

[daws101]

I see! So it's okay for abortion clinics to give substandard care to liberal women. I can handle that.

what "substandard" care is that, exactly...?

Why not search Abortions Kill?

Why?
Don't you understand what abortion means?

Yes it is legal murder...Next question!

False!

 

[WinterBorn]

I see! So it's okay for abortion clinics to give substandard care to liberal women. I can handle that.

Bullshit!
When you get any in office procedure at your doctor, you do realize that the office is not up to hospital standards.
Not to mention most hospitals aren't either.

How many in office procedures can be life threatening as an abortion can be?

Plenty. But I notice they are not included in the fight to "protect women".

The width of hallways is an issue? Any ambulance attendant can get their stretcher down standard hallways.

Why does an abortion clinic need to meet all these guidelines, but a place that does a colonoscopy doesn't?

 

[Fair&Balanced]

>


Not a surprise. If Texas had passed a law that says any clinic that provided oral pills and performed outpatient procedures (i.e. oral surgery, liposuction, colonoscopies, cosmetic surgery, etc.) had to have (a) admitting privileges, (c) surgical physical requirements (door size, hallway width, etc. ) and (b) located withing "X" miles from a hospital - then that would have been Constitutional.

But to target only abortion clinics for these new requirements? That it's for the "health of the woman" is hogwash. It was intended to place a burden on the woman and interfere with access.

At least be honest with the purpose of the law.



>>>>

Too true, but on the flip side , if this had been about anything other than abortion, many of the same liberals who opposed the law would have been supporting it.

Moral of that story


Morons are partisan hypocrites.

 

[Vigilante]

I see! So it's okay for abortion clinics to give substandard care to liberal women. I can handle that.

Bullshit!
When you get any in office procedure at your doctor, you do realize that the office is not up to hospital standards.
Not to mention most hospitals aren't either.

How many in office procedures can be life threatening as an abortion can be?

To who?
Besides most all of them?
I guess you don't understand bacterial infection.

Or you hemorage!