Lesh
Diamond Member
- Dec 21, 2016
- 77,180
- 38,624
- 2,615
They dealt with it like a possible abortion so they held off with the care she neededNo dimwit. Because the hospital delt with this as an abortion.
And she died
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They dealt with it like a possible abortion so they held off with the care she neededNo dimwit. Because the hospital delt with this as an abortion.
What? She had an obvious non viable fetus that had a heartbeat still so they did nothingWhy else would the hospital tell the doctors not to help her until the fetus was dead? Something isn't right here.
Most women don’t have abortions and self absorbed. So, the number of children won’t be affected by this. If the truth were made known, that would help. Did she induce an abortion? Simple question.They'd know that by now. This is going to make alot more women forego having kids if stuff like this keeps happening. Then will you be happy?
If she sues she will have her medical records available to see what she used to induce early labor. It will matter.They will not. Just the opposite
Did it say “a possible abortion?” No it did not. Of course, the doctors probably asked her and if her response wasn’t positive that she didn’t induce, then the hospital did the right thing based on the law.They dealt with it like a possible abortion so they held off with the care she needed
And she died
Still doesn’t explain why they followed abortion protocol. See, you libs always forget to tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth.What? She had an obvious non viable fetus that had a heartbeat still so they did nothing
Pure speculation. If it is proven she didn't induce an abortion then I'd say 5 million should do it. That's cheap in reality. And I'm not a lub I'm a white male lifelong Christian.Still doesn’t explain why they followed abortion protocol. See, you libs always forget to tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
You have no evidence that she didn’t attempt an abortion. I’ve asked several times because the doctors proceeded like it was a botched abortion gone wrong. Everything else means nothing until you show that the mother did not attempt an abortion. You people do this all the time. Lie about stuff and have no proof. I’m calling you on it. Show the proof because the doctors treated this as an abortion.
Most women don’t have abortions and self absorbed. So, the number of children won’t be affected by this. If the truth were made known, that would help. Did she induce an abortion? Simple question.
Did it say “a possible abortion?” No it did not. Of course, the doctors probably asked her and if her response wasn’t positive that she didn’t induce, then the hospital did the right thing based on the law.
Grow up. There is no indication it was a “possible” abortion. Either it was or it wasn’t. Baby killers try to control the narratives by spinning everything. This is just one more botched abortion.They dealt with it like a possible abortion so they held off with the care she needed
And she died
Grow up. There is no indication it was a “possible” abortion. Either it was or it wasn’t. Baby killers try to control the narratives by spinning everything. This is just one more botched abortion.
What the article said was the law prevents them from doing that. When will people take responsibility for their decisions. Attempt to kill a baby and well, what goes around comes around.Actually, if it was a botched self-abortion, they were still obligated to remove the fetus if it wasn't viable.
Oh baloney! 40%. Nonsense. 40% have had miscarriages. Not abortions.40% of women have had at least one abortion in their lifetime.
Look, man, I know you read "A Handmaid's Tale" and thought it was an instruction manual, but this really wouldn't be a good thing.
A baby died.Then the law is kind of fucked up, isn't it?
The woman died.
I mean, I'm sure in your fucked up Mormon World, the bitch had it coming, but those of us with humanity, this is horrible.
What the article said was the law prevents them from doing that. When will people take responsibility for their decisions. Attempt to kill a baby and well, what goes around comes around.
Fetuses aren't babies. At 17 weeks, this miscarriage would not have been viable.A baby died.
The Brookings Institute says otherwise.Oh baloney! 40%. Nonsense. 40% have had miscarriages. Not abortions.
Fetus are babies. The Lord said he knew Jeremiah before he was born. Life is precious. You abortionists are bullies of the worst kind. Beat up and kill babies because they stifle your life styles and gods of gold and silver.actually, what the law prevented them from doing was removing a dying fetus until it's heart stopped.
Which delayed action until the woman died.
Fetuses aren't babies. At 17 weeks, this miscarriage would not have been viable.
Oh God… save us from the zealotsFetus are babies. The Lord said he knew Jeremiah before he was born. Life is precious. You abortionists are bullies of the worst kind. Beat up and kill babies because they stifle your life styles and gods of gold and silver.