You are once again,
entirely wrong, Assclapius. No surprise there.
In REALITY (it's nice here, you should visit some day): neither he nor anybody else can appeal endlessly. Secondly, I am not sure it's rational or advisiable to even bother appealing. But he certainly CAN. And since there does exist a clear basis upon which the ruling against him could get reversed, legally, it would be pretty damaging not to seek the STAY of the order he might appeal, first. (That is, it might be too late to get a benefit from the overturning of the ruling if that happens after the team has been "sold.")
And the dumbass, here, as always, remains you.
Just because you are a a racist raving against another racist doesn't mean that you have the first foggiest comprehension of the actual issues here. And you obviously don't.
Your pathetic version of "thinking" boils down to, "That racist is white, therefore he should get crucified."
You're just a pig dog ignorant racist *****, Assclap. End of story.
Where am I wrong dummy? Where did I say he could appeal endlessly? Your jump to conclusions mat is going to get you in trouble again. He will die pretty soon so its a short window.
No one cares what you think is rational. You're a buffoon of the highest order. Save your crackerjack box lawyer musings for someone that doesn't know any better. He will appeal and lose. Numerous times. Thats how he is built.
Nice try at convincing yourself. Remember dont write a check your ass cant cash. Make sure you read my posts and understand them before mouthing off next time son.
Assclapius, you ignorant racist **** dipshit, you are a petulant little girl, but your dishonesty will not shield you from the consequences of your own words, *****.
What you wrote, you moron, was: "
He can appeal until he dies." THAT is as "endlessly" as it gets in any lifetime, you obtuse dishonest petty pathetic moron.

You might try reading your OWN words. Although I can certainly understand why you might hesitate. They are generally quite foolish bits of meaningless fluff. Why would even a scum sucking twerp like you wish to be held to your own silly words?
I respond to your endlessly vapid musings because, frankly, even though there is little sport in it, I enjoy making a vain petty shit-rag like you squirm. And clearly, I do.
Now, back to the point. Well, in your case, it isn't "back" to the point, you idiot. Let me direct you TO the point for the FIRST time:
Sterling said some stupid, ignorant, racist shit in a private conversation.
Racist assholes like YOU imagine that this is somehow "actionable" against him. In our politically correct (but thoroughly irrational) present day atmosphere, sadly, it begins to look like something he said in PRIVATE
can be the basis for league action against his ownership interest.
That's absurd, of course. It is quite reasonable to assume that in the tempered atmosphere of a court of law, there might yet be found a way to simmer down and be rational, fair and reasonable about this. For like it or not, nothing Sterling said in private (or even believes in his rancid old head) constitutes a true valid basis for the league effort to take away his ownership of the team.
Personally, I don't much care. It's difficult to work up sympathy for a moron like Sterling. On the other hand, there is a basic principle involved. And it isn't difficult to imagine a slightly different place and time where his thoughts might be ones you admired but which were quite unpopular. Under such circumstances, you might think that it would be "unfair" or unjust or whatever to punish a man for his own beliefs or his own PRIVATE expressions of his beliefs.
Of course, you'd have to be fair, reasonable and objective to take the longer view like that. So that's clearly out of the question for a pissant tool like you.