James Comey Accuses Trump of Political Weaponization. Then the US Attorney Prosecuting His Case Presented His Emails, Showing His Intention to Please

[BluesLegend]

Hanging for treason is what's warranted.

Treason, undermining the will of the American people and a presidential election, breaking untold number of laws.

 

[Care4all]

Why did Roger Stone and 4 + other Trump Orbit Folks get real Prison time then

Uhhh, they were REAL, convicted criminals?

 

[Failzero]

Uhhh, they were REAL, convicted criminals?

As opposed to a bad cop under indictment

 

[Staidhup]

Let’s be honest, Comey was a fraud, start to finish? A lying piece of beltway garbage wannabe that used his position to further his career. Follow the dollars!

 

[dudmuck]

Hit Tip to Ace of Spades HQ

We, Patriotic Americans, must use sources outside the LSM. They'll say they reported it, but they seldom cover anything that doesn't please their -- Masters??

I don't believe the LSM has 'masters'. I believe they ARE the democrat party. Anybody that disagrees with that can point out a major policy the 'democrat' party and the LSM disagree on.

While we're focusing on the kids in the playground (New Yawk) the real action is going on here --

Comey expected to work for 'President-elect Clinton,' knew top aide was talking to media: emails

Emails referenced in a bombshell court filing by acting U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan in which the government rejected Comey's argument that he was being maliciously prosecuted for providing false statements and obstructing Congress about actions he took as FBI director.

justthenews.com

Comey has also lied and maintained that he never knew -- nay, never suspected! -- that the "intelligence" he based opening cases on Trump and his associates on was simply some oppo-research garbage paid for by Hillary Clinton. He has also denied knowing that Hillary Clinton cooked up the plan to claim that Trump was a "RUSSIAN AGENT."

Some handwritten notes may prove that Comey has repeatedly committed perjury in claiming that.




As you may know, Comey hired his pal Daniel Richman and gave him a top secret security clearance for the express purpose of making it legal to leak top secret documents to Richman, with Richman then instructed to leak that information to friendly Regime Media.





More detail in the actual article, showing Comey plainly discussing the fact that Richman's role was to serve as a cut-out for illegal leaks from Comey to Regime Media allies, such as Michael Schmitt of the NYT.

Below, Comey openly discusses uses this cut-out scheme to violate the DOJ's strict rules about not releasing information about investigations close to an election day, if that information could influence the election.




What he's talking about there is disclosures that additional classified emails had been found on Huma Abedin's computer, after Comey had already "exonerated" Clinton all wrongdoing. Comey really wants Regime Media to put out the word that those new, never-before-analyzed classified emails being shared among unauthroized persons on an unsecure toilet-stall server would not change his analysis and should not tarnish the sterling reputation for candor and transparency enjoyed by one Hillary Rodham Clinton.

So he justified releasing classified information close to an election by saying, If I don't reveal this information, people might think Hillary Clinton is crooked and did something wrong in sharing classified information with unauthorized persons on a toilet-stall server, so I'm going to leak information to my friend to in turn use to write an op-ed in the NYT assuring the public that it's all a-ok and approved by James Comey as No Big Deal.

And he's claiming this workaround doesn't violate the silence-before-elections rule, because without him speaking up -- through his puppet Richman -- people might get the idea that Hillary Clinton did something wrong.

More from JusttheNews. Prosecutors amply rebutted the claim that Everybody Does It and that Comey is only being "selectively prosecuted" because Trump is "vindictive."





Continue reading

Comey never expected to work for Clinton admin. Comey announced more interest in the Hillary email issue two weeks before the 2016 vote, which handed victory to Trump.

And the investigation into Russia in Trump's first term was kicked off by George papadopoulos bragging to an Australian diplomat, not from any opposition research from the Clinton campaign, which only became known after Trump came into office in 2017.

And Lindsey Halligan is such a crappy prosecutor, her case is hanging by a thread. This was the worst selection of a prosecutor ever.

 

[forkup]

Comey never expected to work for Clinton admin. Comey announced more interest in the Hillary email issue two weeks before the 2016 vote, which handed victory to Trump.

And the investigation into Russia in Trump's first term was kicked off by George papadopoulos bragging to an Australian diplomat, not from any opposition research from the Clinton campaign, which only became known after Trump came into office in 2017.

And Lindsey Halligan is such a crappy prosecutor, her case is hanging by a thread. This was the worst selection of a prosecutor ever.

It actually goes further than that.
If you read the judge’s opinion, which is based on the transcripts and the full record, he all but said the grand jury may have been given legally incorrect or misleading answers. Judges won’t usually come out and say “the prosecutor lied,” but the language he used is the closest you get in judicial writing before making a formal finding of misconduct.

And the issues here aren’t normal procedural hiccups. The problems with the warrants, the privileged material, and the way evidence was presented to the grand jury are so serious and so outside standard practice that the judge took the extraordinary step of ordering full grand jury disclosure. Courts only do that when they believe there’s a real possibility the grand jury was misled or tainted.

I’ll go on record now: I don’t think this case survives. And depending on what those grand jury materials show (and I have no reason to believe it won't show what the judge implied), Halligan isn’t just looking at a dismissed indictment, she'll be looking at professional discipline. And it's almost certain Comey will file a complaint. That’s not me being dramatic; that’s where this kind of pattern normally leads.